NVIDIOTS ON SUICIDE WATCH
https://youtu.be/eqCo0LTUhsE
WHAT DO YOU FAGGOTS HAVE TO SAY?
>>339556114
>curryniggers in charge of holding a fucking bag
>>339556508
>letting a en jun run part of a company.
Any specs on it?
Is there any reason to even own AMD anymore?
>>339556114
I've been an Nvidia loyalist for very a long time, after I got tired of AMD's cards giving me weird driver issues and black screens. And also because their cards gave me the best bang-for-buck.
But if AMD is beating them for price and quality for a given use-case, that makes me happy. It's a win for consumers, and teaches Nvidia that they can't take it e z.
I think I'm going to ahead and finally switch to PC.
>>339556114
sheet I was all ready to go back to Nvidia after a decade+ but now it looks like I'll be stuck with AMD for another 3-5 years.
>>339556874
>compettitor card is $200 more. depending on specs yes there is more and more reason to go red.
>>339556819
not quite yet i dont think. just speculation.
>>339556819
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-10-graphics-card-leak/
>>339556114
How close is this thing going to be to the 1070.
Im going to buy a 1070 but the price in this thing is good.
Worth upgrading if I have a R9 290?
>>339557396
In any case i would wait to see benchmarks, i am waiting to see what the 490 will be able to do at what price
>>339557342
About 75% performance for over 100 less. If you are doing 1080p there's no reason to get the 1070 when the 480 exists.
>>339557773
>but muh cuda cores
>nvidia will still completely crush them
get fucked amdfags, your company is dead kiddos
>>339557865
Why do you want nvidia to have a monopoly. That never ends well for consumers.
And I just dropped $300 on a GTX 970... Should I return it and wait for this?
>>339557865
>your company is dead
really?
>latest card offers "quality vr for convienient price" at $200 (two fucking hundred bucks)
>ps4, 4.5, xbox 1, and nintendo NX will have AMD chips (over 80% of the market)
meanwhile nvidia is looking only at enthusiasts with money to burn and the car(?) industry.
okay
>>339558049
As long as you can still return it, Anon. You have nothing to lose if you return it and wait.
>>339558049
maybe. wait for benches.
So here is the magic question. 480x, or 1080?
You can either buy
>Brand new AMD budget card that's less powerful than a 290X by .1 tflops
or
>Brand new Nvidia top quality card that disables 4 way SLI
Don't call it a grave
>>339558475
480x hands down.
>>339557239
>wccftech
No
>>339558475
There is absolutely no reason to get a 1080 if you're only going to play at 1080p
>>339558735
>SLI
>ever
2 way has only ever been the one thats even benificial and even then its not even that worth it.
>>339558475
1080ti
>>339557773
>If you are doing 1080p there's no reason to get the 1070 when the 480 exists.
It's called minimum frames, power is never a bad thing.
>>339558475
Wait for 11XX.
>>339559492
>not the 12XX
it's like you don't care about your wallet
>>339556114
How many ram does this piece of shit have?
Any spec? So far the only thing is good is the price.
>>339559704
8GB DDR5, 5.5TFLOPS, it's basically a $200 290X
>>339559704
There will be a 4G version and an 8G version
5+ TFLOPS (Slightly less than a 980ti, which means it may beat it in DX12 but not in DX11 games).
I wonder how much a Sapphire Dual-X card will cost.
>>339558878
This is why I love being perfectly content with 1080p. While everyone else is falling for the 4K meme and dropping top dollar for the hardware to get it, I'll be over here, snug and cozy with my 970 and the same old monitor I've had for years.
Can't wait for 8K to go mainstream so companies start swindling even more cash out of the ~enthusiasts~. Meanwhile I'll be back here either still enjoying 1080p or picking up all the cheap 4K hardware that nobody wants anymore.
>>339556114
>AMD
the only thing good about them is new architecture for the low price. that's about all they're good for, is updating to new architecture.
AMD drivers are just too shitty for me to ever use any of the cards ever again.
