Reminder that this is a game with a $265 million budget.
And?
>>338307985
>If I look in the smaller details and cherrypick, that will be a valid criticism ;^)
>>338307985
I don't see a problem here. The game is calculating stuff like infections and blood flow, so what just happened is totally realistic and quite amazing.
>>338308060
i knew you'd say that!
>>338308060
>>338308117
>>338308160
Compare it to gta iv and they've gone backwards
It's a disgrace
>>338307985
Euphoria tech had to be cut due to the heavy CPU usage.
More than half of it was for obnoxious marketing.
What was used for the game itself was mostly used for cinematics and mocap.
It hardly has any real gameplay outside of the shooting and driving.
>>338307985
>Fuck, my foot!
>It hurts, it fucking hurts
>Oh god I'm gonna throw up
Perfectly reasonable reaction
>>338308117
>i don't know what cherrypicking is
It was also made on decade old hardware.
Considering the shit they managed to cram into GTAV I'm surprised they didn't cut more shit from IV. I think they even said that they couldn't update last gen GTAV anymore because the memory simply couldn't handle it.
>>338307985
The gunshot caused an eternal bleeding that released nerve gas into his system
>>338308412
So every GTA?
>>338308117
Locational damage, reactions to being hit in certain locations, limping/arm favoring, and most importantly individual health-bars to indicate overall health status (and the NPC behaving in a manner which reflects his health) were in previous installments of GTA, Red Dead Redemption, etc.. and Rockstar were well known for implementing useful innovations from other IP's they own into their next product- almost as if they are building their depth one game at a time, like a normal company.
Then for some reason all the innovations they made in 4 were removed or suppressed. For no reason at all. The 'little things' which made GTA better than just good, but great, were suddenly gone- compromised for other features, despite the fact those features were already well established within the franchise and there was no need to remove them.
>>338308635
>eternal bleeding
It never stops
>>338307985
He's just playing dead. You'd act the same in his place
>>338308842
>play dead
>they shoot you again
hello??
>>338308674
Pretty much
>>338308986
whats updog
>removed crouch
>add stealth that you never use
>force you to use a shitty cover system
>worse police
>worse fistfighting than san andreas and 4
Shit game but still better than 4 because of mission variety.
>>338307985
Episodes from Liberty City > GTA IV > GTA V
It's just a small detail. You have to look at the bigger picture.
>>338308769
They didn't bother as that's just wasting resources they could use on GTA5's online instead. :^)
>>338307985mods fix that
I still don't know why it's so ugly. GTAIV genuinely looks better.
>>338307985
>septic shock
>heart failure
>dead
oh wow, it's almost like real life
>>338308986
WOWWW
Nah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFbkXffa85E
GTA IV BTFO
That ending pose reminded me of pic related
>>338308769
>no reason at all
Except... that consoles held the game back?
I mean, let's not kid ourselves and pretend that the weakness of consoles didn't severely cripple this game.
>>338307985
reminder gtv sold more copies than all halos combined
What happens at the end of GTA 5? I never finished the game. Do you kill more filthy gooks?
>>338309969
so like half of the game you work for FBI
at the end you like LOL LETS KILL FBI GUYS
happy end
GTA IV was better.
>>338307985
Kek this autist got so arseblasted from yesterday's thread he had to cherrypick the smallest shit to try and make the worst GTA game installment look better. IV is universally known as the shittiest game in the series.
>>338309243
>>>/gtaforums/
>>338307985
Reminder that this game generated $3billion in sales. It's the best selling video game ever.
>>338310259
>Repeat the same shootout mission 80 times: the game
Of course anon, of course :^)
>>338310034
Now that I think about it, V ending really was shit. Worst GTA ending by far.
>>338310823
>what is chinatown wars
>>338311013
>I've never played Chinatown Wars
Opinion discarded
>>338308769
>Then for some reason all the innovations they made in 4 were removed or suppressed. For no reason at all.
Here's the reason; 512 MB.
>>338311698
>More graphics
>less physics
I'm mad but I understand the choice.
>>338310696
>Repeat the same shootout mission 80 times: the franchise
>>338308312
>>338308191
who cares?
iv and v are shit.
there is no real gta since san andreas
>>338314683
>the game with less mission variety in the entire franchise
>>338313382
let it die.
