Is anyone excited about the ArmA 3 Apex expansion?
>>341147286
The CSAT VTOL looks like it belongs in a child's cartoon, and I'm not overly fond of the setting in general.
Terrain is pretty good, but almost everything about it I can get through mods already.
>>341147286
bump
daily reminder that kuthar needs to be banned
>>341147286
I'd have to agree with not liking the setting but I think the CSAT VTOL looks pretty cool.
>>341147286
I hope sa-matra will make a wasteland mod server on the new jungle map.
>>341150142
Yeah I almost only play wasteland.
>>341147286
>30 dollars for a bunch of shit that Bethesda would charge 15$ for
how Jewish
>>341150542
but that's an addon, not a mod
The new UAV looks awesome.
so is a3g coming back?
>>341149810
>comfy this mad that kuthar is a more productive member of AKB
>>341153135
i hope not
>>341153135
I'm not sure what that is.
>>341153723
It's comfy blanket's old stomping grounds.
>>341147286
is that a pelican?
Did they ever port the Arma2 content into A3? Not just the maps, but weapons, vehicles etc.
Thought I was going to die of old age before I ever saw them finish it, so I just stopped playing. Futurewar shit is boring.
>>341153961
Its a remake of a osprey.
>>341147286
It's already released. You can buy it now
>>341153135
a3g is already back though?
>>341147286
i'm excited for my enthusiast pc to tank harder in fps then it ever has in arma 3!
>>341154436
I know, right, fuck this game.
>>341154128
Yeah its a mod though
https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=583575232
>>341154432
Looking at the steam group right now, no events.
>>341150108
It shows Bohemia's utter lack of understanding for the mechanics behind this kind of thing.
Not that the """"stealth""" A-10 didn't already do that. Laughed so hard at that thing.
>>341147286
Tanoa is bretty gud
Jungle combat is hard af though
>>341153135
>>341155045
Why would you want a3g back? It's too tainted by shitters.
>>341155586
Arma isn't a simulator.
Any cool groups that still play this game?
>>341157170
I'm in 111th http://111th.forumotion.net/
>tfw a3g was only briefly popular because of shitters like OnlyAfro tainted it
can i play this with a controller? serious question
>>341157115
Funny how it calls itself that every other sentence then, huh?
>>341157634
so how is it even fun then?
>>341147286
me and a friend tried the new vehicles earlier
the ospray gunship thing is really cool but handles like shit atm
helicopters handle more sluggishly
AKM AK74U are both cool but no attachments, some other cool guns
but the fucking creme de la creme is the new chinese VTOL kinda thing.
it flys at like 500kmh and can do VTOL shit and handles smooth as anything
it's super fun.
>>341157665
games still have to be fun and the rule of cool always wins. If you want an actual sim go buy a license to VBS3
>>341157573
Yes, but very poorly.
>>341158006
This is bait.
>>341157665
Actually it doesn't. The devs refer to it as a "military sandbox" or "tactical shooter" these days.
https://www.bistudio.com/games/arma3
>>341158025
Way to read way too much into me saying that the VTOL is designed poorly and looks like shit, as is the "stealth" A-10.
Didn't ask it to be a NASA-level simulation.
Does Arma 3 runs better than 2?
>>341158380
Worse
>>341157170
all sorts
>>341158235
Delete this.
>>341158380
Needs a min of 2gb of ram
If you think the CSAT VTOL is ugly you haven't seen anything.
>>341158235
>We ban shitters immediately and enforce rules to ensure quality operations
If you're going to lie at least make it semi-plausible
>>341159427
Its not even just that its ugly. Its that it wouldn't work. There is a reason that the V-22's rotors are so fuck-off large.
>>341159460
Fuck off Pansyfaust
>>341159427
wtf is that
>>341160287
Case in point; you have named shitters.
All I've seen is a few operations, I've never played with you chucklefucks.
>>341159427
please don't tell me the syndikat are a bunch of futuristic rebels
>>341160713
>Pansyfaust still salty hes banned for being a shitter
>>341160746
No they are not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5A1O4QiFd58
>>341161058
I think glad is the word you're looking for, considering I wasn't even the one you responded to.
