So what's up with BF1? What's this thing with too many automatic weapons, is that a thing? Surely they wouldn't be stupid enough to not put standard Berthier/Lebel/Gewehr/Lee Enfield rifles for standard units
>>341422323
The irony being there were more Pajeets in the British Army then colonial african mores but whatever
>>341422039
They didn't include The Battle of Verdun in a WW1 game.
Enough said really.
>>341422039
Only medics and scouts have bolt-actions. If you seriously thought it wouldn't have a bunch of automatics you're a fucking idiot.
>>341422039
Just stick with Forgotten Hope 2, these dumb Swede cucks don't have a clue.
Let's make a WW1 game that plays like WW2. What the fuck is the point of this.
Are frenchies still upset?
>>341425796
Well it is comedy gold. It's like having a WW2 game about the eastern front
You got the Battle of Stalingrad but no krauts
But hey you got the Romanian,Hungarian and Italian Expeditionary force
>WWI game
>don't include the french or russians
>50% of the characters are black
>>341426610
>yfw people still think the good guys won WW2
>>341422039
WE
>>341426716
WUZ PRUSSIANS AND SHIET
>>341424220
The vast majority of people won't be able to tell the difference and the won't have their usual audience whining about a lack of automatics.
When will /v/ realize the truth? AAA games aren't made for you, they're made for normal people.
>>341426610
>russians
they did nothing in WW1
>>341426610
>Brits are running around with mp18s
>Germans running around with american shotguns and non-existent italian semi-autos
>>341422039
>>341423551
>Only medics and scouts have bolt-actions.
My interest in this game just went from 11 to -1. I guess I should have expected it from DICE at this point though. Battlefield is officially dead to me.
>it's another game that is "set" in WW1 but has fuck all to do with WW1 but the only problem is the black person episode
>>341426952
They invaded germany and austria-hungary, the french and brits never managed that
>red orchestra 2 and many other ww2 games don't have black people in them
>the year of cucks has black people in a WW1 game
sure thing EA do your thing
>>341426952
they did
some of them even fought on the west front so that's not an excuse either
>>341426981
You forgot featuring the Renault FT 1 tank.
Renault sounds British to me mate
I would not be surprised legitimately if the french governments ass explodes so hard they ban this game
>>341422039
All i want is ironsight bolt-action rifle for all classes. This is ww1 afterall. Everyhing else looks fine. Automatic weapons are ok. I just want my rifles.
And the nigger thing is prob just character customation.
>>341426952
Without the Russian front Germany would have had the manpower to take France in 1914
>>341427180
And every side gets zeppelins, and trenches are boring so there arent any on the maps
>>341427195
Just play verdun. Bolt actions dont work with a game like battlefield
>>341427341
Except BF 1942,Forgotten Hope 2 etc a freaking WW2 game proved that they do.
Now if you mean that bolt action rifles don't work for the average idiot who wants some tacticool AK,AR 15 abomination thats another story and I agree.
>>341426234
You're aware the UK fought from 1914 right? They've decided to focus on them instead of the French.
>But hey you got the Romanian,Hungarian and Italian Expeditionary force
Fucking retard. The Austro-Hungarians and the Italians lost vast numbers of men and made up a huge part of the conflict. This is about a WORLD WAR and not just the western front.
Stay mad frenchy.
>>341422039
For some reason people completely forgot that it's still a modern Battlefield game.
>>341427493
Is this bait or just a severe case of reading comprehension?
I'm not even sure at this point
>>341427341
RO and Rising storm is enough. Dont want another "realistic" shooter.
>>341427510
Its just a waste of a setting. EA would have been better off remaking 1942
>>341422039
Wake up. This is a casualized console game made for the console crowd. Trying to be CoD with vehicles in every way but name as it has been ever since CoD4.
Look at movement speed. Everyone runs like Usain Bolt because kiddies can't teamplay and use vehicles or can't use proper tactics so they need movement as a crutch.
Look at how everyone except snipers are using SMGs or LMGs and not bolt action rifles.
Look at how the maps are designed for close quarters encounters and with no clear long distance sightlines so you could set up an MG on a position and cover lots of ground. Everything is designed around run and gun.
This game is essentially a reskin of BF hardline.