>>338310259
>go to place
>shooting starts
>floow guys but never catch them
>crash car few times because of shitty driving system
>end up some place, enemy's car broke down or some shit
>kill enemy
>repeat this shit in every mission until game ends
>hurr durr iv is better
nah, fuck off
>>338308375
if this is true, then consoles are to blame.
Thanks consoles.I bought this game twice on 360 and xbone :^)
>>338309725
holy shit i didn't realize you could get people to drag race you in gta5 single player at stop lights
>>338309468
>all those fixed areas that are too tall or far from Franklin to grab
Nice strawman
>>338307985
how the fuck does GTAV have less TECHNOLOGY than GTAIV and RDR, im disappointed, at least i still have ragdoll physics.
>>338309468
It still pisses me off how much worse the on-foot movement was in GTA V compared to 4.
Fucking hell.
>>338318132
bait
Back on GTAIV on 360, if you killed an NPC with the sniper rifle at as max range as possible (when they start popping in) they would do the San Andreas death animation because they were too far away for RAGE physics to kick in.
>>338307985
I fucking hate specially after how great the euphoria engine was on IV and Red Dead.
>>338307985
Dunno man, I like it
>>338309792
>consoles held the game back
>Red Dead Redemption
PCucks sure are autists
>>338319635
>RDR and MP3 had the bullet-wound gore
>GTAV it was cut
Nothing was cooler than shotgunning some BR in the face and watching a volcanic looking mound of gore-wound just pop from his head.
>>338319810
I forgot MP3, fuck that shit is amazing.
GTAV is one of the few games where I never found it necessary at any point in time to bother fucking with any ENB shaders. The game's lighting is honestly amazing.
>>338310346
>IV is universally known as the shittiest game in the series.
By who? It had the best protagonist and plot.
>>338319891
Might reinstall and replay it. Only issue is for some reason, the Social Club login never fucking works for me, and I have to go through this massively frustrating workaround that is only temporary to actually log in and play the game.
That and the unskippable cutscenes are what keep me from replaying it.
Such a great game despite that.
>>338319734
MAMA MIA
>>338315194
and they say gaming journalism is dead.
>>338319983
Lol.
IV was boring as shit. So many unlikable characters.
SA was the last truly great GTA game.
>>338307985
If they hadn't spent all that time with the fucking boring ass ocean maybe we would've actually gotten interiors and more fun shit to do. But no, they had to fucking show off how they could make an ocean, a boring shitty ocean filled with stupid fucking hidden collectibles that I'm not ever gonna even get because fuck the boring ass ocran, I just wanna shoot people and steal cars and starts fight in a clucking bell
>>338320108
>dude boring lmao
everyone wanted and liked gta iv at the time except the dumb faggot kids that were growing up with their brother's ps2 and playing SA when they were 11
get real
>>338319787
good bait, here is your reply.
>>338319983
>IV
>best
Dude. Most of the game is fucking escorting people from point A to B. Not only that, Niko is a whiny fucking hypocritical retard.
>>338320108
>SA was the last truly great GTA game
I recently played the whole series again
I actually had more fun with IV
>>338309792
>Except... that consoles held the game back?
But that stuff was in the console versions of GTA IV
>>338308986
Hi, dunga
>>338320186
Is that from your own personal experience?
I honestly don't understand how could people enjoy GTA IV for more than a technological benchmark and/or prefer it over GTA V, especially after SA or Vice City. Don't get me wrong, GTA V has plenty of issues as well as being inferior to IV in some areas, but it's still a far better game overall. The only logical explanation I have is that they are plebs who started vidya gaming in previous gen and GTA IV was their fist GTA ever, so they have fond memories of it
>>338320257
The choose graphics over everything else.
>>338320315
no i started with gta 2 and VC is my favorite SA is really fun i'm mostly just a fag for IV because of the car physics and V's always upset me
>>338320605
The car physics in IV were always awful. I thought this when I bought the game the night it came out, I still think it now, and will continue to think so till I die. I was never able to reinstall IV without the handling tweak config file.
