>FAQ (Badly needing an update)
http://pastebin.com/fcf25Vi9
>Current Build (Alpha v2.0.0)
Download: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/download
Manual: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/1c1bbpmb3uat3r/source/AC-Manual-1-1a-V11.pdf
Tweaks & Stuff: http://pastebin.com/QRWNvEVD
Alpha 2.0.0-305217 Stability Settings: http://pastebin.com/MBcknHRt
>Latest Monthly Report (November 2015)
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15105-Monthly-Studio-Report
>Latest Official Podcasts
Around the Girth 2.13: https://youtu.be/ZnQtZ_D1D7Q
10 for the Chairman 74: https://www.youtu.be/qqcN6UkKfog
10 for the Developers 1: https://www.youtu.be/luDDJoPdMY8
Bugsmashers 17: https://youtu.be/RiUC2_uYohw
>Current Issue of Jump Point
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/xtjaptgtro9w0r/source/JumpPoint_03-12_Dec-15_Refining-The-Verse.pdf
>Entire Jump Point Repository
http://pastebin.com/Cd9wQ9YB
>Last Asset Leak
http://pastebin.com/aGpzF7wV
>Lastest Random Shit
2.1 to PTU: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15136-Star-Citizen-Alpha-21-Available
Pupil to Planet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yLTm8DZ8s4
Letter from the Chairman: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15138-Letter-From-The-Chairman
Star Map: https://robertsspaceindustries.com/starmap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfwyAlGHpTQ
:^)
I'm already in the PTU, but the 2.1 client says I need to change to the PTU.
Sup with that?
>>127962617
>scott_bakula_im_retarded?.gif
>>127960873
And now we don't need to wait for Formula Fusion.
^.^
Who /starfarer/ here?
Post 'em
>>127970392
I backed during the kickstarter with an aurora, and then upgraded. Haven't spent a penny since
>>127970392
How do you even make this picture?
>>127971572
https://raylehnhoff.github.io/SCFSD/
>>127967017
that's literally a direct quote from the wiki article
>>127971667
>300 seriesI hope none of you have a Redeemer, fuck that
>don't actually know what I want to do in SC
>ships keep getting more specific
what do
>>127971869
>C
>>ships keep getting more specific
Freelancer solves all.
>>127971869
>what do
You stay safe with an Aurora and wait till the game is out.
Duh.
>>127971869
go with the multi-purpose ship in the price range you're most comfortable with.
Aurora LN $35 - slow as fuck
Avenger Titian $50 - faster and more agile than the Aurora. Holds slightly less.
Cutlass Black $100 - actually totally sucks in a fight. Is actually pretty fast for a ship with that large a hold.
Freelancer $110 - God awful view. More durable, but also less agile than a cutlass.
Constellation Andromeda $225 - Amazing do everything ship. But owning one turns you into a utter douche that thinks his mary sue ship that has huge shields, a shit ton of large guns, a fuck load of missiles, giant cargo bay, and it's own baby ship should be as fast and agile as a fighter because Chris Roberts once called it the "Millennium Falcon of Star Citizen".
>>127971869
Put your faith in Drake. The Cutlass will be born anew.
>>127972889
This is bad advice, pls no follow
>>127972889
Maybe two years from now after every other ship has been made flight ready.
>>127973098
nice thumbnail
>>127960617
This is objectively the best fleet selection. The only other 2 large ships worth owning are an Orion or a Reclaimer.
>>127972887
They also called the Constellation a Space Superiority Fighter in the initial campaign, those were fun times
Can't see the Avenger being multi-purpose though, even if it's a starter ship the Reliant may be more fitting
>>127973465
Reliant kore will be slower and less armed. The Avenger can fight, can intercept, and can hold some cargo.
>>127971803
I wonder if the Redeemer will be good for anything
>>127974214
I doubt you'll be able to turn it into something like an explorer or a miner though
>>127974241
Good at looking bad
Any tips against Hornets when playing gladius?
My loadout is currently gimballed
tarantula + 2 gimballed 9 longswords.
>>127973448
What about the crucible and the Starfarer?
>>127974374
That's also a great combo if you're going salvage. Also, very useful for support operations. You're clear, anon.
>>127974241
>Redeemer will be good for anything
It will be good for getting people to laugh and call you a stupid faggot when you fly around space in it
>>127974349
1. Remove gimbles and get bigger guns
2. ???