>>339558049
return it asap
>>339559704
>vr
so it's btfo of 970, so 980/980ti
why does /v/ suddenly approve of "race to the bottom" products?
>>339558049
why the fug didnt you buy a used 980 for 250, holy shit are people this stupid.
>>339556819
Not stronger than their previous flagship.
Just cheaper.
>>339558049
lol
>>339560206
???
It's supposedly great performance for that price. Not everyone wants the >$300, nor sees them as practical at all.
>>339560206
NOW
>>339559940
8gb version is $250
>>339556114
>linustechtips
get that shit out of here op
>>339556114
>This video was sponsored by AMD
SHILLS GET OUT
8GB HBM2 WHEN?
>>339560501
16 GB is $300
>>339560687
Are you fucking high? This isn't confirmed at all.
>>339559468
>carrying about fluctuations over 100fps
just get 1440p fag
>yfw you buy a 1080 and a r9 480 to make them work in SLI mode
I'm a console gamer . Don't worry I'm a good guy I have a ps4.
Will this mean ps4k will have more Tflops? :)
>>339556114
>mfw I have a 750ti
Why would anyone want a 480?
>>339561058
first learn what does mean tflops.
>>339556114
call me when they don't have shit drivers
>>339561213
i'm gonna tflop my dick all over your face, faggot
Hopefully R9 380 prices go down now I'm poor as fugg
>>339557396
Maybe. It'd be like 20%. Wait for vega
Will it sport a HDMI 2.0 port? I bet it won't. No 60Hz 4K to your new 65" 4K TV for you!
>mfw have a 960
Should I get this? Or a 10X0?
The 960 does pretty much everything I need, and I don't myself going to 1440p in the near future.
>>339561308
if you had.
>>339561340
>The 960 does pretty much everything I need
So why upgrade?
>>339561306
Hello I am from 2 years ago. I traveled into the future to assist you in making an intelligent purchase. AMD has good drivers finally.
>>339556114
>SPONSORED BY AMD
I find Linus annoying but fuck. When did this shit become okay? Doesn't it just flush your objectivity and reputation for it down the drain?
>>339561340
Keep the 960.
>>339561412
Because it's not going to last very long (?).
>>339556114
>watched stream
>2 cards in crossfire can just barely make 60fps on High setting at 1080p in doom
>meanwhile 1080 hits 90fps on ultra at 1440p on a single card
Yeah man, nvidia sure is ruined now.
Hopefully this craters prices on the 960. I want a 4GB one for like $100.
>>339556114
Is microstutter still a problem for crossfire setups?
>>339561340
Save money and only upgrade when you feel like you absolutely need it.
>>339561537
No.
It's macrostutter now.
AMDiots think that 2 cards together that draw more power, create more heat, and use shitty drivers is better than one card
LOL
Just get a 1070
>>339561523
It's going to last for the time being. Keep it for the next couple months, wait for the benchmarks, save up, and then make an informed decision.
>>339558735
>>339561041
>>339561537
falling for the SLI/CrossFire meme
>>339561609
lol
>>339561340
Why did you buy a 960 in the first place when it was a more expensive and less powerful card than the 280x from release?
The only reason to ever buy a 960 is because you're a wannabe nvidiot that want wants to be on the green team despite being a poorfag, but wince you're open to buying AMD i really can't understand why you would have ever bought a gtx 960...
>>339561537
It's there, but not as bad as it use to be
DX12 has a feature that can completely remove micro stutter in SLI/CF, but no one is using it, fuck Quantum break doesn't even support Sli full stop
>>339561612
>caring about power draw
>current year +/- 0
Did you buy a sub 500w PSU or something
>tfw the actual price is $400 now
NVIDIA IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
>>339561815
>comparing low/mid to ultra
Are they retarded?
>>339561771
Not him. I got mine (4GB model) because considering it came with a game I was going to play, and considering I didn't want a repeat of my previous AMD experience under any circumstances, it was the best transition card. Good enough for a while. In half a year, it's 1440p time.
>>339561815
Let's wait for some real benchmarks, won't we?