DayZ ruined the series by bringing thousands of plebs into the fanbase
>>341161968
Move on, shitter
>>341159427
Jesus christ fuck everything about that.
>>341159427
Ant Man?
>>341164240
lol
>>341162302
DayZ was amazing when it was still a mod constricted to the ArmA community.
I'd take it all back though if it meant getting rid of the life roleplay and zombie faggots that destroy what the game should be.
>>341158025
>you want an actual sim go buy a license to VBS3
VBS3 is literally Arma
>>341164812
Life roleplay servers existed before DayZ though. What really pisses me off is how its impossible to find public servers for a quick match nowadays. Its just
>DayZ
>DayZ
>DayZ Epoch
>DayZ Origins
>Wasteland
>Wasteland: ebin edition
>>341165089
It really, really isn't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syB3Nksxwdo
VBS also has destruction physics more akin to Frostbyte and a whole lot of other junk on the same level as the stuff in the video. They're not even close to the same game.
>>341165631
>tfw we'll never get VBS3
>>341165631
>They're not even close to the same game.
...they're literally the same game, dipshit. Arma is made first, and sold to the public, VBS is developed on top of the already existing Arma game. It's been this way since 2001 with the original OFP and first VBS release, I've played every iteration since. The only major difference between the two thus far is that VBS always had a more detailed mission editor
>>341167858
I literally directly linked you a video of features that don't exist in ARMA you retard. They're different fucking games.
Would you like some more?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51PL1_9rfYk
Is this a "More detailed mission editor"?
>>341167858
They don't cooperate and the engines spit off since ARMA1.
Militaries don't even seriously use VBS to train infantry. It's still a lot less realistic and practical than MILES.
>>341168932
>They don't cooperate and the engines spit off since ARMA1.
This is patently false, VBS3 literally uses the same engine as Arma, you're on the Internet here, there's nothing stopping you from researching any of this
>>341170390
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir8xdku6JRQ
Yes they do.
Small, small part of training, but they do.
>>341171081
VBS3 is on Real Virtuality 3, ARMA3 is on Real Virtuality 4.
>>341171081
>They use the same engine, so they are therefore the same game
>Everything running on Source is the same game
>Everything running on UE3 is the same game
>>341172640
That image is a great example of what its training, even if you don't think it is.
>>341171526
>MPs are infantry now
Top kek m8.
>>341172640
delete this
>>341173072
Yeah, because they're the only people they train there, right?
>>341147286
Yes, mainly because I know the cheating AI will make the game actually hard, rather than the snoozefest it was on those other shitty maps.
>>341173526
And truck drivers for convoy ops. The fact is that actual combat training isn't done using VBS.
>>341153135
I hope a new arma /vg/ group happens, but everyone involved with a3g gets permanently banned from it.
Those fucking people were the worst fucking arma players of all time.
>>341173850
Pictures on the website of 61st Stryamska Mechanized Infantry Brigade on the website, too.
Keep digging this shitty hole, won't get you anywhere.
>>341173526
Ideally, yes, in practice though, at least from what I saw and experienced on Camp Lejeune, it's used when the training and tactics command wants to be able to justify their budget for the simulations center that nobody cares to use and your platoon gets drawn up to do 5 months of training with it. Well, 5 months that really turned into about a month of legit "practice" in a virtual environment and 4 months of dicking around with VBS2 to try and create Leshurn in the game so that we could raid the PX in style.
>>341159427
Mask is shit, but rest is good
Seriously all the stuff they are adding in now like the combined 5.56/.50 gun are shit that needed to be in the base game. This semi futuristic setting is better than the boring as shit one they had before.
>>341167858
They are two completely separate companies
There is absolutely no relation between them.
does the game still run like shit?
then no
>>341171081
I'm patently right though if you do a little bit more research. VBS is a fork off the ARMA1 version of real virtuality.
