>It's called FFXV because it runs at 15 FPS.
Look at their new trailer starting at ~0:34.
https://youtu.be/lW5bEwT6ddw?t=33
They can't be serious about this.
Should have delay it for another 10 years to make it 30 fps
That's clearly just shitty editing trying to make it slo-mo.
Silky smooth. Can't wait for the asshurt and denial.
>>339497971
What? It's so not slo-mo.
Honestly the fps wont bug me i like when my game look and act like games
Its fucking slow motion you retard
How do you think a slow mo made in a editing program of 30fps source will look like?
>>339497470
woah whole video runs fine then they switch to slow mo
The fact that it's literally an empty desert bothers me mroe.
I am curious how well this is going to run on the PS4 Neo, because right now the framerate is a HUGE turnoff for me.
>it's slo-mo
kek
>>339498048
Don't have to wait. It's already started.
Holy shit that frame drop.
The pop-in in the first 20 seconds was enough for me. So this is the power of Square Enix tech. Woah.
>>339497470
Is it still 900p?
Can't wait form the NEO version
This game better be fucking good
>>339497470
>promotional footage taken from pc version with 1080 sli
>runs at 15fps
WOW
>>339500049
It's more so the restrictions of Ps4 hardware and less so the engine. Remember; these games are developed on PC with the original artists vision. They then have to find ways to make it work on inferior console hardware. So things need to be taken out and performance in areas is going to be cut.
>>339499607
this
on the bright side this game might make open fields of nothingness unpopular the same way XIII made linearity unpopular
>Have to buy PS4.5 NEO to play at 30FPS
GLORIOUS PC GAMING MASTER RACE WINS AGAIN
>>339500363
Is it a PS4 exclusive? If it is, then there's no excuse for it to be running on the only piece of hardware it's being released on, especially since Square Enix keeps harping on about how advanced their graphical tech is. Advanced my ass. It can't even maintain 30 fps.
What a piece of shit disappointment. I'm done.
>>339500049
>They can't be serious about this.
They needed to drag in tri-Ace just so FF13 and 13-2 would run at above 10fps.
>>339500672
In all fairness, it became a disappointment a long time ago. On top of that, games stuck in development hell are never turn out good. Luckily, we already have enough information for me to decide that I am not buying this game. There is just so much I already don't like about it.
WOW SUCH AN INTERESTING OPEN WORLD
>>339498147
That is what "trying to" means.
I have no idea whether FFXV will be decent, good, or shit. It definitely showed mild (some bearable, some not) tehcnical issues in the past.
But I'm not so stupid and eager to have shit in my mouth that I'd assume the slow-mo part of this video (for effect) is a clear representation of major frame rate drop in the actual game.
God /v/ you are so fucking stupid sometimes.
>>339497470
>Riding Chocobos
>when you have a damn car
Well, at least they're still there. The theme song is nice.
>Chocobos kick nearby monsters
AWWWW SHIT, CHOCOBATTLES
>>339501220
>slo-mo
We aren't sure if it's slo-mo. There's no indication that it was intentional. Even if we give it the benefit of the doubt, the game shows clear signs of having inferior graphical fidelity, like the pop-in, extremely sparse open world, low foliage draw distance, low foliage density, and extremely low LOD for things far away.
>>339499607
Yeah it should be like FF VII
>>339500426
So less than 5% of the screen in the distance appearing less detailed than the rest, for what is likely just a brief moment, indicates that it's all shit? And does this happen constantly throughout the video? Does the rest of it look really bad?
I really don't think so, anon. Having to try this hard to bear hate all the time, not good for you mang.
>>339497470
You do realize that footage is slowed down on purpose, right?
>>339497470
it's stylistically designed to be that way
WHY DOES IT LOOK SO AWFUL
>>339501416
>We aren't sure if it's slo-mo. There's no indication that it was intentional.
How about the rest of the trailer?
>>339501416
Are you seriously this fucking stupid?
