>he bought Nvidia
*motherboard bursts into flames*
>>344859074
GTX980 is enough to get 60fps though.
Yep I bought a 1080...
>>344859074
>1440p
>120fps
What the fuck is this retarded meme about?
>hanz lays down the law
>>344859074
>480
>on par with a 970
>>344859074
says nvidia at the top on my screen boyo
>gtx 10xx still hasn't proper vulcan support
And this is why nvidia cards age like milk.
Feels good to have a 980ti.
>>344859074
You are telling me I can run this bitch at 60FPS on 1080 full quality for 200 bucks with a RX480?
fukken sold!
>our new mid-level card is as powerful as our competitor's year-old mid-level card
Why is amd parading this around like it's something to be proud of?
>>344859368
It's about not being poor.
>>344859074
That's just how the companies operate.
Nvidia: Optimization and efficiency for current API meaning better performance in GPU lifecycle but bad performance down the line. Driver updates only support the most current series of cards.
AMD: Has the future in mind. While GPUs aren't as optimized or efficient as Nvidia's, they are good enough and get better over time with regular driver updates. Even older cards in the R9 2xx series are getting benefits from new drivers and the Vulkan update.
>>344859505
The year old mid level Nvidia card is the 960, not the 970.
>>344859505
because of the price.
>>344859508
No, it IS a meme. I have 100K bux at my bank and I still don't understand this fucking retarded meme. Not even 30% video games even fucking support your meme resolution/fps.
>nvidia
Stable framerate with maybe 3 fps drop
>AMD
fps frops of 20 or more
>>344859074
>boost your 4 year old cards with a 50% performance gain
>"Booo-hoo why is nobody buying our new stuff? ;_;"
AMD has only itself to blame. They should go the Nvidia route - cuck your old cards as soon as the next generation is released and force the goys to upgrade every year.
>>344859502
the 380 does 1080p/nightmare/60
What about all the other games OP? Or did AMD win because its almost on par in just ONE game?
>>344859573
> R9 2xx
Tahiti and hawaii will never die. The 7970/280x is what, 4 years old? It is still rocking 1080p. The 290x is nearly 3 years old and is now two entire tiers of performance faster than upon release.
>>344859697
You can't really blame people for buying nvidia. They're just paying more for the performance in the moment.
Sure you could have bought a 290 years ago and still be trucking along with modern cards unlike a 700 series, but everyone who owned a 7*0 has bought a 1080 or a 1070 by now while amd users are still using their ancient cards instead of paying for new ones(btw this is also why amd is going to go bankrupt).
It's like people who prefer to lease a car so they always have the latest and greatest instead of paying for a car and getting several years of use out of it.
>>344859074
That bench hasn't even AC activated. For the real bench, look here
>>344859415
>>344859697
It's more about the difference between the OpenGL and Vulcan implementation, than about Doom itself.
>>344859074
My 1080 should arrive later today. Launched DOOM in on an old GTX680 for shits and giggles and it surprisingly runs at 45-55 FPS on ultra settings at 1080p. Of course the framerate drops massively at higher resolutions, but that's to be expected from a 4 year old 2 GB card
>>344859651
>>344859761
DELETE THESE POSTS
RIGHT FUCKING NOW
NVIDIA IS FUTURE PROOF
>>344859502
Actually its on 1440p.
>>344859870
why doesn't it say the settings for the amd as well
>>344859761
> but everyone who owned a 7*0 has bought a 1080 or a 1070 by now while
Shame you have exactly zero evidence to back this up. Even if we loo kat steram's hardware survey (it is about vidya after all) most people don't own a card as fast as a 680.
>>344859926
It's from Digital Foundry, a notorious Nvidia shill outlet. It was their second bench they had to make because they forgot the set the "hyper" settings on the 970 on their first test and people called them out.
Pretty embarassing, but hey, at least 970 owners get silky smooth 14fps and a cinematic experience PS4 owners could only dream of
>>344859929
I had a 970 now I have a 1080
Please delete.
I spent all my NEETbux on a GTX 1080.
Please don't tell me I wasted my money.
>>344860091
The plural of anecdote isn't evidence.
>>344860091
t. goy
>>344860091
And that proves what exactly?