>>338312064
Animations aren't physics
>>338320748
I understand why, I just regularly enjoy steering tanks with semblance of weight instead of feeling like i am flying on the ground
that reminds me trying to play gta iv and fly a heli with the keyboard was so fucking retarded coming from someone who regularly flies transport in shit like ArmA/PR/BF it made me so upset
but yeah it lacked a lot of the enjoyable elements from all of the other gtas desu
>>338320765
I'm pretty sure the body reacting to the bullets on the euphoria engine count as physics.
Casual shit for plebs Russians and Chinks to make maximum shekels. It worked as well so VI will probably be even worse.
GTA hasn't been good since San Andreas
>>338307985
>people cant faint after a shot to their feet
Okay tough guy, try it yourself and see.
>>338318086
>strawman
You should stop using words in an attempt to sound clever when you've no idea what they actually mean, it just has the opposite effect.
>>338319734
Tone down the sweetfx
Fuck off.
BOGT GOTYAY
>>338320765
They are related in Euphoria
>>338319734
>>338321968
Yeah sure, whatever, nice strawman
>>338307985
My friend from school works at Rockstar and I can actually tell you the exact reason they took that out.Apparently it was all because of the possibilities of violence in previous games. Players were making videos having too much fun torturing NPCs by shooting their legs, arms, and watching them helplessly squirming on the ground. Some people at Rockstar decided that it was too much and didnt use locational damage in GTAV.
>>338322562
yeah, well, my dad works for rockstar and he says you're full of shit.
>>338322562
You mean they didn't like that fact that you could torture people in GTA 4 by shooting them in the limbs? Well, gee wiz, someone should've to the guy that designed the mission where you play as Trevor torturing a guy for infos.
>>338322912
The torture scene was put there especifically for marketing purposes.
It was THE SCENE that they expected people to see and talk about on every gaming website, so I guess it worked.
reminder this is a competitive game
>>338308459
>fuck my foot
>I'm instantly dead
yeah totally normal
>>338320503
that has nothing to do with what he said though.
>>338319734
They spend so much money per song in these games it's insane.
>>338324728
Are you for real?
>>338308806
I loled pretty hard on that one. Noice one m8
>tfw you still havent played gta5 because the torrent is xboxhueg and you have rural internet
oh well
>people actually liked boring and grey GTAIV
I know /v/ is full of contrarians but jesus
>>338309513
LMAO
>>338325871
2mbps here, Fallout 4 (27gb) took 40 hours.
Can someone post a pic about GTA being more of an rpg than Witcher 3?
>>338314896
This guy gets it,
GTA turned into floaty colorless bullshit. This series is the ultimate overhyped bullshit, nothing will ever come close.
>>338326108
I'm about as fast and GTA is double that size. I mean I could just leave the computer on a couple of nights but I can't be bothered. Also I'm a jew about hard drive space despite having like one TB free.
>Is this game really worth 60GB?
>>338320108
Truth.
>>338307985
HES NOT EVEN DEAD BRO HE JUST PASSED OUT .. THATS TOP TIER REALISM RETARD
>>338325871
My town has less than 20k people in it and I have 100/100 (Speedtest always get 99/95 though) for $40/month.
>>338320765
>Being this retarded
Are you from Gtaforums or something?
>>338314896
so who fed you this opinion
>>338326458
Yeah there are streets in my area that have fibre as well, but not me. My street's lines are ancient.
i love gtav, shame theres no reason to really play it after you beat the missions.
>>338326553
Copper here though.
The next town have fiber though.
They are about to upgrade to fiber and allow 1Gbps/0.5Gbps here in the next couple of years.
>>338308986
>they shoot me again
>I ain't dead yet
>>338324728
>GTA V
>better lighting
>better textures
>better shadows
>hurr has nothing to do with what he said
>>338320108
>IV
>so many unlikable characters
Tell me good characters from V.
If you say Lamar I'll know how shitty your taste is.
>>338326512
Oh man that takes me back, I used to go there last decade. Even got into one of those weird clans or whatever they were. The Precinct I think it was
But really though, if OP's webm was GTA4, the guy would stand up and limp away. That's hardly physics
>>338314896
GTA IV was boring af. I agree.
>>338307985
>shooting a black man
Fucking millenials
>>338319734
>>338320108
Name a character from V as good as Brucie.
I'll wait.