>>339497470
>DUDE WE GOT CHOCOBO LOL BUY OUR GAME
>>339501545
I don't know, it caught my eye and it really stands out. And yes, it happens constantly throughout the video. Look for bald spots, they're all over the place. It's awful.
>>339501587
It looks good though.
I don't want to buy a ps4 just to have better graphics from xbone, but the demo was dogshit that I might do it
>>339501416
>aren't sure
Every time you watch a trailer/movie ANYTHING does a little indicator appear to let you know what is happening on screen? You're hanging onto nothing.
I'm not saying the game doesn't have mild graphical shortcomings. But railing on this part is absolutely ignorant and retarded.
>>339497470
>Autists on /v/ can't tell when a video is slowed down
News at 11.
The chocobo is walking in that section, so we can't really tell if it's slow mo. It's seen walking at 1:15 too.
>>339502056
It's clearly slo mo video effect, like fucking seriously? It's only in that clip when it goes through the daynight bit by fading in the clips while playing in slo mo.
Why do Japanese devs keep making ridiculously high spec games like this for consoles? Why are they too fucking retarded to not release a PC version day one?
>>339502056
Okay you have to be trolling by now but here you go:
In the part at 1:16 there is obviously no slowing of speed like before, and more happens on screen once the others appear. And it's obvious framerate issues occur when more is happening on screen. What about the rest of the video. You still don't make any sense.
>>339502602
So consoles fanboys can feel justification in their purchase. If all games received PC day 1 releases there would not be a reason to ever own a console.
>>339499828
What they mean is, it's Schlomo's way of cutting development costs
>>339502858
It's only the Japs that do this though. 90% of AAA Western games get a PC release.
>>339502858
How's batman arkham knight
>still no PC release confirmation
I don't even want to play this fucking pile of shit, I just to be able to call the game shit without being called a NEVER EVER EVER PKEK
This shit is literally a poor man's kingdom hearts
>>339503125
It's already superior to KH so no.
>>339502602
>high spec
It's not. It's badly made and so it uses up all the power and still doesn't run as well or look as good as Uncharted or Battlefront.
>>339503474
XV is higher spec than both of those, while both Unchartered and BF are completely baked in small enclosed spaces, XV is all dynamic and massive open world.
Stop being entitled little shits and get the PS4 Neo version if you care about memerates so much.
>mfw I'll buy a PS4K to play it at 60fps
Keep pooring around poorfags
>>339503758
You'd better hope they support ps4k then. Maybe they'll release a patch to do that a year or two later.
>>339503758
>PS4K playing any games at 60FPS
dragon quest 11 is head and tails above this game in terms of graphics
art style > realism
>>339503606
>DICE shooty games
>small enclosed spaces
??????
>>339503758
Calling it now: 1080p/30fps on PS4-II.
>>339503758
It'll keep a stable 30 at most.
>>339501736
I think you need new eyes
>>339504690
No that would be you. It's a desert wasteland area that looks like a desert wasteland area.
>>339503758
The PS4k won't magically add more frames to games. It'll help them stay at their intended framerate. So FFXV will stay at 30, Bloodborne at 24, etc.
>>339504758
Sure maybe if you squint real hard and had sand in your eyes.
Is this game for console peasants only?
>>339504874
So you are autistic.
>>339504967
Pretty sure I'm not. You might want to see a doctor about your poor vision. You could become a danger to yourself and others.
>>339504890
Yes
At least for the next 5 - 10 years.
>>339501416
>We aren't sure if it's slo-mo. There's no indication that it was intentional.
the far greater likelihood is that it's intentional, given that it is bookended by clips of faster movement and animation and clearly intended to show off the day night circle over a fixed composition.
>>339497470
Fuck this game
>>339503758
>console peasant calling people poorfags
>>339505439
I like how pcfats switch between arguing that pc is cheaper and that console is for poorfags every day
>>339505672
The basis lies in the spending habits of poorfags. They tend to skimp on initial purchases, then pay more along the line, because they can't handle the initial investment.
