You have 10 seconds to explain why this won't be Game of the Decade
You can't use the following words though
>empty
>procedural
>Sony
>scam
>shallow
>gameplay
>recoloring
>goal
>multiplayer
>endgame
>boring
>>344883496
Fake and gay
It doesn't look fun. And I'm sure the wonderment of exploring planets will die off pretty quickly if that's all there is to do.
Walking Simulator: High Saturation Edition.
We had this thread yesterday
>you can't use any of those words that really describes the """""""game"""""""
ok
>>344883496
>Make an argument without using your opinion or using words I don't like
Consider suicide
What else is there in the game besides exploring planets? That would get old fast if that's all there is to do.
>you must explain why its bad but cant use any of the reasons it could be bad
I wish shitposting about this game would stop. It looks like it will be good but it's not going to revolutionize the industry.
>>344883496
You should add to that list the following phrases:
>walking simulator
>what do you actually do?
>no multiplayer
>>344883496
It's a whole lot of nothing.
Will be used as a screenshot simulator, nothing more.
>>344883496
There's nothing to do
It's the worst part of an open world and only that. The best game ever would be shit if it suddenly became open world. I can't begin to imagine how bad this will be.
>>344883496
Looks like a pretty desperate marketing or a bad choice of words.
>>344884240
this game isn't for you
>>344883496
it's going to be a lifeless and dull randomly generated game without the spark of human touch that's singleplayer only
devoid of content
you already posted this before.
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/filename/all%20other%20games%20btfo/
Reminder to hide and report these threads.
loved what little ive seen but the most i want to know is how upgrades work.
are they set values or percents? if % are they cumulative or multiplicative
wondering if any kind of upgrades will make you some OP beast
looks fun i'm definitely going to pirate it
>>344883496
It won't even come close to Breath of the Wild
There won't be much to do besides collecting resources to upgrade your ship
>>344883496
No Minecraft style building.
>>344883496
I don't need to.
You're making pretty good arguments against it yourself.
>>344885239
>>344885134
>>344884616
>>344884734
aren't these just variations of the same type? it doesn't mean every animal in the game will be this type, or even a quadruped
>>344884616
>>344884734
oh no theyre basically the same thing... kill me
where did you get this?
10 DOLLARS PER GIGABYTE
>>344883496
I can use one word.
Spore.
>>344885612
https://youtu.be/h-kifCYToAU?t=1308
>>344885572
Yeah, they're variations of quadrupeds.
>>344885756
oh, nigga
"this will be just one creature type, and there will be hundreds of creature types in the game"
im back to not being worried. still a 50% off buy for me
>>344885572
please cancel your pre-order while you can, you are going to be extremely depressed come next month
im honestly trying to save you the pain you will experience.
>>344885572
The point is that they look similar among this "Antelope" type, so they'll probably look same among the other types too.
Getting used to the variations will probably happen even faster than in spore.
>>344883496
Proteus 2.0?
>>344883496
Directionless, lack of focus
>>344883496
It has yet to explain what makes it a video game and not an interactive animal catalogue
>>344885894
considering we've only seen about five creature types in every single video shown, i doubt they're going to pull 95 new skeletons out of their ass
>>344885987
I mean it's definitely a game. Just a shitty one...
>>344885926
I didn't preorder
>>344885949
Yeah but it all depends how many archetypes there are. There could be hundreds or there could be 5. Having variations isn't inherently bad until we know how many pools are being drawn from
They've already shown everything there is to do in the game, and it's not much.
You walk agonizingly slow.
There are no alien cities.
There is little variation in the terrain.
There are no gas planets, planets with volanic activity, no aquatic planets, etc.
I'm just in it for some light, comfy space exploration every once in awhile. I'm on no hype train, I'm not expecting Narvana, the Promised Lands or the Garden of Eden of Space Exploration/Simulation/Intrigue of the Universe.
I just want something to lightly enjoy every now and again and for me, this game does that, I don't want some EVE clone or something like Scam Citizen or the other one with tons of menus.
I also don't expect anything with deep in the game. I'm buying this with the understand that it's going to be as wide as our known universe and more but as deep as a puddle in the middle of a road.
