No Man's Sky?
More like
NO ONE WILL BUY LOL
>>345410304
lol
This post has been procedurally generated 1234487485785475878458578784 times.
Rolf that was so clever bro!
>>345410304
I bought it.
>>345410304
Give me the money and I'll buy it, post proof, and give weekly screenshot updates.
>>345410304
Never understood the meme of hating this game
Theres billions of planets to explore
with literally anything, ANYTHING to do
every planet is different
it would take billions of years to explore all of them
when you discover something, you are most likely the FIRST person to discover it
I for one am so excited
>>345415404
If you arent having some sort of deja vu after writing that, then you are probably too young to remember Spore. That game is the reason we hate this other game, we dont want to see the youngsters go through the same disappointment we went.
>>345415404
But there's nothing interesting to find, and no gameplay anywhere.
NU
>>345410304
More like
No Man's Hyped
ROFL
>>345415404
>anything to do
I am a bit out of the stream with no man's sky, so would you kindly elaborate on what exactly is the player able to do while exploring the vastness of space for billions of years?
>>345415404
Yes and don't forget the game has 18 BILLION TRILLION planets
Also there's definitely multiplayer even though you probably will never encounter itplease don't notice there's no multiplayer
>>345410304
Loads of normalfags and kids will buy it, but it will quickly be forgotten due to its mediocrity and unfulfilled promises.
>the hate on NMS has been reduced to namecalling
NU MALES SKY LOL
It's a pretty good sign. Usually means that /v/ can find very few things to actively hate it on, and then resort to lower levels of rhetoric.
>>345416374
ANYTHING
N
Y
T
H
I
N
G
>>345415404
>with literally anything, ANYTHING to do
>every planet is different
Why are people falling for this so fucking hard?
Can you climb a tree? No. Can you do a backflip? No. Can you fuck one of the animals? No
>duuurrrr but why would you want to do those things
Literally the only answer people will give you when you point out the countless things you CANNOT do.
And every planet is not fucking different. They are all VERY similar, with slight differences between each. God you people are so fucking dumb.
Because I already got tricked by Spore and Elite Dangerous and so far they have shown very little gameplay
/v/ just can't handle people having fun
inb4 "b-b-b-b-but how can you find any of this FUN!?"
Fun is subjective. If you don't like it, just stop caring. You guys are no better than the feminists who try to change games to be more pandering.
>>345416896
>Can you climb a tree? No. Can you do a backflip? No. Can you fuck one of the animals? No
Just go to one of the planets where they developed a better version of NMS and play that. It's not complicated.
>>345416845
Since I'm nice and chill, I'll ask again.
>elaborate on what exactly is the player able to do while exploring the vastness of space for billions of years?
I realize by now reading comprehension comes hard for your like, but please do try
>>345417252
you can go to the planet but they forgot to implement letting you play a game
Even if you like the concept, why would you preorder a game like this?
The fears of it being unrewarding and repetitive are very real, so why not wait literally one day?
>>345417252
I am the person you were replying to, and lol.
>>345417291
I THINK he was being sarcastic anon.
And welcome to /v/.
>>345415404
>anything, ANYTHING
kek
Nice checklist of shill points though.
What this should have been is a casual friendly Star Citizen. No multiplayer means people will be done with this game within a week though.
>>345418037
>a week
B-b-but muh billions of years...
Don't people want to see every permutation and combination of our variable sliders?
>shitposters actively ignore proper responses and only reply to other shitposts
the definition of a cancerous circlejerk
/v/ have stooped so low
>>345418460
it's a shitfest because this game has literally no concrete selling points
that said I am here for the shitposting, there's nothing to discuss except the ridiculous amount of hype for a game that most people won't play for more than 20 minutes
>$60 for a RNG wallpaper simulator
>normies will go full damage control to defend their purchase
It's the Witness all over again.
Game costs $63CAD, fuck that.
>>345418651
>>345418735
I don't get it. I only recently became interested in NMS, and through some research I've found several selling points that points to a game that can be played for a long time.
I mean, just take a look at this: https://repo.nmsdb.info/
>>345418735
>not using cropped version to remove gook face
>>345418945
literally my first click
>>345419025
gookface is a cute
>>345416475
Zero fucking content in your post, why respond?
>>345418945
>Most planets will not have life
>It is estimated that 90% of planets will not have any form of life on them at all
>Of the 10% of planets that have life, 90% of those will be boring and primitive
kek
>1% of planets are interesting.
>>345419181
Yes, and? Base building is irrelevant in a game that's all about being constantly on the move.
>>345419181
degenerate.
I'm buying it because I like space and isolation
>>345419326
>constantly on the move
PRESS FOREWARD TO MOVE
CLICK AND CONFIRM TO MOVE INSTANTLY
WOW SUCH A REWARDING EXPERIENCE
I AM MESMERIZED BY THIS SPACE SHIP MECHANIC
>>345410304
>not no man's buy
At least shitpost correctly
>>345419642
what?
>>345419743
space travel in nms is shit
>>345410304
Wrong, i'll probably buy it when it goes down to 10$ or (probably) less.
Puddle deep, water planet wide content is for plebs and normies.
>>345419816
how so?