>>338326734
>af
underage
>>338320257
And GTAV had enough extra going on otherwise (graphics, size and scope, draw distance and density etc) that it had to make cuts elsewhere. Rockstar is using virtually every byte of memory in the 360 and PS3.
I'd expect TECHNOLOGY to come back with a vengeance in GTA6.
>>338326682
>>338325456
You faggots like to cherry pick and ignore all the other little things that were added to V that IV didn't have.
I'll make a list and youll just pretend not to hear me because that doesn't fit your stupid ass argument.
>>338326684
Franklin
>>338326768
What if there was a command to throw a spare gun and a bag of crack on him afterwards?
>>338326984
But that's the fucking point. Because they added so much while still working with the consoles' shitty hardware something had to be cut, hence less physics.
>>338327020
I find it strangely ironic you picked the single most boring character in the game.
They really fucked up the fun part which is committing crimes and added a bunch of shit no one gives the slightest fuck about (YOGA MINI GAMES, GOLF MINI GAMES, BORING PROPERTY SIDE MISSIONS THAT GIVE YOU NO MONEY).
Just a huge fuck up really.
>>338324170
Okay not sure what your gif has to do with that though.
>>338327157
He is boring as shit, but he has ambition and isn't a huge lolrandom asshole or emotionally pathetic mess.
>>338307985
jesus the AI in GTA4 wasn't this bad
Dude let's turn a crime game into a retirement simulator
Rockstar hasnt been good since RDR. Don't even get me started on max shit 3
>>338327346
>or emotionally pathetic mess
You might want to play the game again.
oh look its the gta 5 is worse than gta 4 thread!
here is some footage of something which has nothing to do with how good gta 5 is in order to prove my point ;)
>>338327623
>haha never is always better!
>>338309513
Terrible textures and no detail.
>>338326815
>Brucie
Terrible pick.
All of you muh IV/V millennial babbies need to educate yourselves and accept the bitter truth; the last god-tier GTA's were III and VC. San Andreas was good/OK, but IV was absolutely trash, and so is V.
Sorry to burst your bubble.
>>338327885
yeah i hate video games too.
>>338319734
>>338327885
>Brucie is bad because I said so
>hurr durr only older games are good
>III
>god tier
go away you condescending hipster retard
unless you're over 40, you're also a "millennial baby" so shut the fuck up
>>338324495
If I shot you in the foot you'd probably shit yourself.
>>338328094
yeah but I wouldn't die 3 seconds later
>>338327768
>haha never (nothing* you faggot) is always better!
Stop talking about GTAIV
>>338327475
>mentions her a few times
>never really endeavor in it
>Franklin living his new life
>bitch shows up to his mansion on the hills and she drops him
Fuck that part, it had no impact whatsoever and at that point Franklin is so rich and living it up.
FUck.
>>338327885
>talks about trash
>praises III
>still can't tell me any good character from V
>>338309468
oh man i loved doing parkour in gta 4 multiplayer
>>338328148
You'd probably curl into a ball and cry. Either that or just pass out.
>>338327824
>>338314896
Stop with this nostalgic bs. I got into GTA back when Vice City came out and adored SA but in most ways GTA IV was an improvement. Albeit I do remember having the complaint that there weren't many cheats and no planes.
>>338328317
yes but I wouldn't die
stop backtracking
>>338324495
Hes was mearly pretending
>>338327885
agreed
Preach it anon
>>338326312
2mbps is about 250kb/s
>>338328470
like you?
>>338328364
>2008 game vs 2014 game
>>338319490
>the truth is bait
okay
>>338328547
not to mention he posts a shitty shitty screenshot with lowest settings to boot
>>338314896
>muh san andreas
Even if you are correct you are a massive dong.
>>338319734
Fuck me, dude.
Look, I like the technology stuff as much as the next guy but lets face it. You see it once, you're impressed for like 5 minutes, maybe record a webm to post that shit here and that's it. You'll never use it for gameplay in any way and they had to waste money to make it.
>>338309430
>multiplayer has killed the grand single player experiences.
>>338328396
He's diabetic.
It's why they cut off their foot.
Getting shot with diabetes in the foot is pretty much instant death.
That's why the doctors cut them off of fat people so they don't die.
