>tfw no more gta online content on last gen
Why did rockstar not want to do this?
>>339990261
It limits the stuff Rockstar can make when they make content for outdated crap
>>339990261
Upgrade nigger
They only made last gen games because they knew they would get people to buy the game twice
>>339990261
They already got their money's worth with the 7th gen release
At this point, it is more efficient to make content for a 8th gen game with stronger hardware rather than having to deal with cross gen tech issues
>>339990903
That's a poor excuse. ubisoft still made dlc for watch dogs on 360. They clearly care more it seems.
>>339990261
Because of stuff like this
>>339991363
/Thread
>>339991363
>subpar FPS
>muddy/washed up look
7th gen ports were a mistake
>>339991095
rockstar made so much money off this game they don't need to make dlc, it would be more beneficial to just begin work on GTA 6 as soon as possible. their soul is gone, their president is gone, they are not the same company that you once knew.
>>339990261
You forgot how awful GTA Online runs on last gen? It's like below 20 FPS.
>>339991635
It is mostly 25-30fps and looks great on 2005 hardware. Although the PS3 version streams in textures better because of blu-ray.
>>339990261
It's pretty much like the PS2 was in 2010 by now. It's irrelevant. Except now even the poorfag market is mostly more interested in mobile and toaster viable PC games. It's over.
>>339990261
are there any good torrents of this game that just werk? i just want to play the singleplayer.
>>339992002
If they continued support it would still be good. There are PC users who can't even run this game on low settings.
>>339991095
>They clearly care more
Please tell me you don't really think this
Watch Dogs was fucking terrible and ubishit pumps out games every year
Rockstar can go years without a release because they make sure their games are great and handled with care before releasing something
Also you just need to upgrade man
The current generation has been out for a while now and GTAV is almost 3 years old
tfw they expect us to pay $40 for a 3 year old game
>>339992448
>3 years old
wait.. what the fuck? feels like a couple of months ago
fuck i just wasted another 3 years doing nothing with my life.
>>339991095
>They clearly care more
Watch Dogs wasn't even developed for 8th gen in mind considering how big the userbase was for the 360 and PS3
They just did it to cash in on the hype of the game
>>339992179
Nah, it's just holding them back. Now that they've abandoned it entirely they have WAY less restriction with what they can accomplish. I realize that sucks if all you have is an old system, but this will make better games.
>>339992710
>tfw Rise of the Tomb Raider came out on xbox 360
>playing on old hardware
just buy current gen and put away the old shit until it becomes old enough to pull out for some nostalgia
>>339992557
GTAV came out in September 2013 :(
>>339992979
not opee but I have a ps4 I just don't feel like spending $40 on a 3 year old game that I already own
>>339992979
games aren't nostalgic since pre 2005
>>339993218
you win the award for dumbest post of the day
What bothers me the most is that the Online updates are not even adding the cars and weapons to the singleplayer anymore, they're locking that shit to Online only now.
does anyone else like gta4 more? i love that grimy brooklyn gangsta scene.
>>339990261
Are you and everyone else who doesnt understand this retarded? Last gen consoles are a decade fucking old if not slightly more. They did a great job making gta 5 run. As it is, thats the maximum the systems can handle. Theres something called ram among other things. Rockstar said that the systems have so little ram that anything else they tried adding into it would crash the game,rendering it comomtely unplayable. Consoles of last gen really did hold back games since they were the primary focus and pcs 2nd.
>>339991575
>their soul is gone
No not really, they're not charging people for gun skins and paint jobs
>>339993840
I don't like either but if I had to choose between IV an V I would choose V to be honest, IV was much worse.
>>339993840
GTA 4 will always be hated by purists, but it was fucking earth shattering when it came out. Only V has even come close. Nobody but Rockstar themselves have ever come anywhere near touching it. The city was real.
Is last-gen GTA Online still active?
>>339994225
It's active as in the servers are still running, but nobody is playing. Rockstar might shut down the servers soon though.
>>339994225
Yeah, on 360 at least
>>339991552
Except they could end up looking great. The 360 titanfall port was amazing. Ported by bluepoint. They have a great rep for ports. The damn game looks almost as good as the xbone version.
>>339994440
That's probably because the Xbox One is a weak console in the first place and not that much better than the 360;
>>339992818
Absolutely this!
>>339994039
that's not the point, they don't make games the same way they used to. there's less humor and more realism and that's not okay because they're supposed to be the makers of GTA.
>>339994649
GTA V was a pretty obvious step back in that direction, was it not?
GTA IV was bland, grey garbage with shitty side content
GTA V is an objectively superior upgrade in every sense of the word
>>339990936
this