>>345419310
b-b-but explore for resources
>Planets will generally only have one type of resource on them.
You can't make this shit up.
>>345419864
I just explained it you fuck, watch the trailers if you want to see it.
>>345419642
>goal of the game is to make a fast ship to reach the center of the galaxy
>wants to make a stationary base
are you fucking retarded
>>345419998
>CLICK AND CONFIRM TO MOVE INSTANTLY
I have no seen this
>>345420069
you can't go manually between systems so yeah instant travel between them
I suppose you'll have to do some scanning or researching to move instantly in an unknown system though
>>345420182
>you can't go manually between systems
Yes you can. It just takes a very, very, VERY long time. Hence why you need hyperspeed. Keep in mind that every jump will require ridiculous amounts of fuel.
>>345420279
>It just takes a very, very, VERY long time
you mean just like you probably will never encounter another player?
yeah 10^-1000 isn't zero but it might as well be
>>345420465
So you get proven wrong and proceed to bring up something completely different?
Fucking retard.
>>345420279
That's not what I've seen. In the gameplay videos I watched you use a galactic map to select the next star system you want to visit, but there's no real-time travel between them.
>>345420465
>complains of a realistic simulation of interstellar distances
grasping at straws m8
>>345420743
Because that's the default way to travel between solar systems. In theory, you can aim your ship at a star and just cruise ahead at a regular speed. After a decade or two you'll actually hit it.
Buy my game instead
>>345420590
>>345420762
you're both retarded for misunderstanding me
he said "yes you can do it but it would take a very long time"
as in you don't meet a planet in hours or more of travel
as in you won't do that because holding the throttle button for 8 hours doesn't seem like much fun
Should've been No Man's Buy
>>345420906
You're still a retard for comparing statistical probability to the time required to achieve a distance of several light years through a constant velocity.
>>345420906
>You can't do this
>Actually yes you can.
>Well you might as well not do it!
Like i said...You're a fucking retard.
>>345421041
>You're still a retard for comparing statistical probability to the time required to achieve a distance of several light years through a constant velocity.
it's an analogy
people use that sometimes in conversation
Shill Man's Cry.
>>345420861
Do you have ay evidence for this?
Seems to me that would add unnecessary complexity to programming the game for a feature that would literally never be used. You wouldn't go through the trouble if there wasn't some way of going fast enough to successfully travel that distance in real-time and a reason to do so over using the fast travel.
>>345421097
Yes, but an analogy usually have a gram of comparative content. Yours doesn't.
>>345421061
so you really are telling me you will instead of using the fast travel
>point your ship towards the nearest star
>travel at max speed for 25 hours
>realize it's taking too long
>point your ship in the reverse direction
>travel for 25 more hours because you're retarded
a feature that you don't use is essentially the same from a feature you will never use
Do you think someone will make a mod like some kind of base register that allows to to got other player's coordinates?
>>345421223
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-uMFHoF8VA
He says it somewhere around the halfway mark in this video.
>>345421241
>a feature that you don't use is essentially the same as a feature that doesn't exit
meant to say that
Unfortunately it will probably sell because the vidya """journalists"""" have shilled it to hell and back so it has a lot of artificial hype. People are actually falling for the FIVE BILLION YEARS WORTH OF CONTENT meme.
>>345421241
>fast travel
IT'S FUCKING HYPERSPACE TRAVEL.
You know, bending space to move you a long distance instantaneously? It's an actual theorized way of transportation, and not just "click on an already discovered location to watch a load screen and be there after some ingame time has passed".
>>345421419
what's the difference though?
has it even been shown?
maybe it is just a loading screen
>>345421295
was meant for
>>345421178
>>345421276
there will probably a website to track stuff like that
it would easy since it will be the same universe for everyone
>>345421493
>what's the difference though?
One is scientifically viable, and necessary for interstellar travel. Another is a cheap gimmick for lazy players.
>has it even been shown?
Yes, in one of the gameplay videos. Don't ask me to pinpoint it.
>maybe it is just a loading screen
Already confirmed that there will be no loading screens when you're actually in-game. Everything is generated on the spot.
>>345421419
How is watching your ship zip through a bunch of squiggly lights effectively different from a loading screen?
>>345414401
op's name is Rolf?
>>345421726
Kinda like how Rimworld is nicer to play than barebones Dwarf Fortress. It's all about the presentation and immersion.
>>345417858
It's fine since I was being sarcastic as well.
My point, however obscured by my wording, is that in NMS there is literally nothing to do at all. You can go from planet to planet, contemplate, probably even shoot things (yes? I haven't paid attention) and stuff. But "anything" actually does mean a lot more than that.
Since I'm a diehard fan of fallout (the good ones), I'll base my argument on comparison NMS' in-game possibilities to F2 (1998) simply because I see it as a game with freedom done right. One of the very few
Can you create your character to be a brainless retard who can't speak anything but hurr durr? A genious genious scientist who fixes and changes every tech he encounters to work for him? A sly sexy beast who's too weak to fight and seduces everybody instead? A hexed weirdo who comes through any pickle by a sheer luck because everybody around him just blow themselves up trying to kill you?
Can you become a famous boxer?
Can you become a porn star? Or fail at becoming one, settling for sucking a dick for coppers?
