A 7 and above is good you fucking shitposter, kill yourself

File: hurr.jpg (36 KB, 350x333) Image search: [Google]

36 KB, 350x333

>>343408582
>Has to pick out the ONE review that wasn't well above 8
DAMAGE CONTROL

>>343408582
>IGN

>>343408582
>If the game isn't a 9 or 10 It's bad
Normie tier retarded

>>343408738
Retard.
8 is trash
9 is decent
9,5 is good
10 is great

>Tedious dungeons
Did she get stuck at the moving dresses or something?

>>343408582
>tedious dungeons
IGN being IGN.

File: screenshot0033.jpg (418 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]

418 KB, 1920x1080

>>343409232
>>343409617
to be fair, this dungeon is shit but she probably didn't get that far

>>343408582
>scale of 1-10
>5 is the middle and therefore average
>6 above average
>6.5 at least is good
>below 5 is bad with 4 being fair and 0 being 'there's literally nothing here'
Do you not know how to count, or is this a shitposting thread?

>>343408582
>ign
A 7 is good honestly anything above a 5-6 should be decent.
Reviewers now just tend to be picky and imply only games above an 8 are playable

Are the battles random?

>>343410551
Hit the generic shadow with your sword to get a first attack

File: 1425686063250.jpg (26 KB, 318x318) Image search: [Google]

26 KB, 318x318

>>343409215
then why not just use 1-5 instead of 1-10