>>341427609
You're suggesting that leaving the French out is comparable to leaving the Germans out an Eastern Front WWII game.
>>341427643
Verduns really just for if you have a a WW1 itch
>>341427493
Fuking röökijäbä. Read the comment again you finnish fuck.
I hope that when Dice will start adding new nations through DLCs, they'll add several others before the french. The baguette meltdown will be glorious.
>>341427721
Yeah, we know. We are bitching about these things, not surprised by them
>>341427493
>huge part of the conflict
>can't even break trough the (second) most ineffective military force for 4 years
>more relevant than russia or france
lmao okay antonio
>>341427728
It pretty much is
>>341426610
>50% of the characters are black
More around 5% judging by the footage. Character customization seems likely though.
>>341427728
It's more comparable to leaving the Russians out and having the Tuvans and Mongolians instead
>>341427728
it is
>>341422039
Ea dice game
NO BUY
>>341428030
why arent the germs on that pie graph?
>>341428246
Because its the entente powers casualties
>>341426716
>>341422323
I don't know you guys fully understand the situation dice put themselves.
When they do ww2 again we can demand that they put Black nazis in the game.
>No France
No buy
>>341428102
But russians are mongolians.
>>341428093
Austro-Hungarian Empire will have blacks?
Shiet when will these damn Austrians,Hungarians,Czechs and Croats pay back to africa for their colonial empires
>>341426689
the side with the simplest uniforms wins
>>341428246
Because you are unable to read
>>341428298
...holy shit
>>341422039
>muh historical accuracy
God, these threads are retarded
You wouldn't have bought the game anyway, lets not pretend here.
>>341428354
sorry didnt know what entente meant
i do now though
>>341428386
If bolt action rifles were a significant part of the game I would buy it. Maybe
>>341428298
If it takes place in Africa you can most certainly expect black Nazis.
>>341428337
>Austro-Hungarian Empire will have blacks?
Worse. They'll havetanks.
>>341427728
But that's basically correct you dumbass.
Ubisoft should have left out America from Assassin's Creed 3.
>>341428298
ok but who's gonna remember to stick with this and not let them squelch out of it
>>341428386
>You wouldn't have bought the game anyway, lets not pretend here.
God, you "nevah gunna boy it" shills are retarded.
The game isn't out yet, literally no one has the capability to purchase it and play it.
Yeah, I know, discussing things should be banned.
Are weapons faction-locked? Or will you have blacks German soldiers on Western front maps running around with English automatic guns?
>>341428246
its allies only
meanwhile
>33% for allies
>97% for centrals
>>341428529
>Italy and Austia-Hungary having epic tank battles on the Alps and everyone is a nigger
>>341428529
Can't wait for the Austro-Hungarians to launch gas attacks against the Italians.
>>341428625
99% of /v/ wouldn't buy a Battlefield game just because its EA and DICE, and the fact that it is just another Battlefield game.
I wont buy it on release either and don't know if I ever will, but its retarded to hold off a purchase just because
>muh historical accuracy
>muh black people
Its retarded.
>>341428728
Don't forget dem epic low-altitude blimp raids on the battelfield
>>341428637
You have british soldiers running around with german smgs and germans running around with american shotguns
>>341428672
And zeppellins crashing down in flames, all while a dank hip-hop soundtrack is playing. Just how I imagined WW1 to be.
>>341428775
>99% of /v/ wouldn't buy a Battlefield game just because its EA and DICE,
Source? There were BF4 threads for a while after release as far as I recall.
>I wont buy it on release either and don't know if I ever will, but its retarded to hold off a purchase just because
So you're making assumptions based on your position? Are you the speaker for all of /v/?
I seriously believe Russia was left out because swedecucks are buttmad about Putin or some shit.
But if they were smart they could troll the russians by having the Russian empire army all be Finns
But this is swedecucks after all
>>341428858
That's the least retarded thing of the bunch, weapon scavenging or simply taking them as trophies was commonplace
>>341428858
Crap.
>>341422039
These cucks are revisionnist pieces of shit, I will not buy a game with a shoehorned US niggers and strong muslims wymyn because 200 of them fought when they scrapped France who lost 1,1 millions young men.
>>341428608
We can do this! It might take a decadência but we cannot allow them to keep getting away with this shit.
