Tank gifs/webms
Anyone want to dump what they got?
>>802515
More like this.
>>802529
It really is the future, huh
>>802512
I wish there was better wartime footage of Soviet tanks as well, but I guess they had more important things to worry about.
>>802857
Yeah, some kv-2 footage would have been amazing
>>802529
>that pressurized jet of flame from the ammo cooking off in the basket
holy shit
>>803311
>the motherfucker inside survived
>>802857
you'd think that they'd film plenty of SOVIET STEEL for propaganda
>>803307
Wow got shot in the fukken ass.
>>802517
Fucking damn.
Anyone have any abrahms footage?
![[Commie] Girls und Panzer - 11 11.webm](https://i.imgur.com/nndVA4F.jpg "[Commie] Girls und Panzer - 11 11.webm")
>>803437
PANZER VOR
>>804194
The anime was retarded.
Also the heaviest was the E-100 and it got disassembled by allies.
>>804194
Why is this titled commie? The song that's playing is Panzerlied and those are German tanks. Get on your game faggot.
>>804222
The E-100 was a lighter maus, though.
It was just a tiger 2 chassis with a maus turret mounted on top.
>>804222
It can get pretty stupid. At one point a Type 89, with its awful paper thin armor, gets hit with a round from an IS-2 and is totally fine.
>>804237
The sub group is called Commie m8
Well I guess this is a girls und Panzer thread now (OP here)
>>803314
M1 ammo racks are behind an armored door in the turret. Blast goes up through blow off panels on the rear turret roof.
>>804352
at first i got excited when I saw the thread only to find it's been infected with weeb shit.
im so sorry anon.
>>804237
Pretty sure that's the guy who did the subs
>>804222
Fuck off the E-100 was never assembled in the first place, the allied only found the unfinished hull
>>803425
I don't remember seeing that scene
>>804253
Tanks have reinforced magical (not literary) armor. That way tanks can survive any attack or stuff what could destroy them in real life. So we have stuff like this, or tankettes surviving being shot at, Hertzer being under Mauss for while.
>>804645
Still it's anime with tanks, hard to find those in serious, war anime (because those have mechs instead).
>>804383
It's ok, I liked the show. But I just want tank gifs and webms
>>803285
not to mention the barrel shooting out the front and doing a flip.
>>804929
OP here again
>>802875
You mean the tanks that couldn't turn their turrets on hills because they would fall over?
>>804251
>Tiger II chassis
>able to mount the Maus turret
Yeah no, the Maus turret probably weighed more than the Tiger II chassis. The E-100 had a different chassis. It had much more angled glacis plates and rear transmission, unlike the Tiger II.
>>805130
Yeah, the KV-2 was pretty shit. That's why only ~300 of them were ever made. As far as a 152 mm howitzer goes, the ISU-152 was much, much more effective.
>>803307
What a lucky guy he is, holy shit.
>>803314
Thats American engineering. Our tanks have always been very survivable.
>>805647
america coward
only survival of motherland cause important
>>805649
Go home gaijin
>>805653
but amerika. YUO of gaijin...
>>804253
they live in the future and those are just practice tanks lined with more modern armor that can shirk off an mausss round.
Near the start of the anime the drop in one of the more modern MBT's
>>804194
>barely a bigger gun than the is-2
>tanks fly away when it shoots near them
yeah how about no
>>805721
They live probably in present, but that show setting technology is more advanced than ours (and not fully realistic), especially if you see stuff going with schools/ships there.
>>805728
>is2 gun
22kg shells
122mm
800m/s muz vel
>maus ccgun
29kg shell
128mm
960m/s
Thats quite a bit more kinetic energy, and the other tank was a light tank.
>>805738
The MBT tank the airdrop onto their giant supercarrier cities looks like a much much much more advanced lepoard or abrams.
Its safe to say they understanding of material sciences far outstrips our own.
>>804645
GuP is tame when it comes to 'girls and x'
Shit, you should see Strike Witches. THAT is fucking retarded.
>>805740
And? The Soviet Union widely deployed a TD with a 152 mm cannon and it didn't do stupid stuff lke that.
>>802529
the unstable trajectory is due to strong crosswinds, right?
>>805141
nigger you can read about it. It was a modified Tiger 2 chassis, not the maus'. It was slimmed down and designed to be more standardized, using most of the Tiger 2's parts.
>>806002
Probably
>>802526
Damnnnnn, you can even see that it's HEAT-FS... Fucking cool.
