File: latest[1].jpg (27 KB, 512x384) Image search: [Google]

27 KB, 512x384

>>342985471
>I really wanted a WW1 FPS
>It exists
>It's on Unity

Thanks but no thanks.

>>342985615
Still better than niggerfield 1

>>342985471
I do not know.
Im not the online FPS guy anymore and while I enjoyed Heroes of the West, I played like next to no games, despite it being quite good.

>>342985615
What's wrong with unity?

>>342986909
Not him, but Interstellar Marine went from a passable looking in browser game to a fucking resource eating steam game atrocity.
Might be because of the Unity versions though

>>342985615
>>342986909
This game runs like shit. Well, I get above 60FPS but due to the frame stutter it feels like way less than that.

>>342987146
>>342987040
Oh ok I didn't know

I dont know about this game, but these same devs are responsible for this early access game called Marooners that's shaping up to be a fantastic party game.

I bought it last year.
Good game.
Runs fine at constant 60 fps these days.

If you like the older BF titles and Red Orchestra you will like this.

I hated it because of how clunky it feels and looks.
I thought I was gonna get a WWI Red Orchestra, boy was I wrong.

It's alright. The shooting is good and the people complaining about performance are fucking retarded, but I don't like how closed-off the maps are. The whole "You can't leave this very small, specific area when your team's on attack/defense" is a bummer, makes the battles feel too boring and directed.

>>342987805
It simulates the attack waves of ww1.

From what I've seen it looks basically like a WW1 version Call of Duty 2, right down to the graphics, aesthetics and gameplay. Am I right?

>>342989263
Doesn't play like CoD2