>>341422039
A game like this should be focused on tactics and team play, not so much guns
>>341428991
Germans literally never used shotguns because they despised the very idea of them and shot on sight anyone caught with one. There were only ever 5000 mp18s and they werent in use long enough to be captured and used by the entente
Wait, they don't have the french?
Why the FUCK are there American blacks running around then? I figured they were doing the Harlem Hellfighters, but they were only deployed under French command because US soldiers literally refused to fight alongside them.
>>341428934
Making a game where russians are not the antagonist will be confusing both for developers and the target audience alike. Also, no one cares about them.
>troll the russians by having the Russian empire army all be Finns
That would be trolling finns tho
>>341428362
Just imagine the collective assblast that would cause.
>>341428918
>There were BF4 threads for a while after release as far as I recall.
Yeah, people mocking the state of the game on release, because it shipped out like complete garbage.
I have never seen /v/ discuss Battlefield with actual discussion and not just random shitflinging.
>So you're making assumptions based on your position? Are you the speaker for all of /v/?
I think its pretty easy to spot the reasons why the majority here resents the game. That being
>muh black people in WW1
>muh historical inaccuracy
>muh thing that doesn't affect gameplay at all but I'm insecure about the skin color of people in an online shooter so here I am bitching
>>341428991
no it wasn't
throphies maybe but that doesn't mean they would be allowed to toss away their standard issue weapon and run around with their newly found scoped mg08/05
>>341428672
>>341428883
Lel
>>341429209
French army are NPCs in the campaign and we don't know if the Harlem Hellfighters are in outside of cosmetic DLC.
>>341429224
Eastern front will be dlc, French are in the campaign and will be dlc for multiplayer
Is reviving soldiers with paddles after being filled with a full mag to his body, a modern military thing?
Is jumping out of your jet, sniping the enemy jet's pilot below you and then hoping on his jet and fly off a thing in real life?
>>341422039
PLEASE PAY ATTENTION: BOYCOTT THIS RETARDED GAME.
this game is, as of now, literally trash. I spent some time this morning watching all the multiplayer gameplays I could find on yt, and trust me when I say that it is totally retarded.
I have seen 0 (non sniper) bolt action rifles,0 trench assaults, 0 everything related to World War I.
What i've seen is nigger german soldiers, a disgustingly huge use of automatic and semi automatic weapon that were in the prototype stage and were only rarely used in WWI.
To make a long story short this game is fucking trash because instead of re-designing the meta to adapt it to realistic WWI warfare, dice faggots produced just another retarded shitty battlefield with 0 teamwork and 0 historical accuracy.
boycott this fucking trash game and help bring down dice.
>>341428386
If it would have been an actual ww1 game I was seriously considering getting over my hate for EA.
If it's just going to be BF4 with mustard gas.... nah.
The last BF game I played was 2142. Is the Battlefield theme not a thing anymore? It's such an iconic soundtrack.
>>341429280
For reference, only the black German is inaccurate. While there were no black Australians on the western front, I'm fairly sure uniform and race are separate, even though that causes inaccuracies.
>>341429362
lel, frenchies will be the useless coward NPCs that you have to save and bail out all the time.
>>341428298
DUDEblack jap soldiers yelling banzai
Imagine if the Russian were in the game you got this Black Cossack going
SLAVA ROSSIYA
pfff buahahahah
>>341429490
There were a few thousand abo's to be fair
If they want brown people in their game so bad, why not the turks ?
>>341429478
They've butchered it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uEc8_dcYUc
Maybe BF1 will have a better version.
>bf1 is remade to be completely realistic
>both team spawn in a trench
>as soon as you peek over the trench you die
>you have to wait 4 hours for artillery to come in and then rush over to be killed instantly
>the commander who gets the most of his team killed wins
>>341429564
Gotta admit, that would be awesome.
>>341429073
you're a massive faggot who doesn't realize that france had the niggers fighting for them.
Africans actually come from Africa,not Baltimore, where the french still had colonies.