SAUCE of song? songaus sawse on saung
>>803311
>guy claps his hands as he jumps out
What a badass.
>>805740
It also helps that the Type 10 is nearly 20 tons lighter than the Abrams.
>>804645
Well it's not a softening of a war story it's more of a sports series, and whilst the premise is silly at first, it takes itself quite seriously and you kind of just roll with it. And for all of the artistic liberties they take with tank behavior I say overall they did a pretty good job with the tank battles.
>>806740
What's this from?
>>805647
Building a tank takes a week, training a tank crew takes at least 18 years.
>>806002
I don't know what model of ATGM that is, but modern Russian made ones are programmed to weave around like that to make it harder for active protection systems to detect that it's coming for the tank and intercept it.
>>808720
18 years?
>>808868
I think he meant from birth
>>803311
is that what ammo racking looks like IRL?
>>809159
Yes, in a modern vehicle where the ammo compartment is behind blast doors. You see jack-in-the-box effect from older tanks where the ammo is stored in the crew compartment.
>>809058
Is that what daesh was trying to do, except they didn't have the wraps so they used a prisonner?
>>809098
#DaeshDoesItBetter
>>809060
>HEAT-FS goes through him
Literally what
>>804645
That's kinda like asking: "Why does Hollywood always hire attractive actors to play the lead roles?"
Nobody wants to watch a bunch of ugly people.
It's fiction.
>>809691
No it is not
>>805891
>hating on Strike Witches
>>806750
The Great War
>>804662
It's from the OVA, I believe.
>>806575
Kavinsky - Rampage
>>809384
you do realize that the russian killed hundreds of afghanis, like this, in the afghanistan war?
>>810605
I hadn't heard of that, but I wouldn't be surprised either. They didn't have daesh's bitchin' post prod team though.
>>809111
Why did they blow up a whole tank to kill a bird?
>>812142
They might as well be throwing rocks at it. If the gunner figures out roughly where they are he will just fire a shell in their general direction, and for a few seconds, the air will be 90% 1st, 2nd, and 3rd degree shrapnel.
>>812438
Unlike what you seem to believe, tanks, even the abram, aren't invulnerable beasts of war, they can be easily disabled and shitskins have lost a few abrams to atgms. Only good tactics and training from the americans made them look godly.
>>812442
It's easy to disable a tank with an rpg. All you need to do is to hit the track. To take out a tank completely on the other hand you need to breach the crew compartment. The AT4, the light AT weaponry US soldiers carries(that mind you also has better penetration capability than those old USSR pieces) cannot pierce a modern tank in the front, and even the sides are highly unlikely. The only way a atgm stands a decent chance of killing a tank is by hitting it in the rear or on the top where the tanks armor is relatively weak.
>>802528
Fucking keked.
>>802600
Now that, is nice
>>803309
>gun blowing smoke rings
fucking kekd
>>810710
Go and see the beast of war NOW to see how you actually do COIN with the goatfuckers.
>>806173
Not him but no, nigga, no, its not.
>>815742
Brilliant film.
>>802523
Let's fuck vw's!
>>803311
That's why the gas-turbine of an abrams is inferior to a combustion engine
>>803311
is that a fucking abrams tank?
>>809648
>Literally what
You don't fuse that shit so it blows as soon as a limp wind hits it.
>>816084
thats not the engine going off the blow out panels are doing their thing
>>816108
yeah iraq has been using them pretty poorly as of late though they are dumbed down models
>>816108
Export Abrams, classified composite layered armor removed, base model, no upgrades, not like an American M1A2 with TUSK and CROWS
>>803437
ahhhhh fuck what is that song doing in there!?
>>808861
>weave
I only know of some missiles spiraling towards their target.
"To capitalise on the advantage given by using a lower cost seeker the Soviet designers also produced a new flight control system: Fixed fins cause the missile to spin in flight and a single moving control surface adjusts its course during this rotation. The result is that for the cost of one equivalent Western model, the Soviets could build five. Any loss of effectiveness being partially counteracted by pilots being encouraged to fire their missiles in pairs."
>>816235
Yes, but they do set up fuses on HEAT shells so that they explode when they hit just about anything.