>>338319361
LMAO
literally everything is better in V. niko controls like a 70 year old sumo wrestler with cum in his eyes. and the animations all look stiff and awful. everything is so much more fluid in gta v. right down to the way the camera moves, vaulting over objects and how smooth the aiming is
>>338328547
im not the one who said gtaiv looked better when it clearly, objectively doesn't
>>338328396
You're not getting it. If you shoot someone in the foot, there's any number of ways they will go very limp and very still.
>>338328892
Don't try and ruse me you meanie.
It's 4am and I've spent the entire night drinking scotch and popping painkillers.
>>338329718
It's time to go to bed, Max.
You got lives to "save" in the morning.
am I the only who thinks V was great? it was an improvement over SA in almost every way imo.
>>338329949
I like it, my major problem was the map. The egg shape and single city was kinda boring.
>>338329658
Yes, but they wouldn't die instantly as they do in V.
>>338307985
Probably the best game Rockstar's made besides RDR.
Not even nostalgia driving my opinion like IVfags and SanAndreasfags, I played RDR after this.
>>338328295
>still can't tell me any good character from V
I'm also honestly trying, but I can't.
V's main and supporting cast were all garbage.
I'm 27 years old and played III, VC, SA, IV, and V at release unlike you underagefags. I'm not here to tell you my opinion on the best.
However, IV was the biggest load of clunky boring shit I've ever had the misfortune to play.
Controls were shit. One poster put it perfectly that niko controlled like a sumo wrestler with cum in his eyes.
Visuals were shit. Boring grey cockadoodie grit shit.
Characters & Story = shit. You think the story is going to pick up with brucie but boy were you wrong. You play as shit eastern euro trash that comes to america and hangs out with ghetto trash.
Please stop embarrassing yourselves by sticking up for this hot stinking shit of a game.
265 million includes marketing, you cuck
>>338330507
>no new poster IP
How in the goddamn hell is Grand Theft Auto V such a downgrade from Grand Theft Auto IV? Don't say it's consoles, because GTAV is on the exact same console as GTAIV.
>>338330507
>Characters & Story = shit.
Just like V.
Why are Niko and Roman the most likeable characters?
I like 5 but most of its short comings are because they realized how much money could be made from online rather than single player. They could have added more details, or they could put up new e-clothing for people to buy with real money. You can bet 6 will have a massive focus on online as well.
>>338331107
good chemistry
something none of the guys in V had
>>338326312
slower than 92% of the rest of the world not just europe, jesus christ I bet the bootleg connection in lebanon is better than that shit.
Next GTA should just combine Vice City with FC3 Blood Dragon.
>>338332703
Might as well make a Saints Row-GTA crossover.
>>338319734
fuckin italians,they love putting pepperonis everywhere
>>338332853
saints row is worthless
>>338310696
But that's what was so good about it.
Would you prefer "cinematic" missions where you follow someone around in a helicopter?
I mean the missions in IV basically plopped you in a cool area, like a museum or construction site, and you had to shoot your way through it. The shooting mechanics were fun so I thought it was a great thing. I thought the missions in IV had a very appealing simplicity.
I actually think V had more TECHNOLOGY than IV:
>that very smooth animation
>those cool moments where you switch to another character and get a little scene: often if you do it right after a mission, you'll get a unique one about how they felt afterwards
>michael says different things in therapy depending on your actions
>lots of different conversations depending on who you choose for the heists
>first GTA with a full score that gave the missions some amazing atmosphere
>those cool moments where you're starting a mission, and the game flawlessly transitions into the cutscene
>a lot of moments in the game had a "cinematic" camera that gave you a neat perspective on the action
Honestly the game really felt like it used every dollar wisely. You can nitpick extremely small details but it definitely plays and feels like a game that cost hundreds of millions
>>338333251
Saints Row 2 > IV/V
>>338334085
I don't think you understand what TECHNOLOGY is..
>>338334090
saints row 2 is a meme game. better than iv? whatever, I'll let you have that. but it has absolutely nothing over gta 5. don't get me started on sr2s awful graphics, driving, city and controls
>>338329201
Gta IV looked better for its time.
