![Price of the Machine [1].webm](https://i.imgur.com/hWeSjjN.jpg "Price of the Machine [1].webm")
Last thread hit image limit: >>796279
![Price of the Machine [2].webm](https://i.imgur.com/jyDpLnH.jpg "Price of the Machine [2].webm")
![Price of the Machine [3].webm](https://i.imgur.com/rAOaeQf.jpg "Price of the Machine [3].webm")
>>811659
>white man
>are you god
Japakeks
[minor spoilers for "It Follows"]
Watched this with friends, entire room exploded at this scene, shit was amazing.
>>812256
My god, what a shit film that was. I've never been so annoyed by characters before.
>
>>812179
Man I need to watch avatar again
>>811659
sauce?
some random athf endings
>>812369
The marketing team for this film fucked up so hard that the DVD release (in the UK at least) had a completely different name to the cinema release just to try and get some money coming in.
>>812357
is this that fresh new ebik meme?
>>812179
which version is this? from the sheer pretentiousness i'd say it must be Lynch. but then again... that's more exposition than all the Lynch films i've seen so far combined. so... what gives?
>>811635
what are those from and is it any good? i generally like stuff with singularities in the justice system, but the trope gets a bit old these days... this looks a lot like Eagle Eye, which was pretty stupid already
>>811635
link it in the last thread if you make a new one baka
>>812879
You are absolutely right, it's Lynch. And yes, the whole movie is full of needless exposition including random voice-overs.
>>812373
I actually really liked the movie though.
>>813330
Me too. It's like groundhog day, but more badass.
>>812879
Person of Interest
>>813397
>>812179
>>812879
>pretentiousness
>Not epicness
Faggot
>>813653
anybody know the credits song?
![The Thinnest Thread [1].webm](https://i.imgur.com/Cuek8aW.jpg "The Thinnest Thread [1].webm")
>>812879
>what are those from and is it any good?
It's from a tv series called Person of Interest, and it's much better than the likes of Eagle Eye.
First three seasons are spectacular. Not a fan season 4, but most many seem to be.
![The Thinnest Thread [2].webm](https://i.imgur.com/XjX1L9A.jpg "The Thinnest Thread [2].webm")
That said, it's still a very well made show despite being made for network tv. I'd say give it a chance.
Minimalist Sci-Fi approach with the best A.I. portrayal. It's grounded -- very realistic in that regard.
>>812879
>that's more exposition than all the Lynch films i've seen so far combined. so... what gives?
Lynch tells you that the beginning is a ver delicate time. The beginning of every movie, of every story. The beginning is decisive. And his beginning is that he tells you so. That is very Lynchian.
might as well post some webm i made for a different thread some time ago while i'm here
>>813095
>>813397
>>814712
>>814717
thanks a lot
>>813653
pretentious doesn't mean it can't be enjoyable. but you have to admit, that a lot of stuff with Lynch is deliberately made strange just for the heck of being weird. i really like Mulholland Drive, but i don't deceive myself that the film isn't up its own ass. It's a perfectly coherent movie with strong imagery and good message for the longest time and then Lynch just swaps the two main characters for basically no good reason (which, btw is directly lifted from Bergman's Persona anyway, so it's not even original).
>>814721
eh, i don't disagree with the importance of beginnings. but i did a little reading-up on Dune after posting and it appears that all the voice-over stuff and exposition bullshit was added by the studio against the will of Lynch (who btw disowned the movie). i enjoy being a fanboy just like the next guy, but you should maybe do a little fact checking before white knighting for Lynch on a movie he hates.
>>814703
>>814899
l-lewd
Going to dump my Trailer Park Boys webms
>>815004
>>815007
I love the shield
>>815019
Amazing show
>>814872
>>814899
>that cream error tho
GET FUCKING HYPE
>>815064
i'm out, but i'll make more
>>815230
Same anon, any requests?
>>815232
something with qts
>>813397
>le "she will readi t aloud gambit"
>le guhh face at 0:21
>"What's he doin'?"
Fuck that's terrible
>>811659
that crackers jap is probably the best ive heard, but its still pretty bad plus
>you dont understand english
>even though you live here
>and its not your native language
>thats why you're no good
havin a giggle
>>814802
>you should maybe do a little fact checking before white knighting for Lynch on a movie he hates.
I like Dune despite some awkward plot telling. I like it's imagery, it's base story, it's morals and especially baron Harkonnen. The action is mostly lame but it has a unique style. Lynch does not like it? That is his good right. But I enjoyed it thoroughly. And my praise for the opening sentence stands, it's a clever little meta reflection, just a little fun thing.
