God damn this game is good. It's basically Dark Souls 2, but without the bad parts. (soul memory and health consumables)
I was expecting a trainwreck after the travesty that was Bloodborne, but this shit is actually legit fun.
>>334454829
What exactly makes Bloodborne a "travesty?" Bloodborne is the better game at the moment. Matchmaking issues were sorted out a while ago.
>>334454829
>I was expecting a trainwreck after the travesty that was Bloodborne
post your ps4 with a timestamp
>>334454989
Combat is crap. It's yolo-better-dodge-or-die, because there's no armor and shields that let you take hits. Then all the bosses are basically damage sponges, so it makes it a chore. Then the art style is terrible. Everything is too dark and you can barely make out what you're seeing, unless you turn the brightness up high enough to wash out what colors there are and make it look like shit. Playstation 4 exclusive means shit resolution and framerate as well. And finally, I think the setting is uninteresting, but that's just me being not into gothic steampunk-y stuff, and barely worth mentioning
>>334455347
post your ps4 m8
>>334455347
Dark souls 3 is similar to Bloodborne in a lot of ways. Dodging is way more prevelant in DS3. You must have eyesight issues or a shitty tv, because I never had problems seeing anything. There were also torches for a reason man...
Shitty bait
Check my repeating digits
>>334455091
>>334455512
Bought the fucker just for BB. Now I never touch it because it has no good games
>>334456071
good, you may now proceed with your shitposting
>>334456071
nice dude
>>334455347
>I think the setting is uninteresting
>as opposed to medieval zombies
>>334456071
That a WiiU on the left?
>>334456493
I barely play that piece of shit either
>travesty that was bloodborne
stopped reading, get better bait
>>334454829
>travesty that was Bloodborne
(You)