>>341429613
Ottoman empire is one of the factions
>>341429442
HOL UP
U BE SAYIN
WEEZ GERMANS NAO
SIEG HEIL
>>341429637
Verdun manages it pretty well depending on your taste
>>341429209
>America is in because we want the US audience
>Italy is in because Alpine battles or something
>UK is in because Western Front, in here from the beginning
>France's role is covered by the UK, let's make them a $15 dlc and pretend there is too much stuff to be ready at launch
I think this is DICE reasoning. Which is retarded, Americans will use FT-17s for example.
>>341429564
Well they already believe that they were the original japs só it's not unthinkable.
>>341429668
total dead and missing : 1,397,800. These figures include 35,200 French Colonial Forces, 35,900 "north Africans" and 4,600 French Foreign Legion personnel
truly the blacks and Muslims won the war for France
>>341429617
sweet wubs
>>341429478
Its always been there, bf3 strayed away from it in exchange of farting noises arranged to sound like the theme but bf4 brought it back...with a little bit of farting as well.
When bf1 was about to be revealed a bf theme that I've never heard before was playing the background, so its probably coming back.
Its sounded like a classic bf theme, like 1942/43 but themed ww1 ish, no farting noises.
>>341429592
They were at Gallipolli at least, not sure about the western front though.
>>341429827
Also
>nobody wants to play as surrender monkeys anyway
>>341429827
Americans actually did use a lot of french gear. They will probably have chauchat (or BAR) as an assault rifle and RSC as a semi auto
>>341429895
it's the battlefield theme but rapped over, it's in the trailer
>>341429896
I'm not sure either, but I dont see why they wouldnt have been
>>341429958
France was awesome in ww1
>>341429958
Possible. But that would be even more silly considering this is WW1.
>>341430071
Please be jesting
>>341423767
Thats ww2 m8
>>341426952
Kys retarded amerimutt.
http://fortune.com/2015/03/10/american-millennials-are-among-the-worlds-least-skilled/
A nigger in a fucking cape on the western front as promo wow.
>>341430128
I wish I was jesting, but it sems to be in sync with black characters in every faction, and african american celebrities present and made highly visibleduring the shill/showmatch event
>>341427385
>t. buttblasted toilet cleaner
>>341430185
There were both niggers and great coats on the western front so I dont care
>>341430012
Yeah. French weapons will already be in the game at launch, this is hilarious.
>>341422039
Literally a simplified BF4 re-skin.
>>341429958
Nobody wants to play with subhumans either desu.
>>341429878
>people like diversity
>there were tens of thousands of blacks, Muslims fighting, and even more asians labouring
>why aren't Dice making the game all white, lets make it all white lmao
you're a fucking retard if you thought that they weren't going to be in the game
>>341430103
>>341429896
Abos weren't actually allowed to join the army, they had to pretend to be Maori or mixed, so we don't actually know exactly how many joined up.
>>341428298
>Black nazi
What if the original idea was to remake BF 1942 but the fact that they had to make Black Nazis is why they decided to make WW1 that plays like WW2.
>>341430281
There was also probably a nude midget fighting off a german soldier. Why not use that for the boxart?
>>341428298
>When they do ww2 again we can demand that they put Black nazis in the game.
Implying that the SJW capital of the world will ever let Dice make a game with Nazis again, let alone have black soldiers working for the side of the bad guys.
The nazis were collectivists though and so are SWs, so I don't really know...
I have ancestors who fought in WW1 and I can tell you right now, WW1 was the war where blacks and Indians found out that their colonial masters were not invincible. There were plenty of blacks and Indians fighting for the British.
This game though is a mockery of what actually took place during WW1.
>>341430497
>they had to pretend to be Maori
Really? Because maoris werent allowed in either. They had to come in their own units that were technically non-combatants and not part of ANZAC
>>341430497
need some help carrying that goalpost anon
>>341429668
>WE WUN WW1 N SHIEEEET
Give me a fucking break, the tirailleurs sénégalais were less than 200 000 compared to the 8,6 millions of soldiers and less than 20 000 saw an actual battle.
It's bullshit and only a revisionnist piece of garbage could argue that a US black regiment, who fought for 6 months and lost 1500 man when the war was already on they way to be won, is on par with the french people who fought the war straight from 1914 to 1918 on their soils.
>there will be no melee system based around overly long Lebel and Mauser rifles, trench clubs and spades
They could've created a game centered around bloody close quarter battle in the trenches, instead they reskinned a modern era game.