Can you become a respectable gangster? A sheriff? A caravan security guard? A whore? A meth manufacturer and dealer? A slaver? A ranger fighting slavers? A smuggler? A drug addict who can't put together two sentences because of horrific withdrawals?
Can you purge every living being you encounter with flamethrower, including animals and children? Can you break one's legs with a crowbar and then watch them crawl away from you while you throw rocks at them for fun? Or the opposite - never shoot a gun or hit anyone once?
I could go on for a long time with this, but the most important thing: can you do all mentioned above and still beat the game?
>>345420061
>An open world sandbox game doesn't allow you to play how you like, or have any game mechanics other than flying.
What's the point of having billions of planets when you can't settle down and create a little world for yourself?
What's the point if you can't be a little creative with the places you visit?
It just seems counter-intuitive to create billions of locations and having only one of those locations matter.
And then at the center, there's just probably going to be some 2deep4u bullshit saying something about how our restless ventures towards one absolute goal mean nothing, and how those that carve out a home for their-selves are more happy in the end.
>>345421618
Not same anon but
>One is scientifically viable, and necessary for interstellar travel. Another is a cheap gimmick for lazy players.
You are so desperate for reasons to like this game you've resorted to using the method in which one fasts travels between points as a selling point. There is absolutely no difference other than purely visual between a loading screen and a "hyperspace animation". In fact the animation could be used as a loading screen, like they do when traveling to planets in Destiny.
>"undiscovered" solar system
>DUDE TOUCH THE BEACON THAT'S ALREADY ON THE PLANET
Fuck you.
>>345421498
He says "boost out into space seamlessly" in references to traveling from the surface of a planet to the space of that particular star system, not for traveling between star systems.
>>345421938
Jesus dude, nobody is going to read that fucking wall of text. What are you doing
>>345421972
>What's the point of having billions of planets when you can't settle down and create a little world for yourself?
To visit them all.
>What's the point if you can't be a little creative with the places you visit?
You can. There are ways to modify the landscapes of a planet.
>It just seems counter-intuitive to create billions of locations and having only one of those locations matter.
That really depends on what you want from this game.
>>345422209
>You are so desperate for reasons to like this game you've resorted to using the method in which one fasts travels between points as a selling point.
No I'm fucking not. I'm pointing out to one retard that what he calls fast travel is a necessary mechanic to allow for people to travel between the stars.
>>345422327
Any modifications you make to the planet will reset upon leaving it.
>>345410304
The first thing I am going to do is make a pirate fleet by using run and gun tactics to disrupt planetary trade routes picking up recruits along the way as we build a resistance and continually starve planets until they surrender to us unconditionally. Then I will make mutant life forms out of the population that will be like orcs in 40k which will be ground troops for invasions of other galaxies. If I find one of you faggots out there I will steal your ship and drop you off on an abandoned planet and make sure that you have a fleet of orcs to deal with as I continue my onslaught of the galaxy. Nothing will stop me.
Who hype here?
>>345422431
Nope, it'll stay there. Confirmed in this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-uMFHoF8VA AFAIR.
>>345422327
>There are ways to modify the landscapes of a planet.
and if you leave it you lose that change
>>345422497
we've been over this, you're just horribly bad at interpreting the English language
>>345422463
>picking up recruits
can you even recruit npc's?
>>345422213
>ancient monoliths teach vocabulary words for the same alien race living on same undiscovered world
I also got the feeling a planet could have 100 monoliths and they'll all just teach you "Gluup = Ass". Since it would be too convenient to learn a races entire language on the first planet you find with their monoliths.
>>345422431
>>345422515
>we've made this exploration game with a massive universe full of planets discover
>BUT CAN I HUNK DOWN ON A PLANET AND REBUILD MY BASEMENT CAVE THERE!?
>n-no, as we said it's an exploration game, so we haven't include base bui-
>WHAT A SHIT FUCKING GAME COME BACK WITH SOMETHING PROPER NEXT TIME YOU FUCKING KEKS
Want base building? Go play a different fucking game.
>>345422602
Hell yeah man you can, it's going to be so sick, there's so many possibilities.
>>345422250
I might be a little to zealous when it comes to my beloved fallout, sorry mate
tl;dr
in a game with limited world made with a limited technology back in 1998 you can do a lot more than in BILLION YEARS OF CONTENT meme game in 2016 that claims you can do anything.
Spore all over again, but in spore you could actually do stuff and have fun for like a week
>>345422705
>Go play a different fucking game.
That's the punchline to all NMS threads isn't it.
>>345422705
>Go play a different fucking game.
why would I play this one?
I never said I would.
I'm just here to shit on it.
>>345422728
>claims you can do anything
They never did this. It's Peter Hines lies that /v/ plasters onto any new game they need a reason for hating.
>>345422780
It's the punchline of all threads where people complain about features that aren't there.
>>345422814
What's it like to live your life fueled by pathetic, irrational hatred?
>>345422717
https://www.google.be/search?q=no+man%27s+sky+npc+recruitment&oq=no+man%27s+sky+npc+recruitment
I've got nothing
>>345422862
>What's it like to live your life fueled by pathetic, irrational hatred?
feels pretty good
>>345419025
>that shitty .gif
>>345422927
Watch some interviews forgot which ones.