3. PROFIT
>>127974241
Redeemer will be shit cause it's a gunship/dropship with no ability to be stored on any ship sans a Bengal Carrier, which no one but the biggest organizations will control.
>>127973448
>endeavor
>being anything useful other than a cash cow for CIG
pick one
>>127970392
Support ship master race
>>127974349
Don't joust, ever. Strafe and dart in and out. The gladius' yaw and horizontal strafe sucks now so pitch/vertical only. Use missile at close range once you've weakened the hornet' shield, they can't chase targets for shit anymore.
>>127974349
Gladius is a meme ship atm (that means it's bad)
>>127974349
1. remove gimble
2. hold e
3. win
>>127975272
Ben will never leave CIG, and the Endeavor is his science-ship baby. You're fucking retarded if you want science gameplay and don't go into Endeavor.Buy the base and earn the modules, you goyim.
>>127975715
S3 guns on the wings and the dual S1 turret the early version of the ship had would help a lot.
>>127975882
>playing a space sim
>to do imaginary space science
>paying $900 to do so
>>127977313
>Not reading spoilers
>Posts picture of himself
>>127976220
rip balance
>>127978087
>thinking this post is about anything you said
>>127978293
Not really, considering the 325a, Avenger, Delta, and Reliant Tana all outgun it as is.
>>127969683
Picked one up myself. It's a whole damn flying comfyzone in itself.
>>127960617
>Latest Official Podcasts
>10 for the Chairman
Why so serious?
>>127970392
Fleetposters are worse than furries.
>>127980179
Freelancer in AC when I just want to use quad combines on a puny fighter
>>127982983
Considering it used to be
AND the S4s got downsized to S3s
I'd say you're double late to the party, kiddo
>>127970392
Is it out yet?
Which ship will be the next one to be flyable, place your bets.
>>127983974
Not yet derek. Better write another tumblr post about how it's never coming out.
>>127985307
your mom>she wasn't already playable in the initial pre-pre-pre-pre-pre-alpha
>>127985420
>implying 64 bits positioning could handle my mom
>>127985320
lol, nice response template mr cultist
I honestly think all these fleet pictures are just one retard picking arbitrary selections of ships and posting them.
>>127986030
We will never know for sure.
4chan should be more like reddit and have accounts.
>>127986175
Yeah. 4chan should be more like reddit in practically every way.
>>127986175
Horror stories like that belong in /x/
>>127986175
Go check /b/, they have ids
>>127986612
Nevermind, they used to.
>>127986030
>32 posters
>10 hangar list
It's just that it's always the same pictures posted over and over, we are redditing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOHAXsJHPuw
>>127986014
>4 auroras
Spot the testfag.
![JckjGQp[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/xuwgxP5.jpg "JckjGQp[1].jpg")
I have improved the function of the retaliator
>come at me
>>127986854
I didn't really expect to say it, but holy shit the Retaliator looks bad nowadays.
>>127987384
>tfw /scg/ used to be Aegis general
this pleases me
>>127987421
>/scg/
>used to be aegis general
er, no?
>He bought an avenger
>Redeemer is shit
>>127987536
people used to say Best Dynamics a lot, even if it's because of the tali, I don't even get why people like it so much
>>127987595
It raised the quality bar of the ships by quite a bit, but it has pretty much been surpassed now. My biggest issue is the fact that the current in-game mesh is just a fucking mess. I don't know if it's due to the LoDs or what, but it doesn't look anything like
https://youtu.be/fxEWc6IvtQc
Oh and obviously both interior and exterior are hardly practical right now. Fucking least functional ship in the game.
So do you think that for the next CitizenCon in Cologne, CIG will urge all backers to attend while bringing their wives/girlfriends/daughters?
>>127987595
That was because two sharkfag degenerates kept spamming it in every thread.
>>127986854
all you did was rip the wings and tailfins off, how does that help?
>>127987801
>CitizenCon in Cologne
CitCon 2016 is in LA.
>>127988094
Yes, I know. But when it goes back to Cologne I mean. You think CIG will invite some of the local Syrians to enjoy his creation and the comopany of his backers and their closest female relatives?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBFynCIh9OU
I made a video.
