>undead immune to backstabs
what's the deal with that? they have backs, so they should be able to be stabbed.
>>339946270
Shit game design by Chinese hacks
-Backstab are instakills because it pierces the heart
-Undeads don't need their hearts to live
-Ergo backstabs are useless against them.
I rest my case, judge.
>>339947120
It's backstab, not heartstab
why the hell would you get to that conclusion?
>>339947120
Backstabs are sneak attacks, the extra damage comes from the enemy not defending themselves. I don't know what the logic vs. undead is, though. Maybe they don't defend and are just inherently tough?
>>339947569
>Backstabs are sneak attacks, the extra damage comes from the enemy not defending themselves
Prove it faggot
>>339947943
It's the same logic with counterattacks and armor penetration. Those do extra damage too, right?
>>339946270
the idea of a backstab is that you attack a vital part of a person. go and tell me a vital part of an undead. you just have to slash it to pieces. and you're not gonna do it with a single stab, no matter the direction it comes from
>>339947569
It's more about having the opportunity to freely attack a vital part of the body in addition to the defense stuff. Undead don't really have such things ( especially skeletal ones) as they are just animated corpses. Not sure what's up with vampires and stuff tho.
>>339948326
Critical hits are a different matter entirely because they don't negate defense.
>undead immune to backstabs/sneak attacks
>undead immune to critical hits
>undead reduce damage from piercing attacks
>pick rogue
Fuck NWN campaign, seriously