>>341153135
a3g reformed as akb
>>341175387
It runs and even looks way better now, although it still isnt perfect
>>341147286
>Is anyone excited about the ArmA 3 Apex expansion?
Excited for the maps and features.
Still not excited about the quasifuture weapons and vehicles and shit.
>>341159427
>>341159427
jesus thats nightmare fuel
>>341175971
>I want more M4s and AKs
Come one man, let's have some variety.
>>341157665
Post Gabe
>>341177030
We had variety and it ended up just being modern weapons made slightly more futuristic feeling with made up names
>>341177030
>wanting new, fun content modders cant/wont make
>not wanting the same old shit over and over
This is honestly what the vast majority of Arma players believe is best. Honestly they should have gone full futuristic with shields, plasma weapons, lasers ect.
>>341147286
I'm happy for it but I'm tired of ArmA so I'm not excited. It looks like a really good addition that won't fundamentally change anything about the design but will add some well made content for everyone to use.
>>341177385
Would have bombed harder than hell.
>>341177321
>we dont have future weapons
>but do we have future weapons
Make up your mind. Its either futuristic (Which no, no it isnt) or its just more modern shit.
Thankfully they are fixing that, oh so fucking slowly.
>>341177321
And that's bad because..?
At least it was different. If you really want your shitty M4 AK, go play Arma 2.
>>341153135
I hope so. The more groups the better.
>>341178046
It would have been their most successful title ever. They should have continued support for Arma 2 and used Arma 3 for future warfare. There simply isnt a semi realistic futuristic warfare game out there and they would have made a fortune getting an whole new wave of players into the series, rather than just forcing all the arma 2 players to migrate because they stopped support.
>>341178075
I have no words to describe how fucking stupid that is.
>>341178315
>>341178075
If you didn't want anyone to challenge your opinion why post it. This isn't your safe space dyslexci.
The weapons in vanilla Arma 3 didn't feel futuristic and behaved exactly like modern weapons. The only difference was the model and names were fictional.
I'm sure Bohemia loved saving on licensing but it didn't really do much for me.
Either go full future weapon or pick weapons other than the standard fare. Instead we got """future""" weapons that were identical to modern except in name.
>>341178075
Really the most pointless rifle. They could've given us an underbarrel shotgun but can't have shotguns in arma anymore.
They could've given us enhanced night vision but no they got lazy.
CTRG, NATO and CSAT pacific all have lmg versions of their rifles instead of dedicated lmgs because they didn't want to bother making more models too.
>>341179168
Actually yeah, full future would've been much better. Gotta agree there. I just think what we have is still better than M4 AK shit
>>341179168
Learn to read, you just proved you have no idea what you are talking about.
>>341178906
Go back to arma 2 faggot
>>341157665
Ignore him, he's the autist that feels the need to push this everywhere.
>>341178075
Thanks BIS.
>>341175742
a3g would never taint its name with MCC
>>341180151
Boolets dont penetrate flesh (simulator my ass)
Shoot him in the chest and he would die instantly
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_0jwV6nu6E
>trailer shows a breach and clear
>something literally impossible in the arma engine
Why do they keep doing this. You cant even walk through a door sideways let alone breach and clear a room without getting stuck on 15 different invisible boxes
>>341180335
They survive a shot to the chest and before anyone accuses me I have extended armor off as well. It's .50 beowulf and not BMG.
>>341181120
Well then just fuck my everything up
no
/a3g/ is dead so I don't have anyone to play the game with
also it still RUNS LIKE FUCKING SHIT FUCK YOU BOHEMIA YOU FUCKING JEWS WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU EVEN DO ALL DAY YOU FUCKS
>>341178075
>these shitty stupid "future" guns
>>341182063
>MA AK
>MA M4
Kill yourself
Laser weapons when
>>341181941
>wanting to play with a3g
thats almost as bad as wanting to play with wowg or d2g
>>341181753
They can survive one .50BW to the head too. Truly the best gun.