>>127986683
>>127986612
>>127986175
i dont care if its bait.
go away reddit
>>127978293
>giving it similar firepower to a base hornet (hornet would still have better protection, and more cargo capacity than an avenger or base aurora)
>upset balance
Picking both makes you a hornet nigger
Or sabercuck
>>127988465
I give it a 7/10
Right so I think I'm going to get this vapourware piece of shit because I'm an idiot who can't resist burning money on things that seem nifty.
I've been thinking about getting an Avenger Titan, because it looks wicked smart, semi cheap, isn't overly specialised like the Warlock or Stalker and has an interior I can walk around in (which is a must have for me).
But should I get it now or wait until it gets the sheduled redo?
>>127989702
Get the Avenger Titan, then change it for a Reliant Kore for free when it releases.
>>127989702
>Buying non-LTI ships
>>127975427
Still no friends to crew all that shit you rich fuck?
>>127970392
Lets not fuck around shall we?
>pic related
>>127989756
I don't think I like the look of that ship, but I might consider it. It says it has 2 people in the cockpit, but I don't have anyone to play with either.
>>127989786
It's not like I have a choice Anon.
>>127990163
Darnit Anon, it asked for one of those when I made my account less than 5 minutes ago.
Thank you anyway, I'll save it in a text document and hope these things don't have an expiry date for when I get my ship.
Anyway I looked at the packages but the only one there is the Avenger Stalker, I don't see one for the Titan.
>>127990705
You can upgrade to a titan once you have any package that is less expensive.
>>127990818
So I should get something like an Aurora or Mustang package and then I can upgrade that to a Titan for a cheaper cost than the Stalker package?
>>127990705
Get an Aurora CL package and upgrade it for the Avenger titan for 5$.
>>127991008
Just to note, not all ships have a game package though which prevents you from upgrading to the larger ships (if you decide to do so down the line). Pretty much all the one seater ships do have game packages though.
>>127991008
Just get any GAME PACKAGE that comes with a ship that is the one you want or cheaper.
>>127991008
You don't save money by doing anything, you can just always upgrade for exactly the price difference (but not downgrade)
>>127991196
>>127991329
But what about the better hangar, extra money and insurance that comes with the Stalker? I'd need to buy all that separately, wouldn't I?
I don't understand why they don't just have 1 package for every ship and you can select which variant you want with a corresponding price change.
I also don't understand why the specialised Stalker is the base model of the Avenger and not the all purpose Titan.
>>127991682
Otherwise just get the Avenger Stalker and remove the cells onceifit's possible.
>>127991682
You get whatever hangar is associated with your ship, and all hangars cheaper than that by default. You get all the other stuff as well when you do a ship upgrade, don't worry about it.
>>127991823
No way Jose, I'm not buying it if I might not be able to change it!
>all those terminals for crew use
God damn man, its scary that there is SHITTONS of mechanics to be implemented. I really hope we get to fiddle with them near autumn.
>>127991953
Of course you can change it, the cells are just a module slapped in the cargo bay. You'll be able to swap them around at some point when modules are implemented in the holotable.
>>127989702
Stick with the basic game package. You'll be able to earn it in-game.
>>127970392
I have shit taste
>>127992012
Does it worry anyone else that stations like shielding will be completely useless unless they are also paired with some sort of view like the pilot has of WTF is going on around the ship? Like at the moment all crew stations just have a view of a contextless control panel.
>>127989702
The Avenger rework is already done, they didn't update the stats page yet.
In fact, you should ignore the entirety of the stats page. It's wrong anyway.
>>127992237
And getting an expensive ship just makes it more likely to piss you off when it gets fucked up*
*superhornets are immune to this
>>127989883:^)
>>127992376
>buy Phoenix or 890 Jump with real money
>lose it to a bunch of Aurora LN
>cry on the forums
The Beta days will be glorious.
>>127992827
I remember retards saying the same thing about Javelins and I still don't believe it.
>>127992992
Isn't the Javelin just some huge metal box without any guns, shields or systems on it when you buy one?
>>127993057
The Idris maybe, I'm not sure about the Javelin.
>>127993229
They said that the Javelin comes without the turrets and guns.
>>127993306
What the fuck are the whales who bought one of these even planning to do with it? Like literally, what fucking purpose?
>>127993306
Did they get rid of the stupid "the sides are modular!" feature?