>>339561442
They get sponsored by nvidia and especially Intel too. They get pretty much every gpu they use on the show for free.
If you watch their livestreams, Linus will get pissy if a company doesn't send out the newest card to him for free on time like its just a carton of milk.
>>339561771
Because it was like $180 and does what I want? I really don't care too much for brands, nor did I want to spend too much time browsing for cards. I saw it, saw that it could play the games I wanted to play at the time, had an acceptable price. So I bought it.
>>339561934
Nvidiot mad as fuck.
>>339561771
Maybe he got it discounted or something, stop being an idiot.
>>339556114
>$200
so it's just a rebranded 380, which was already a rebranded 280?
sick.
>>339561967
>4gb model
It couldnt use 4GB because of its limited bandwidth, you paid more just to get a free game...
The X80s are supposed to be "high end" with X90s being "enthusiast" so either we're gonna have pathetic jumps on both ends or, unlikely scenario, the 490X actually ends up being a great card
>>339562079
What
Sure it can, the fuck are you on about?
>>339561815
$500 is the price for 2x 8GB
>>339561041
are you retarded or what, it's not posible to do SLI between nvidia and AMD graphics cars.
>>339556114
mfw I bought 380x for couple months ago
>>339562064
No it has the performance of a 980Ti with reduced power draw.
Not every gen is a rebrand.
>>339561306
ring ring faggot when was the last time you used an amd driver? thats what they have been working on for the past two weeks.
>kek
captche rue mour
>>339562135
It is with DX12 and Vulkan
>>339562167
>mfw I bought a 280x at all
>>339561969
Seems like a prick but there's a difference between getting review models to test and going to what is essentially sponsored marketing event and being used as a type of spokesperson to announce their new product.
Sponsored basically means he got paid to do this gig, not just getting shit for free.
>>339556114
That you're gonna start bitching about Nvidia "gimping" games after getting what you pay for in a few months.
Which card would you main in a GPU fighting game?
Whats the point of people buyings a card and then buying next card after 18 months, buy a card that lasts you at least 3 years.
>>339562124
Go look up some benchmarks, it makes little to no difference becuase of the 128 bit bus.
>>339560029
Why not just drop down to 720p and save yourself even more money?
>>339562267
This qt right here
Why are most AMDfags weebs with no jobs?
>>339556114
So if I get this, what would be a good build around this? cpu/mobo/ram etc
>>339562210
The 280x is still really high in price to performance charts, I got use out of mine and I'm about due for an upgrade.
How long until my 770 gtx is outdated garbage
>>339562282
What game even now have problems in 1080p or even 2k on a 970.
>>339562267
GTX 275
>>339562329
>Having a job
Point at him and laugh!I want to kill myself, I wish I could just not work and spend all my time making vidyagaems and music.
>>339562396
Several years ago.
>>339562214
They stil get actually sponsored by nvidia and intel, I dont have it on me right now but theres a video where Luke dresses up as an Intel gladiator.
>>339562284
I did. It does make a difference. Not necessarily where they're topping out - the GPU is still the same after all - but in framedrops.
Sure, if the game is old or small enough to not need more than 2GB anyways, it makes no difference, but there's enough games that can use the additional VRAM, and some that desperately want it. No, I don't want random framedrops because the 2GB VRAM is full.
> it makes little to no difference becuase of the 128 bit bus.
And that's just BS. On a faster GPU, it would, but not on a 960.
HOW CAN I MAKE THESE 2 WEEKS GO BY ANY FASTER I JUST WANT IT TO BE JUNE 10 ALREADY!
>>339562463
I wish I didn't have to work but I know if I didn't my time would be wasted.
>Thinking about upgrading R9 270
>see this
Fuck yeah.
>>339562064
it's new architecture, GCN 4.0, so not a rebrand.
>>339562669
People don't understand what "rebrand" means anymore. They now think it means "card that's similar in power to an older card".
POO IN THE LOO
AMD IS POO
POO IN THE LOO
>>339562571
It's still wasted, just in different shit. At least that way I would waste time in MY shit, not in making some fag rich.