>>344859929
>>344859870
>>344859761
>>344859651
>muh tech demo
>muh vulcan
>>344859929
Warhammer doesnt have driver support for Nvidia
>>344860091
I had GTX780 and I still have it.
>>344860076
what's the game? that new mirrors edge one? i thought the hyper shit was meant for the 10 series cards
Just wait until the Nvidia a-sync driver, then you'll be sorry.
>>344859929
>two version of 960
>950
>no 380
what the fuck
>>344859074
Anyone else has the game crash after loading a level in Vulkan mode? Can't do anything unless I revert to OpenGL via config file
>>344860249
The hyper settings were made for GPUs with 4GB of Vram.
How the fuck are they getting a GTX 960 run it that well? Mine runs like garbage even at 1080p medium settings.
>>344860214
Yes it does - the game has been out quite a while before the DX12 patch was introduced.
>>344860313
Blame Ivan.
:^)
>>344860374
>Yes it does
It doesnt, it has some sort of bullshit exclusivity deal going on with AMD. There is not a single driver update to support Nvidia and Warhammer cards.
>>344860431
A-at least my company isn't going bankrupt
>>344860369
doesn't the 970 only have 3.5?
>>344860374
>380 52 fps
>960 25 fps
what, are these even real?
>>344860431
DELET THIS!!
>>344860519
>>344859074
Sadly DOOM is LITERALLY the only game that supports Vulkan
>>344860531
That's where the 1060 will take it's seat a year after release
All this tells me is that the 1080 can do this at 4K60. Good shit.
>he fell for /v/'s AMD meme
>>344860559
well i mean i guess if you use settings meant for better cards your framerates are going to be silky smooth 16fps
>tfw still on GTX 650Ti with 1Gb.
>>344860437
>And with regards to Total War: Warhammer, the new GeForce Game Ready 368.39 WHQL drivers introduce several changes ahead of a game update. For further details please stay tuned to Creative Assembly's social media channels.
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/mirrors-edge-catalyst-and-geforce-gtx-1070-game-ready-driver-released
>>344860531
The 960 gets crushed due to hilariously poor bandwidth.
>>344860650
>literally falling for the Nvidia "leaked" benches
>>344860650
It's /g/'s meme, AMD cultists are in massive damage control now that RX480 is the worst gpu ever released.
>>344859074
I don't know that you're trying to say, nvidia is compatible with Vulkan are you trying to say it is not?
>>344860671
Those fixes were entirely for SLI and didnt improve performance across the board for Nvidia uses like normal drivers updates would, and most Nvidia users are still suffering from worse than average performance and issues in stuttering. AMD shafted Nvidia on Warhammer.
>>344860243
Same. Though the only reason I haven't upgraded is because I have a shitty case and I'd have to get a new one for a higher-end card to fit.
>>344860761
He's saying Nvidia gets a shitty boost with Vulkan, and a worse boost than AMD on DX12 as well.
>>344860671
>3 more expensive nvidia cards vs amds new normie entry range card
consider me triggered
>>344860650
so what you're telling me is the 480 beats the 1060 in performance/price except for like three games?
No shit. Even the glitchy quantum break uses dx12 which is why nvidia can't handle it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zh2svARKcDM
Vulkan or dx12 doesn't matter which nvidia just can't do it well. The 1000 series will hang in there due to clocks but it ain't getting a boost
>>344859431
Its on pair wit the 980 nigga
>mfw 0.001% of games use Vulkan
Heh, you almost won there for a moment AMDpoors, Almost...
So where is the async driver Nvidia promised us nearly a year ago?
You know nvidia could decide to sell 1060 and other cards cheaper and really push AMD out of the pc gpu market.
They wont though, everyone needs amd to be there doing what it does.
>>344860965
See you in a few years.
>>344860961
MODS
DELETE THIS POST
NOW
>>344860820
oh, well that's no surprise, only the 1000 series cards have async compute, same as the PS4 and Xbone.
AMD cards have been capable of it for a while obviously
>>344860431
wheres the sticker that warns that the card destroys motherboards, lied about PCIE certification, burns houses to the ground and is weaker than the 970 in almost all tests?
>>344861072
That's what they said few years ago.