>>341430545
Because black soldiers were an actual (if minor) thing and a nude midget didnt actually occur
Can somebody post black german solider ?
>>341430742
>>341430678
>he expected DICE to experiment and take a risk
a meme of hilarity
>>341430692
There were half a million french african colonials on the western front who were in combat
>>341430843
I can't wait for "French DLC" being all WE WUZ
>>341430987
I dont even care as long as we get sexy horizon blue uniforms
>>341430692
>who fought for 6 months and lost 1500 man when the war was already on they way to be won
lmao that measn that luxembourgh did almost twice as much for the entente
Which map will I get to play as the Ottoman Empire slaughtering the Kardashians?
>>341430692
Did you even read my post, or are you meming. ill say it again: black people were actually in war. the public likes black people. EA likes money. it does not contradict anyone in WWI that a large amount of blacks would be seen in a battle, why not include it?
>>341430679
the recruiters weren't told about the decision to keep Abos out for a while, and even then there was a bit of confusion, so they got in through various excuses, or just said they were Abo and got in anyway in some cases.
>>341430817
Imagine how they could've done the game had they gone for historical accuracy
>campaign starts off with you playing as a Frenchman in a bright blue and red uniform at the start of the war
>you're formed up in a classic line formation, ready for battle
>German MGs and arty open up, killing everyone around you
>you have to then fight your way to safety with little more than a pike-sized Lebel and a fancy moustache
>>341431270
Thats pretty much a description of america in general. Foguht for 6 months against a beaten enemy and still managed to get higher casualty rates than armies who had fought for the entire war
>>341422039
WW1 casualties:
>38 million total
>Russia: 9,00,000
>Germany: 7,000,000
>Austria-Hungary: 7,000,000
>France: 6,000,000
>UK: 3,000,000
>Italy: 2,000,000
>Ottomans: 1,000,000
>Romania: 500,000
>Serbia: 300,000
>Bulgaria: 300,000
>US: 300,000
Hmm... Rather than focusing one of these countries... Why not focus on a single Regiment with 1,500 casualties that joined in the last year of the war, and an irrelevant Middle-Eastern tribe? Oh, and while we're at it, let's not include France and Russia, who together made up 40% of the total casualties :VV)
Wait, what's that? Did you say there were a few colonial soldiers fighting in the German army? And the Australian army, surely it had a few Aboriginal soldiers in it? Hmmm... Why not model the NPC characters after them, instead of after the 99.9% of white soldiers that fought in those armies? :DDD
This enrages me and is a disgrace to those that fought and died in the war who weren't niggers, a.k.a almost all of them.
>hurr you don't want blacks in your game but battlefield's not about realism lol
>hurr you want everyone to use bolt actions but battlefield's not about history lol
How do you respond to this faggotry
>>341431339
>the recruiters weren't told about the decision to keep Abos out for a while
Huh interesting. I only found out about abos in the war at all because of BF1 threads, I always figured they would have been treated the same or worse than the way we treated the maori
>>341428672
I can't wait to create a Italian black soldier fighting in the alps with the name Benito Mussolini
DUCE WAS BLACK
>>341431517
>this overrepresentation
>realistic
By killing yourself faggot
>>341431510
The story can be about anyone you like, it doesnt have to represent the average soldier. Although the bedouin woman is utterly retarded. Multiplayer will probably be customised skins, a bit silly but it makes no real difference
>>341430506
>>341430506
I could see they trying to pull that.
>>341431652
Learn to read autismo
>>341427939
http://fr.ign.com/battlefield-1-ps4/14937/news/e3-2016-battlefield-1-dice-sexplique-sur-labsence-des-franca
France is already confirmed as premium DLC.
>>341431652
This, really it's like having a WW2 game and 1/3rd of the Germans are some forcefully conscripted Slovenes or some shit.
>>341431864
Just woke up and my head is pounding
I fucked up
>>341430843
Most of them were whites, they were colons coming back in Metropole to fight for France.
Never heard of the "Pieds noirs" ?
No I bet you don't because you are ignorant and try to make a point with no knowledge of history.