>>339556114
>tfw you made an investment in nvda and amd a week ago
So which one should i sell guys?
>>339562167
Same but I got mine for pretty cheapo so I'm not feeling too bad
POST BUILDS
>>339562226
Always. The AMD fanboy cycle:
>nvidia releases new card specs
>fanboys reeee that AMD's going to destroy nvidia with <insert new technology here (HBM, HBM2)>, telling everyone to just wait for it
>specs get released, vastly underpowered compared to nvidia, yet somehow in AMD's own benchmarks seem to be beating the leading nvidia card
>fanboys start chomping out about nvidia being finished
>cards get released
>they, as expected, underperform
>fanboys reeee about nvidia gimping them with their illuminati influences
>nvidia releases info on new card
>cycle begins anew
At least nvidia fanboys know they're never going to get anything but incremental increases.
>>339562767
this much denial
Waiting to hear about how expensive the 8gb version is and about the other vendors. Still the 4gb version is vr ready and you can't beat $200 for that. Good stuff here.
>>339556114
I was planning on buying the 1070. Would that be worthwhile getting a 38in 4k monitor and a 24in 1080p monitor for my desk? Or should I just save up and go 1080
>>339562267
FX 5800 is most OP, it can literally blow other cards away with it's jet engine fan.
>>339560294
the 480 isnt their flagship.
>>339562935
If you're going to try 4k now I would not go with anything less than a 1080.
>>339562778
>A week ago
None, not yet.
>>339562935
>>339563068
If you're considering 4K right now, don't. Nor even the AIB 1080s in SLI will be hitting 60fps in most games. Wait one more generation. At the very least until 1080tis.
>make a $200 VR card
>probably is on par with gtx970
>nvidia drops the 970 price to $200
>amd goes back to toiling away on consoles
amd is shit
hey,
why is AMD so interested in driverless cars
>>339561526
>budget card vs. enthusiast card
>$200 vs. $700
okay mistir you sure showed me.
>Mfw I paid £340 for the Nitro 390 a month ago
End me
>You can buy at least three 480 for the price of one 1080
>>339561442
It's also not a review. It's a announcement.
>All these retards who don't get the point
The 1070/80 series and 400 series are designed to be VR cards, that's why they exist
Nvidia is having to release the 1000s because the 900s needed major improvements for VR and the 400s seem to be going cheap to see if they can strike deals for "VR Ready" Prebuilt PCs
>>339562267
8800GTS
>>339562849
Used to be like that, except AMD would always release a card weaker, but they've been closing the gap every generation. Finally this last generation was the first I finally saw it. Most people were suggesting AMD on entry level builds. Most people who want a strong computer get a 970 but they were referring the 390 because it was a little more "future proof".
I fell for the 3.5. Still probably gonna go 1070.
>>339563313
Have fun with that CF setup, and don't forget to invest in a new PSU. Also, crank up that AC.
>>339561815
>min settings vs ultra
>better in dx 12 amd optmised game barely 4 fps
can't make this shit up AMD is finished
>>339562267
HD4780
all the way.
>>339563313
two for me and one for a friend.
so guyswhat are you gonna do with your money?
>>339562315
There's an appreciable difference between 720p and 1080p, 1080p and 4k, not so much.
>>339563068
Well the 4k is down the line. As of now where I wanna put a monitor could not fit anything above 25 inches. I wanted to get a 1440p monitor but I could't find anything that was in my size range with a refresh rate 120 or higher. Should I just go with this if I'm gonna be gaming in 1080 144hz or hold out and get the 1070 in preparation for when 1440p monitors get smaller?
>>339563308
You fuck, that was AMD's own comparison. If you want to blame someone for making that idiotic comparison, blame them.
>>339563310
I feel your pain bro
>>339561526
Wait until the Vulkan version of Doom comes out.
>>339562849
>R9 200 series
MANTLE GUYS! BUY IT FOR MANTLE!
>No mantle games
>R9 300 series
DX 12 GUYS! DX 12 IS IN THIS YEAR! BUY IT FOR DX12!!!