>>127993678
I remember reading about one whale buying it because it was going to be quicker to have a Javelin released than a Merchantman for the same cargo capacity.
>>127993798
Why isn't the big turret on top of the command deck instead of being an asymmetrical piece of junk?
>>127993798
I highly doubt they'll take out something which is kind of its selling point entirely
Have they ever said how large the Hangar Bay is supposed to be? Like how many ships can it hold in comparison to the post-frigate Idris?
>>127993678
Rent it to Orgs.
>>127993926
Last info was a single medium ship, but they might have changed that. If you really want to you can watch the Javelin part of the holiday stream again, maybe they showed the hangar.
>>127993926
One redeemer.
>>127993920
That would probably look weird, having the turret on top of the command deck where all the soft humans are.
>>127994118
Huh, never realized the Hull E was that big
Have they said anything on making an actual corvette? I want to see if they give it to another manufacturer other than Aegis/Anvil/RSI
>>127994156
it looks weirder to me to have the main turret behind the command post. It doesn't obey the rule of cool, how are you supposed to see your shots leave the barrel to then crash on Furry scum if the turret is behind you?
>>127994287
They are doing an unnamed Corvette, it would be a Carrack/890 sized ship with some anti capital ship guns.
>>127994118
It's easy to forget just how fucking huge the Bengal is.
>>127994407
The old corvette Idris was a little larger than that, think more around the size of the Reclaimer.
>>127994438
Although when you're flying past it, it doesn't seem that large since it takes like 2-3 seconds to fly past
>>127994617
Perspective is weird like that, everything seems small in Star Citizen til you get close.
How big is Port Olisar, for instance, in comparison to the Retribution?
>>127994702
The best example was the old size chart with the terraforming beam compared to the Bengal.
>>127994549
I find it funny how the old Idris could barely fit a single hornet in the hangar width wise and now it can fit two side by side hornets with wings folded. Foundry 42 is the studio we need.
>>127994617
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr-03jhw9XI#t=02m15s
This is what I mean, although the video is quite old
>>127970392
Waiting for Tali launch on live so I can trade one for a Tali
>>127995105
Old bagel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0hQMBwi8YI
>>127970823
+1
Aurora MR -> LX -> Avenger Titan
Might CCU to a Herald if it winds up being a great scout/recon ship
If I win a big giveaway I'm melting for a Cat or Starfarer
Really look forward to being a crewman on a Starfarer
>>127994751
Right, I'm thinking we need something like that but with Port Olisar or some other station we actually can walk around.
>>127988465
10/10 reference best thing ever
3/10 meme, is the joke just that m50 is kind of fast? What of it? Needs a punchline, leaves the audience unsatisfied.
>>127996719
LN*
>>127997510
The video ends with a shitty pilot in an m50 getting slowly shot to pieces by a hornet shitter.
>>127997331
Port Olisar is supposed to be abit over 3 kilometres long, so that's two Kingships.
>>127997510
I believe I missed the punchline entirely.
If I were to change the subtitle to "super hornet motherf" would it work?
>>127998715
Buggies enabled in Port Olisar for mass vehicular homicide when?
I went from this
>>128001380
to this.
made some ~100 bucks profit doing it.
Did I do the smart thing guys? Will I regret it?
That's a reliant Tana btw.
>>128001530
Definitely. You just gained 100 dollarydoos and gained yourself fun times earning those ships you want in game. You win
>>128001530
My heart goes out for the Carrack but otherwise you're fine.
So nothing <125USD other than hornet is combat viable?
>>128002402
what.
The Avenger is very much viable.
Hell, even the Aurora LN has been in the top leader boards at one point.
>>128001891
What's with the Carrack circlejerk ITT?
Why's everyone so infatuated with it?
>>128002556
It's kaul
>>128002556
Someone started a shitty meme that the Carrack was a milf and now every desperate loser is jizzing themselves over it.
>>128002682
They what?
>>128002402
The Merlin is fierce.
>>128001380
>>128001530
Did you use leddit trades? I feel like trashing some of mine.
>>128002556
As a spaceship design and concept I think it's neat, even though all the friendless loners that own one are delusional.
>>128002556
It's probably the nicest looking multicrew ship aesthetically, and it is exactly the same size and basic design as the Bebop. It's the nearest thing that captures that kind of aesthetic of what people think a spaceship that explores the galaxy should be like.