>>814935
what is this?
>>815226
predictable escapist CGI fest for 12 year olds
>>815852
fair enough, i in no way intended to criticise your personal taste. it just sounded like you were arguing for authorial intent in your original post.
we all have our guilty pleasures and obscure gems with an appeal hard to explain to others.
>>816070
this is my favourite play adaptation and dark comedy. scratch that - my favourite comedy period. but it's not just the humour - the dark story, the fucked-up characters, the mysterious shrouded backstory are all very intriguing to me. but i realise it's a tough sell, not in the least because having 3 amazing actors does not make up for having 2 god awful actors - especially in a play with only 5 characters...
>>816093
if anybody has some play adaptations to reccomend, i'd be happy to hear your suggestions. just please no Mamet. i like some of his original screenplays (Ronin, The Untouchables), but i guess i just wholly detest the subject matters and characters he puts into his plays (Glengarry Glen Ross, Oleanna).
or really just suggest films that are play-like: tiny cast, one location, great characters, snappy dialogue, dark subject matter (insanity, crime), etc. Examples: Hard Candy, Palabras Encadenadas, Surveillance, Coherence...
>>816101
excuse me now, while i go hide the kitchen knifes...
>>816070
Excuse me, anon, what is this from?
>>816070
I love Parker Posey.
>>816101
How can you hate Glengarry Glen Ross? Is it really because all the characters, for the most part, are scumbags?
>>814935
white house down 2013
>>816125
I don't remember this happening, but it's stupid enough that I can imagine it being in the theatrical cut. Is it?
>>814939
Why didn't they dive after firing the torpedo? Seems like a huge unnecessary risk to take, there.
>>815773
>based on manga
What is a light novel, retard?
>>816216
manga for people who cant draw
>>816125
this is worse than watching advertisement for a third class RPG
>>816206
>extended edition
i dunno why hackson would leave it out of the original cut, it's literally the best scene to come out of the movie
>>815226
let me guess... directed by Uwe Boll?
>>816215
isn't this the one where they are forced to take over a busted german sub with a skeleton crew? I don't think it *could* dive any more.
>>816156
The House of Yes
>>816189
there's plenty more where that came from. she does deliver a stunning performance indeed.
>>816192
let's get a couple of things out of the way - the acting is stellar, the cast is incredible, the visuals are great. having said that - there is no actual story, no particular arc, the film really goes nowhere. the dialogue is intense, but... i don't know, best i can express it is: the flood of explatives reminds me of Tarantino, but the dialogue here lacks Tarantinos elegance. it is blunt. characters just blabber endlessly. well not quite endlessly, since there are completely pointless shouting matches here and there. and yeah, the big one is definitely the characters. they're assholes. every last one of them. i get that it tries to capture a particular subculture, but man - fuck them all and the horses they rode in on! i have nobody to root for. it might also be too "american" for me. it seems to heavily tie into US culture (rags to riches, american dream, death of a salesman, motivational speeches - that sort of stuff). to me it seems utterly pointless. gangster stories often have a cool-factor, but these characters are just despicable. but i have to admit the film was somewhat capitiving. but when it was over and i stepped back and reflected on it there was just nothing good i could say about the writing.
even though the film lacked a female element sorely, it's probably for the better. Mamet couldn't write a woman if his life depended on it. House of Games and Oleanna made me think he must really hate women actually.
anyway, if i take the whole package of Glengarry Glen Ross i'd have to say i'm neutral. it is really well-made and i don't regret seeing it once. if i just focus on writing and characters - yeah, hate is probably an apt description, though for a good part fuelled by how truly epic this could have been with a better script. waste of a legendary cast i guess :-/
>>816057
Well cut webm.
>>817063
awwww... they're hugging :3
>>816057
It doesn't get any comfier than this.
>>817063
When you can see how they are trying to do fake falling. It's like more than 20 rifles and hit only few of them since others have iron skin or something like that. worst acting in movie.
>>815226
gave enough of my life to that shit already!
>>816101
>i just wholly detest the subject matters and characters he puts into his plays
wew, look at this fag
>>812273
god I fucking hate when they force this "LOL SO RAMDNUB XDD" approach, that fucking chainsaw clearly doesn't have anything that could fit the hole in that guy's arm, and they knew it, they did it on puropose because "LOW BUDGETTT AMIRITE", fuck them.
>>815226
I've never even considered playing WoW, but i can't wait to see how this turns out, especially since Ragnar Lothbrok is in it.