>One DX12 game
>Nvidia new line already has full DX12 support as well, still no DX12 games in sight.
>R9 400 series
Whats the gimmick this time?
I'd love to see AMD get competitive in the desktop market but lets be real. They're not going to be.
>>339563630
>VULCAN GUYS! BUY IT FOR VULCAN! CAUSE YOU TOTALLY FELL FOR THAT MANTLE SHIT A COUPLE YEARS AGO LOLOLOLOL.
Are you literally autistic to take this bait, AGAIN? Fuck anon, kill yourself now.
>>339563514
this. i can see people wanting 1440 but 4k on anything thats not a 40" monitor is stupidly dense ppi and not fucking worth it, power wise or graphically.
>>339563313
>buying shit gpu 3 times in a row
Piling shit makes only a bigger pile of shit you know
>>339563662
>Nvidia new line already has full DX12 support as well, still no DX12 games in sight.
>Bearly winning last gen AMD card
yea, "full support" indeed
>>339563513
Huh? Money?
Did you think I could afford one of either card?
>>339561934
>>339562007
exactly this i used to be amd fanboy but this is lying straight in your face
>>339563608
the comparison is to show that you can get similar performance for significantly less money
>>339563313
xfire always works well :^)
>>339563630
>literally being a literal "just wait for it" and fanboy, literally
Why do you punish yourself like this? Are you a masochist?
>>339563823
Why do we care? What DX12 games are there? What games in 2016 / 2017 even have a DX12 engine? You're literally going to buy an AMD GPU for 1-2 games?
>>339563662
>Whats the gimmick this time?
Vulkan
>>339562267
nvidia tnt 2.
This bit was hilarious
https://youtu.be/ZwlQvjwYFEM?t=2200
>>339563856
They look the same?
>>339563882
>high vs ultra
>comparable
>>339563823
Pascal has the hardware support for DX12, Maxwell did not. There is however absolutely no reason to be prepping drivers for DX12 when there is nothing that uses it.
I get that you're feeling buyers remorse over your purchase, but don't worry... maybe more than one game will use Vulcan when you buy your new 400 series card? Haahaha... Who am I kidding? You're getting literally robbed based on false promises.
>yeah... most people will spend an extra $200, double the price for a 10% performance increase. Heh. And AMD will never release a stronger card. Ever. Lmao.
Daily reminder
>>339564167
There's a reason they made it tiny so the difference aren't glaring.
Look at the small figures, that have been reduced to dots. They're blurry as fuck on the left.
>>339563992
There are 4 engine that are implementing Vulkan right now, one of witch is Source Engine 2.
They might update all their older games to that, soon enough.
and there are like, 21 games that are supposed to get DX12 support this year, no idea about new games.
>>339563856
To be honest that could have just been the contrast and color settings.
I've already looked at a higher res version and I really only notice the difference in colors
>>339564265
>fake
Two r9 290X score 19-21k with excessive OCs. You do realize you can see the top scores for specific builds on 3dmarks site right? Stop posting fake shit faggot.
>>339564220
>I get that you're feeling buyers remorse over your purchase
Yea, GTX780 isn't as good as Ti, real shame I didn't wait until I was fired to buy it.
>>339564265
hahahahHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>339564413
>4 engines, of which I'll list one
>21 games, of which I'll list zero
Well shit, I'm convinced, hand me a cup of that kool aid.
Good, I just hope Vega is good. I have a 970 and not only did i buy it before the whole 3.5 meme jewery the drivers are horrible. Geforce experience never fucking opens for instance not even after a clean wipe/install also frequent blue screens. Been thinking even to put my old 7950 in even again.
>MFW $199 R480x from Gigabyte the perfect 1080p replacement for my 2gb GTX 770 EVGA
It's a great day today lads.
>>339564576
Wikipedia is free, dude.
>>339556114
>4GB for $200
topkek
>8GB for $300
:^)
>>339564413
>citation needed
I've seen three games planned for 2016 that use DX12. One that uses Vulkan.