>>341182468
I had fun with /a3g/ in the alpha and beta.
wowg is completely different, not sure why you would even bring them up
I don't' know anything about d2g so I can't say anything about that general
>>341182345
I think railguns would fit the setting more than lasers. Could have a tank variant for long range AT, a handheld one (something like the MAR) for anti material. Short wind up as the coils charge. It would be awesome.
>>341182934
all generals are full of autistics niggers, tripfags, avatar fags, namefags and shitters in general, who use the threads as a way to be even more niggers than they can be in game.
I dont think I met 1 person who was 'good' at arma from a3g or any other videogames for that matter.
Meanwhile I still don't have a fucking shotgun
What the fuck Bohemia all I want is a simple shotgun to fuck around with
>>341183223
arma in a conflict that's not "forseeable in the near future" would be neat. Aren't there mod packs for halo gear? That would be neat, or something just past it for cool ass tech that would make the granularity not as boring cause tech can do a lot of the boring stuff.
>>341183883
depends on what you mean by 'good', there were some people I'd call decent in a3g, ops wouldn't have been able to be completed if everyone was an absolute shitter
and they were still a lot of fun even when they went to shit (usually)
>>341180713
It's funny that they focus on adding all sorts of new vehicles and islands and shit while ArmA 3 is still just as clunky as the original OFP, and its still is optimized like ass. Maybe BIS should focus on making the game play like a decent tactical shooter before spending all their dev time and money copying blops 2.
>>341184137
Yeah I tried the Halo stuff. It has potential but the textures are fucking awful and I don't really like the gear. I wish they'd added a few more optics, and used the SAW from Halo 4 instead of the shitty LMG they made up. A few extra guns would've been nice too, but I suppose Halo was never a game with a lot of them, just one for every role.
>>341183223
There was literally a tank made for Arma 3 with a railgun by BI, they cut it from the final game.
It was in one of the very very first release trailers.
>>341185195
CUT CONTENT
>>341182345
Just go play COD or Overwatch or some shit for laser shits.
>>341183883
/gtag/ shitter here, can confirm. But those faggots are more fun than NOFUN IGN crew cuckruma babbies.
>>341185195
That sounds dope as fuck
>>341185427
>HAHA LOL YOU LEIK LASERS BCK TO COD
I mean, really kid? Really?
>>341185414
>>341185195
Just fuck my shit up
>>341185427
CoD and Overwatch aren't even close to the type of game Arma is. A "Military Sandbox" doesn't have to be modern to befun. It would've made it stand out a little more from the previous game imo
>>341185783
Yeah, Infinite Warfare comes out in the fall. Enjoy.
>>341185497
>/gatg/
are they actually fun?
I've been lurking the threads since the updateeven farming some (You)s from dumb frog postersbut it seems like half the people in the lobbies they play are menu-ers or its one of the autists like Higgus or that german guy ruining the fun
>>341185414
This just pisses me off to no fucking end.
>>341185737
I think they removed the trailer it was in which is a shame, but it both looked and sounded amazing, all the animations worked too.
Just cut because faggots like >>341185427 cant fucking handle the fact that Arma could satisfy multiple fucking types of players and not just mega autism realism only faggotry.
>>341185914
What's the point to ARMA if everyone just pushes it to be some 2nd rate BF 2142?
>>341186169
Grow up
>>341154436
>>341154531
Lmao shit PCs
>>341186468
>Arma 3 is ruined because players get more options
This is how fucking stupid you sound
>>341186252
Because the one decently realistic game should now just be shitted up because faggots who already have 100 options for lasers and ballons and clowns and whatever other goofy shit you want have to eat up the one game that doesn't do that shit.
I guess it's only a matter of time until DCS just becomes some Star Fox rip off to boot.
>>341186468
So by your shitty logic Arma is now bad because people play mods in different settings.
There is no fucking reason they couldnt release a futuristic DLC pack and let people and server owners decide if they use it or not, except of course because of idiots like you continuously whining that other people having fun ruins your enjoyment of the game.
>>341186468
So just because they'd both be set in the future, they're the same game? Arma and Battlefield have many differences in how they play, and the mechanics. It's like saying Arma 2 is some 2nd rate BF3 just because they both have M4s and AKs.
