You have made up stories which you're supposed to dwelve deep into, characters which don't exist you're supposed to care for...
...but when we have fictional sex appeal, liberal gaming media (that is 99 % of all gaming media) slams it as immature.
Can someone tell why? Do adult people lose so much of their sex drive they try to act like it's cooler if you don't get hard so easily? Or is it the old "everything that is about focus on looks is bad" feminism shit?
For me, visual sex appeal in games is a deal breaker, just like a good story or multiplayer is a deal breaker to other people.
If you are allowed to cry to fictional stories, why am I not allowed to fap to fictional characters?
because all they can think about is what would happen if kids saw it and then tried to emulate it
it makes them so uncomfortable, that they want to censor sexuality from anything children can potentially get their hands on, so that they never have to think about it ever being a reality. And because they don't want to have to explain sex or sex etiquette to children who shouldn't be doing it anyway because they aren't biologically ready for it.
>>339536318
Mirai a shit.
Because working for the gaming media sucks, which is why they're shit at this job because the job was shit in the first place.
I didn't think it was immature until I read your fucking post. God damn I'm cringing so hard.
>>339536884
Elaborate if you can.
>>339536653
You too.
>seeing a man as a literal blood/guts balloon with no character and only serves to be a doomed jobber
>show his inner organs and viscera splattered everywhere in a giant mess and in various poses of excruciating pain
>effectively just a target/object/objectified
>this is fine
>Cute girl without much clothes
>just doing cute stuff
>probably does some unnecessary, sexually stimulating poses for no particular reason
>maybe gets more extreme in some cases and just blatantly shows off body parts or sexual acts
>effectively makes them a doll/sex object/objectified
>this is considered NOT fine
why is one allowed but not the other when both of them are just as bad? At least in one of them, nobody is getting physically hurt
>>339537038
Go watch some porn if you need to jerk off, kiddo.
>>339536318
Become a man and don't give a fuck, even if you're a girl.
>caring about what literal retards have to say
Do you scream at pieces of dogshit on the sidewalk?
So why would you care about their shit opinions?
Nobody knows for sure. Some say journalists/casuals/normalfags are insecure about playing video games at an advanced age, so rallying together and pretending to be enlightened will somehow make video games a more acceptable hobby.
I'm with you, though. If a lot of these journalists are middle-aged, then their libidos are probably fading.I hope that shit never happens to me.
>>339537613
I can see you fail miserably to provide actual arguments. As expected from a fag.
>sex appeal in games
As much as people shouldn't get butthurt what is it with people wanting every character to be fap material and need to be just full of fanservice that it makes nothing look like it fits. If you faggots could have your way every game would just be porn
>>339538052
Go play your prettyboy Jap games with panty shots, virgin.
>>339538430
>Fire Emblem used to be a decent SRPG
>They wanted the fucking weeb audience
These fucking assholes ruin everything.
>>339536318
Sex appeal is immature because it is used as a marketing gimmick to attract sales from the (typically youngest) audience. It adds no content and frequently indicates a lack of content, where the developer needed to throw in titillation as the only reason for some people to buy the game.
>complains about people calling him immature for needing a virtual girlfriend to fap too
>>339538485
Go cry to Aegis in FFVII for the 50th time while pretending she exists after you've turned off your console, fag.
>>339538430
Who are you to decide what fits or not?