>>339564265
Triple 290X only get ~14500 in firestriker.
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6110086
>>339563313
Would you rather have a clear 480p or a full 1080p :^) ?
>>339564620
>I'll tell him to go use wikipedia so I look smart instead of having any actual facts or information to back up my statement
Wow, just hand me the fucking pitcher already.
>>339564680
www.wikipedia.com
>>339561526
>This much misinformation
The Doom demo is obviously a single 480, they show ultra settings being turned on and getting around 70fps.
Resolution is most likely 2560x1440, which would put the 480 at 980 performance levels, as expected.
>>339562849
pretty much this.
>fell for AMD meme
>>339564265
now post sli 1080 aftermarket and hang yourself
also synthetic tests
clearly AMD autist
>>339563068
Is the 1070 worth it for 2k?
>>339564452
Where the heck did you get that number from?
23 ~ 24 is basically what 290x CF average score for Firestrike is.
You mentioned the chart yet you didn't even look at it yourself the first time.
>>339564917
It's not even accurate test results. The numbers are fake.
>>339562080
480 is mid, 480x is upper mid, 490 is high, 490x higher and the new fury will be enthusiast.
There must be some sort of catch, I won't get excited until I hear a couple bad things about it.
>>339556114
Damn that's a nice looking card.
I hope the 480 will be able to play Bannerlord at 4K. If it can do that it's good enough for me.
>>339564764
>I'll just memetext a bunch of stuff like how i'm a big dumb doodoo head as if that's what they're really saying
Wow, just hand me the fucking pitcher already.
>>339565162
Nobody knows yet, it was just announced, there is no reviews or anything yet.
>>339565172
>nice looking
The specs are nice, but come the fuck on, the reference cooler is ugly as sin
>be AMD
>present shit tier GPU for 199$ 4gb version
>not avaible until june 29th
>nvidia releases gtx 1060 Ti , 1070
>amd on suicide as ever before
Can't make this shit up. Nvidia won so fucking easy.
>>339564894
>GDDR5
What happened to HBM2?
anyone else feel wierd seeing a company show a card in CF on low settings vs the other card on max settings not in sli, on a game that is heavily biased for amd, while using experimental drivers that wont be released or benchmarks that wont be verified?
it just seems so wierd that people are just jumping on the band wagon instead of stepping back and using a small iota of critical thinking skills.
>>339565272
OY VEY IT IS ANDDA SHOAH!!!!
>>339565251
It's classy as fuck m8. Way nicer looking than Nvidia's gaudy xX 1337 g4m3r Xx reference card.
Obviously I'm gonna buy a Sapphire model anyway so it's a moot point.
>>339556114
just give me vega raja senpai.
>>339565319
it's too expensive for a budget card
>>339564738
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/7250527
>>339565319
too expensive for mid tier gpus
>>339565319
AMD is for POOrMAN's shitty gpu
>>339565339
aren't you banned yet?
the live demo was run on a single card. It's completely unrelated to the benchmark they showed later.
>>339565045
See what? A broken tri-cf setup?
>http://www.3dmark.com/fs/7652159
Plenty of 3x 290x score around 29k.
The benchmark you just quoted for me is equivalent to a single 290x, its clearly faulty.
>>339565319
>Putting expensive Ram into a $200 card
>>339564325
>Look at the small figures, that have been reduced to dots. They're blurry as fuck on the left.
Don't even need to look at that. Just check out the snow there's way less detail on the left.
>fell for AMD meme
>fell for xfire meme
>fell for AMD driver meme
Im waiting for Vega this october anyways. Should be good.
>>339556114
>i just bought a 760 for 150...
>>339565548
All I see in your example is a completely different CPU than in the graph. It's not hard to ramp up your score as high as possible when you let a i7-5960X do the heavy lifting. Be honest, take the FX-8350 the graph advertises.
>>339565343
I S R A E L
>>339565654
that is pretty expensive for deprecated card, m8.
