I know there's a script that tries to guess who used sage and who didn't based on when the thread hits page 1. But it's not very reliable since page status isn't updated very quickly. So it would work in slow threads (1 post per minute maximum) but it'd fail in faster threads. That's why I don't use it.

File: 1369687108750.png (7 KB, 385x306) Image search: [Google]

7 KB, 385x306

>>31894
Why would you want to? Sage turned into a sperglord magnet and became just another way of derailing a thread.

>>31894
Sage doesn't matter in the age of the catalog

>>31945
Nothing about trolling or derailing. I mostly browse /jp/ where sage isn't considered anything negative.

>>31961
I'd still like to be able to see who sages or not. I want to see how much it's used nowadays.

>>31961
But it does. You use sage when you don't want to bump a thread.