>>345410304
If there was multiplayer, I could dig it. exploring the galaxy WITH FRIENDS would have been hyper as shit. but a AAA Space Engine? It was already boring as fuck. No thanks.
>>345422862
>They never did this. It's Peter Hines lies that /v/ plasters onto any new game they need a reason for hating
Well isn't it obvious that "you can do anything" phrase is just a manner of speaking? I've watched some of their videos where they clearly implied (even stated occasionally) the mythical "infinite possibilities", and in the context that sounded a lot like "you'll be able to do anything".
Going through some links right now, it is pretty much evident that you won't be able to do shit except for EXPLORE
Wow what a game this must be
>>345423067
>treating the dev's word in some random-ass interview as good as gold
people are going to be so disappointed in this game it's actually hillarious
>>345422327
>To visit them all.
Except it would literally impossible to do so.
>You can. There are ways to modify the landscapes of a planet.
Ya got me there, but it would get pretty pointless, from a creative perspective, if big changes are hard to pull off and/or time consuming.
>That really depends on what you want from this game
You said it yourself, to travel to the center of the universe. If that's the goal, then you won't be able to visit those billions of places.
So if you won't be able to visit a large portion of the locations, why bother even putting them in?
>>345422431
>>345422515
Large modifications are said to get saved.
Exactly what is considered a large modification and how you go about doing it is beyond me.
>>345422463
That sounds cool and all, but can you actually starve a planet? I know you can go all space pirate and increase your "wanted level", sounds fun.
I'm definitely going to go for a archaeological journey. I just hope there is more to the game world than "find the mystery at the center of the universe". If there isn't, I'm going to go space cowboy and hunt people like you. Watch your six.
>>345423153
Actually I was going par for par with my bait where I just make a random ass fan fiction tier post of shit that you will never be able to do in the game and get those sweet (you)'s so people can be that much more disappointed when they get the game and there is nothing to do.
>>345415404
Because some of us remember Spore, No Man's Sky reeks of false promises like Spore did.
>>345423262
Hell yeah man it's going to be fucking sick, hope /v/ makes a clan.
>>345415404
fuck off false flagging and samefagging you fuck
>>345423137
It's obvious until the point where people start using it as an actual argument against the game.
>>345423231
>You said it yourself, to travel to the center of the universe
That's one thing you can do. But you won't be punished if you do something completely different.
>>345423490
>if you do something completely different
like travel to the edge of the universe?
>>345422463
Anon, I severely hope you can do a fraction of what you dream, because you sound pretty top-tier and I would hate for you to get your hopes crushed.
Not to mention, that sounds cash as fuck.
What are you cunts talking about, this is a single player game only
>>345423490
What different? Fly eternally nowhere and just count the planets you named that will never be seen by another player like you would have if you aimed for center anyway?
More screenshots out, from my top secret source! Look and be amazed. Possibilities are truly endless here.
>>345423683
>>345423589
>>345423718
Like whatever the game mechanics allows you to.
What do I know. I haven't played the game.
>>345423296
Spore wasn't false promises. Spore got gutted by EA but it would have delivered otherwise.
>>345424038
>but it would have delivered otherwise
>>345423836
Wow, so you mean some planets are eye-vomit, neon green while others are eye-vomit neon red? Truly this is the greatest planetary generation algorithm ever made.
>>345424201
Those are clearly shopped, m8.
>>345424112
Peter Molyneux had nothing to do with Spore. Spore was going to be Will Wright's magnum opus.
>>345422463
Sounds like Star Citizen.
>>345424286
that's what he wants you to believe anon
>>345424201
You just can't accept anything that isn't a sepia brown CoD clone.
>>345425136
there isn't one person in this thread that can tell me what their first 8 hours in the game will be like because it would be impossible to fill that 8 hours with gameplay
>>345425323
Oh, that one is easy. Your first 8 hours will be filled with ENDLESS POSSIBILITIES. As well as next 8 hours, as well as next 300 trillion hours of your life. Rejoice!
>>345423836
HAHA, he posted it again>>345425136
>>345425485
>>345425485
but I wanted the shills to respond
maybe they're on a coffee break
>>345425485
Are they planing to expand these endless possibilities in the future or will these possibilities just remain endless?
>>345415921
>>345423296
I wish Will Wright stuck to his guns and made the game he wanted to make. It could have been great.
>>345425557
Sorry, we're only here to keep the thread in the catalogue as long as possible.
>>345410304
>>345425485
>>345425136
Christ, just looking at that bores me.
Shit game/10
Zero fucking content in your post, why respond?
>>345425658
Of course. Release version aims to bring countable infinite set of possibilities and rumored patch 1.1 will boost that to an uncountable infinite set of possibilities.
>It's a shitposters pretend the game is shit thread again
Kek
I don't think I ever saw a game that caused that much butthurt on /v/ since it came out
>>345425884
It did not come out yet.
Negativity the game is getting is fully justified.
>>345425963
That's even more pathetic
I guess it's summer so you have a lot of free time before school starts again
>>345426106
yet here you are
posting
wasting
>>345415404
>anything
So you can find a alien civilization and have a GTA style expirience where you steal alien cars and beat up random aliens in the street, and get profiled by alien police?