>>816826
Still an Abram, even the US army variant wouldn't have resisted it
>>804194
http://www.youdubber.com/index.php?video=wOAQyuiYQ8k&video_start=33&audio=8fvhZxYJopk&audio_start=0
>>818748
Bitch please, theres no TUSK on that thing, TUSK would easily have blocked that HEAT missile
>>816084
that webm had nothing to do with the engine for one, and secondly turbine engines are combustion engines
>>812265
Tehy didn't blow tank to kill bird, the bird bombed the tank to kill them...
>>819170
You don't even know what was the shell, I don't think even the TUSK armor would have resisted it in this saide of the turret
>>806511
gimme song pls
>>806740
Congratulations ! You're deaf now !
>>812265
Why not ?
>>819928
>most likely a wire guided rocket from something like a tow launcher
>most, if not all, guided anti-tank missiles use HEAT warheads
>RPGs also use HEAT warheads for anti-tank purposes
I think the chances are pretty high that it was a HEAT warhead that struck the tank.
>>818748
Export abrams != us army abrams.
Export has steel armor. Normal abrams has composite armor designed specifically to defeat heat
>>820433
kavinnsky rampage
>>819827
that audio overlay is rather cancerous
>>818728
>Yes, but they do set up fuses on HEAT shells so that they explode when they hit just about anything.
Isn't that usually in tandem with a minimum arming range though? That shot looked pretty close range.
>>822256
A long time ago i had the version without it. I have no idea why this one became more popular. I blame /v/
>>819170
>>822126
That was a Metis-M tandem charge ATGM, you can tell by the flare used to track the missiles flight path. The precursor charge negates ERA and the the main charge is supposedly can pen ~900mm RHAe after ERA, some manufacturers include precursor penetration to inflate stats so take it with a grain of salt but 700mm+ is expected from a ATGM of its size and age.
No tank can take one in the side and remain unharmed. However the blowout panels worked fine and the hull should be salvageable and crew alive.
>>808720
Except for shit like the shermans, appropriately named "tommy cookers" for their habit of burning the people inside alive.
well, it's not a webm or gif, but this video consists of interesting footage of tanks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivP1qYG_tLw
Also this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvlvWnz2-bY
>>822187
>Export has steel armor
No tank since the fucking 70's have been using steel only armor. The Saudis are using the US SEP model, it doesn't have the depleted uranium armor that US models have, but of course it has composite armor.
high explosive anti palm tree
>>825030
they sure love blowing shit up
>>812265
Because in the soviet union....you know the rest.
>>816862
The song is "Panzerleid" thats why.
someone have the one where the Russians are comparing a Matilda (i think) vs one of their own?
>>812265
Birds bring down more than just airplanes.
>>804351
way to butcher a good song, jesus fuck.
>>832483
Some of them got out but I imagine the rest of them probably fared worse than the Jordanian pilot.
>>816826
How do you know this? Is it just knowing a lot about military shit or is it just you can tell from what it looks like
>>833077
By looking and by knowing. If it was a current A2, it would have sides skirts of explosive reactive armor, and the .50 up top would have a camera module. The stuff about armor composition is simply politics; export Abrams tanks don't get the latest composites or DU components, as a matter of protocol.
>>832483
not instantly. the grenade makes a hole in the tank and starts showering molten metal on you before the entire thing bursts into flames so i guess you got like few seconds to live
>>804645
>This fucking shit is killing anime.
Thank you.
>>804645
>Unironically implying Anime can have quality
>>816084
>I don't have a fucking clue what I'm saying
>>825030
they could have used that tank and the explosives but sure blow it up instead
>>805163
shit and shit, it was a bunker buster not really meant for tank warfare
>>825028
Fool, the M1 Abrams is impervious to all attacks, conventional, nuclear, biological, or otherwise!
Get your facts straight.
>>806002
why the fuck doesent anyone know how fuckin cameras work? the camera is zoomed in and since the missile is flying parallel to the line between the objective and the camera, you will see all the flopping around. if the missile was flying horisontally and you were filming it, it would seem as a stright line but it would flopp around just the same
>>840002
>using the Commie troll subs
Kill yourself.
>>804645
Actually no. It's saving anime. Anime has been losing popularity in Japan for decades, and it took a certain genius show called Lucky Star to start to save it. If it weren't for moe, Anime as a medium would be dead by now.