>>128002556
because it is literally voyager
![872-bebop03[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/hQfIZsJ.jpg "872-bebop03[1].jpg")
>>128004204
It's LITERALLY the Bebop.
>>128004295
Fuck.
>>128004295
Except it looks nothing like the Bebop?
>>128004606
Cover a Carrack in thick brown armour and they are the same.
>>128004805
Maybe if you're fucking high, half blind and squint a little.
The only thing they have in common is that they have big nacelles on the side. Do the Freelancer and the Cutlass look like the Bebop too?
>>128004951
And the deck on the top with the door, and the overall shape and size.
Meanwhile it could hardly look LESS like Voyager
>>128005313
But the bridge is at the front of the ship and not high in the middle? What do you mean deck and door on the top, there's nothing on the top of the ship apart from a hangar door which is on the floor and not at 90 degrees from it like on the Bebop.
And the shape isn't even similar what are you fucking smoking?
How can you even know they're a similar size too?
>>128005313
>>128004295
>You will never make a sea landing on your carrack on some ocean world and fish off the comfy as fuck deck while your waifu sunbathes
![F9mWNvQ[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/yxCOyh6.jpg "F9mWNvQ[1].jpg")
>>128005654
Actually The Bebop is a bit larger, but other than that its the same overall form. You name me a single other ship that has deck you can walk around on the top with a door like both the Carrack and the Bebop have? The only difference is that door is also the hangar door with Bebop whereas the Carrack has that on the top deck floor.
>>128005792
Have you not seen Pupil to Planet and their plans for collectable fish, retard?
>>128006137
>it has a top deck (which doesn't even share the same function and is barely big enough to qualify as a deck)
>ITS L I T E R A L L Y THE SAME
>informal usage doesn't exist please rape my face
>game is buggy alpha
>LIVE/PTU
>>128006851
Honestly? Because the people playing and testing are crybabies who throw a fit every time the game crashes or shows instability.
They have to separate it into PTU and Live so they can give the PTU builds the "unstable piece of shit" disclaimer so the person playing it doesnt mutate into derek smart after the first ctd.
2.1d is actually pretty stable. I'm getting 30 FPS regularly now.
Would the validity of Ted Cruz's ability to become president only need to take place after election, and if so, what would happen if the Supreme Court denies to verify the wording?
To my knowledge they can just leave it be without doing anything
>>128006851
Because they wanted to let people have a somewhat stable 2.0 and a less stable 2.1 over the holidays.
In general, to allow actual testing of features on the PTU build, and have people playing on the live build.
Is this actually hard to understand, or were you just pretending to be retarded?
>>128008056
>In general, to allow actual testing of features on the PTU build, and have people playing on the live build.
There is only testing atm, nothing has real meaning and both are extremely buggy
The relative stability of the two instances doesn't warrant a split
>>128007935
>era of white guilt/the current yearing
>62% white
Clinton will win
>>128004295
nah, the bebop would be a starfarer that's been converted into a mini carrier.
>>128008973
I disagree. Yes, most of the social issues of today stem from that core epidemic, but the popularity of dissenting sentiments are rising just as fast with the proofs of the end results.
With moderates now being open to anti-immigrant ideals, I feel it's now apparent that the problem wasn't that everyone was simply self-cucking, but that the non-vocal majority had no benefit on opposing these toxic ideals.
This is the core reason why Trump will win.
>>128008712
>at this moment
That is why I said 'in general'. As in, at all other times than now, shortly after the holidays.
At this moment, it is because they wanted to let people have a somewhat stable 2.0 and a less stable 2.1 with new shit over the holidays.
Is that so hard to understand, or are you still pretending to be retarded?
We know you posted your hangar /scg/ but what will be that endgame ship you're set to get ingame after countless hours of grind.Pic related
>>128009892
>somewhat stable
Doesn't warrant a split though, very sorry
>>128010157
Then why don't you head over to RSI and tell the people there about your concern over the split between 2.0 and 2.1 on the PTU, I'm sure they'll be happy to hear all about it.
>>128010641
ok thanks
>>128009974
>endgame
I'm going to be smuggling space crack in my connie with my tevarin copilot. Stacking my cargohold with fat stacks of UEE credits.