>>344886039
eh, youre probably right
but, honestly, even if all the conspiracy shit is true (no actual multiplayer, not a large variety in planets or cities, etc), i think thisll be worth $30. or less
i dont think it ever was a first day buy except for... well the types of people in this thread lol
>>344886245
Yeah I'm cool with a casual exploration game, but I still haven't seen too much from the game to impress me just yet. I'll wait until I see more of it.
>>344885756
14:40
"I would say we're quite uh... stupid"
>>344883496
Who is even the audience for this game?
A new breed of walking simulators?
>>344883496
>You can't use the following words though
I can already tell this thread is going nowhere, but fuck it, I'll indulge you.
The biggest problem that I see, which has no doubt been pointed out by hundreds of detractors already, is that I find myself wondering, "what's the point?"
Maybe naming a bunch of shit will be fun for the first couple of planets. Maybe I can get some enjoyment out of murdering some xeno-life, but really, what's the point? It's all gonna feel the same after the first couple of runs. You see, this is the problem with big, psuedo-random generation games like this one. It might look slightly different, but its just a bunch of visually distinguishing assets with no real meaningful variation. It's too much substance with not enough style, like a 4 course serving of mash potatoes.
It's too big for it's own good, give it a month and people will start seeing through the seams.
I'm not worried because now game refunds are a thing for most digital platforms. Even fucking YouTubers will outright say, "I'm probably going to refund this," after they play their 10 minutes of shitty meme games.
There might be an initial boom of popularity for this game, but it won't last long.
>>344883496
It just seems like it won't be full of rich content handcrafted by artisans. We've seen this level of hype before and since it's not coming from Microsoft or Nintendo, we can be assured disappointment. It doesn't look like there's much depth to the interactions with the world. I expect a lot of the visual content will repeat but with a shifted palette. And what exactly is the point of exploring the world. It's not like your friends can join you and after a while I don't think it can keep anyone's interest.
>>344883496
Spore has proved how a game using content generated off of an algorithm can go horribly wrong, and /v/ is determined that No Man's Sky will fall victim to the same fate Spore did.
>>344886441
I'm with you on that senpai.
>>344883496
>>shallow
>>gameplay
sick cunt
>>344883496
It's going to be shit.
>>344883496
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvXJK0gjlB8
>>344883496
I'll take a stab at this and even observe your ridiculous rules.
Ahem..
"It's shit."
>>344883496
you already explained everything that is wrong with it
i never expected a shill to be this incompetent
>>344883496
Smart consumers won't fall for it because there is a limited amount of fun to be had in the game.
>>344883496
it's single player lacks substance.
>>344886829
what in spore was created by an algorithm though? except for functions that would be in any other game. i thought all the creatures, buildings, etc were made by maxis or the community.
>>344885756
>you look up at the sky and think what's even the point of anything, we're all so small and insignificant
I think he's feeling down, guys. Buy his game to cheer him up.
>>344883496
there is literally nothing to do
>>344887345
I can't help but feel like he knows what he's doing is wrong because he's hyping up his game to levels he never intended and is lying just to sell it .
You can see how ashamed he feels
>>344886530
those people who like big ideas and get sold on hype
i.e most of the gaming community
The staff seems to be 'idea' guys too. They are probably liberal.
>>344886716
They could have added a little bare bones story to give you a purpose for fucking around, like there are ancient ruins that give you powerups that let you do fun shit like turn an entire planet into a massive dick.
But no, here's your ship, figure it out yourself cunt.
>>344883496
shenanigan
spore 2.0
>>344886829
Spore was pretty good though, its just couldn't live up to the hype they made.
The problem with the creature creator was lack of diversity, even when they added shit it still was pretty boring.
>>344887746
So people who watched the E3 trailer and decided not to keep updated on the status of the game and buy it anyway.
>>344883496
I was actually full on board with this game until I found out it wasnt multiplayer... Ive been wanting an MMO space exploration like since forever, and thought this was it. Dreams were fucking smashed to glass last week when I found out it was single player only. Wtf man...
STARBOUND 3D
>>344883496
>tell me how this game is bad however you can't use any word that would make it seem bad.
Just kill yourself already shill you make exactly the same thread every day.
>>344883496
Bad combat, repetitive environments.