>>810628
Fucking metal slug
>>812448
there is nothing else in the world quite like gunning an abrams, you feel like a god, on the first night we had hajis trying to shoot us with ak's fucking pistols even. funniest memory is nutshotting some durka who was working the bolt on his mosin in the middle of the street after taking a shot at us
>>841308
were they lugging around a fucking sound studio or were those sounds added later. Maybe my expectations are dimmed because of the shitty tiny cellphone and camcorder mics nowadays
>>843377
Cameras in that era did not have sound. Unless you had some other guys lugging around a boom mic getting as close as possible to the origin of the sound, and you don't really see any boom mic guys all over the battlefield, do you?
So yes, all the action sound you ever heard from WW2 films or documentaries is all foley work.
>>843377
>Shitty tiny cellphone and camcorder mics
As opposed to the high definition old dial telephone and VHS mics?
>>843390
I recall VHS camcorders having way better sound quality than any video recorded with a phone I see on the internet. Probably just has to do with the old VHS camcorders having larger mics. Maybe I'm recalling incorrectly I don't really know.
>>843396
I hope you're joking. Home VHS recorders could barely catch any sound further away than 10-15 feet if it wasn't some massive explosion.
>>833096
>export Abrams tanks don't get the latest composites or DU components, as a matter of protocol.
True, but they still have composite armour, just last-gen version.
How's it feel if you're a veteran of Desert Storm knowing your armor only saved you because the Iraqis were using steel Sabot rounds, not DU or Tungsten?
>>805647
>always been very survivable
[citation needed]
>>815735
dumbass
>>825569
Alternatively, Explosive Reactive Palm tree.
>>812442
That particular M1 got hit over thirty times by RPGs and still remained partially functional. I'm pretty sure it got mobility killed, but fought back until a recovery unit got there. Was back in operation less than a week later. Was during a thnder run when we were taking Baghdad.
>>822187
It's actually mostly a failure of training and skill. The arabs cannot into conventional warfare, so have zero clue how to correctly employ the M1. It's a general failure of every middle eastern arab army.
>>825028
whatever that missile is its a mischievous little devil
>>844887
The Sherman had the lowest fatality rates of any main armor vehicle in the war.
>>844608
That's not true at all, and is a myth that has somehow gained ground.
For one, the US is the only country that uses DU rounds, and two, the Iraqis had Tungsten penetrators as well.
The frontal armor of an Abrams is nearly impregnable to any tank fired weapon sans a couple weak spots. Abrams can't frontally penetrate an Abrams.
The side armor is significantly weaker, and would have been pregnable to even the older steel sabots the Iraqis did field in reserve and second rate armor corps. But unlike the Iraqis, the US armored corps is well trained and intelligent and operates in conjunction with infantry support and air assets, meaning they almost never got into a situation where the side armor was exposed.
The Desert Storm vets survived because they outfought and outsmarted their opponents, not because their opponents were incapable of hurting them. They were more than capable of hurting our armed forces, but our armed forces never let themselves become vulnerable.
>>855030
>patton pls go
>>855030
http://archives.library.illinois.edu/blog/poor-defense-sherman-tanks-ww2/
muh tommy cooker
>>855030
I am just having a really difficult time believing that...
>>806577
Nah m8, he was just turning out the lights as he left.
Gotta save that electricity.
>>855445
>>855109
>>855108
It's a fact, and factually supported by actual army records rather than two bit hacks, politicians, and pogs with an axe to grind.
I'll look for the actual figures, but I seem to recall them being around 1.7 kia per tank knocked out. British tankers had higher wounding rates, while American tankers had higher fatality rates, but only by around .2%.
Most casualty rates for tankers hovered at 2-3%, with some Soviet tanks having 3-4 casualties on average per tank lost.
This also includes tankers lost while outside of their tanks by things such as artillery shrapnel, snipers, ambushes while peeking out the tank or just getting their head blown off while peeking out of the turret, as well as casualties caused by rounds that penetrated but did not destroy or disable the tank.
And when you look at what the Sherman was it shouldn't be surprising. Compared to its contemporaries it was either similar or superior. The PzIV had the advantage of being up gunned en masse, but even the short 75 on the Sherman was more than capable of knocking out, their armor profile was very similar, with the Sherman actually having both more effective hull armor and much better turret armor. The T-34 was in every way inferior to the Sherman until its T-34/85 overhaul which made the tanks largely on par with T-34s having somewhat better HE and more kinetic energy behind their rounds, although the Sherman still retained significant ergonomic advantages and reliability advantages.
Don't take it from me, take it from an actual Tanker.
A Soviet tanker at that. Here's a few of his accomplishments.
