I'll just leave this here.
>>341961262
The top is from the nx, the bottom is from the Wii u
The top is bullshot, the bottom is from the Wii u.NX will be exactly the same as WiiU ;^)
>>341961262
DELET
Report, sage, hide.
>>341961262
PRESS SCREENSHOT VS 480p OVER CONTRAST STREAM SCREENSHOT
I'll just leave this here.
https://mynintendonews.com/2016/06/16/zelda-breath-of-the-wild-features-different-visuals-on-nx-but-same-experience/Even so, it won't look much better.
Top looks like shit.
Bottom looks like WiiU.
>>341961262
It's called a bullshot
At least 90% of vidya has it, and it's solely for the sake of marketing.
Shits in other industries too, like in McDonald's commercials.
>>341961262
I'll just leave this here...
>>341963969
Nice thumbnail.
>>341961789
I'm hoping this is the case but I doubt it
>>341961962
>>341961789
The top is bullshot, the bottom is from high end PC.
If you actually believed that Wii U was cabable of top when they first showed it off, I feel bad for your.
It's good to have hopes, but keep them realistic.
>>341961789
If that's true I'll wait for NX version no matter how delayed it is. But there's no way that's true, Nintendo said that difference between two versions will be minimal.
>>341963986
>>341961262
It's all about the grafix
>direct capture
>compressed low resolution image
What's the problem exactly?
>>341964301
> 1 foot draw distance
> n64 textures
I-its the f-feed I s-swear
>>341964249
Yes it is on /pc/ - graphics whore.
>>341961262
>>341963096
But it's already good, nobody gives a shit about the graphics, I wouldn't bought a WiiU if I did.
>>341964429
>>341964249
knowing is half the battle
>>341964301
>I-if only the bottom pic was higher quality, the lighting, textures, resolution, AA and draw distance would magically improve!!!
>>341963969
wrong pic
Can someone PLEASE explain to me the hype behind this game? Is it just because Zelda? Because everything I've seen so far about this game looks mediocre.
It legitimately looks like a tech demo and reeks of open world sandboxing from 2011.
I just cannot for the life of me think of anything this game dose well or why it looks like something worth playing especially when it's obvious it is a complete departure from it's roots in linear based progression, proper level design and pacing. Gone is an adventure style cohesive and adaptable story that shapes the environment and path of the game, instead what we have now is literally the open world sandbox meme and Nintendofans are praising it to high heaven.
Try name one thing this game dose well let alone something that's never been done before. You can't.
>>341961262
How retarded must you be??
Upper picture is literally more graphically intensive than E3 Witcher 3,
you would need an really beefy PC with I7 and 980ti to pull something like that.
Look at the textures on stone, its 2k texture, at least, then look at foliage range..
You cant be this naive, this is not even an bullshot, its literally an ad for the game.
And this game is for what, WiiU? Weaker version of xbox360!
Console crowd is really retarded.
I get when PC cucks get fooled, because you can do some grand stuff(photorealistic) with smart usage of hi res textures and ENB+ReShade, and you can do it on fairly old hardware.
But when you think console that was designed 16 years ago could pull this, then you are either an kid or pants on head retarded.
>>341963969
wow you embarrassed yourself pretty hard
>>341964715
It has fun movement and moment to moment gameplay, unlike 99% of open world games. It also has physics that actually equate to interactive gameplay. And it will be finished/ And your an awful shitposterd
>>341965159
>Mash the single attack button twice to kill a trash mob
>interesting moment to moment gameplay
>>341965159
>It also has physics that actually equate to interactive gameplay.
So it's a tech demo that open world sandbox games achieved in 2009. Got it.
>It has fun movement and moment to moment gameplay, unlike 99% of open world games
Literally what?
>>341964412
>>341964552
But you can't tell how detailed the distance is, how detailed the textures are and so on if the resolution is low and on top of that it is compressed. There is literally not enough info to show you all of the individual grass blades so you see green mush instead. Simple physics boys.
The game will looks great. Not as good as top prob but close
>>341961262
So is this... the power of the WiiU...?
Woah....
>>341965159
Nintendogaf is real
>>341965375
>Not as good as top prob but close
People told me "literally no one was stupid enough to believe that this pic was in-game on Wii U!" But I knew that Nintendrones EVEN NOW still believe it.
Jesus Christ.
>>341964715
I can't tell you why honestly. I guess nintendrones get excited when they finally have something to play for once that isn't splatoon.
Why are people shitposting with this anyway?
The very same area is the opening shot when you get out of the stasis room.
Are you so mad about bullshots everywhere else, Nintendo must have them by the loads to feel better?
>>341965656
People wouldn't post it nearly as much if Nintendo fanboys wouldn't try to deny it and get as mad at it as they do.
>>341965375
>prob close
That delusion is so delicious.
