can someone please remove this watermark? thanks in advance.
bumping for help, i'd really appreciate it
>>115900
Looks perfect to me.
>>115900
uh...
help me out, guys.
can someone please help me out?
>>116745
at this point just go buy it.
>>116746
you're not wrong.
Honestly the amount of effort to do it isn't worth the time, even if a person were being paid to do it.
You can pay the royalty fee to Getty if you want it that bad. It's only a couple of bucks.
>>116751
lol, ~300 euros. fucking forget it.
>>116753
unless there's some other way of purchasing it i'm not aware of, the price i got was superior to 300 euros...
The replies in this thread are kind of sad given how easily things exactly like this were always so easily done in specific threads on /b/ etc.
In short: Just shut your dumb communal fleshlight-ass mouth if you can't do what is asked.
>>116769
Eat a dick when you're done bawling, little girl.
>>116769
>things exactly like this were always so easily done in specific threads on /b/
well go to /b/ then
>>115840
here you go fucking faggot
heres a tip: Chrome Dev Tools
>>116814
you don't even need any chrome tools for that, you can obtain that image in that same size with getty's embed-in-social-media code. i needed that pic in a larger size, thus the request.
I tried
>>117504
THANK YOU! that is definitely good enough for the purpose.
>>117507
>>117508
How'd you do that?
>>117934
just replaced the rectangle with the low quality version. and tweaked the colours.
>>118065
How do you even get the LQ ones, anyway?