Stop trying, there will always be people like me preventing you to subvert history in order to promote your agenda, indigeneous african presence on the western front was totally anecdotical, we had already enough problem to transport natives so bringing in Picardie from West Africa thousands of badly trained Mamadou who barely spoke the language was not the fucking priority.
Few thousand fought in these battles ? Great, that does not change the fact that the troops were 99,98% Metropolitan french.
>>341431926
There were a shitload of non-germans fighting for germany though
>>341431517
I don't expect realism out of a videogame, I expect authenticity
>>341430692
Are you retards still talking about this shit?
Accept it, they fought and served in the war, there's documented proof it was by the millions (seriously stop being a lazy asshole and google it) and you aren't the developer so you have zero say in the who gets in the game.
Don't like play something else, which to be honest shouldn't be too hard since the game itself isn't really interesting in the first place.
>>341431556
they probably were. They joined up because the government controlled most aspects of their lives, so war was the only way out, and the Abos that didn't die were treated a bit better when they returned.
>>341432138
Yeah but those were FUCKING WHITE MEN so who cares?
>>341432138
This.
The Germans had troops from all over Europe.
Sweden.
Norway.
Finland.
Italian.
Estonians
Latvians
French
Danish
Croatians
Russians
Indians
Etc
>>341432117
you miss the point the argument, but thanks for your service.
>>341432278
There were non whites such as some arabs,turkmenis and what not recruited from pow camps and universities.
But the point being is does it make sense to make such a big deal about some 200 arab guys fighting for the Germans during Berlin 1945?
You might as well feature those gypsies from the Dirlewanger Brigades
>>341432117
No most of them were black or north african. About 1 in 10 was a european colonial
>french and russian guns can be used by each available nation
>but france and russia will be added to the game with DLC
>>341432117
> pic
looks like scarlet johanssen but with larger, rounder eyes
Would things be better if DICE had gone all the way with this shit and included Asians, Arabs and Latino's in their army as well? Just so people would fully realize that the Battlefield franchise has nothing to do with historical accuracy?
>>341432820
character creator would have sufficed
>>341432820
Japan technically fought
>>341432257
STFU revisionnist garbage, I know my history better than a SJW trash who googled "blacks in french army WW1".
Giono, Barbusse, Barthas, you probably don't even know these names.
Go back asking for a female link and stop talking about shit you have 0 knowledge about.
>>341432117
I wouldn't go "most", that's giving a distorted vision of things.
Have a Tournassoud pic of non-white WW1 soldiers.
My biggest grip with showing Black colony French soldiers is it would be impossible for the game to show properly how shitty our country treated them; a non-insignificant portion of them died out of battle, as they were thrown into winter without any winter gear.
I remember interviewing people about the Northern front and being surprised at the shame of some old farmers for how their parents hadn't helped at the time.
>>341433008
Blacks fought whether you like it or not, having a black soldier be the focus is not ahistorical
>>341424220
i would have actually liked to play another ww2 battlefield
Where was /v/ when this game featured a black protag?
>>341433164
what were you doing interviewing farmers?
>>341432820
Is that sum Neil motherfucking Breen?
>>341433280
He was american too. I wonder if DICE stole the idea from this?
>>341433323
The one and only.
>>341428386
If it was a somewhat realistic WWI shooter and didn't shit all over historical accuracy in the name of muh diversity and had gameplay pandering to Rambo idiots, then yeah, I would have actually seriously considered it. I was cautiously hyped for the game at first.
In short, you're wrong and your opinion sucks.
>>341433280
You're missing the point, I don't think their problem is the very existence of a black character.
Not to mention, the tone - and artistic direction - of the game meant it could be given a lot more leeway.
>>341428298
>black nazis
>>341433513
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzIRG525l6s
>>341433008
http://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/carrier_corps
http://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/war_losses_africa
Go fuck yourself in the ass you lazy retard.
>>341433179
Funny how people like you beg for "repesentativity" but you have no problems when somebody totally erase off the picture the bodies of 1 millions young white men to insert 1500 US nignogs that amerifats would not even want to fight with.