>>345423836
>plant models are identical, just different colors
wew
What if Minecraft just throws together some instagram filter mode?
It's already randomly generated.
Wouldn't that kill No mans sky?
>>345425963
>Negativity the game is getting is fully justified.
HA
Ok if you call this cuck/nu male forced meme posting "negativity" you are beyond help.
90% of the posts in these threads doesn't even make any sense.
>>345426308
They don't have to make sense. All they need is to disrupt the echo chamber with posts like >>345415404.
>>345410304
It'sgonba sell thanks to retards pre-ordering.
The concept sounds cool but I remain sceptical, randomly generated planets and aliens seem like a recipe for disaster, there's only so many planet and alien models and textures, I bet you will start seeing repeating shit only after a few planets.
>>345426458
Thoses are bait posts, I'm not surprised /v/ can't recognize them
>>345410304
a billion miles wide and 2 feet deep
>>345426286
>instagram filters
Watch out anon, your teenager is showing
>>345426561
If they are left untouched, they will contribute to illusion that NMS will be a good game that devs are so desperately trying to create.
>>345424201
>>345425537
>>345426206
Its because its multiple screens taken of the same plants from the IGN demos of which there are 3 planets
>>345410304
Moar liek no mans buy amirite, v?
Can we have a space engine thread once in a while instead of this bullshit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4ag0LPRjhA
>mfw I started this retarded joke in another thread and someone actually made a thread from it
>>345426654
But it'll be a good game anon.
You don't buy the "procedural generation is always shit" meme, do you?
>>345426842
I'll ask the exact same thing as I did for nms
what exactly do you do in this game?
it looks nicer than pastel sky at least
>>345426632
is that not what no man sky is?randomly generated Instagram filters?
Memes aside what would be the easiest way to find a player?
I'm guessing orbit a planet so you can see the horizon and travel without obstruction.
>>345426985
>what would be the easiest way to find a player
buy EVE online and go to Jita 4-4
>>345426956
No, I don't. I like procedural generation. As a complement to solid gameplay model.
It's devs attitude that gives it away. If they had something that procedural generation would complement, they'd be talking about it. Most of what they talk about is procedural generation.
>>345426968
Literally just fuck around. The only difference is that SE has the best planetary generator to date, and it uses actual scientific data.
>>345415404
>every planet is different
>Theres billions of planets
They dont have billions of colors and environments to make every planet unique.
There will be 20-50 different looking planets, which means for every planet that is actually different, you will see 1000000 that look the same.
>>345415404
Even though I'm sure you've been told this a million times, I'll say it for the 1,000,001st time.
>billions of planets
None of which will have variety. They'll all have the same spawn behavior, with a few slight seed modifications. We won't see an unstable crystalline world, for example. Nor will we be able to explore a planet on fire because of a nearby sun going supernova.
>anything to do
You can technically do anything in any game, but where's the polish? I can pretend to be a pirate all I want, but the game giving me some basic tools to work off of would be nice. Thy don't even give that.
>every planet is different
in minor ways, at best.
>billions of years
Only if you take one pixel differences as "unique planets"
>when you discovr something, you are most likely the first person to discover
Then why even have online, if nobody is ever gonna run into anything that hasn't already been discovered?
>>345426968
Last time I checked Space Engine wasn't a game in the first place. You just move around the universe and observe randomly generated planets, attempting to make nice looking screenshots.
>Make thread
>Make stupid post pretending to defend game with INFINITE
>/v/ responds endlessly and I get upvotes
I love how easy it is to troll you morons.
>>345427157
>this is the 64th IP in the thread
>>345427106
all right
fair enough
I don't think I'm enough of a science geek to get much out of it.
>no base building everything you do on a planet RESETS once you leave
>just one ship class, no giant freighters or medium sized ships
>no factions to do quests for or wage war against
>>345427081
So the gameplay videos don't count?
>>345427251
>N-NO I COULDNT HAVE FALLEN FOR OPs TRAP!
Too bad sucka. I fucking love how easy it is to troll with NMS, its even easier than making 'why /v/ hate GO so much why you so fat' threads
My fucking sides
>>345427157
I'm a patrician shitposter, I can tell apart the b8 from the shills and I only try to get shills to be BTFO.
And you sir, are someone who preordered.
>>345410409
would the clock just hurry the hell up already?
>>345427307
1/3 correct. Good job anon.
>>345427359
>he doesnt like NMS
Sorry you hate FUN this game LITERALLY has infinite gameplay and youre missing out
>>345427341
You might have a very severe misunderstanding of how 4chan works.
>>345427445
>he keeps falling for it
INFINITE BAIT
>>345427106
>only difference
At least NMS has gameplay. All you do is move around in Space Engine.
>>345427436
b8
>>345427424
shill
>>345427625
>n-no, i couldnt get baited that easily!
Pfthhahahaahah, you fucking fell for it!
>>345427661
my irony goes deeper than yours anon
also I'm not retarded
>>345419280
>Zero fucking content in your post
so like the game?
>>345427307
There are at least 4 different ship classes and 4 factions
>>345416828
Underrated shillpost.