>>341187365
>Arma 3 is shit because people play versions other than the one I play
Opinion invalidated.
>>341187365
>implying future-based games can't be realistic
>>341187365
I mean I would buy it. It'd be better controlling than Zero was.
>>341187365
>Because the one decently realistic game should now just be shitted up
I didnt realize you were forced to buy and use every DLC BI released.
Whats it like using the go karts to get around the map? Since you obviously HAVE to use it ALL the time because its in the game.
>>341188087
It's not even the DLC, it's the base game, taking place in 2030 or whatever doing the Advanced Warfare shit. It's been a shitty thing from the get go.
>>341188759
>ARMA IS RUINED COS FUTUR
>ARMS IS MODERN FUCK FUTUR
Make up your mind shitposter.
>>341188759
Literally go play Arma 2. Or use the myriad mods made by shitters like you. If you don't want innovation, why even develop new games?
>>341188759
>Arma 3 is both future and not future
Are you being stupid on purpose? Woopdefuckingdo its 2030, its also has absolutely nothing futuristic in it, and is in fact behind the times at this point.
>>341189138
What? How do you figure Arma 3 is modern?
The worst thing about Arma has always been its beyond terrible engine and developer skills. We need a modern ArmA clone made with multiplayer sandboxing/missioning in mind that's not total garbage.
Closest thing to that is SQUAD but its smaller scale.
The map is pretty cool
>>341189545
How the fuck is arma not modern? There is literally NOTHING futuristic in the game.
You are either trolling or stupid, either way no more replies for you.
>>341186242
I'm one of the few non funmenus, but I am friends with mac daddy bl8 the shitmaster himself. Can be fun.
>>341190332
>no more long range sniping
>more close quarters combat
>naval units now useful
>actual cover everywhere
Perfect.
>>341190332
>welcome to Panau
>>341150108
>mfw I like concept planes with the "rotor in wing" thing
Oh baby
>>341189301
>what's improvements on expansions of mechanics and content, fixes, graphics, maps ect.
>>341189404
Yeah dude, widespread working caseless ammo, retarded vehicle designs and wearing a fuck load of plastic and rubber and those helmets sure are the calling cards of contemporary warfare.
>>341174786
What a load of shit.
I have no other words for that virtual simulator serving the purpose of a "training" environment.
I want to doubt that this is the cutting edge of what can be done.
>>341190332
Super duper can't wait to make a mission around that volcano
>>341191056
Then refer to the second part of my post. And fuck you, the helmets look cool and still plausibly functional.
>>341191056
not him but
>widespread working caseless ammo
Is currently possible, armies dont do it right now because they still have so much ammo for older weapons and no one is in a serious war
Futuristic = shit we cant do or is well outside our current graps, nothing in arma comes even close to futuristic.
>>341178075
Im literally sick of this model and everything 6.5. It all functions the same, it all looks the same, it all has the same tactical rails... fuck off. Give me some variation.
>>341190332
Is there a real-world equivalent like with altis and stratis? I heard it was going to be serasan island but it looks nothing like that
>>341191692
>guns are guns
>guns get boring
No. Shit.
>>341192019
Greece and I think Cuba(?)
>>341191149
>volcano
Ostensibly
Its not filled with lava anon
>>341191571
Caseless ammo has a lot of problems that haven't made it any better than cased, namely the additional heat generated and fouling causing more misfires and such. Caseless ammo can fire, but there's have to be some serious advances before it can be workable enough to even try to spread it around.
>>341192019
Bro I've memorized their locations.
>>341175520
>If I refuse facts I can pretend to be right
>>341153135
>>341154432
>>341156856
>>341175742
a3g is shit
Ahoy world is the best A3 group it's filled with objective players and NO shitters at all and they're all gentlemen.
>>341192138
Apparently making everything look like painted nerf guns or super soakers should be the next move.
>>341192486
And its still not futuristic so I dont know what you're trying to argue here
The real issue here is the fact Arma is a shit simulator. There isnt even such a thing as gun jamming or overheating.