>>344883496
uninspired and overused concept that is severely lacking content with no real incentive to continue playing after a short time.
>>344883496
Well gee, OP, when you've gone and provided such a convenient list of the problems with No Man's Sky, why do I need to explain anything at all?
>The entire allure of this game is to explore and name planets/aliens and upload it to multiplayer so other people can see it
> Devs claim you need gazillions of manhours before the universe will be explored
> Basically guaranteeing that no one will ever get to see another person's named planet
The multiplayer aspect is already barebones as fuck and you won't even get to experience it except by some freak occurence.
Fool me once, shame on you
Can't build not terraform. Hiking is fucking boring.
>>344883496
It's an empty, procedurally-generated Sony scam with shallow gameplay full of recolored elements rather than true variety. There's no goal, no multiplayer, and no endgame. Ultimately, it's a potentially-interesting concept with boring execution.
>>344883496
It's an empty procedural Sony scam with shallow gameplay, recolored planets, no goal or endgame, no multiplayer. Also it's boring.
huh that's actually pretty accurate
>>344883496
>Prove to me a game isn't bad
>Rule: can't use bad words to describe it
This is how you sound.
>>344888383
>Sony
What do they have to do with it.
>>344885134
autism
>>344888563
>gets BTFO
>a-autism
lmao little bitch nigga lmao
>>344888539
The shills already tried making legit discussion threads but everyone started (rightfully) shitting on it.
So now in order to keep talking about the game they need to resort to shitposting.
>>344887909
I don't really think its that so much as they get the general idea then just shutdown due to information overload and go away thinking it will be amazing and new.
They'll buy it because they'll think 'this is that amazing and new game I saw'
Then they will play it for about an hour and never play it again.
This is the majority of gamers today.
Remember that most of them are 30 year old women.
>>344888678
Is ithis some sort of reverse psychology shilling or just a meme like toddposting?
it's $60
>>344888562
I don't know; ask the OP. That was on his List of Scary Words.
>>344888650
why does this game make you so mad?
>>344888818
Yes I'm actually trying to get a real discussion going about this game we don't know anything about because the Devs refuse to reveal anything.
>>344888970
I dunno anon he doesn't look mad to me...
>>344885134
>>344885239
>>344885340
Is this shit real?
Where's it from?
>>344889015
That's a lie though.
>>344889235
Holy shit it's even in an official video?
And people are STILL hyped about it?
>>344889635
You're really looking hard for reasons to shit on this game, aren't you.
This empty, shallow, scam of a game may win game of the year, but soon people will realize that Sony has released a game with limited, boring gameplay. NMS has admittedly no goal other than to reach the center of its procedurally generated, endlessly recolored universe, without even the allure of multiplayer to keep you hooked into the endgame -- if there even is an endgame.
this kills the pc race
>>344889635
Marketing.
Once they got in their head what kind of great game it was gonna be, they're willing to overlook small things that don't match.
That's probably why the gameplay not showing much doesn't mean there's much to the game to them.
>>344889743
>looking hard
Yeah sure is hard when all the information is right there for anyone to see.
Arma 3 is more fun.
>>344889912
I'm just saying, no matter what will be posted on the game or what video you'll look at, you'll always be searching for reasons to call the game shit. Pretty dedicaced if you ask me.
>>344889857
Well... Fuck.
That is a bummer
>>344889857
>anonymouse4chan
This is reliable source and I have every reason to believe that man.
>>344889857
the fuck is 'gimp'?
>>344883496
Anything you build in any planet will be lost as soon as you leave that planet. You will never be able to feel like you've actually done something worthwhile because the planet and the game force you to forget about it and go explore another planet, where everything you do will be wiped away as soon as you leave.
>>344883496
but will it have over 200 endings?
>>344889857
This is obvious bait but if by "gimping" he means "optimizing it like shit" i wouldn't be surprised.
>>344890304
Actually, I wonder, can this be done differently? Like is it possible to save every little change everyone makes on the planets they visit and not ends up with way too much data?
Anyway, that complain is stupid, since you're not trying to set on a particular planet
>>344890304
I think the state of planets is persistent (for you anyway - not to other players)
it's not much fun after you explore for a few hours
You have 10 seconds to explain why shit isn't the best food.