>>341426716
Jesus fucking Christ for the N-TH TIME
CUSTOMIZABLE
CHARACTERS
IN
MULTIPLAYER
>>341433825
>The Germans, as the only colonial power amongst the Central Powers, used plenty of African soldiers of their Schutztruppen in the African theatres of war, but they had never planned to deploy these troops in Europe and would not have been able to do so during World War I for logistical reasons anyway.
from the same website, check your sources
>>341433825
>http://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/carrier_corps
Exacty a damn labour force you clown they were not sent to the front.
Let's make a WW2 game and put some Jewish concentration camp Flak Helfers into the spotlight.
>>341433306
Actually I was there to interview Raoul Servais.But the interview was taking place in local association with loads of old people, and the post interview conversations were just as interesting as the one I was being paid to do.
Kept a lot of it as it's pretty good material.
>>341433513
It's not a point of pride for the Nazis, it's a point of shame for America that this isn't entirely untrue.
>the year is 1917 the year of our Lord
>Negroids are fighting side us and not at one of our African colonies
>>341433513
>monolithic voice of jewish media-control
this image, with no sources, definitely seems unbiased
>>341427180
>Reno sounds british
>>341433937
I want to point out that depending on your criterion, wiping out a million to give 1500 a place can be more representative.
>>341427493
>You're aware the UK fought from 1914 right? They've decided to focus on them instead of the French.
And that seems acceptable to you?
As a Brit, I'd have felt very upset if they had "focused" on the French only and not included us in the game
France and Britain were the two main Entente powers, they should both be there
>>341433825
Fucking thank to prove my point yourself piece of trash.
Pic related: number of africans who died in fought in Europe between all Allies (a large part of them were white colons btw, example are the French Zouaves): Belgium, France, UK. Italy portugal.
On the western front that makes
That makes 365.000/23.350.000 = 0,015
So the colonial trumps represent 1,5% of the force present on the front, with a large part of them constitued of white colons.
That
>Africans in European front
Guffaw
>>341434964
who died and fought*
>great war era tanks driving 50mph
>zeppelin casually looming over the battlefield
>overabundance of semi-automatic weapons
>soldiers 360 no-scoping each other
>bi and tri planes doing barrel rolls at mach speed
"Sure, whatever, it's just a game."
>black soldiers in the multiplayer
"DICE are a bunch of SJW cucks who are blackwashing our history! How can they get away with this!"
Okay, now I see your point, /v/, believe me I do. What I don't see is how this bothers you so much. Battlefield has always been, for better or worse, a franchise that is hilariously unrealistic. I'm sorry if Battlefield games have always been your source of historically accurate depictions of past wars but for DICE to pull shit like this was predictable.
What if they just included females/black people as DLC?
Is it me or are triggered faggots using this more of a reason to hate on niggers rather than actually caring about WWI? If you want a proper WWI game go play Verdun, if you want a proper history lesson, go and watch a fucking documentary.
>>341427180
The current French government hates France even more than the Swedish cucks who made that game
Just look at the shameful "ceremony" they organized for Verdun...
>>341435103
are you people so stupid that you think the black soldiers aren't just skins?
>>341435151
Just you.
>>341435151
I'm more annoyed that they have the gall to shoehorn their unwanted politics into the game with black soldiers and female Bedouin' while not including Frenchies.
Also Verdun is shit.
>>341435281
What are they then?
>>341427728
A better analogy would be letting Americans out from a Pacific War game and making it Brits vs Japs instead
Buy Battlefield 1
>this thread
>>341428934
they literally confirmed weeks ago that Russia is first major DLC
>>341435462
>tfw no war in the pacific game involving Russians fighting Japs
>>341435151
Yes, because everybody know that people never base their views on history via the treatment done by pop culture.
Most amerifats can't even tell you when USA joined the conflict.
>>341435592
Buy the Harlem Hellfighters DLC pack
>>341435650
>One of the major players in the first world war is DLC
>Frogs haven't even gotten a DLC announcement yet
As long as dey wuz soldiers an shiet and semi-automatic weapons everywhere people happy
>>341433280
His portrayal was accurate: a lone afro-american fighting under the french banner, in a french uniform, with other french troops.
Not xXxHarlemHotRod87xXx, rocking that EPIK british tacticool uniform with his niggas from the anzac Abo legion fighting the afro-german horde.
>>341435592
This image just screams "WW1" to me.
>>341435151
>it's a video game! it doesn't have to be realistic!