>>341150108
Looks like a skull
>>341192840
BI said this is the literal 'apex' of Arma
Im sure it will get post release support, but its obvious Arma is dead to them. They are bored shitless of this series. So lets hope they drop this and do something futuristic instead.
>>341192138
>Half the guns the game offers are literally the same
>gets boring
>MXM
>MX
>MX 3GL
>MXC
>MX SW
Emm ecks dee
>>341184079
>med-close quarters
>Arma
famm...
>s-shotguns are good to 100m
>muh slugs
Average engagement distance in Arma is 300-600m
>>341193630
>Average engagement distance in Arma is 300-600m
Not on this map it wont
>>341192840
>>341192138
And that wasn't my point,
but I guess we can't have anything thats not "near could happen sometime future feasible guns" weaponry in order to have variation.
Fuck off
>>341194012
>wanting fun in arma
Shut the fuck up and use that ported Arma 2 AK more
BI should never make new content, they should remake the same content over and over.
>>341193630
I get that, I just want a shotgun.
I mean A2 had like 10 of them, and in the art book imgur it had a section talking about one in A3
Where is my shotgun, BIS?
So what, SQUAD is the better game for infantry combat?
>>341194487
>>341178075
woah
as someone who already bought Apex this worried me
glad I checked the site and saw official AKMs, ARs. AK74us, and a 9mm mp5 that I was looking for as well
>>341150108
It's the fucking quinjet from the avengers
>>341192856
Dude, it's like saying Interstellar is realistic because we have space ships, robots and AI in the modern world, and not acknowledging the giant leaps in advancement all those things would have to make to be usable the way they are in the film.
And I'd agree, ARMA could be a better simulator, but it's been pretty clear theyve given up on that entirely.
>>341194487
And soon to be vehicle combat as well
Its community is so insanely good it makes the game far better than Arma.
>>341190332
from a Warfare perspective all I see are a bunch of islands no-one'll use, a few big mountains that people will just Tab-lock missile spam and lots of bridge choke points which any DayZ player will just bit at you about.
>>341195036
>space ships, robots and AI in the modern world
We dont have any of those things that can achieve anything that is done by them in Intersteller
We can make functional weapons with caseless ammunition
Stop trying to save face on this, its not even an argument, you're just being purposely ignorant and bias.
>>341193337
Just fuck them then. Whatever, the only thing they have is ARMA and an arma spin off. Their shitty engines and programming isn't going to be put up with anywhere else in the mils I'm genre since it's so starved they'll take anything.
>>341195036
>comparing the tech of Intersellar which we are not even close to achieving to caseless ammo
>something we actually have and works
>caseless ammo makes Arma 3 a futuristic shooter, even though absolutely nothing about it is futuristic and for all purpose its like any other ammo type
You're a moron.
>>341193630
>The shotguns are impractical due to ranges argument
So are pistols and SMGs but they're also included in arma 3.
>>341159427
Planet side 2?
>>341193630
It's true, shotguns have never been used in modern war especially in jungles where you typically engage enemies at 300m+.
>>341194979
Coincidence? I think not!
Holy fuck why is Arma 3 DLC still so fucking expensive.
>12 bucks for access to some helicopters and a trial mode
>12 more bucks for some sniper rifles
>optional 3 bucks for some go karts
Why
>>341195385
Dude, the G11 had a million problems, 90% of them were around caseless ammo. Caseless ammo doesn't work anywhere near well enough to start making the case over having brass, you'd need that same sort of giant fucking leap in the tech to make it widespread in use and usefulness.
>>341153135
>Hey let's reform A3G
>Let get a community to invest their time in ops, map creation and content creation
>Let's build a decent size group
>Then let's do nothing when a handful of shitters wreck it for everyone
Nah, A3G's death was deserved, wish I knew other groups.
>>341196652
Oh it all makes sense now, you know nothing of guns but fucking CoD.
Outstanding, kill yourself.
