THE GTX 1080 IS 2 TIMES LESS POWERFUL THAN THE RADEON R9 FURY X.
FPS OF THE NEW INTEL CARDS ARE UP TO TWO TIMES LOWER THAN AMD.
>>340461694
Got a source for that?
Chew you have a single satisfact to snack that up
>>340461694
>angry birds
>Angry Birds
>LOOKITDATAXISLABELING.JPG
>Paint
I'm not sure if OP is the biggest faggot on /v/ or a satirical genius.
>>340462137
>a satirical genius.
Clearly this was all on purpose.
>>340461694
>also 1 extra frame
i mean, that was a good laugh, thank you for effort put
GeForce-killer!
>>340461694
I love these graphs
>>340461772
Not the guy you're replying to but
FPS for one of the most famous recent high profile video game are extremely low on high HD for Nvidia cards.
AMD cards on the other hand have no problem running it at IMAX standards.
>>340462598
i won't believe you unless you post a graph as masterfully crafted as the one in the op post
>>340462598
Yeah yeah.
But do you got a source on that?
>>340462057
Not just that. Its comparing to 980ti