>>344861112
>the 1000 series cards have async compute
>>344860978
It's "coming soon™"
>>344860978
>maxwell
>async compute
I hope you weren't expecting them to follow through with that, they never even gave their old cards a proper WDM driver for Windows 10.
>>344861130
It literally wasn't.
Vulkan was released earlier this year dumbass.
>>344861112
Even the 1000 series gets only a tiny boost, regardless of async compute. About the same as the 900s. Just look at OP's pic and his source video.
>>344860893
Someone should be telling you youre retarded and can't read a simple chart
>>344861119
Doesn't look like a 960 to me senpai
>>344861186
THEY FUCKING DO
NVIDIA SAID SO
FUCK
>>344861301
Then where is your performance boost, eh? Eh?
>>344861186
well they do, barely, but it's there.
>>344861235
clearly they want to push gameworks over dx12 vulkan and async compute, now they have to compete.
>>344861205
b-b-but they said so!
>>344861220
I'm sure it will be a great success.
Just like Mantle was.
If the 480, a budget card, is doing this, I shudder to think how badly the 490 will demolish the 1070
>>344861370
the 480 is out of spec and dangerous to use, hopefully the 490 won't be.
>>344861119
this was due to a bad driver version
they fixed this with the newest update.
>>344861441
The problem was patched.
>>344861370
The only thing 480 is demolishing is itself.
>>344861468
without fucking with performance?
>>344861441
>the 480 is out of spec and dangerous to use
The aftermarkets have 8 pins, better cooling and amd fixed it on a software level. There is no issue anymore as badly as you want to pretend.
>>344861358
Vulkan will be huge on mobile devices.
DX12 will be king on PC.
In 2 years 90% of games will be one or the other or both.
>>344861479
if you where to read a bit more. the new update driver fixed the power usage of the pci slot.
>>344861497
By improving it.
>>344861441
Yeah see this >>344861468
It got undervolted, which actually caused some performance bump. (not Vulkan like but 1-3%+ depending on game/scenario)
>>344859074
i have a 980ti why am i supposed to regret it? definitely a better investment than a ps4, i cant even play games at 1080p anymore with all that fucking aliasing.
>>344861497
It improved the performance funnily enough.
>>344861526
>>344861454
>bad driver
So AMD is keeping up with the tradition?
That's nice too know.
I just bought a 1070 today to replace my 660.
No regrets.
>>344861567
You don't but the 480 is currently beating the 980 when it made to compete with the 960/1060 in price.
I mean the 980 cost literally the double than the 480 currently. The 980 ti is still a great card
>>344861583
Never said that the drivers where good in the first place
>>344861638
I would rather had the Fury X, but I don't think the 1070 is a bad pursache yet
>>344861542
>>344861548
>>344861568
It is most likely AMD set an aggresive voltage curve to get maximum yields. Given polaris has an enormous amount of memory for firmware (256kb iirc) just tweaking the power states to not pull from the pcie is easily done by AMD.
Plus if you tweak voltage down a card is less likely to hit its thermal or power draw limit, thus maintaining high clocks for longer.
>>344859074
Isn't this game more than 2 months old?
Surely no one's playing it anymore.
>>344861757
>i-it doesn't count!!!
>>344861638
AHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I'm a 780 but I'll wait for the 490 or vega or whatever
I guess we'll be shitting on each other sooner enough eh
Or rather I'll be shitting on you and you'll take it like the good goy you are
>>344861454
>Drivers can fix design flaws of an entire board
Looks like you have no idea about GPU's or actual circuit design in general. You cant just tell it how to draw, not when how its drawing was built into the very foundation of the card. Best they can do is weaken it so it /doesnt/ draw that much.
AMD's poo in the loo has you believing that throttling is good.
>>344861704
It's kinda funny.
When Nvidia drivers shat itself people went ape over it, but when AMD drivers shat itself people were like "Oh, that was expected."
>>344859074
>AMDkeks using ONE game utilizing a technology as a basis for shitposting
It's mantle all over again
>>344859074
>amd has shit drivers
I totally didn't know that m88
>>344861813
Turns out it wasn't a design flaw.