>>341196802
>Arma 3 thread
>e-celeb dramatic little girls instantly descend
please stop
Arma 3 doesn't use G11-style caseless ammo but telescoped ammo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlM8IHij6Hs
>>341196652
The g11 also worked, and since Arma doesnt have any of the problems of real guns there is NO difference between caseless and cased ammo
You have literally no argument to claim its futuristic in arma for caseless to work.
>>341195648
If it works so well and is so problem free, why is it that no one uses them, why you can't find it except in a prototype or two that absolutely couldn't make it.
If I showed you a world where 95% of cars were driverless and everything ran on wind and solar power, do you think that'd be a future world, or the modern one?
>>341197605
Point to the issues cased ammo have in arma, and the issues caseless have in arma
Ill wait
>>341197605
Thats not his fucking point at all idiot. There is literally no difference between cased and noncased in arma except the fucking name. Its not futuristic, its fucking lazy. Holy shit you are thick.
>>341198565
Fuck off shitters.
>>341197991
If I made all the weapons shoot star wars styled lasers, but made them mechanically the same, you'd still count that as "modern" ?
Or maybe give them all the pulse rifle from Aliens, ect, as long as all the mechanics are the same, or whatever, just the same?
>>341154128
Yeah , CUP mod is pretty fleshed out and worth using now. They are still working on uniforms for some of the secondary factions (German Spec , ect) but all the weapons and vics are in along with new content
>>341198865
Imagine every single underage bad player who did nothing but spout memes in an attempt to get more popular was in one group of players. Thats a3g.
>>341196802
>>Then let's do nothing when a handful of shitters wreck it for everyone
Thats were akb is different
shitters get banned immediately.
>>341198923
Those are purely aesthetic changes, of course its not fucking modern. Holy shit you really are trying to save face now.
Anyone know of any KOTH servers that use Apex?
>>341198923
>backtracking this hard
You lost. You claimed Arma 3 was futuristic and the only thing you could come up with was caseless, something we have today and that works, even if its not widespread because there is no reason for it to be right now.
No more replies for you, I know you'll keep trying because you cant admit you were wrong on the internet.
Arma 3's vision of the future is body armor everywhere so you can take multiple rounds to the chest, thermals on everything even static MGs and RCWS on everything.
Everyone also shares uavs, turrets and crew/pilot helmets even if it makes no sense.
>>341190332
>Dat zero visibility jungle combat
I love it
So how's that halo mod doing? Seeing that votl make me want to play A3 again, and I want to see how it's doing.
>>341199242
Holy shit, fuck off.
If you changed all the skins so everyone was knights all shooting arrows and replacing all the tanks with dragons and some shit, the missiles with magic fireballs, ect, according to you, it'd still be a modern day simulator because the mechanics and numbers are the same.
>>341198865
There was an Arma 3 /vg/ group a3g (Arma 3 General)
2013 - Launch Year
Everything was fine
2014 - Shitters aka people who cheat, script or acted like assholes joined but weren't banned. The group had a "bully the people out policy"
2015 - Group hits 64 player ops but bleeds players because 2-3 players shit on them
2016 - Non-shitter remnants of old group form new group that immediate banned old shitters called AKB
Those shitters who got banned are now shit posting in this thread (anime heads)
>>341199527
We can/do all that right now. Not futuristic.
>>341199590
I want to carpet bomb that jungle then sweep up the survivors.
>>341199669
You can try to backtrack and throw around shit I never said as much as you want kid but you've already proven you have no idea what you are talking about. Caseless is not futuristic and thats the end of that.
>>341199669
>If you changed all the skins so everyone was knights all shooting arrows and replacing all the tanks with dragons and some shit, the missiles with magic fireballs, ect, according to you, it'd still be a modern day simulator because the mechanics and numbers are the same.
Why wouldnt it be? If all the changes are purely cosmetic, its still Arma 3, and its still at core a modern day shooter.
Changing a gun into a model of a dick and having it shoot sperm doesnt make it any less of a gun in function. It might look absolutely fucking retarded, but the core game is still the same shit.
SonixApache is.
