can I even run overwatch with this pos?
Graphics: Intel(R) HD Graphics Family
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4510U CPU @2.00 GHz 2.60 GHz
RAM: 6.00GB
>>339956403
No, you need a better one. New CPU + atleast 16 GB RAM
I built my computer planning to get a 1070, so I'm just using the Intel HD530 in my i5 right now. This is what Overwatch looks like on my system. It runs at 60fps.
>>339956557
Don't lie to me, man, I just wanna know how much of a difference not having a decent graphics card will hurt.
>>339956842
Is it even worth it to suffer through that?
>>339957069
Here's the settings I have to use to achieve that. It's not horrible, especially since the menus and stuff are in 1080p, it's just the 3d stuff is rendered at 1/4th that (the same resolution as a PS vita for reference). It doesn't impact game-play at all, it's just ugly. You'll get used to it if you find the game fun.
>>339957069
Not that guy, but pro players play on the lowest setting for a reason
>>339957521
Because it's gets the highest frame rates possible. Pro players don't play on toasters.
>>339956403
You could if you wanted to work for Gamespot
>>339957363
I feel you, I've had to do stuff like this at times
>integrated graphics
no you cant
>>339957632
any halway decent pc gets you 60 FPS or 144 if you have 144hz monitor.
PSA: Overwatch has a horrible frame buffer that blesses you with heavy input lag on anything lower than 130fps. Have fun not being able to aim for shit.
Overwatch has some weird glitches that I think are only on Intel graphics. Like there's this weird ghosting sometimes after you spawn (pic related) and the game always reverts to windowed mode every time I start it. It works fine in full screen mode, you just have to reset it in full screen mode every time you start the game.