>>338334085
>smooth animation is TECHNOLOGY
>variable dialogue is TECHNOLOGY
>variable dialogue is TECHNOLOGY
>variable dialogue is TECHNOLOGY
>having a sound track is TECHNOLOGY
>smooth transitions is TECHNOLOGY
>alternate camera angles are TECHNOLOGY
>>338309157
why exactly is variety seen as some kind of universal "good"? if a gameplay mechanic works well, there's nothing wrong with building the game around it.
>>338334350
the person I responded to said "gtaiv genuinely looks better" when it factually doesn't
>>338309513
GTAIV looked better if you're a blind retard
>>338334187
>>338334375
What is TECHNOLOGY to you? Sorry if I'm not up with the exact definitions of these memes. But I was far more impressed with V than IV from a technical standpoint.
>>338334396
>why would variety be good in a open world sand box game
yes. lets replace all the cars in gta 5 with just the stock taxi. and remove everything but one of the machine guns. and remove jumping. actually, just remove fighting at all. just have a big, flat open parking lot with just taxis. taxis as far as the eye can see...
>>338334350
still looks better in some ways. more sophisticated lighting, also better rain/weather effects.
>>338334626
Objectively wrong, opinion invalid
>>338334564
the story mode in a sandbox game is still largely linear and is built around only a few mechanics. You don't need to shove in a bunch of random shit in the missions for the sake of variety.
GTA V had too much retarded shit, like using a submarine, or mopping floors. If that's variety than I'm not too interested. The best missions in V were the ones that stuck to the basics: the shootouts with Franklin/Lamar and the shootout in the slaughterhouse
>>338334540
technology would be something impressive implemented in the engine.
Like, if you shoot the gun of an enemy in GTA IV, he will drop it. Shoot the leg, he will limp.
Fly an helicopter over a three, and the leaves will move around. This is technology. Those kind of technical details. But playing a different sound file depending on the character you are playing (aka depending on a variable value, whether it is 0; 1 or 2) is not.
>>338334396
Exactly, people always list this as a complaint but I don't mind the missions being ''drive here shoot that'' because the driving and shooting in IV are great, which isn't the case in V so they had to make up for it with boring set pieces that make for shit replayability.
>>338334915
>the story mode in a sandbox game is still largely linear and is built around only a few mechanics
what. the story mode of every gta is basically an excuse to make you do everything in the game. racing monster trucks for the shady agent guy in sa? flying rc airplanes in vice city for the nerd kid? breaking into a military complex for a jet pack? all you had to do was follow the damn train cj?
>>338307985
And they still couldn't be fucked to write a decent story or any decent characters.
Anyone who suggests that there are deep philosophical implications of the way the characters are written can go fuck a cactus.
Like suggesting that Trevor is supposed to be some deconstruction of the typical GTA player's mindset is giving the writers way more credit than they deserve. They just had him say the dumbest shit while hoping for it to come off as THIS GUY'S SO CRAZY AM I RIGHT GUYZ LOL
The writing in these games pisses me off so fucking much, but because the game made so much money there are going to be tons of games written in the exact same fucking way.
Fuck this piece of shit game for dragging down the entire industry.
>>338319734
>SATURATE MY SHIT UP
>>338319983
>im an immigrant
>america is hard on us
>i ran away from home because of war
>oh and guy who betrayed me is here
>oh here's just a fag
>oh here's some guy i owe money to
>i kill him or side with him
>nah, actually I just kill him. some random side character I'll never see again dies because of my choice though, who gives a shit im foreign.
>>338326815
all of them.
>>338328368
the first time I played IV, I legit didn't finish it because I was fucking tired of being called every hour and my stupid completionist brain wouldn't let me ignore it.
came back years and years later to the PC version and enjoyed it quite a bit. its a good game. I had more fun with 5 though.
>>338308769
>The 'little things' which made GTA better than just good, but great,
were clearly not in IV because IV was garbage
You guys just don't get how GTA works.
>GTA 1 and 2: Sorta fun but for the most part forgettable
>GTA 3: Vanilla GTA, this is "the" GTA game.
>GTA VC: GTA 3 but like Scarface
>GTA SA: GTA 3 but with niggers
>GTA 4: GTA 3 but with slavs and technology
>GTA 5: GTA 3 but with filler and clouds
Am i the only one who enjoyed gta IV driving better than any other gta? For some reason it felt way more realistic then 5.
brucie is the best character
the constant homo-erotic undertones are hilarious
>>338337413
Point being, different GTA games are like different flavors of ice cream.