>>341199590
>thermal ops get actual use
>sneaky jungle ambushes
> >>341199831
>Drones become less of a gimmick item
Gib
>>341147286
YES.
When will OnlyAfro join the discord and start recording AKB ops ?
>>341199510
>You claimed Arma 3 was futuristic and the only thing you could come up with was caseless
Caseless, retarded rubber uniform bodyarmor and helmets and vehicle designs. We dug into caseless, but it wasn't the only thing I mentioned.
Again, you keep saying caseless works, but it still has a fuck ton of problems. It works about as well as modern humanoid robots and driverless vehicles, things which are nowhere near ready for any sort of widespread use like you see in arma 3.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caseless_ammunition#Modern_caseless_ammunition
Fucking read up or provide some sources or something to support your argument that caseless ammo is this thing that's just ready to go for everyone.
>>341200398
>wikipedia
Thank you and goodnight
> a3g good. Hah ya that's why they are certainly still around....
>>341200529
Nice counter source faggot.
At least I put something out. What made up source are you using to make your case that caseless is fucking ready for anything?
>>341157482
>tfw a3g was always terrible but they need someone to blame
>saying tfw without posting a picture
suicide when?
>It's a RealismFags v Fun2PlayFags episode
I want to change the channel.
>>341200398
>he actually thinks arma is futuristic because of that
>literally none of that is futuristic at all, and in the case of 'rubber armor' literally wrong
You are literally the most stupid person I have ever seen in an Arma thread, do you frequent a3g when it was alive? You're the type of moron who would fit in perfectly.
>>341199674
>2014 - Shitters aka people who cheat, script or acted like assholes joined but weren't banned.
Oh, like hopej?
>>341158235
>/v/'s resident Arma 3 group
Al Kebab is residing feces from /vg/'s /a3g/
/v/'s resident group is Broma
http://steamcommunity.com/groups/broma3
And it's actually good.
>>341200398
>Again, you keep saying caseless works, but it still has a fuck ton of problems. It works about as well as modern humanoid robots and driverless vehicles
>once again comparing shit we have right now to shit we cant even get to work
Once again, you're a moron.
Im still waiting for you to point out a single difference between caseless and non caseless in arma 3 apart from name, but I know you wont say anything because you cant admit you are wrong.
>>341200794
L E W D
onlyafro here ama
>>341200645
We're in discord now testin tanoa
>>341200908
>Broma
When are you going to fold into Al Kebab, we are doing tanoa soon.
>>341200398
>retarded rubber uniform bodyarmor and helmets and vehicle designs
None of the uniforms are rubber, the helmets are all basic as shit and the vehicle designs are what we literally use now. And caseless does work, it just shit.
What the fuck are you trying to say? That modern = futuristic? What the fuck is wrong with you.
>>341201056
How does the corporate dick taste?
>>341201056
Why are you such a shitter?
>>341200794
>>341201056
i hate what you've become
OnlyAfro is fucking wasted on TS like a gay little trans girl.
>>341201056
Return to AKB when.
>>341198865
Admins for A3G had a "hands off" moderation policy. Retards constantly shitted on content creators when their missions/etc fucked up. Instead of backing content creators mods sat on their thumbs. In a move the surprised many, would be content creators stopped volunteering and ceased making content. Constant drama that admins refused to address. Head admin vetoed mod choices of the group. More shitters joined ops, refused to play in alignment with the groups tatical view and continued to shit up ops. The group bled players until mostly shitters remains and then the admins couldn't afford the same servers they did before.
>>341199089
This wouldn't surprised me given who runs the group and who some of the admins are. Hopefully it'll be a good experience.
>>341200398
>le arma is futuristic!
>why
>cos caseless ammo!
I dont even. Unrealistic =/= futuristic faggot.
im in shacktactical, so yeah, I'm hyped at better vietnam missions in arma 3
>>341201757
> given who runs the group
Yeah Domiku has already been banned once
Pansyfaust has already been permabanned for A3G level shittery.
Hell, Duck and Jiffy are one incident away from being pansybanned
14
ding ding