>>817228
>2.53 MB
>for yahooo
>>818245
AYY LMAO
GET HYPE
>>811659
and last one
So WHEN is the Warcraft movie supposed to be set? Is the one Human supposed to be Arthas? I can tell the Orc is supposed to be Thrall at least.
>>819388
first war, the first game. Thrall and Arthas dont show up in the games until warcraft 3 but are technically alive, but children, before that.
>>813668
>you tore up her picture
>i'm gunna tear up the fuckin dance floor
C L A S S I C
L
A
S
S
I
C
>>819399
wtf is all that sappy shit about brotherhood between orcs and humans then? wc3 is the first time this even comes up, uniting against a common foe. in wc and wc2 the orcs were savage beasts. i have the original Tides of Darkness manual right in front of me. half of it is even written from orcish perspective. they're fucking bloodthristy war machines! it's in their fucking nature!
don't tell me they retell the first games from the retconned perspective of WoW... jesus fucking christ....
any trailers show Medivh yet? one would figure he was a main protagonist if they really cared about the classic lore...
>>817816
worth every byte.
>>819743
yeah they were depicted that way in wc1-2 but in wc3 it was explained why and that their original way way shamanism and bullshit so I guess they are trying to cover the full story and not just having 'orc bad human good' storyline. Kinda disappointed they arent depicted more savage but eh.
medivh is in it, he's been cast and is a main character but not in the trailer yet. Karazhan, i think, is at 0:05 of >>819304 and possibly see the back of medivh's head but not sure.
they are sticking mostly with classic lore, I mean wc3 explained how the frostwolves and durotan werent keen on conquering and shit but there's just not enough content from wc1 for a movie.
Also medivh was a antagonist in wc1
>>813883
What a truly phenomenal performance. Bardem has that perfect mix of hyper-competent genius and genuine psychopath that classic Bond villains had. I could argue forever about the best Bond but Bardem is certainly top 3 villains.
>>814712
THAT is person of interest? really? I thought person of Interest was some typical shitsack procedural police show. there are 10 CSI and Law & Order clones for every show on TV that isn't. I'll give Person of Interest a try for sure.
>>820406
I want a 300 word essay on it on my desk TOMORROW
>>820418
Cashiers have desks?
>>820406
I guess they changed writers or soemthing
>>820448
gun slide doesn't move + no recoil
>>816070
oh god tori spelling GET IT OUT
GET IT OUT NOW
>>821617
>>821648
>>821654
>>821648
Hanibal
>>820406
It's really great up until season 3 or so.
Then, pretend the series was cancelled prematurely.
>>822827
story?
>>822859
They had to hook up with I-coy. So he did.
>>822875
unrealistic or was the enemy a bunch of dumbfucks?
>>822884
It's not that easy to differentiate between friend and foe. There are no nametags hovering over a soldiers head in real life.
>>821654
Am I the only one who noticed that at 0:43, the command/service module is heading towards the moon without a Lunar module attached to it?
Does it make me a huge fucking space nerd for noticing that?
>>822884
This is from band of brothers, most of it is completely real based on interviews from the actual soldiers of E company.
>>822884
unrealistic anon, unrealistic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Speirs
>>822893
You're not a space nerd, that's a pretty huge goof and I have no idea how they could render something like that and not even notice.
Seriously, how does that even happen? I mean it's not like they know about the LEM because it was in the very next shot.
>>823103
Holy shit, what a shit show.
>>821654
Bay's so good at giving me feels.
>>823099
Fucking loved OL.
>>823382
Yeah, the third one.
>>823393
cheers
>>823389
sucked in colombia
>>823389
is that supposed to be the Yucatán impact?
>it hit with the force of 10,000 nuclear weapons
not even close! from wikipedia:
>The Chicxulub impactor had an estimated diameter of 10 km (6.2 mi) and delivered an estimated energy equivalent of 100 teratons of TNT (4.2×10^23 J). By contrast, the most powerful man-made explosive device ever detonated, the Tsar Bomba, had a yield of only 50 megatons of TNT (2.1×10^17 J), making the Chicxulub impact 2 million times more powerful.
we're already in the millions of nuclear devices when we talk about the one bomb that was ridiculously more powerful than all the others. so the comparison is more than 2 orders of magnitude off!
even common sense tells you that 10,000 must be way low. puny human technology doesn't even compare to natural phenomena. and i really don't get why they would sell it short for the audience. i don't know the context of the scene, but it seems like they want to hit home that it was crazy powerful. i mean, the visuals might actually show an accurate blast wave, but there's no way to recreate that with even hundreds of thousands of nukes. what were they thinking? better not blow the audience's mind too hard? wtf...