There is no endgame. except for the one in SQ42 when you make some big play against the Vanduul and halt their advance.
>>128009974
Vanduul carrier.
>>128010779
>There is no endgame
Indeed, but you still halt your progress somewhere, follow your dream like this anon >>128011162
>>128011314
When my drug cartel is galaxy spanning and there is a joint task force between the Xian and UEE to take me down, that'll be my end game.
>>128009195
The Starfarer is really more like Serenity if we are going down that route. The Carrack even has a snub fighter.
>>128006614
But they do share exactly the same function (as something to walk around and launch ships off).
> and is barely big enough to qualify as a deck)
Oh you are literally retarded, why didn't you just say?
For the people that kept insisting they just changed the loadout and not the ship's mounts, the Freelancer officially has S3 hard-points on the turrets. Still handles too similarly to the larger and better in every way Constellation to justify it's tiny cargo hold. Still hasn't had the view adjusted.
>>128009974
I genuinely don't want to own any of the larger ships. I'd be happy just flying some reworked version of the Cutlass Blue that's not total ass and doing high risk smuggling runs.
>>128006138
>>128008056
>>128009892
>>128012273
I feel like you have some beef with the disabled for some reason
>>128012273
>you are literally retarded
Funny coming from the blind guy.
>>128009974
Most likely a Constellation exploring new systems and finding hidden artifacts while lurking in abandoned space stations facing off alien horrors.
I'm a System Shock and Alien Isolation fanboy
>>128016214
Blue a QT
some sort of xian cargo ship used in S42.
though I assume it's suppose to fly vertically instead of how it's positioned in the images
http://imgur.com/a/huLHT
So
Have they said anything about when to release 3.0?
Late summer? Christmas? Late 2017?
>>128015558
Hopefully they look like disgusting aliens.
>>128016616
Somewhat less ugly now but that might be because the picture isn't yellow
>>128016214
I have a collar very similar to that one.
Also it's huge
>>127975715
>peaks
fucking trolls
>>127975882
>never leave
No, I'm sure they'll stuff his fat carcass and mount him in chris' office when he's dead. (hopefully soon)
>>128017556
Jesus
>>127987785
Might be the LODs. At the moment they're just auto generated by cryengine or maya or whatever and the result is predictably awful
>>127991252
>not all ships have a game package though which prevents you from upgrading to the larger ships
that's wrong though.
You can upgrade to anything from anything, as long as what you're upgrading to is available and costs the same or more.
>>128018496
I think what he was trying to say was that you can't upgrade to a gamepackage from a ship that doesn't have one.
>>127970392
Support bitch reporting in
>>128006842
millenials gents
>>128009974
I already own a reclaimer but once I've made enough money I want to turn it into a pirate flagship
>>128019252
oh right
>>128019737
>Reclaimer
>Pirate Flagship
Good luck with that
>>128006614
I'm with this guy, people that share opinions similar to >>128006137 are retarded, and Cowboy Bebop was a shit series anyway in which every god-damned episode starts in a fucking bar.
It's nothing like the Bebop, except maybe size. We will see more utility out of the Carrack than an overrated sci-fi anime's shipunless you're talking about LoGH, mother fuckers.
>>128023321
And you win the award for being a special kind of retarded, the "hurr durr all that matters is how much I personally like a series" type. So congrats for that.
>>128012626
>freelancer isn't allowed to be inferior to a ship that cost 100 dollars more, shares its multirole function, and costs more in-universe
I'm so glad you retards voluntarily confine yourselves to places like /scg/ where no dev will ever read your shitty opinions.
>>128023321
Sit down, have a drink and calm down
>>128023321
The show is hella overrated but has fucking 10/10 ship design. The Bebop is pretty similar to the Carrack in some ways (the top deck thing), the overall shape and size etc but it has a very different bridge.
At least you are 100% right about LOGH. Fucking GOAT.
I've noticed that when Chris does the "10 for the Chairman" episodes, he ALWAYS uses words like "maybe, could, perhaps" in front of all statements that he makes about features.
It's almost like they don't have an actual plan and he just says whatever he wants in order to appease the question.
>>128028369
Well it's more that 90% of the questions are "Hey will this cool feature I made up be in it?" and he doesn't want to outright say its a terrible idea for the bad ones, or guarantee that the good ones will be in, so he goes for the diplomatic response.