You can't use the following words though
>taste
>smell
>texture
>disease
>>344890695
>it's not much fun after you explore for a few hours
Source?
>>344890551
Of course it's possible. Fucking Minecraft could do it why wouldn't this game.
The issue is probably server storage.
>>344883496
You have 10 seconds to explain why you repost this copy paste OP as a blatant marketing attempt by saying we cant describe it with what describes it and only say nice things
because Quadrilateral Cowboy is coming out in a couple weeks
It will be repetitive as fuck.
>>344890824
Yeah but Minecraft was just blocks, so it's got to be easier to store. And yes, I was talking about server storages, since the whole game is online saving everything everyone is doing on the 1% chance someone actually land on a planet already visited seems like a waste.
>>344886209
>There are no gas planets
Seriously?
Dropping down into a gas giant was one of the things that intrigued me.
>>344891025
The whole game is not online.
Things you do won't affect anyone else in any way besides them seeing the name of shit you discovered first.
>>344883496
looks like shit
>>344891025
This is also just blocks. Well, voxels, but whatever.
You would only have to actually download/upload planets when landing/leaving one so I don't think it would require that much storage.
And even if it did they could have provided more incentives to stay on any one planet for longer. Hell if it's multiplayer how fun would it be to just build 2 forts and have a war.
Nothing to do.
Once you've seen one "procedurally generated planet" you've seen them all.
Exploring is no fun if you know precisely what to expect and what you'll see.
No surprises.
No reason to care.
Can't even co-op with a friend.
you can do EVERYTHING in this game
ok, can you explain what do you mean with everything?
>false flag shilling
Why did you do this to Borderlands? Why NMS?
Choose a shittier game so its more funny. Like bad rats tier stuff.
>>344891642
You can even get bored.
IT'S HAPPENING AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!
It won't be more popular than Minecraft. It's setup for structure and there is none. People are going to be bored fast.
>>344883496
>you can't use words that would faulter the game like every other boring shitty open world game.
The reason why those arguments are popular is because they work.
>>344883496
Youve been posting this shit every day. Kindly kill yourself
>look at all this content!
It's either going to be several classes of sameyness or a fuckton of weird chaos. The amount of effort to make truly diverse procedural generation would not be wasted on a game such as this.
>>344891831
>i cum on cat it hiss
it's felt like an eternity
>>344892517
It's been 7 fucking years, man.
>>344891996
>It's setup for structure and there is none.
So, just like Minecraft?
Why hand-make interesting locations when you can just get a computer to procedurally generate limitless amounts of dull, soulless nothingless.
>>344883496
>"don't use words that I don't like"
Fuck off
No other thing that takes 5 Million years to complete is something a human would want to do.
So how is this any different?
>>344883496
>You can't use the many reasons why it's bad though
Ok.
Void of content.
Environment is randomly generated.
Man I honestly can't wait, I wann fly some god damn spaceships, once I get this game first thing I'll do is fly off to the night/day side of the planet and take off to space.
If I'm bored after 10 hours I'll drop it, wait until I forgot how reused the assets are then pick it up again, I've played Subnautica 60 hours doing practically the same thing over and over again.
>>344893917
>>first thing I'll do is fly off to the night/day side of the planet and take off to space.
>he doesn't know
>>344894086
Doesn't know what? Fairly certain you start with a shit-tier ship.
>>344890260
Like gimped, it means that sony wants to make the pc version worse and to have bad performance so people will the ps4 version which in their terms it's "superior"
>>344894182
That shit tier ship can't lift off without you grinding some copper bars to build a warpdrive.
>>344894348
I heard the warp drive is only necessary to go to another solar system.
But anyway, if it can't take off, grinding the required materials probably isn't going to take long.
>>344894182
If you pre-ordered you get a free ship. Otherwise you gotta start by gathering resorces to get your first ship.
>>344883496
>You have 10 seconds to explain why this won't be Game of the Decade
>You can't use any of the legitimate complaints that can be used against the game though
So what? Noone explored a default minecraft map either, it's just too big, even though it does have a limit.
This discussion is pointless. Here is a much more interesting question.