M0re
B0nd
_7
>>814703
David Sylvian and Ryuichi Sakamoto - Forbidden Colours
>>823784
>Yucatán impact?
yup.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3nyn_yZQ98
It's simply an intro about how a meteor can devastate earth. Why they would sell it short I have no idea. Maybe they are just retarded and didn't even do a wikipedia search.
>>822859
Band of Brothers, god tier TV show
>>823121
source please
>>823825
My favourite movie ending.
>>823858
Pretty sure Wikipedia didn't exist then.
>>824479
MOvie??
>>824532
Skyline, this is literally the only good scene in the entire movie btw
![[panting intensifies].webm](https://i.imgur.com/RNijLzD.jpg "[panting intensifies].webm")
who hype
>>825118
This fucking shit movie.
>>825927
show*
>>823389
heres a more recent one from cosmos ep11
I honestly don't understand this scene. Why does she appear to be touching herself? I know she's excited to see him turn into a mouse, but this is a disney film.
>>826071
A disney movie decades old.
>>826071
>implying disney doesn't subtlety inject all their films with subliminal sexual undertones
The Goose turned 35 today
>>819762
For a movie to work it has to be a different format from a video game. From you post I get the feeling you're a cynical autisc who doesn't like David Bowie.
It's based on the novels, and makes changes to suit a screen based storyline. A screenplay depicting orcs are bad hoomans are good would seen as a terrible movie by anyone who knew their nerd shit.
You'll see, in the coming sequels when Arthas is culling stratholme. You will see.
>>825927
u wot
>>819762
>Also medivh was a antagonist in wc1
fair enough, i was saying "main protagonist" more in the sense of: central figure of the plot. his heritage, history and ambitions basically drive all of warcraft's lore. i was just surprised he wasn't front and center on all the trailers.
>>826278
>A screenplay depicting orcs are bad hoomans are good would seen as a terrible movie by anyone who knew their nerd shit.
i don't particularly like the movie adaptations, but i don't think Lord of the Rings is all that bad. sometimes staying true to the source, even if it means black/white or good/evil stories is pretty alright actually.
if i'm thinking warcraft, i don't want a character drama with layers. i want war and the craft of said war. orcs were fucking cool. proud mighty alien savages cooperating with goblins and fucking dragons to subdue and pillage a rich human world. for the horde!
and i don't think a movie faithful to the first games would be boring. there is still a lot of plot - backstory, personal drama, deserters and traitors, assassinations, heroes, sieges, alliances to be forged, etc.
i can see why they do it, they want to build a movie franchise. but advertising it as being based on the first game while not admitting that Metzen has bent over backwards and retconned the shit out everything in the meantime just doesn't sit well with me. but it's a sound business decision for sure. there are definitely more wc3 and wow players than wc1 and wc2 enthusiasts.
>>812273
Tip: Try entering the movie name in filename
>>815177
Same episode?
>>826320
Why the fuck did they create a weapon with which they would have to zap the entire population individually?
>>811635
>>826545
Funny scene but at :16 the chick teleported
>>826346
Wrong how?
>>826565
Well 65 million years ago the continents didn't look like they do today, and it looks like they didn't think of that when rendering this stuff.
>>815773
>adapted well
>original end boss is just one of many
>rita's death was ultimately meaningless, and everything keiji did is meaningless because humanity loses anyway
but no your right the happily ever after version with shitter suits is way better.
kill yourself.
>>816215
>sub is flooding
>lets dive
never join a sub crew.
>>826590
its to show contrast as to where it would be today.
>>826421
because this was written decades ago you fuck.
>>823237
Bay is a talentless director and all his movies are trash.
You get the feels from this because of the soft violin strings in the background. It's such a stupid trick that even Michael Bay knows it.
Your brain is a wad of play dough. You are an idiot.
>>828360
I agree on Bay being shit, but that clip references to a pretty awesome chapter in history. There is nothing wrong with being stirred by that. Even though US patriotism is disgusting, the amerifats had a really good run in the 20s century.
>>828362
>that clip references to a pretty awesome chapter in history. There is nothing wrong with being stirred by that.
Absolutely, but watch the clip without sound. It's nothing but a chronology of the Apollo 11 mission, as sterile as a bowl of sawdust.
Movies are a visual medium and a movie worth its salt can affect the audience without leaning on music to do the job. There's a reason "Metropolis" still stands up today despite being a silent movie filmed nearly 100 years ago.
