>"Hello Private Anon, you had something you wished to discuss?"
In terms of gameplay and waifuness which Overwatch girl is the best and why is it Pharah?
Amputee.
>delicious brown
>no bullshit attitude
>best mobility
>good damage potential at all ranges
>great utility with concussion rocket
>no skill ceiling, always room to get better with her
Best girl hands down.
>>340605357
literally confirmed not
>tfw pharah will never be real
why live...
>>340605535
Hasn't /v/ realized by now that you can't take twitter posts as credible sources? False information has been passed through twitter posts for many games in the past. Let's not forget that most game twitter accounts are run by more than one person.
>>340605572
>>340605535
Her concept art, later official art, in-game models, and comic book appearances all show her with mechanical ball joints that make it literally impossible to fit flesh inside. Another obvious flag is that her allies in the official comics who wear the same kind of armor as her don't have the same ball joins, only another specific character has them on his arms but that's it. I mean, come on, you have all these examples AND the fact that a comic has her uniquely barring mechanical limb joints while her allies in the same comic do not.
When are you guys going to stop eating shit? Pharah being an Amputee does nothing for me but I'm not going to bullshit myself when there's all these obvious as fuck things that show she is.
>>340605461
Shhhhhh don't wake her up.
>>340605572
>>340605535
http://imgur.com/a/CSDpo
http://imgur.com/a/jOLxR
http://imgur.com/a/mAvuZ
http://imgur.com/JrQxPHC
>>340606379
Ah, you're shit posting. Alright then.
>>340606561
she fits inside of it you retard. It has joints so she can move.
>>340606336
>caring about porn fitting into canon
just make it fappable, jesus christ
>>340606561
this guys an amputee too right?
though i will agree the model makes it look like her legs would have to be stick width to fit in, i feel like thats just the design choice to make it a bit more slender
>>340606925
Who's talking about porn? I was just speaking in general.
>>340606979
Lmao. You didn't get a reply at >>340606684 so you're going to keep trying with replies huh? Well here's your reply, anon. The bait isn't working but I hope your happy.