>>344894494
Fairly certain you're going to start with a barebones ship and you'll have to construct all the basic components like weapons, power cel, etc from scratch.
>>344883496
> yfw Planet 334734 is exactly like Planet 578828 except the grass patch in quadrant 47288 is slightly greener
>>344883496
mechanics look simplistic and get old quickly
planet generation looks limited
no longevity
:^)
>wants us to tell him why the game WILL be shit without allowing us to state the reasons why the game WILL be shit.
We get it, you think the game is the greatest of all time and dont want to here any arguments about why it will be shit.
Eat a bag of dicks
>>344895132
Name a game with a better planet generator. Id like to try it.
>>344895259
Space Engine you cockmongler.
>>344883496
No Mans Sky/Mighty No 9
Nuff' said.
>>344883496
It's an empty, procedurally generated cash-grab scam by Sony that has a shallow world with equally shallow gameplay with no clear goal and nonexistent multiplayer that will ultimately end up being extremely boring.
Fuck your rules, OP.
>>344883496
>You have 10 seconds to explain why this won't be Game of the Decade
Because this is SPORE all over again.
>game about exploring
>everything to explore is soullessly randomly generated
the very core concept of the game is inherently broken
you are gonna end up with 1% of the galaxy with actually interesting looking landscape and 99% garbage
>>344895361
I like NMS planets better though
>>344883496
There's nothing to do.
Sure is going to be fun when you're mining a random planet because you need to upgrade your bronze warp drive to an iron warpdrive and the space police comes to chase you off.
On every single fucking planet.
>>344883496
>vacant
>pseudo-random generation
>ソニー株式会社
>fraud
>superficial
>dull
>repainting
>purpose
>player interaction
>peak view
>fake and gay
>>344895361
>No animals
>No plants
>No buildings
>Textures super shitty and terrain not detailed when close up
Space Engine is great but it cant hold a candle to NMS's generator. You can't honestly believe what you said, can you?
>>344896625
You only asked for a better planet generator retard.
>>344895838
Oh god this image. The difference between these planets is negligible at best and even reinforces the whole "red grass instead of green grass, it's a different planet!", shit. Good job.
>>344889857
>95 percent are pirates (ubisoft study)
kek
>>344896728
Yeah, and Space Engine's terrain by itself isnt as good as NMS
>No caves
>No destructibility
>No overhangs or floating islands or other natural structures
>>344883496
It's minecraft with better graphics, but space flight instead of crafting. Enjoyment of these game depends on how much you enjoy flying a ship and shooting rocks.
I wish the game allowed us to purcahse/steal a giant starship, and with enough upgrades and research you could build a cannon that can wipe out entire planets -- but in doing so would aggravate the drone machines across the galaxy. Imagine being the galaxy's most wanted, constantly having to upgrade your ship to fend off the hoards.
>>344883496
Over-hyped
>/v/ literally complaining that the game doesn't hold their hand and tell them what to do
No one has liked randomly generated "infinite" content in games since people realized it just meant the same shit over and over again with miniscule edits.
Still hope the game will be good but it's not looking like it will.
>>344896772
You're oversimplifying it, you can clearly see big differences, even though some planets look samey.
>>344886530
people that would like to be able to do anything in a game?
>>344898728
>Big differences
The planets themselves are all same terrain style with some different stuff tacked on. There are no sheer cliffs, there are no massive spires, there are no gargantuan canyons or trees the size of skyscrapers. The most unique things in those images are eggs, that diamond, and skinnier eggs.
I literally dont know what the objective of the game is.
>>344883496
>$60
>indie trash
Day 1 pirate at best
>>344883496
>5 billion years to fully explore
If you shrunk me down to the size of an amoeba and put me on a dog turd it would probably take me a billion years to fully explore it
It would still all be the same shit though
>>344883496
Destiny 2: Procedurally generated boogaloo
>>344883496
>hey guys let's play terraria for 5 billion hours because the randomly generated terrain is always slightly different
anyone who pays for this game is going to get hosed, but it's the middle of summer and there's fuck all else to play on the PS4 so i'm sure it'll sell millions
>>344883496
It's an empty procedural Sony scam with shallow gameplay, recoloring, no goal, no multiplayer, no endgame, and it's boring.