>>128028367
OK, one punch man.
>>128028369
10ftC is just Chris avoiding the question as much as possible, I stopped watching a long time ago because there was a lot of repeat questions and that goon Beer kept appearing.
>>128028681
>le anime connoisseur
>>128028369
>>127781960
is 2.0.0/PTU fun? i havent played in a super long time
>>128028992
>>128029041
I don't know. I have a friend who watches that show. I'm just trying to stay relevant.I'm like 75% normie
>>128030964
Check its features, it's a babby universe, example and foundation of what's to come.
>>128031274
OPM is a weird one, the manga was super popular with /a/ and was pretty much universally liked for being slightly subversive of its genre's tropes and funny, then an anime gets made and goes MEGA FUCKING viral and mainstream and ...you can work out the rest.
>>128027704
>Its justified that the Connie handles the same as a smaller ship that holds less than half the cargo because it costs way more.
>>128028369
There are only so many ways a man can say 'we're working on it you faggots'.
>>128031829
Conniefags really are going to bawl their eyes out once the new ship weights get implemented and they can't swing around like a Hornet.
>>128033957
>le epic meme
I just watched the first episode of LoGH to see what y'all were going on about.
>24 minutes of exposition dialogue and steak eating later
I don't understand the appeal.
>>128027704
>muh real world cost = in-game cost
HORNET NIGGER ALERT
>>128035879
>>128031829
>be you
>walk into a car dealership
>"excuse me mr. salesperson, I was looking at your vehicles and two of them caught my eye. one was a used piece of shit from the early 90s that was cheap when it was new, and the other is a brand new full size pickup truck."
>"The truck is much bigger, and holds much more cargo, but doesn't handle any worse than the piece of shit. It's better in every way but costs way more. THIS ISN'T FAIR. I DEMAND YOU AND REALITY JUSTIFY YOURSELVES TO ME"
>salesperson just looks at you
>"Get the fuck out weeb faggot and take your anime reaction images with you back to reddit."
>>128033087
Everything will be able to spin around, the only thing that may change is if they have to decouple.
Everything has enough thrust all over to do high (100m/s+) speed turns, and turns take a lot more thrust than a spin.
Ships relying on armor and DPS will always be the best under CIG's claimed goals.
That means hornets & vanguards. Everything else built on gimmicks like stealth or agility are memeships
>>128037191
>Ships relying on armor and DPS will always be the best under CIG's claimed goals.
Must be why the Gladius does so well
..wait
>>128028369
It's almost like he doesn't want to commit to things because if he does then raging autistics will throw a shit fit if it's not implemented by the end of the beta phase.
>>128033087
They're already butthurt because the ship has been lowered to 155 m/s on the ptu. Even though that's basically the speed everyone expected it to be before 2.0
Not to mention, while other ships owners are bitching about not being able to fight one damn ship, conniefags keep complaining about how they can't defeat three hornets at once.
>>128038175
>conniefags keep complaining about how they can't defeat three hornets at once.
I kept telling them Chris was talking about stock F7Cs when he made this comment, but nobody listened to me.
>>128038175
I'm only sad that they keep nerfing missles over and over again.
>>128037191
Still not convinced the anti-fighter vanguard will be worth a shit. It will probably be fast but, clumsy and easy to hit. If it doesn't cripple something in an alpha strike it's toast. Seems like the torpedo boat and ewar variants will be much more viable in the long run.
>>128038559
Last mention of it we have is RtV Ep73
"they are still intending for it to be three hornets against a Connie. They’ll take lots of damage too. For a Tali, it’s three hornets, and one of those hornets is dead."
But I don't know how you can know Chris specifically meant one single loadout for an F7C.
My co-pilot and waifu
https://imgur.com/a/BIlWu
>anyone here checked this shit out?
>fucking lol @ the inflated sense self importance of this faggot
>>128040341
haha fucking wreckedanother win forkong
>>128040168
>wooden floor on a ship
>chair not bolted to floor
enjoy seeing your overpriced whore being thrown around the bridge and wooden splinters lodging in that airbrushed face when attacked.
>>128040341
Having $100 million does not make you a 'multi-million dollar company'.
>>128040341
Why doesn't he just make a new account?
Jeez