>>341964575
>muh sony
And the cycle continues
>>341961262
why didn't you left it there, first 1000 times you posted it?
>>341965905
>Nintendo fanboys
Where are these magical boogieman?
>>341965280
>>341965354
>>341965521
name an open world game that has actually fun gameplay and not just "wow, look at this sparse story and all this boring stuff to do"
>>341966567
In this thread, idiot.
>>341966661
>open world
>fun gameplay
Pick 1.
>>341966661
>red dead redemption
>ac black flag/rogue
>witcher 3
>>341966661
Grand Theft Auto
>>341965939
The dedication that sonypony put in screaming everywhere that they really are persecuted is a sad sight
>>341966661
Pretty much the only OW game I've enjoyed.
>>341966661
Zelda;BOTW
>>341961262
I love when shitposters start a thread with this image, makes it that muchy easier to count the OP for the fuckign retard that he is
>>341966891
>>341966960
>good game
>lol, ubishit with BOATS NOW
>literally what I described. story, big world, shit combat
>funny sandbox, boring in 10 minutes
>>341967245
>If i buzzwords hard enough, maybe somehow will pay attention to me and believe me ;_;
>>341967323
>if I can't refute anything, I'll just be as vague as possible and people will believe that I proved him wrong :^)
>>341967568
Says the guy who green text vague game descriptions 2 posts ago.
>>341967774
hey, you admitted that they describe the games :)
That lack of detail is crazy.
Looks worse than Skyrim.
>>341964575
>bottom looks more cinematic
I'll take "Jokes only retards misunderstand" for 100, Alex.
>>341961262
The first image is overly edited as fuck from the original for starters, those lighting effects certainly wouldn't happen on a Wii U. But you act as if even the Xbox 360 couldn't pull off those foliage effects. It literally cuts off by the second hill you delusional niggers.
That distance is smaller than the top of the Temple of Time to the ground in the second image shown, not to mention an area in game without long grass.
>nx
>>341961262
>second image come from a stream with bad bitrate
You still haven't learned.
>>341970291
>posting a bullshot as if it is ingame
You still haven't learnt
and I'll JUST leave this here
>>341970525
That's not a bullshot.
>>341971249
It is, fucking hell, just how stupid are Nintendo fans?
>>341961262
You have eyes and a brain OP (probably). Use them.
>>341962301
the bottom one clearly lacks grass and has flat trees, and features very low viewing distance. The contrast is the least of its problems
>>341961789
No, not really, that would take time and effort and capable hardware, which the NX won't be
Top is pre-rendered
>>341970838
WHAT COULD IT MEAN
>>341961262
How many time do we need to explain it to you before you stop ''leaving'' your shit bait every hour or so?
Is your autism that powerfull?
>>341961262
>Nintenbabbies will defend this
Worst fanbase by far
>>341971667
>he is too autistic to admit that Nintendo won E3 with 1 single game
I don't know how you can fall this low, desu
>>341972312
>he sidesteps the issue because it triggers him so much
It will be ok, Anon.
>>341961262
your butthurt is showing and im starting to like that , suffer you poor sonygger
>>341972386
What situation? The one where Zelda won E3 and you got a bunch of autist spammming shitposting thread about it in a vain attempt to regain relevancy?
>>341972741
Zelda's downgrade in visuals you purposefully dense fuck. No one ITT but you is talking about other companies E3.
>>341972312
>>341972386
fucking kids with your XY company won E3 and its totally not the one company that manufactured the console in my living room and i totally dont have to do everything to justify my purchase for fear of admitting to being wrong for once in my life
>>341972874
Only the Nintendo fanboy is talking about E3. (and now you) The thread is about Zelda's downgrade.
Top isn't even real
>>341972989
both are cgi
>>341972979
it looks worse than the previous trailer but they replaced all the graphics with interesting gameplay , im fine with that.
>>341972623
Quality post anon
Perhaps you can post less one-liner stuttering garbage and you'll get deleted less
>downgrade at E3
Color me surprised.
>>341973115
>they replaced all the graphics with interesting gameplay
the graphics are mostly off-loaded to the GPU, and Zelda is not exactly computation-heavy. So there's little reason to replace one with the other. Meanwhile money has been spent to produce the assets for the top screen, and now they're seemingly unused? That strikes me as wasteful
>>341973115
And I agree. See, why is it so hard for some people to admit when something happens? (the downgrade in this instance) Fucking hell I hate fanboys.
>>341973231
because the ubijews got a shitton of flack for their downgrade but these sonyggers keep forgetting that their downgrade happened between E3 and sale and not between last E3 and this E3
>>341973220
sounds like you are an expert in game developement for the wii u , why not make some games to increase the library?
As long as its fun im fine with it looking like shit , i would even be happy with the demo footage they showed. I even play n64 games to this day and they look shittier than that.