I'm hoping and expecting it to be like a 4X game. If it is, then it's all I've ever wanted in a space game. If not, then yes, it will probably get boring pretty quickly. I'm taking a risk with this game and I'm well aware of that, but I want to know if they're hiding a ton about this game considering they've been pretty quiet about it. If I'm wrong, then fuck me I guess.
>>344899147
I dunno about that, they're just random screenshots taken from trailers, using arbitraries criterias like "really big trees" seem a bit weird considering the dev don't want to spoil shit for no reason.
>>344899569
>Don't want to spoil shit
>in a game with 18 quintillion planets
>>344883496
Explain why you wouldn't let this dude in your house.
You can't use the words
>he
>is
>a
>murderer
>>344899942
Might be rapist.
>tell me why this game is bad without telling me why this game is bad.
>>344899942
this person could possibly comitt harm and or death upon me
>>344899738
Well, if he shows something on video, then it's safe to assume there's variations of that. Like one ancient video had a giant worm, so it immediatly answer the question "is there giant animals in the game" by "yes", and in a game about exploration I can understand why keeping a few things secrets before release would help.
Plus it's not like he simply showed three planets and then moved, they clearly have different terrains, ecosystems, climates and there's some definitely aliens stuff thrown in, which is what most people are expecting.
>>344899942
they could just want to rape me and make me their sex slave
i'd be happy with that
>>344886209
>There are no alien cities.
how could there be? you ever played in a procedurally generated city? dorrs halfway up the walls or no door at all. shit is unplayable without the ability to destroy the environment.
procedural generation is good for fields with sparse trees, which is why i'm betting this game is going to be bland and boring as shit.
>>344900206
>Then it's safe to assume there's variations of it
What kind of fucked up logic is this? So we have to assume there's more shit than just what's been shown off, and they cannot show off any more due to fear of spoiling, despite there being 18 bazinga-illion planets in the game.
>>344900579
You're acting like they've shown 5 planets in the 4 years of development of their game, I'm just saying it makes sense that they keep some weird stuff out. I mean vidya trailers don't usually spoil the most impressive areas of a game too, what's so different about this one.
>>344883496
it's an empty, no gameplay scam with no multiplayer. there's no goal, it'll be boring within two hours, there's no endgame (if there is one it will be shallow as fuck because of Sony).
even the exploration will be stupid because the level design is just recoloring the same lame environments.
>>344883496
5 billions is a number far too high. The enviromnent eventually will get boring as any planet/stage will be basically the same with only little differencies.
They shouted too high numbers and even if this will be a good game, you'll be disappointed anyway.
>>344900965
>They've shown 5 planets
Actually, that's all they've really shown off. Aside from some of the compilation trailers that gave us images like that one and sneak peaks into the sand worm. Of the gamplay we've seen, we've seen two different green grass planets, one planet that has some water, a snow planet with jack shit on it but an empty base, another snow planet with jack shit again in which the lead dev spaghetti'd himself through an NPC interaction, and I think we saw a desert, but I don't remember that.
So yes, through all this development time this is the most we've fucking seen.
>>344900532
>doors halfway up the walls or no door at all
you're a fucking retard. it's not hard to implement some logic to say "doors need to be on the ground".
>>344901289
>Actually, that's all they've really shown off
So the 40 planets are irrelevant in your argument? How convenient.
>>344887345
>>344887715
Burn the witch, and let her burn.
For crimes untold she must learn.
They could take 5 animals, give them 2 colors each, and then randomly generate the two colors from a 256-color palette and claim 115 quattorivigintillion combinations of animals on planets; which is nearly the number of atoms in the visible universe.
Combinatorics to generate large numbers is not impressive.
>>344901413
>40 planets
Nigger I literally described to you the entirety of what we've seen in gameplay footage. Don't be a cunt.
>>344901329
>it's not hard to implement some logic
the fact that no one's done it properly in a modern game indicates that it actually is, i guess you must be so skilled at programming that you just didn't notice
>>344902683
No, it means people have their priorities in other places, like making more COD rehashes to make more money. By your logic
>Only one developer has made a modern space sim in recent years, therefore space sims are difficult to make
It's already been done before.