We're talking authenticity you dumb faggot
>>341435978
Well, there were black soldiers in the British armies and aboriginals in the Australian armies. There were no blacks in the German Army, though.
>>341435592
When will this fucking blue & orange meme end?
>>341435179
It wasn't the government. And it wasn't that shameful. It was bad, but they wanted to represent the Verdun battle with kids running around.
It just didn't go that well.
>>341436309
When the fundamental nature of colours change.
You know if they just included the Frenchies, it would at least make sense if there were blacks because didn't Frenchies use a lot of colonial troops?
>>341436396
they did, but not in the front. It wouldn't have made sense anyway.
>>341436204
My point was that colonials of a select skin colour were being over represented when you considered the thousands of Indians, Arabs and Indochinese that were also shipped to the conflict, and that colonials should be represented at a lower ratio than what Dice has shown us.
>>341436357
It was garbage:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4dhsur
There is one fucking basic rules that every human being respect throught the globe in a cemetery: you don't run and especially not on the graves.
You have to be a retard to not understand it or being a sad piece of shit to do it on purpose.
>>341436396
>didn't Frenchies use a lot of colonial troops?
Not that much, and much less than Britain
But still more than Germany
I can't believe there are unironical black German troops...
>no Alp map
>Not even fucking Verdun
>>341428093
Nah it was around 50% with australians and germany having blacks as well. But its just going to be a skin choice that people will pick just to fuck with other people like female stormtroopers in SW:BF.
>>341436204
There were literally half a company's worth of abbos in WWI and only 2 squads were combat troops.
t. Australian with 8 dead ancestors who served
It's easy to understand the fascination for torn buildings post-war.
>>341428298
Nazis are always depicted as evil, it would be so racist to make negros evil.
>>341424220
so they can make the WW2 version 5 years later and keep making money
>>341436515
Because the entente shipped over hundreds of thousands of colonials, gave them guns told them not to fight
>>341435874
Visit Sweden
>>341431510
This is how they get ya with the DLC $$$
>>341437195
Just ignore /v/ when it comes to ww1. They know less than nothing about it.
And when I say that I mean they have so many misconceptions that they somehow know less than the average joe on the street.
>>341431510
>not including the 400,000 Australian casualties
ya fucked
>>341437195
Yeah man those krauts shipped over so many africans with their mighty fleet sitting there blockaded the entire war.
Give me a break
hey remember that time BF was historically accurate?
me neither
>>341437520
did you get that post off some faggots twitter?
>>341437448
>australia
>relevant
ssh kid
>>341437481
thats why I called them the entente you fucking retard
>>341437675
>america
>relevant
>especially in wwi
get your head out of your arse, dickhead
>>341437783
Where did you get that idea from kid?
>>341437870
What, that you're an americlap retard? The fact you're calling a faceless poster on the internet "kid" was a dead give away, only burgerfags think they can say it without sounding like fedora tipping knob jockeys.
>>341422039
>ITT old man /v/ doesn't know anything about modern battlefield
>>341437720
They barely fought in europe, most of them were labour forces and the equivalent of that would be having Jews running around in a WW2 setting in the German army because they were forced to build the Siegfried line.
If you were going to feature anybody it would be the Indian Pajeets because they did serve on quite the scale in the UK Army.
>>341438084
Sorry you got so angry over someone not adding 400k dead convicts. I will never forget about them after this day
>>341438158
>Jews running around in a WW2 setting in the German army because they were forced to build the Siegfried line.
do you ironically hold this opinion
>>341438406
Clearly there should be White British people in the IJA because they were forced laborers during the Burma Campaign.
>>341438158
https://web.viu.ca/davies/H482.WWI/ColonialTroopsWWl.pdf
They should add women because there were female aviation pilots in WW1 lol. also add gays because surely some of the soldiers were gay
>>341438874
>Clearly there should be White British people in the IJA because they were forced laborers during the Burma Campaign.
do you ironically hold this opinion
>>341438980
>do you ironically hold this opinion
What did he mean by this?
>>341438951
My point stands exactly most of them were forced labourers and the pajeets were the one's doing most of the you know fighting when it came to colonial troops in europe
>>341439094
>What did he mean by this?
do you ironically hold this opinion?