>>344861813
>I'm smart guise, I know everything
>still no 1060 3rd party
>still no 470 3rd party
Fuck I just want to play 60fps 1080p on a somewhat reasonable pricetfw still using a 750Ti on 1366x768
>mfw installing the nvidia async driver
>DX12 is great!
>>344861786
>>344859074
the 1080 is still on top though?
what are your implications?
>>344861860
I think Rise of The Tomb Raider is also getting Vulkan support, although it might not if "PS4 all games must look worse on PC" has any say about it.
>>344861985
DX11 comparison.
>>344861791
It's probably going to take a while for you to come back here after your motherboard melts
>>344862009
>DX12 bans multithreading
>despite being made with multithreading in mind
>>344861985
#NotaTrueDX12Game
Only true DX12 games like Ashes of the Singularity count
>>344861860
Mantle was only backed by amd who didn't have the cash to force devs to use it
If it took off we would have had good performance early on and not have been limited by shitty dx11.
Meanwhile nvidia held everything back and well as the goys. I give the 700 series users a pass since that's when shit was obviously going downhill to the 900 series. But 900+ series cucks are retarded and it's nice to see their hardware age like shit now.
Now with vulkan threatening ms, they made dx12 which also does async compute and will force it being the 400 billion dollar company they are
nvidia is barely worth 10 bil. They can't stop it. It's fucking ogre.
Besides, RANDOM FUCKING DEVS ARE ADDING VULKAN/DX12 AFTER THE GAMES RELEASED LIKE DOOM, WARHAMMER, TOMB RAIDER ETC
PLENTY MORE USE IT IN THE FUTURE
ITS FUCKING OVER. PACK IT UP YOU'RE DONE
>>344862148
That pic is pretty much what /g/ and /v/ believes. Someone shooped it to say vulkan for me the other day as well.
How kind that anon was.
>>344861985
>>344862047
So this...
is the power...
of the PC 2...
Woah...
>>344859618
Maybe you could pay someone to explain you what the term meme even means, you retarded cucklord
>>344859650
are you retarded? that image in the op says nothing about fps drops
>>344859651
>cuck your old cards as soon as the next generation is released and force the goys to upgrade every year.
w-what do you mean by this
JUST
WAIT
>>344862425
AMD cards do like to stutter in DX12 games though.
>The big showdown: Nvidia's GTX 970 versus the AMD R9 390. Again we see AMD's card stuttering to a greater extent, but both turn in a remarkable level of performance at max settings and 1080p, meaning we have to push to 1440p to show any divide.
>>344860243
I had 2 780's and have a 1070 FTW on the way to go with my G-Sync monitor.
No I'm not kidding.
Can't wait to stop getting cucked by SLI.
>AMD cards perform worse
>FUCK YOU NVIDIA GIMPWORK!!!11!!!1
>AMD cards perform better
>IT'S OVER NVIDIA IS FINISHED!!!!1!11!
>>344859074
What are the most demanding and best looking games to test my new GPU on?
>>344862557
It should be noted that in your video, the 390 is shown to have a higher average framerate.
>>344862778
The Bitcher 3, no doubt.
>>344862782
I'd rather pick slightly lower average frame rate with no stutter than higher average with stuttering.
>he makes flame threads
>for free.
Sageru Ishimoto Faggot-san
>>344859074
I'm loving the nvidia tears recently.
>>344859074
can confirm dx12 and vulkan games on my 390x stock fucking fly along at 1080p
>>344859279
That was fixed, and even then no one's motherboard broke, it was literally a hypothetical prevention
>>344862879
>RotTR
Holy fuck this game runs like shit even with memefx off
Its painful going from 70-150fps down to 30-60 again
Even DX12 new drivers and updates do nothing for me
Looks gorgeous and runs okay i guess but its not smooth and i'd much rather it was capped at 60
lets plays and reviews do not do it justice though its one of the most gorgeous games ive ever played even at 1080p with fxaa everything else maxxed
daily reminder
>>344863297
I will ask you kindly once more because you seemed to have ignored my other posts
DELETE THIS
Isn't this like the 3rd game that has Vulkan enabled?
>>344863297
480 the poorfags choice.
>>344863297
Here's the real one.