>>339565612
>left:Nvidia
>right: AMD
>>339565343
Buying AMD card is supporting Israel. :^)
>>339565173
I told you to tell me what engines and games are going to have DX12 support. You told me to use wikipedia, which is fucking stupid and shows you have no evidence and are just making shit up. You are now continuing to try to pull away from the statement you made regarding engines and games because you're a fucking moron who decided to mouth off fake numbers and now can't back shit up. How long is this delay tactic going to go on before you manage to finally google up enough titles to pretend like you didn't just look it up yourself?
>>339565612
Is it confirmed to be out in October? I tought it was mid 2017.
>>339565751
>I told you I'm a big dumb dookie head!
Yeah you really are.
>>339565798
http://www.techpowerup.com/222403/amd-pulls-radeon-vega-launch-to-october
>>339565527
>aren't you banned yet?
get off your high horse bitch.
live demo, doubt.
falsifying and skewing a scientific process is COMPLETELY related.
this is just some desperate dog and pony show for investors to not jump ship.
only a moron would believe anything at this point.
>>339565798
You are right, that rumor has been debunked. AMD stated that VEGA is a 2017 product clearly last week.
Im honestly surprised this many AMD fanboys exist.
>>339565798
rumors put the 490 release in october with probably GDDR5 memory and then the fury vega with HBM2 memeory in january/february.
if the HBM2 vega came out this year i would be so fucking happy.
>>339556874
DirectX 12 and Vulkan.
>>339565272
If AMD didn't release this, the 1060 would be $300
>>339565832
Consider suicide, fucktard.
>>339562267
5850
>>339564738
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3468325
GPU score
>>339565974
i know right?
>>339566048
>I'm a huge dumb poopy face!
Man we get it you're a poopybutt and you're proud just shut up about it already geez.
>>339564167
>>339564439
anons you are blind as fuck or just amd fanboys
pic on left has 0 tesselation, lower ground models and textures, reduced lod of units, shadows are put on low/mid
amd graphics looks like shit see it by yourself https://youtu.be/ZwlQvjwYFEM?t=2238
Wasn't the 380 also 200$?
>>339566331
$200 for a 2GB model of the 380
>>339564917
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8599632
2.1GHz overclock GTX1080
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/3468325
R9 290X crossfire
The meme is real
Can't we just let AMD go thru their death throws in peace guys? Another under performing card for budget builds. It's great news for mid-range NVidia owners, AMD just promised us our 1060 and 1060 Ti will be in the 200-300 range and will again deliver perfect 1080p/60fps game play. And we don't have to give money to sand niggers.
>>339566307
>$200 vs $700
>$200 looks slightly worse
stop the presses. That's exactly the point Raja is trying to make.
>>339566470
$200 for 4GB if you buy from Sapphire
>>339561815
>NVIDIA IS FINISHED BANKRUPT
I hate fanboys of both sides. Just buy what you're happy with and fuck off. Jesus.
>>339561934
Well, to be honest the GTX 1080 and 1070 are both based on GP100, which isn't even their flagship chip. That's GP102, which is being saved for the 1080 Ti/Titan version.
>>339566634
>only $1399
>>339566487
>2.1GHz overclock GTX1080
>thinking anything other than cherrypicked cards can achieve this
http://videocardz.com/60631/asus-rog-strix-geforce-gtx-1080-offers-poor-overclocking.
>>339566531
>He wants AMD to die so Nvidia can monopolize and fuck his tender asshole bloody
Competition is healthy.
>>339566487
Look at me, I can shitpost too!
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8600271
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/7372943
>>339566775
It doesn't really matter to me how much it costs. I'd rather AMD die, Nvidia get consoles back so ports arn't shit. AMD is holding the industry back and you fucking know it.
>>339556114
Is this AMD's flagship card? X80 cards are AMD's budget cards, right, kinda like Nvidia's X70?
>>339566487
You missed the point check the graphics scores. The R9 290X cf wins
>>339556874
Is money a reason?
>>339566824
>It doesn't really matter to me how much it costs
You're a fucking idiot then.
>>339558475
1080 if you got the money.
480 if you are looking for value.