>>345427552
>NMS has gameplay
Like what? It's like minecraft where you can't even build shit.
>>345427552
Space Engine is also free and available now.
However,
NMS will be free once it pops up on +.
>>345425676
>sticking to your guns when EA is in control of your supply of bullets
You ain't gonna fire a shot, m8
>>345427975
Pretty true though. Most of the people criticizing the game are doing so on misinformation, ad hominem, or other bad reasoning. There are legitimate concerns, but they never seem to bring those up.
This post has been procedurally generated. OP is a cuck.
>>345428472
numale quq pls
Did someone say PROCEDURAL GENERATION?
>p-procedural generation guys!
>c-cucks! n-nu males!
>look I posted it again
>h-heheheheeeeh
i like finding backgrounds in elite
>>345428053
https://repo.nmsdb.info/
Okay.
I want all of you in this thread to watch this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAbrLXtr-lU
The guy literally goes over a trailer video and disects it bit by bit making wild speculations about every single detail.
These are the people that will buy this game.
Naive autists.
>>345431101
holy shit that looks so good
>>345431101
No need to even do that, just click the link in the post right above yours
>>345430364
and see how truly deluded most of these people are, I distinctly remember the same type of stuff around Spore where people were going into great detail about how deep the evolutionary systems would be.
There are people who constantly post about this here, in the same one two two spaced sentence format. The OPs of these threads all either use the header, or a picture of the developers tweet about the game going gold. It's pretty obvious why that's happening.
I worry more for the naive people who genuinely believe these kinds of things, based off of stuff that hasn't even been shown, likely discussed only in press by the same people pushing the "it'll take 5 billion years to see it all" meme. 4.9 of those billion years will be spent seeing it all over and over, but in a green that's one shade lighter.
At least Peter Molyneux had to work for years to reach a position where he could tell this many lies to naive children. These days any two bit indie hack could do it just off of shovelware like Joe Danger and some Sony money.
>>345431497
it's strange
it's like everyone just discovered the internet
>>345431497
There's autists in every game, I don't give much of a fuck about >>345431101 but the game still look sweet, and as far as I'm concerned I think I have a pretty good idea about what the game's about.
By the way, how is the repo site "deluded" ? It's literally just a compilation of the differents infos known about the game, there's no speculation and everything is sourced.
>>345431101
>>345431497
t. butt-frustrated virgins
>>345431923
>It's literally just a compilation of the differents infos known
Here's the issue; next to none of that is "known." It's what people who are paid literally to lie and exaggerate are saying to the press, which is never present in the videos they actually show of the game. To clarify: i'm not saying that the features not shown in any trailers or on-stage showings thus far DON'T exist, just that until the game actually comes out... It's Schrödinger's game feature.
Put it to you this way, in my opinion the hype that came from Spore was in some cases justified, because what was being said to the press at the time was some revolutionary stuff. The issue was on release next to none of that extra game-changing stuff was in the game. So when someone goes out to X outlet, of course X outlet wants to know about some stuff Y outlet hasn't reported yet.
This is how it always works, but for some reason, only in some cases, rather than just giving away actual features, they'll just make it up. For me that was what drove the Spore train off a cliff, because for some reason they had no leash on their own press jockeys. Doing the same type of stuff as whoever it was who tried to claim, literally, it would take billions of years to see all of NMS. Just maybe tone the bullshit down to a 6/10.
It's gonna be cube world all over again.
kek
>autistic virgins who're shilling this game to be the best thing ever
Fuck them.
>autistic virgins who're aggressively hating on the game for the sake of making it fail
Fuck them.
>laid back people who're excited for new games but can't be bothered to get their hopes up
My kind of people.
Unless you're in the latter category, kindly fuck off.
>>345432265
I see no reason why any of the features they haven't shown wouldn't be in the game, because none of them seem so impossible that they can't pull it off in 4 years.
Also please stop talking about Spore and comparing it to NMS, If NMS turns out crap, it would be for entirely different reasons than Spore.
>>345421178
>>345420743
why do you think it adds unnecessary complexity? all the star systems have co-ordinates. you have a velocity. it's extremely simple.
>>345432265
>schrodinger's cat reference in a discussion about speculation on whether a game will have a certain feature
into the trash it goes
>>345432662
>I see no reason why any of the features they haven't shown wouldn't be in the game
well there you go
>>345432819
>being a pleb
>not liking analogies
I liked it anon, good job
>>345432898
it doesn't work, and shows you don't understand the idea behind schrodinger's cat.
>>345425485
loving the pics m8, all the landscapes and colours are different every time. loving the 15 degree tilts as well. post more exclusive content I cant get enough
>>345410304
If space exploration isn't your thing, then the game obviously isn't for you.
>EVERY PLANET WILL LOOK THE SAME
Okay, and to those people I ask you to step outside and look at all the stars in the sky. Notice how they all look the same? The universe is kinda fucking huge and I'm willing to bet a lot of those stars out there, get kinda samey after number 10,000 or so and we're talking about a game with 5 billion (yes, with a B) planets.
>QUALITY OVER QUANTITY
Friendly reminder that most of us will only ever discover like, 12 planets and I can promise you they'll feel pretty custom tailored and hand crafted despite the "procederual generation". Maybe if you start exploring hundreds or thousands of planets, you'll have notice a bit of deja vu but the sad reality is, is that the universe is pretty much like that as well, so you might want to get over it.