>fought for years in Shermans
>knocked out a Tiger tank in a Sherman
>survived his Sherman being destroyed twice, unlike the guys in the T-34 next to him who all died when the ammo cooked off and the tank exploded
http://iremember.ru/en/memoirs/tankers/dmitriy-loza/
>>855518
Also before anyone brings up
>muh Panthers
>muh Tigers
Just remember that all the Tigers and Panthers still lost the Germans the war, and the US had a near 1 to 1 k/d ratio to German armor. And also that anti tank guns and handheld anti tank weapons like the Panzerfaust killed far more tanks than German tanks ever did.
>>855518
And that's 2-3 casualties, not %, of course.
>>809098
best thing is thats the tank he drove when he was in the Austrian army
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioBiYEcpPnA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6LL4tCTXEs
here are some jagdtigers driving around
>>802515
the fuck happened here? story?
>>856354
>T-55 tries to peek-a-boo from cover
>As soon as it moves the commander sees an enemy tank waiting for them, or even the muzzle flash
>He then screams while getting the fuck out of that matchbox (soviet MBTs are notorious for blowing up at the first hit)
>The driver is fast enough to stop the tank and reverse
It's not clear whether the shot would have hit the tank or not, still it's a great footage.
>>846542
Source and story please,?
>>806547
gotta love laeffy
>>839205
Countermeasures against wire guided?
>>858425
I've been trying to figure out where this footage came from too. It's seems to be a Shtora-1 test. I've never seen any combat footage of Shtora, though T-90s, 80Us, etc. don't get filmed that much anyways. The red eyes always seemed like a bit of a far reach but they look really effective in the video.
>>810600
loltraktors?
>>840419
retard.
>>858425
Scissors.
>>802515
Someone tell me that tanks are now paired with their own drones that can survey the area? Not just some high flying USA drones. I mean like a drone you can shove into the barrel of the tank and have it launch out and up into the sky that gives a video feed. IT may have autonomous mode/manual flight might be controlled via low power laser. Whatever the situation requires.
>>803307
>>805643
>>832483
>>833067
>>833099
No, they die instantly. The guy you see running away you can see him under the back of the tank at the beginning doing "something". He wasn't inside the tank.
Any explosive force that can blow a hole in a tank will instantly kill everyone inside due to the pressure involved.
>>859977
give me your ass virginity and i will give you the sauce 8^)
though i did give some hind in one thg thread in /k/
Does this count for this thread?
>>860043
>>820433
>kavinnsky rampage
It's a remix from DBZ, the Cell saga, when he showed up
>>839879
Not for a long time without maintenance and limited ammo
>>856732
No way that was a tank shell, you can see the projectile on screen for two or three frames before it explodes, and it looks like they got about 3 seconds warning that it was coming.
A tank round would be much too fast, so it was probably some sort of rocket/missile.
>modern tanks
>interesting
>>860032
Holy shit please tell me he dodged it. A is for Affort.
By the beautiful stalwart glare of Frenchfag's baby blues, please give me the source one that shtora test.
>>825569
that's pretty fucking neato though, with e penetrative liquid trail and all
>>809691
i would like to watch a bunch of average looking people in a well made war movie that's FUCKING REALISTIC
>>802523
thats the new strategie against global warming
keep your pollutants vw!
>>816084
>hurr I like using buzzwords like "inferior" to argue about something i know nothing about
>>812442
Unlike what you seem to believe, the Abrams is only popular because its highly produced and highly successful during wartime. It shined in the Gulf War with a MASSIVE kill to loss ratio. Only tanks lost in combat were due to friendly fire and the bullshit pics youll find online are due to self detonation. As in, it cant be salvaged so the army destroys them. Sure they arent invincible but check out the combat history and tell me how many crew members have died due to combat.
>>803311
That looks like an American missile fired on an American tank
>>863453
Duh, that's because they all trampled on poor antiquated third wolders
>>802529
Looks like an angry wasp.
>>825524
That was fixed very quickly. Something like 95% of penetration pre-wet storage caused ignition. Afterwards it was less than 10%.
>>819824
nothing to see here folks
>>806740
open two of these at once
>>802528
Waaaaaaaa tank-sempai noticed me!
>>816084
Gas-turbine is a combustion engine you dumb fucking idiot.
>>819757
B-E-A-Utiful!
>>856354
IIRC that's a Syrian army tank and thats either a ATGM or tank shell whizzing by, pretty sure the guy who jumped off was killed by blast overpressure