>all those threads showing sonyggers cinematic silky smooth experience
>Nintendo bullshots are thrown around and praised
>When game released or is playable, it looks (X, bayonetta, wonerful, zelda)
>Muh fun, it's just the stream, wii u is capable, the nx will show you
Disgusting.jpg
>>341973603
It IS actually the stream in large part in OP.
THis has been beaten to death, there are dozens of videos on youtube where you can see it's not as washed out at this dumb fuckign image.
But, every single time, the autist will repost the same god damn fuckign picture and act like we didn't fuckign explain that shit to him less than an hour ago.
>>341973758
the color is not the problem. The models are
>>341973994
You missed the point. You're meant to post a bullshot and an in game screen, not two bullshots.
>>341973849
Then post a clear example, shitpost-kun
Like, what's bad in >>341973994
example ?
>>341974518
>My little sonypony can't be this buttblasted
Is the team that made the new starfox made the only graphical programmers the have
>>341974537
good question. Looks fine to me at a glance, including and especially the foilage. Unfortunately it's on a hill. So you got nearby objects and distant objects, but nothing in the transitional zone.
>>341961262
I don't even see why you care. Zelda has -never- been about graphics and this time around it's even more apparent they've focused on gameplay rather than graphics, which is a good thing.
>>341974672
>Nintendo Baby has to live in a safe zone consisting of bullshots whilst denying the only game coming to his system has been downgraded to hell
I can greentext console war bullshit too anon
>>341974865
But the only game on the system already came out, and it was actually upgraded between it's initial showing at e3 and release
>>341974993
>offline mmo worth playing
Opinion discarded
I'll just leave this here
sonyponys about Nintendo:
>nice 2002 graphics
sonyponys about PC:
>b-but graphics don't matter!!!!!
why are they such hypocrites?
>>341975139
Goalpost status : On a whole other planet
>>341974672
Who are you quoting?
>>341975496
A sonypony
>>341975181
>b-but sony
>>341975702
>b-but graphics
>>341964715
I'm hoping it'll be a good Bethesda game since Bethesda obviously will never be able to make one afger this point.
I couldn't give less shit about the franchise.
>>341964715
>it is a complete departure from it's roots in linear based progression, proper level design and pacing. Gone is an adventure style cohesive and adaptable story that shapes the environment and path of the game
Wasn't Zelda 1 pretty much an open world? You could easily visit dungeons in the wrong order, you got very little direction and linear railroading. That said, open world and a linear/controlled progression are not mutually exclusive. Games like Link's Awakening show that quite well. The game's never ever limiting you per se. The world does have obstacles though that require the right tools. As a result, the more you learn about the world, the more it opens up on you, until you're free to go absolutely everywhere, but also know exactly where you want to go
>>341975702
>muh nintendo
>>341976172
Also Dark World in Link to the Past as well as Lorule of Link between World's could be done in any order
Games didn't become linear progression till Majoras Mask even Ocarina of Time allowed some choice
Once you get Hookshot you can choose Forest Fire or Water to start, After completing forest and water you have access to Shadow and Spirit, Fire Temple can be done last because no other dungeon requires Megaton Hammer, but like 99% either go for the Spirit final or Shadow final
>>341961262
How accurate is this picture?
>>341974584
>this gets posted
>no one pays it attention
So you're all gonna shit post then? K
>>341978282
I'm pretty sure you have to do the Forest Temple first as adult Link because all other temples require the Bow and Arrow.
The order of the other 4 is up to the player though.
Kind of like how in aLttP you have to get the magic hammer first in the dark world.
>>341979865
regard of these dungeons requiring bow or hammer, can you still enter them? And figure out inside of them that you're missing tools, leave them, and go look for the tools?
>>341979971
In aLttP's case, no you can't even get to the other dark world dungeons without the hammer. Thanks to those purple pillars on the overworld that keep you in the area of the first palace.
>>341981225
fair enough, in that case it's more an overworld limitation than within the dungeon (intentional, of course, to make clear you need the item to even go there)
![skrmbillede2016-06-15sju41[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/sEy39GG.jpg "skrmbillede2016-06-15sju41[1].png")
I'll just leave this FFXV pic here
>>341982830
wow
>>341982830
pretty. The model of the flying craft is way too smooth and detailed though, inconsistent with the rest of the pic
>>341971436
People are so desperate they're actually photoshopping the bottom one. Every time it gets worse. There is clearly grass in the game.
>>341984883
I've seen the grass in screenshots where the ground is up close. Here the ground is distant, likely beyond the threshold for the grass models, which makes the flatness look more awkward. I'd be interested in a pic showing the transition from the grass-heavy front to the rolling hills in the distance, how the game handles the cut-off.
>>341984883
tinfoil