>tfw cucked by NVIDIA CUDA cores because I edit with Premiere
Oh wow.
on my 390 doom runs on max at ~80fps with vulkan.
that's great
>>344859074
>top 5 cards with best average fps are nvidia
not sure what you're trying to say here buddy
>>344859486
This. I won't need to upgrade until 1080ti comes along.
>>344863463
got a link for that test?
>>344863586
The AMD cards which are considerably cheaper are running a lot better than they were
oh this is at 1440p as well, jesus
>>344863586
>Top 5
Someone can't into basic pre-school math.
>>344863586
the benchmark in the OP is wrong, here is the real one with async enabled
>>344863645
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/9258975/fs/9249139/fs/9247799
>>344863749
>buying nvidia cards when every future API is based on Mantle
RIP in Pieces nFailia
>>344863749
>390 on vulkan that far away from a 980ti
that's actually embarrassing for nvidia
>>344863753
so to get a marginal advantage over the 480 they had to overclock it to hell and back, i wonder what temps they got with that overclock.
plus, still doesn't justify the extra money, no SLI and impossibility to be watercooled though.
>>344860658
how about a gtx550ti
>>344863753
why are results of this so unnaturally low?
here is same PC with rx480 that was OCed by 100mhz
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9157685
>>344863994
The stock one is 9% ahead of 480.
>>344864050
That's not Fire Strike Extreme.
>>344863380
Talos principle and dota2 support it as well.
>>344863994
>no SLI
Who cares? Multi-GPU performance gains are usually terrible and you're better buying a single more powerful GPU with your money
>>344860491
>Reference 480s temporarily sold out everywhere even after they had produced a shit tonne
>Every AMD shill soaking at the panties for Zen
>They get a cut of every single console made this generation and probably the Neo and Scorpio
These meme is worse than the "NINTENDO ARE FINISHED" one
>>344864050
>why are results of this so unnaturally low?
this, wtf are they so low?
how can those results be credible if none of the scores for either card make sense?
it's like that faggot ran the tests on a busted machine
>This fucking thread
Holy shit ATI faggots are so fucking pathetic
>>344863994
Why would you watercool a $250 GPU?
Besides, that only applies to the reference board.
>>344861971
>480 is more powerful and $199 (Saphire has ones for $189)
>but you're considering a 1060 that's slightly less powerful and proven to choke on DX12 at $299
>>344864220
>>344864165
>w.we don't e-e-e-even n-n-need those features!!!
>>344862009
Oh, but those gameworks cheats are A-ok, right?
>inb4 no reply
>>344864283
So you have no counterargument, then?
>>344860650
>"Leaked" Nvidia benchmarks
>>344859074
>$330 390
>beating $500 980
>tfw watercooled 390 will last me for years
>>344864190
>ATI
who
>>344862148
>>344862202
Don't bother. Nvidiots need to come up with conspiracy theories to explain why their cards underperforms the competition for almost double the price.
>>344864114
>That's not Fire Strike Extreme.
Oh, that explains that, cheerio.
>>344864236
i was actually hoping the 1060 would give the 480 a beating for less money because i don't really care about brands, i just want cheap powerful cards.
Thanks for nothing nvidia...
>>344864354
>didn't fall for the nvidia meme
It feels awesome
>>344864401
>Nvidiots need to come up with conspiracy theories to explain why their cards underperforms the competition
Pretty funny coming from the people who scream nvidia sabotage every day.
>>344864190
>Haha! If I laugh at them and post a meme it'll make their facts go away!
>>344860756
Literally thousands of high end motherboards disintegrated to ash.
Forget the 970, this thing barely manages the 960 (the best budget card ever created).
They tried fixing the PCIe issue by slowing the card down about 40%!
>>344864190
>ATI
Shhh...
>>344864507
Gotta love the denial of AMDrones
>>344860650
Source:
http://videocardz.com/62122/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-official-performance-leaked
>Of course since those values are straight from NVIDIA, not all games are included. From popular titles there’s no Doom or Hitman.
>Of course since those values are straight from NVIDIA
>Of course since those values are straight from NVIDIA
gee, i wonder what he ment by that
>>344864507
One does not exclude the other when a variable changes.
