So, now we confirmed that non-historical Total War games are fucking flops, will CA bother to do the other two Total War: Failhammer games they planned?
What race is everyone going first?
86 is a very good score tho
86 isn't too shabby anon.
Before I sink money into this, can I be necrons?
>>338324428
This is bait.
>>338324378
Somebody provide the /v/ score scale.
>>338324232
>86
>flop
What dimension am I in?
>>338324504
No it isn't.
0.9-8.9 is shit. 9.0-9.5 is good. 9.5+ is possible GOTY.
>>338324624
>9.0+ isn't shill
>>338324232
you have autism
not only is this the first total war game to not have a historical setting, but it is being lauded by all the critics. This game will be a huge success
>>338324813
>86
>'lauded by all the critics'
No.
>>338324232
>Blatantly ignores the fact it has been reviewed far better than Rome 2 and Atilla
I bet you shilled for Rome 2 when everyone was calling it garbage
>game gets under 90 on metacritic
>LEL BLUNDER OF THE CENTURY, WHAT WENT WRONG, /v/?? xD
Why does Neo-/v/ do this shit?
Trusting hacks with no talent reviewing games they do not really play. Majored in social studies and have not done anything for society other than bitching about things they are most likely wrong about because of lack of understanding.
Yeah, You should totally go by scored these days. They're totally steered by money or anything.
>>338324375
>come in this thread
>first post is 40k
>3rd post is asking if somebody can be necrons
This is why WHFB died. People thought it was the same fucking shit.
>>338325165
>People thought it was the same fucking shit.
It is now
They're running out of historical ideas. This is a grasp at straws, anon.
>>338325165
Aside from WFHB-exclusive races like Skaven it pretty much is the same shit except with half as much lore. Greenskins for example have barely as much development as the Orks.
>>338325404
>Same shit
The cities in the Empire are no where near as bad as a hive city in the Imperium.
>>338325384
You're a fucking retard considering it's common knowledge they have separate teams working on Warhammer and historical titles.
>>338324232
Game has terrible performance. Can't wait for the shitstorm on tuesday.
>>338325335
Oh. I didn't know Space Marines could be women, anon. That's cool. Can you show me that fluff?
Also, Paladins, what are those?
Give us a picture of the bolters, tanks and lascannons anon, be nice.
>>338325520
The Empire have a lot of unique lore but it's hard to argue they don't have very obvious parallels with the Imperium. Sigmar is pretty much just a babby version of the God Emperor.
>>338325335
Seeing as WHFB fell out of Top 5 sellers 2 years before AoS and 40k didn't, I think it was a wise choice.
>>338325653
So, like every Total War game?
>>338325653
I've read that the performance was great for a TW release
>>338325653
People have been saying that it runs well. Certainly not as bad as Atilla or rome 2 on release.
>86 is a flop
Holy fuck you are retarded
>>338325335
The wings look cool
Haven't you shit posters have another game to shitpost about? Overwatch comes out the same day.
>>338325939
But Attila had great performance on release.
>>338324232
Isn't that higher than any other total war since shogun 2
>>338326356
nope.
>>338325715
Wait, what if its a perfect 8?
>>338325653
Source?
>>338326341
I guess they took a break to shitpost about another game
0-69 is garbage
70-79 is mediocre
80-89 is good
90-95 is great
96-100 is amazing
Prove me wrong.
It's going for 29 Britbux on Kinguin if anyone's interested
http://www.kinguin.net/total-war-warhammer?utm_source=global&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_content=warhammer&utm_campaign=20.05.2016
>>338327141
That's what I said.
>>338324375
>wanting to stick it in a xeno
>>338324232
Game looks good. Can't say that for Rome II.
>>338324232
>non-historical Total War games are fucking flops
TW : Warhammer - 86
Attila - 80
Rome 2- 76
Why would they do anything historical if those are even worse flops?
>>338328858
Shogun 2 was a 90
>>338329238
And the last two historical Total Wars were flops and failed to recapture what made Shogun 2 great, your point?
>>338329503
it means they succeeded once with historical shit
just that
>>338329238
Because shogun 2 was amazing
Rome 1 is the best Total War.
>>338324375Vampire Counts. Fight me
>>338329871
>empire and napoleon have above 80 score
who's running this shit show
Total war: 3 kingdoms when?
>>338326470
It's a shit game that paid for reviews.
I hope they have the imperial guard. I love their vehicles.
How will Total War differ from Dawn of War, gameplay wise?
>>338331679
they are focusing on space battles, while dawn of war is focusing on land battles.
Also, don't confuse them with battlefleet gothic armada, which is a grand strategy game mixed with real time tactics set in a medieval version of w40k.
>>338330318Nothing wrong with playing as Dracula
>>338325830
A wise choice would have been releasing a 9th edition that would fix how shit 8th was
>>338325830
>America is the world
So people are just going to wait until the game is patched and available in a complete version right?
>>338332303
Dracula's dead, you play as his ""son"" Blanndfred
>>338332404
The game won't be done for several years, as it's being split up into three games.
>>338332378
No, but it is important when gauging how popular something is.
>>338332497
Mannfred is fucking GOAT. Don't diss.
>>338329871
Why does Napoleon have an 81? Were people sniffing paint?
>>338329871
>rome 2 has a 76
wtf did I miss something? rome 2 has to be my favorite, and I've played all of them aside from the original shogun and medieval
>>338334081
Rome 2 had an ABYSMAL launch. Literally unplayable for months. Also the downgrade was real
>>338327141
unless said game is on your preferred platform and got a bad review, then it's an "underrated gem"
if it's a game you don't like, and got a good score, then it's paid reviews
