Bad Company
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
Best Battlefield or worst?
>>339652414
Does it have regen-health?
>Yes
it's shit.
>No
it's not shit.
best. sound design alone is better than 3 and 4 in certain aspects
>>339652672
>not playing hardcore for instant death anyway
>>339652414
Best After 1942/1943.
>>339652672
Hardcore or not? I've always played hardcore because I hate having to magdump people
BF2 > BF2142 > BF4 (patched) > BC1 > BC2 > BFV > 1942 > BF3 > 1943 >>>> Heroes
BF2 is the best one, though. Everone knows that.
>>339653883
PR is fun
>>339652414
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPzBh_sufKU
>>339652672
there's literally nothing wrong with regenerating health
the first call of duty had fixed health and this promoted sudoku spam, you cannot have health pickups in 2000+ and having a dedicated medic class would hamper gameplay flow
>>339653719
man I fucking love the unpredictible and dynamic setpieces that open map mayhem multiplayer games bring, no scripted sequence will ever come close as this shit in terms of raw awesomeness
>>339654304
That's why I like it so much. Actual destructible environments, great sound, and fast paced multiplayer that my computer can actually handle. The callouts are helpful but not over the top
I don't like battlefield but I love BC2
>>339654304
>Defenders are dug in
>Attackers can't even get within viewing distance of the M-COM
>Attackers eventually just say fuck it and level the building
>tfw can't play bc2 because the password for my ea id was lost
>cant just buy another copy on steam
Why did DICE become so shit? Everything they made from BF2 to BC2 was great, and then they completely shit the bed with BF3 and everything thereafter
They should just make Battlefield 2 HD
>>339653725
>my first game was BF2
>>339652414
IS THIS A CUSTOM cROSSHAIR !? IT SEEMS THINER
>>339653725
BF1942/DC >>>>>> BFNAM > BF4 (patched) > BC2 > BF2142 > Everything else.
>>339654304
>>339654823
This kinda shit gets me hard
>>339655167
EA's demands got tighter, Sweden got more PC.
>>339654823
>Attackers just sit on the other side of the map and destroy the MCOM building with a tank
>Vehicles have infinite ammo so they can take as many shots as they want
>Practically nothing defenders can do
Yeah, that sure was a blast to play against.
>>339655547
So it was the jews fault? Again?
>>339655623
Not all buildings were fully destructible.
>>339655781
Quite a few MCOM buildings were though. None of them should have been in the first place.
Tried reinstalling BC2. Nearly every server was dead AF.
>>339655547
holy fuck it has nothing to do with either of these. BF3 and those games were shit because their design theory changed and went towards more streamlined (IE CoD) gunplay. These changes were a direct result of health regen, high customizability/unlocking and so on that BC2 and even BF2142 started.
>BC2 best battlefield
no, BC2 does not follow BF1942, BF2 or even BF2142's gameplay, so its actually a pretty shit battlefield, but it is a very fun shooter.
BF4 post-patching and DLC is underrated. The worst game in the series is definitely BF3. The best is BF2.
>>339655623
>valparaiso third stage
>turn tow2 in spawn around
>destroy both mcoms without leaving spawn
>destroy mcom B in stage 4 too
>mfw
BF1 soon.
>>339655623
Go out and fucking kill them then. Defending side has infinite lives anyway so you can keep throwing yourself at them.
>>339652414
Made for a good spinoff, but was the beginning of the end for the series.
>>339656778
>The worst game in the series is definitely BF3
Bullshit.
I'll admit i've never played BF2, so maybe it's fucking fantastiv, but Bf3 was better then BC1 and 1943, and about on par with BC2.
Both Bc2 and BF3 were 8.5/10 - 9/10 games.
>>339654180
>You cannot have health pickups in 2000+
And why the fuck can you not?
>>339652414
bad company 2 was my favorite game in the series, hands down.
i booted up the PC version a little while ago, and there was exactly one server that still had people in it, and it was a hacked server.
It's a shame.
Started playing BF4 again and..
WHY ARE VEHICLES IMMORTAL??
Rockets do 16 damage a hit to tanks and by the time you get 2 shots off you're already dead and they've repaired it back to 100%.
Someone said once you get RPGs you can 2 shot vehicles from the back but it takes hours upon hours of grinding just to get to a point being an engineer is useful.
>>339655451
This
>>339659173
Haven't played Battlefield 4, but 3 was atrocious when it came to this.
I got so sick of pummeling a humvee with rockets or tank shells over and over and watching it just bounce a little while on fire.
They aren't THAT well armored. Back in Battlefield 2 one or two shells or rockets was enough to blow it to bits or at least kill the occupants.
>>339655623
I think there was only 1 point in 1 level where both MCOMs where in destructible buildings.
Bad Company 1 > Bad Company 2
All the charm that the first game had was gone in the second in favor of CoD shit.
>>339659173
Because DICE is incompetent and/or refuses to fix issues. Every BF game will have well known mechanical and balance problems that will never be fixed. Just accept it or give up on them as developers.
>>339653725
I'd swap BF4 for BC1 myself. No game's improvements could make up for the colossal shit show it was at launch, let alone the lone wolf gameplay it continues from 3.
>>339658904
it wasn't even close to the fun of BC2. Too much unlocking faggotry and 'realism' as opposed to arcade-yness. It also had a shit filter that washed out everything and most maps were unfun garbage.
If you started on 2142 or after, your opinion of battlefield is limited to fuck dude.
>bc1 1943
you're right on these though, those were mediocre af
>mfw hardline isfun
Guns in this are weirdly high up and wide.
>>339662679
So is your mom's ass.
1 was a lot better but 2 is alright too
>>339659028
because they are archaic desu
unless you are playing unreal tournament or quake arena
>>339652414
Whata shitty webm
>>339663176
>archaic
I should have known I was responding to a retard.
DO PEOPLE STILL PLAY BAD COMPY 2
>>339659028
not that anon, but in my experience medpack in MP slow down the game, turning it into a cat-and-mouse game, with whoever is wounded at the moment being chased by the newly spawned at they search for the medpack. sometimes it gets campy especially when the medpacks have specific spawn places and times.
medic classes are more reliable without slowing the game down too much.
>>339664893
I also want to know this
>>339664893
>>339666689
Start it up and report back
>>339652414
BC2 was one of my favorites.
>>339664893
not many, only a few servers and they only have a few people
Bad Company 1 was way, way better than Bad Company 2.
>Bad Company 1's story and characters are amazing, and they're butchered in 2 for a generic cawadoody clone of a campaign
>Multiplayer focused on large maps and vehicles, even infantry only maps were open. BC2's maps are all chokepoint-fests.
>BC2 had fucking PERKS, somebody tell me what these added to the game and why they should ever exist. Especially magnum ammo.
>Gun unlockes in BC1 were non-linear, you pick whatever gun you want to unlock as soon as you can. BC2 is a skinner box cowadoody clone of an unlock system.
>BC1's classes way better than 2's
I could go on.
>>339667807
>BC2's maps are all chokepoint-fests.
u wot
>>339668692
They are. At least they were at release.
>>339668836
>>339668692
All I ever played was Atacama Desert and there ain't no choke points in that
>>339659173
I'd say jeeps are too weak though. Only one blast so people never really use them other then taxi
I fucking loved BC1 because I had a shitty computer that couldn't play anything and it was my introduction into the series. Basically only played everything after it
>>339668836
Oh, sure then, but the maps added post launch fixed that