>>344859074
>all the derp settings on
glad I know how to work nvidia control panel and work my way around in game settings for the best possible fps/visuals
4gb 960 is + my i5 does everything perfect at 1080p. Not even worried my niggas
>>344864357
You know, the assholes who actually DESIGNED the shitty Radeon gpus AMD has been rebranding for eons now
>>344864318
Its a feature that exist on most cards.
Missing out a feature is always a negative anon.
And whether such feature is relevant to you individually is a matter of opinion.
>>344864438
Why are you pretending not to be an amdrone?
No one with even half a brain left would buy into anything said in that post.
>>344864236
I just want a 1060 for power efficiency.
I'll wait for aftermarket versions of them and compare it with the 470 or 480.
My shitty country charge electricity cost quite high so power efficiency comes into play.
I'm shit with computers and I don't want to buy those bloated fat-ass super powerful high-end cards, but I do need to upgrade my GPU soon.
Should I just buy the RX480 with 8GB or is this another meme card that is actually shit?
>>344864567
>denial of the people who have cards capable of DX12 and Vulkan which nvidia can't run for shit.
it's amazing, nvidia cards are outdated before they even get released.
>>344864438
If you want cheap OR power you want to stay away from nvidia, especially during this gen. As games move to DX12 the performance gap is gonna widen and AMD has DX12 cornered completely. Making mantel and basically giving it to Microsoft for free was one of the smartest business moves they ever made.
>>344864627
I can't cook eggs on a 1080 even though I could do it on a GTX 480. It's missing a feature. How horrible.
>>344864680
so, why not just use integrated GPU?
or get a notbook and steal power from coffee shops?
>>344864507
Yeah, except we have this thing called proof.
>>344864656
>you're an amdrone unless you blindly speak good things about nvidia
jesus christ, i hope you get paid for that shit
>>344864726
you can't, you need 3 way GTX480
>>344864778
Nice strawman.
How much did you get paid for that?
>>344864818
>no u
>>344864507
As somebody who's gone from one to the other and back, Nvidia bias in benchmarking comparisons is real as shit and I have no idea why. Brand loyalty is fucking retarded, I'd actually respect them more if it turned out they were getting paid good money to lie.
>>344864530
I have no idea what I'm saying: the post
>>344860756
I laughed 3.5 times
>>344864529
>Facts
Don't you mean "The Ultimate DOOM® Experience with Radeon™ Graphics"
http://www.amd.com/en-us/markets/game#
Try posting some benches from games that aren't being paid by AMD to optimize for their shit GPUs
Oh that's right you cant
>>344864726
But you can cook eggs on GTX 1080 FE!
And its a premium feature that you can get by paying $100 more than the MSRP!
Isn't it amazing?
>>344864854
>that power saving/util cycle over a few minutes
disgusting
>>344864851
Not him but hitman
>>344864968
Hitman is another AMD sponsored game.
So is Ashes.
So is Total War: Warhammer.
Isn't it funny that all the DX12 games people like to post are AMD sponsored games?
>>344864818
>literally saying no u
>>344864743
Have you ever tried gaming on an integrated graphics?
Do you think that's what budget GPUs are like, slight steps up from that?
>>344864851
>Try posting some benches from games that aren't being paid by AMD to optimize for their shit GPUs
AMD doesn't need to pay shit.
in case you haven't noticed, AMD made sure that every new API (DX12 and Vulkan) is based on their own Mantle, which means shit will be optimized for AMD cards by default.
there's no reason to buy an nvidia card unless you plan to stay in DX11 forever like those people who still use Windows XP because directx 10 is evil
>>344865034
you mean like Tomb Rider?
>>344865079
>DX12
>based on Mantle
>And what of these claims that Microsoft would have copied Mantle? There was even some claim that the documentation was mostly the same, with some screenshots of alleged documentation of both, and alleged similarities. Now that the final documentation is out, it is clear that the two are not all that similar at the API level. DX12 is still using a lightweight COM approach, where Mantle is a flat procedural approach. But most importantly, DX12 has some fundamental differences with Mantle. Such as the distinction between bundles and command lists. Mantle only has ‘command buffers’. Again, it looks like Mantle is just a simplified version, rather than Microsoft cloning Mantle.