>>345433074
it totally works and you're a roody poo
>>345425676
i did enjoy spore as a kid a lot
even now it's kinda fun, though you gotta play space stage for that
a disappointment, though, to be sure
>>345432662
>I see no reason why any of the features they haven't shown wouldn't be in the game
Your own sentence includes within it, if you look really close, why. It has something to do with what they have, or in this case haven't, displayed. There is nothing to show there. By your own logic, in 4 years, why have the actuall features shown in trailers, on stages, in exclusive previews for game sites... Been the same? Why, if this game has all of this stuff added in over the years to give it depth, would you not... Show it.
>Also please stop talking about Spore and comparing it to NMS
This is the exact same thing they did in the press, though. None of that depth was in the final product. Many people decided to blame it on EA, but more than likely Wright just was too ambitious with his ideas. He also had the know-how and funds behind him (even despite EA never wanting to do much) to do much better. This is not the case with Sean Murray.
Just as another example, I can't remember how to search through my history to find the article in question, but early on when NMS was being discussed in the press, Murray or someone similarly high up in the company was discussing how they made sure their procedural generation was top-notch. They said they had a program which actively checked clients, to ensure the optimal rate of random "new" objects in different shapes and colors than seen/generated before. This sounds good, except now they have a GoG release, which would have none of the always online connectivity enabling this "feature." Moreover, they themselves have said that they have confidence in the code behind the generation, but if that were the case, why would they need a program to run cursory checks on clients and ensure that? This is the type of stuff you have to police, someone somewhere (in the press) said something about this which ends up conflicting with their own later statements on the game. This is the same thing that went on with Spore.
>>345410304
MORE LIKE SHIVA THE DECEASED LOL
>>345415404
Ten gorillion planets to explore, with nothing, NOTHING to do. Each planet is somewhat similar and somewhat different to a planet you've seen before.
Exciting, intense, high quality game.
>>345433225
You're paranoid and looking for reasons to hate the game.
You shit on the game for not showing any features and yet if you will likely dismiss every other features they've shown if people bothered to give you gameplay videos.
>>345432819
>read from my favorite videogame newzzz site that there's going to be a cat in the box of the new [Hype] game
>buy Spore
>there's no cat in the box
>buy NMS
>there's no cat in the box
I mean, Kotaku told me there would be a cat in the box, I have no idea how this could have happened. If you want me to be honest, I just didn't wanna make another food analogy, but this one is probably just as bad now that I think about it.
>>345433276
The main idea of the game is to find upgrades and materials and shit on different planets to upgrade your ship and help build relationships that will allow you into new galaxies and shit. Diplomatic badasses, frag heroes, dedicated collectors, this game appeals to so many types of gamers it's insane.
>>345433180
>we don't know for sure if something is true
>'hurr durr schrodinger's cat!'
please, please stop pretending you've done the work to actually understand a thought experiment made to rhetorically expose problems in our understanding of quantum mechanics. it was not made for idiots like you to try to convince others to be cynical about the feature set of a videogame.
>ITT: People too young to have played Freelancer or Elite hating on a game they have no proper frame of reference to form an opinion around
Old timer here. Freelancer is the shit. Can't want for comfy trading in NMS.
>>345433417
>You shit on the game for not showing any features and yet if you will likely dismiss every other features they've shown
I'm not sure if you can't read or what, but my post literally says I only believe what I see and they aren't showing even a quarter of what is on that database. At some point you're going to have to come to terms with your own arguments, after 4 years there is no excuse to show the same stale loot and scoot feedback loop if this game has actual depth to it. At this point you're not even reading the posts you're responding to.
>mfw Wright couldn't deliver on his bullshit but people somehow think the developer of Joe Danger can because IGN told them so
>>345433465
see, this has nothing to do with schrodinger's cat, this is just about someone lying to you about there being a fucking cat in a box, not whether the complex system in the box is in one state or another dependent on a singular, random quantum event.
>>345433584
>Freelancer
Hey kid, that's cute. I think it's time to sit over at the little table now, though. We're breaking out the adult eggnog over here.
Sean here, again.
I'll ask again, what DO you guys want? We have never said the words "you can do anything"
>>345433642
>He thinks a game should show everything before releasing
>He thinks it's bad for a dev to want to let player figure shit out themselves
>He probably uses wiki extensively whenever he's playing a solo game so he can be sure he's doing it right
> after 4 years there is no excuse to show the same stale loot and scoot feedback loop
Please show me a video from 4 years ago showing this. Of course, you don't have to, you can just backpedal.
>>34543374
>this is just about someone lying to you about there being a fucking cat in a box
The analogy is shit but this isn't actually why. See in this context, given what I actually posted (rather than your simplification,) the argument made was that merely discussed features do not exist in any sense until you bear witness to them. The self described "state" of the item was implied by people lying to the press despite the item itself not existing in a form to check.
I mean, again, even my own post admits it was a shit analogy, but it wasn't fucking food, this time. Do you want food, next time? I can gladly give you an even worse one.