My point is not that Apollo 11 was not momentous - it absolutely was - but that Michael Bay has no idea how to use film as a visual medium to affect the audience. He resorts to leaning on music (soft violin strings being the most cliched version of this trick) instead of using the imagery itself. It's so bad that instead of music augmenting the effects of the images, the music is what accounts entirely for the feelings of the audience.
>>828412
>muh silent era
fuck off gramps it's 2015
>>828412
Well, as I said I absolutely agree with Bay being an ass who uses the cheapest tricks to manipulate the gullible and tasteless among us. He is a hollow person, sterile, fake and utterly boring.
>>828429
EatShit.jpg
>>820564
yeah :-( hence why i wrote >>816093
>having 3 amazing actors does not make up for having 2 god awful actors
Spelling and Prinze seariously drag this movie down :-/ the difference in acting skill is quite staggering. such a shame...
>>828412
like the other guy, i agree that Bay leaves much to be desired. i even agree that he uses cheap tricks to stirr emotions and that it's good to recognise them.
but your argument doesn't make much sense. your opponent isn't talking about the same thing as you. they mean the pleasure of watching an emotional movie while suspending their disbelieve and enjoying the ride. you talk about the intellectual pleasure of analysing a well crafted movie. both are valid ways to approach cinema, but you can't really compare them. being moved and enjoying yourself is a perfectly fine metric to measure a film by. and Bay is successful at this, as his box office numbers repeatedly show. getting off of perfect framing, long takes and subtle use of colour correction is just as fine - but it will return a completely different set of directors as being good at their craft.
apart from missing this point, you also misconstrue film to be a purely visual medium. except that this has almost never been the case (apart from the earliest films, experimental films and early consumer filming in the 60s). film quickly became and has remained ever since an audio-visual medium. i'm sure you can find films that work entirely without audio track, but whole genres simply don't. nearly all well-regarded horror classics, even those with perfect visuals, turn anywhere from bland to goofy if you watch them without music and dialogue. even Metropolis has a score and was always meant to be accompanied by music. it simply doesn't make sense criticising Bay's use of emotional music and citing Metropolis as a reference.
you have valid points, no doubt. but you're straw-manning pretty hard to start a pointless flamewar.
>>812179
ugh, american storytelling
>>828455
>you're straw-manning pretty hard to start a pointless flamewar.
I actually find that little exchange quite civil, considering this is the internet. And I am glad everyone agrees that Bay's generic style is for plebs only.
>>824479
>nuclear ICBMs all over the world ready to travel to any other part of the world
>send a bomber
>>822893
Isn't the lunar lander module already in orbit around the moon? I thought they docked with it before landing.
>>828250
I fucking love Taxi Driver. For some reason I had never seen it until this morning
>>828654
>>828654
It's George VI
>>826421
because they were harvesting. if they killed everyone, who would they harvest?
>>828684
thank you! I enjoyed that film. Good Times!
>>828699
Damn, you have the wrong filename for your clip.
>>828684
What is this?
>>828622
>>828706
>>823988 Doctor Who Series 8, Episode 2: Enter the Dalek.
>>828699
>The only good bit in the movie
spot on
>>815769
He was praying to the gods because he wanted help in an English exam
>>828795
A field in England
>>828699
just when i'm thinking to myself "well, this is shit - why would anyone do that to a title sequence?" Gaspar Noé's name pops up. oh right. now it all makes sense.
i fucking hate the guy and his obsession with strobe lights and making films deliberately as unpleasant to watch as possible. watch one of them and you've seen them all. hell, spare yourself the waste of time and just watch one of his music videos. it's all in there. the drunk camera, the flashing lights, the gratuitous nudity, the depravity and violence just to be edgy, shooting mere concepts without a proper script at feature length. fuck that guy. whenever i stumble across his shit now i'm just watching it laughing at how hard he tries to be edgier and ediger each year.
the man has certainly found his style, i'll give him that. and maybe someone even had to try it once, so we could all know how much it sucks. so maybe he's a hero of cinema or something... but man, fuck that guy. sorry for the rant, but him and Richard Kelly share the dubious honour of being my least favourite directors of all time.
>>828775
>those monkey noises at 0:27
>>829578
great moment in tv hstory!
>>826318
looks retarded
>>829797
That's what your parents said when you were born
>>828706
so comfy
when I first watched it I always thought he was going to crash at some point. He always seemed to be so disconnected with what he was doing. He must've been an incredible driver
>>817559
Do you not see the cylindrical bit on the back? Obviously a compatible port for his arm.
>>829814
maybe I dont know. But choppers would never be able to get that close to warship. The warship would have seen them long before, and react much quicker.
>>817559
or maybe because he did the same thing in Army of Darkness and they're referencing that?