Still, I'm excited for it. Obviously not buying it though
>>344887095
>consumers who actually pay for ones and zeros (video games)
>smart
oh my keks
>>344887746
well there is a mentally ill woman in the dev team who thinks she's a guy so yeah
Sounds a lot like Spore's hype
It'll end up being garbage
>>344887746
uhhhhhh you do know there were 15 people making this game and not 500 right?
>>344905067
Didn't stop them from asking 60$ though.
>>344905335
fuck off cunt
>>344905554
Nice argument.
I probably will though. NMS threads are the worst.
>>344888562
they funded it
>>344906551
No actually, they only added funding for the marketing aspect/advertisement
>>344905874
They will only improve once you're gone, don't let the door hit you and see you tomorrow.
On a related subject I hope the creatures in this game can get real bigs.
>>344883496
I don't understand the appeal of this game, isn't the exploration just generated by a fractal
algorithm? This game is nothing revolutionary or special in any way.
It wont be the "game of the decade"
Why?
Because Ubisoft tried the same shit 8 years ago
>>344908218
The space age in Spore was more fleshed out than this is looking to be. I mean you could find animals that weren't based off of the exact same skeleton.
>>344884506
That's the reason why it won't be Game of the Decade, Year, Month or Week.
A large portion of the potential audience will ask that question. Will that be your answer then as well?
>>344907103
>he fell for the "only marketing!!" trick
>>344883496
There will be nothing to do.
>>344890260
It's a way to say hobbled, or intentionally restrained/held back.
>>344883496
>why this won't be Game of the Decade
Exactly because you want an Game of the Decade.
Expectation is too high.
It's the one of the thing what killed MN9.
>>344883496
It's an empty procedurally generated world with no content. The game is backed by Sony because they know a good scam when they see one. It has shallow gameplay due to there being no goal other than exploring the same recolored world over and over. The multiplayer will be boring and the game has no endgame.
the only game that been able to do randomly generated lore and other similar shit so far is dwarf fortress and I doubt the nms devs put the same amount of effort into their game
>>344888650
>lmao twice in one sentence
>>344883496
>explain why this game is bad without criticizing its most key components
its a bad game cause I fucking said so
>>344883496
>5 billion years
These figures a really unimpressive to be honest. If the total combinations of the apparently "extremely advanced" procedural generation is only enough to keep us entertained for five billion years then taking the nature of factorials into account it would suggest that there aren't actually that many variables and in practice the game will be very unvaried and repetitive despite the occasional minor change. Using the same kind of misleading mathematics we could suggest that dominos have 2.43*10^18 (20!) different pizza topping combinations. Or to put it in the words of no man's sky developers "enough pizza to keep you fed for over 2 quadrillion years" (assuming you eat 2 - 3 pizzas a day). And that's only assuming that dominos only has 20 toppings. With 21 toppings this number jumps to around 50 quadrillion years. once you understand the nature of factorials and how they calculate the "endless" combinations in procedural games you realise just how little noticeable variation there will be.
>>344883496
>You can't use the following words though
>empty
>procedural
>Sony
>scam
>shallow
>gameplay
>recoloring
>goal
>multiplayer
>endgame
>boring
The game is not created by Nintendo or Xbox. The Playstyle of this game is weak, and it has a lacksure of other features such as co-op and new game +
>>344883496
>minecraft 2.0 but not simple enough for children
yeah itll flop
WHAT THE FUCK? THESE ANIMALS ALL LOOK THE SAME! WHERE IS THE DIVERSITY?????
>>344886789
> Microsoft and Nintendo
> living up to their hype
I bet you jerk it to bill gates and are a manchild
>>344909980
#AnimalLivesMatter
>>344883496
Mediocre
>>344909980
>animals all evolved under similar earth circumstances and spread
>meanwhile you will be exploring countless alien worlds and the animals will still arr rook same
I know it's been said but I'm seriously expect Spore levels of disappointment.
Glad I'm not buying into the hype at all.
>>344909980
I mean, you can make that silly argument, but it's not like procedural generation will make anything as wild and silly as a shell that clings to shit for its entire life and is made up of 95% penis
>>344910529
i don't think it'll be that bad. consolecucks have lower standards.
this could easily be the current generation's LBP, Smash, or last of us.