>>344865043
You said that power is big problem, i'm giving you optimal solution here.
>>344864968
>Enter a World of Assassination. You are Agent 47, the world’s ultimate assassin. The game is designed to end you – get AMD in your arsenal and arm yourself with cutting-edge support for DirectX® 12 and the latest 4K gaming.
http://www.amd.com/en-us/markets/game/featured/hitman#
>>344864568
Don't bother >>344860650 is just gonna ignore you and pretend if never happened while pretending be isn't a drone
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-gtx-1060-performance-benchmarks-leak/#comment-2780580773
POST YFW
>>344865117
When we finally get a non-AMD sponsored DX12 game, AMD cards no longer perform that great. Isn't that surprising? RX 480 no better than GTX 970.
>>344860893
Pretty much
>>344865258
Tomb Raider has a bad Dx12 integration everyone knows it, even for Nvidia.
>>344865316
And here come the excuses. If AMD doesn't dominate, the game just sucks at DX12. If AMD dominates, DX12 is well implemented.
Apparently Hitman has well implemented DX12 according to some drones, despite it actually looking worse with DX12
see
>>344861985
>>344862047
>>344865171
here's a quote from that same blog:
>In a recent blogpost, after dealing with the nasty antics of a deluded AMD fanboy, I already discussed what we should and should not expect from AMD’s upcoming Radeon RX480.
basically you are getting your information from an nvidia's fanboy blog and using it as "proof"
well done.
well, fucking, done.
>>344865316
I'd like to point out that particular chart is old data - as of the most recent patch AMD bests its equivalent Nvidia card at the game.
See >>344859738
>>344865316
>even for Nvidia.
Why does this even matter? I thought AMDfags keep spouting that all Nvidia cards have bad DX12 integration already?
>>344861985
texture streaming issue I guess?
>>344862557
>DX12 games
I think the topic is Vulkan, not DX12, hence the bait-y >he bought Nvidia.
>>344865416
Explain your reasoning on how that line makes him a fanboy.
>>344865495
Yes.
>>344865232
hey there buddy, you're a bit late to the party >>344864568
>>344865514
Try reading the thread other than the OP.
>>344865175
Wasn't that guy, just saying it makes no sense to try game on an iGPU when he could just opt for the least power hungry card.
>>344865258
is this pre or post patch?
>>344865445
Both benchmarks are from the same day, actually.
>>344865520
>Explain your reasoning on how that line makes him a fanboy.
i don't need to explain shit, the blog is there for everyone to see, that fucker is as anti-amd as it gets, i wouldn't be surprised if you're that faggot trying to get more hits on his shitty blog.
>>344859074
Well judging by the chart its better than all the AMD cards so why wouldn't you buy nvidia?
>>344865663
It's pre async patch if that's what you're asking, not that it gave large performance increases.
>>344865258
>When we finally get a non-AMD sponsored DX12 game, AMD cards no longer perform that great.
Not since the latest patch :^)
>>344865785
Large performance increases for async, that is.
>people take benchmarks and meme games as reference
>people dont OC their cards
Consolefags everywhere.
>>344859074
This is proof of one thing: AMD makes rock solid cards but can't be fucked to make software that can actually use it properly. Once again, open source amateurs outdo salaried professionals.
>>344860961
DELETE THIS!
>>344865785
so, why are you sharing irrelevant banchmarks then?
are we going to just play a game of "find bench that supports my point the most"?
>>344865842
>Fury X loses to 980 Ti at 1080p
>narrowly wins at 1440p and 4k
What's your point here? Those numbers are in line with average overall performance of the cards. No large AMD advantage.
>>344860965
>what's Dx12?
>>344861109
Can't find the one with the nvidia hat
>>344865842
MODS
FUCKING STOP
DELETE THIS RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!
>>344865842
>glorious, saviour of the gaming async only improved performance by 5 fps.
thats not that much of an improvement desu senpai.
>>344865842
We can't let AMD keep getting away with it, bros..
How the FUCK do we stop them?
please delete this, they told me paying extra for gsync and nvidia exclusiv APIs was worth it.
>>344859074
>RX 480 worse than a R9 290 rebrand
So much for the hype.
>all these butthurt, falseflagging amd autists ITT