>GTA IV had better physics
>Can't stand on trains
Worst shit ever you can spend hours on trains in GTA Online.
>>338314896
>since san andreas
fuck no, III is the best, VC is the sucessor. SA was leftist pandering nigga loving GTA.
>>338307985
And it's a hella fuckin good game.
>>338314896
And then there is this asshole
>>338307985
fifa 2016?
>>338335469
>Like suggesting that Trevor is supposed to be some deconstruction of the typical GTA player's mindset is giving the writers way more credit than they deserve.
are you literally retarded? rockstar stated what you just said and i dont think they ever intended it to be deep
from what I understand, r* got some blowback from the ultra-realistic reactions to getting shot in RDR, and toned it down for GTAV
clearly they went too far
>>338307985
thats a mod to change the dying animation to gta 4
yes this happens in gta 4 also
>>338337416
there's a balance between realism and fun. increased realism can be cool and add flavor but too real is just boring. having to take your clingy cousin bowling every 20 minutes instead of doing the shit you want to do is too real for me.
>>338337989
Are you being ironic? Standing on a moving train is not a very easy thing to do.
>>338307985
reminder that this game was first made for last gen systems
>>338335469
Butthurt writer detected.
>>338337413
>GTA2 forgettable
Newfag please, that game was the shit back in the day, GTA3 wouldn't have existed without it.
>>338307985
>a $265 million budget.
makes you wonder how much was wasted on music licensing and advertising
>>338340315
It was great for the time, but it's really aged. It doesn't hold up to time as well as later games.
>>338338403
lol
>>338307985
Dindus always overreact to any kind of injury they receive.
Seems realistic to me.
>>338319734
MY FUCKING EYES
Vice City was better IMO
Who can agree?
>>338309468
>black_men_can't_jump.webm
>>338308117
Except that GTA IV had a lower budget and it had much better AI
>>338342336
I love the 80s anon.
>>338337489
This.
He's the typical gear head.
Better than any of V's shitty characters.
I'm not gonna pretend like I have great taste but I really dug V's story and characters, definitely my favorite since Vice.
GTAO is some of the most boring shit ever in anything above small doses but it's fun to come back to occasionally and mess around with the new shit after glitching a good 100mil out of the game.
>>338342926
No wonder.
Vice had shitty characters too.
>>338343017
????
??????
??
?????
Daily Reminder L.A. Noire is the best R* game since 360/PS3 gen
>>338308312
Backwards in one way, which was barely appreciated at the time, forwards in almost every other.
>>338343368
World had great detail, but it was emptier than V.
>>338343864
Maybe if you're a casual
>>338344919
GTA single player is and has been casual in every way. If you cant complete a GTA campaign due to difficulty you're a casual.
Fucking autist.
Choose an arguement to why GTA IV was better? Other than muh Brucie and and you can't crouch.
IV was a huge downgrade from San Andreas. Couldn't own your own vehicles couldn't customize vehicles or your weapons. Shitty brown cowadooty filter. Only fun thing to do in multiplayer was cops and robbers which was dead after the first two years. Chill with the /v/ contrarian meme, IV was the shittiest game in the series. It was a massive downgrade from San Andreas. V is far from perfect but definitely superior to IV by a long shot.
>>338339071
But it is more fun.
Realism kills fun in video games.
>>338345523
my favorite part of vice city was buying shit and building an empire.
SA had some of that too.
GTAIV was like 3 in that regard. you just had safehouses. 5 was between VC and SA.
>>338343368
it was fun but not even in the same genre
>>338307985
Versus an N64 game.
>>338340484
Maybe you should actually play the game.
>>338346636
But I have anon. The controls are shit, the overall gameplay is bad (the camera angle gives you virtually no time to react to shit in your way at high speeds, so every car you enter becomes a burning wreck sooner or later) the game wasn't playtested, so missions are either pitifully easy or balls to the walls difficult. I will admit that the game has a great retro aesthetic, and stellar music, but take off the nostalgia goggles. Even on release people were noting that it had some flaws (see: any GTA 2 review)
