It's a good question.
Why aren't there Wapeach, Wadaisy, and Warosiana?
Because the names are stupid and they'd be filler characters just like Waluigi and Daisy.
And since they aren't going to be babies, there really isn't much point to them existing, is there?
![1375215977720[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/cMrjQYK.gif "1375215977720[1].gif")
Because Wario doesn't care about saving women.
>>339560419
Because Waluigi was retarded enough.
>>339560996
Good point, but who are Wario and Waluigi supposed to plow at the end of the day? Maybe that's the reason they're villains in the first place.
if they made them they would be the Super princess super sluts.
>>339560419
Wouldn't it be weach and waisy?
They're already the warui versions.
Daisy is already Wapeach.
Daisy is Wapeach. She's made by the same guys who invented Wario.
>>339560419
they are both whores and live in mexico
>>339561405
Wario has Syrup or Mona, if he ever decides to stop jerking off to treasure. (It's even canon that he and Mona dated for a bit).
And Waluigi isn't even Warios brother. He only shows up for sporting events. We don't know who is in his life.
>>339561632
But she came before Wario.
>>339560419
Only autists wish for "Wa" princesses, because it will complete a set. They only want it for completion sake. Not because they're genuinely interested in having Wa princesses.
>>339560419
Something like this?
>>339561405
>who are Wario and Waluigi supposed to plow at the end of the day?Each other.
>>339562954
>trashy peach and daisy sluts
>yes pls
>>339561257
does he care aboutneggingthem?
>>339562791
If those autists were so obsessed with "completeness" for the sake of it, why don't they get off wellfware, build up social and work skills, contribute to society, and then have a complete life?But, interesting perspective. I agree, Anon.
>>339560419
>Mario & Luigi
>rivals of Mario & Luigi
>girlfriends of Mario & Luigi
>girlfriends of the rivals of Mario & Luigi
no, Besides, Waluigi doesn't need a girl and Wario's already got a whole harem of not-lazily designed bachelorettes to choose from, we don't need a Wapeach.
>>339560419
Because Waluigi only exists to give a doubles partner for Wario, same reason Daisy was brought out of obscurity.
>>339560419
It was a stupid thought and it was rejected for a good reason.
>>339563978
Also Waluigi apparently was used by Wario on a dog contest, if I remember correctly.
>>339560419
wario and waluigi are japanese puns
wapeach and wadaisy aren't at all.
Daisy is Wapeach
>>339560419
Wario was made to be an anti-mario right?
Waluigi was made by the sports games as a partner for Wario.
There doesn't need to be a counterpart to Peach or Daisy.
Syrup and Mona are the closest thing. Would be neat to see them in the next Mario spinoff.
>>339560419
because wario and waluigi are stupid characters to begin with
>>339565145
You forgot Shokora.
>>339560419
Because all those characters exist entirely to set up the world for Mario
It isn't a big equal opportunity drive, it isn't a focus on each of these equal but unique characters, it's literally mario and company
Literally everything in that world exists as a reaction to him
>>339566260
Corpses aren't allowed to play sports. If she came back as some skeletal being, then maybe.
>>339560419
Because women 'can't be evil'. That would be sexist.
Wouldn't they be named Pear, dafodil. And thornalina?
>their princess is a drybones because they never bothered to try and save her