>>345415404
>with literally nothing, NOTHING to do
ftfy
>>345433813
>base building (even if it's just plunking down pre-made mines, factories, etc.)
>space station building
>shipbuilding
>advanced civilisations with which to trade, interact, or engage in combat
![[I just don't know anymore...].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/GJ89i71.jpg "[I just don't know anymore...].jpg")
>>345416896
Those things you want to do are only possible in an extreme super hardcore VRRPG/VRMMORPG with petabytes of data for EVERY script.
Can we make a petabyte script?
yes, but it doesn't fit anywhere.
Just wait until the year 2020 or some shit.
>mfw I will probably live to see the year 2020, 2040 and maybe 2075I swear if I can't get a female/futa cyborg body and cyberbrain I am fucking done with this shitty planet.
>>345433809
nigga I literally mentioned a game from '84 in my post.
>>345433813
fuck aliens
>>345433813
see
>>345434042
Also city planets like Coruscent. Tomb worlds. Machine consciousness races.
>>345433813
oh ffs sean
why not make your fucking space travel a bit more engaging it's fucking space travel
and let people build fucking bases
and make your planets persistent in your god damn SINGLE PLAYER game
you're a failure
i just want a star destroyer in this game
1 shot blew up an entire planet collect ressources buy a huge fleet
but it's not in this game
so it sucks
>>345433976
>He thinks a game should show everything before releasing
>He thinks it's bad for a dev to want to let player figure shit out themselves
>He probably uses wiki extensively whenever he's playing a solo game so he can be sure he's doing it right
>let me tell you what you think
Did this shitty strawman work when your single mother tried it on you? Literally nothing i've said was anything like this. The database (factually) includes features which have not been seen. Spore (factually) was marketed in the same fashion, lies and exaggeration to the press. You (factually) have failed to argue any points made in my posts.
>Please show me a video from 4 years ago showing this.
???
Your own post mentioned your trust in them and the features they claim exist was based on the fact that they've been developing this for 4 years. In this time frame, every single trailer they have shown is almost identical in terms of the depth of action portrayed. The database linked includes a ton of "features" which sound great, but for some reason aren't shown at all. However, they've discussed them, by your logic, that means they exist. Either they are already showing everything, or they aren't and some of this is a lie.
The reason people keep bringing Spore up is the same thing happened then, and it was a lie then, just like it is now. Show me a trailer with any sort of depth past the same old loot and scoot you get in minecraft clones, or come to terms with your conceptual abortion.
>>345433813
All I wanted is some sense of fucking scale, not spore level shit.
Real sized planets, proper atmospheric layer with actual seamless transaction (without that hidden load bullshit), actual orbits for moons, asteroids and comets, draw distance further than 10 fucking meters and without that terrible popping, more than one fucking biome per planet.
more like6 gb
the 'we haven't seen everything in the game so it's gonna be shit' argument that plagues these threads is such a fucking meme. so is the 'they've shown no gameplay' bullshit. we've seen shittons of gameplay. what you're saying is that you haven't seen the gameplay in enough context. there's no story. no levels. no missions. just a list of things you can do and an infinite fractal space to do them in with one overarching and vague goal and some 'lore', which i can guarantee you has a few non-procedural elements to prevent you from completely missing it. if you don't like that, tough shit, but what you've seen is gameplay. you just haven't *experienced* it yet, in context. none of the shit they've promised is in any way outlandish if you accept the fact that the procedurally generated universe works. all the other stuff is relatively trivial.
>>345415404
>when you discover something, you are most likely the FIRST person to discover it
Too bad that no one will ever see it,nor it will be an exceptional thing because BAJILLION PLANET UNIVERSE
>>345434331
>PLEASE STOP TELLING ME I'M WRONG
>I-IT DOESN'T COUNT
>The reason people keep bringing Spore up is the same thing happened then
Sound like someone wasn't around for Spore.
>>345434152
You also mentioned Freelancer first, which indicates to me you're closer to that in age than you were to Elite. I'm just happy they're making space games again though tbqh, even if they (some of them, anyway) wont have any of the usual sim depth.
>>345434332
>all i wanted is this list of outlandishly complicated and difficult to implement features
>>345434042
>>345434297
Let me repeat, this game is not about building a base. Play Minecraft for that experience.
>>345434332
Planets are fully scaled. Watch our latest EXPLORE trailer to see the scale.
>>345428472
If you actually read the thread you'd see that plenty of people brought up the issues, and were either ignored or told they were wrong, despite all evidence to the contrary.
>>345415404
>a blu goat
>go trillions light years way
>same blue goat only this has 0,00001% more hp that makes this diffferent
>45384 trillions light years away
>find green goat
>>345434484
The game does have moons and orbits and stuff, scale definitely seem bigger than Spore. One biome per planet doesn't bother me but I can understand why it would.
Popping is ass but the webm you posted is pretty old, I think it looks better in the recent videos.
No idea what you mean by "hidden load".
>>345434510
>Play Minecraft for that experience.
Ok. No comment on fleet buildin and intergalactic civilisations? Sounds like your game is pretty fucking boring then.
>>345410304
Reminder that there's a GOG version. You know what that means
>>345434510
>this game is not about building a base
would be pretty awkward if it was because you can't do it
