[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Post your specs and tell us how well Overwatch runs: >i5-6600
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 110
Thread images: 21
File: url.jpg (2 KB, 134x100) Image search: [Google]
url.jpg
2 KB, 134x100
Post your specs and tell us how well Overwatch runs:

>i5-6600
>geforce 560
>50fps on medium to high
>>
Fuck off, what a shitty thread
>>
>>338272447
>PS4
>runs perfectly

get fucked
>>
>>338272521
>>338272581
The cancer that's killing /v/
>>
>>338272581
LOL
>>
>>338272447
Xbox One
60fps
;)
>>
I'm running it in my brain right now cause I can't play it.

10 fps
>>
>>338272631
>>338272632
m-muh specs

enjoy wasting hundreds every year upgrading your piece of shit while i enjoy using that money living a real life

also enjoy your hackers and CSGO players who will just be quicksniping every lobby
>>
>>338273238
>enjoy wasting your money on a mortgage while I live in a 1BR apartment

>enjoy wasting your money at a nice diner while I eat at McDonalds

>enjoy wasting your money on a BMW while I ride my Heelys
>>
>>338272447
>Xbox One I got for $200 can run it 1080p at 60 fps maxed
>$500 pc can't even get 60fps on medium settings
lmaoing at your lives pcucks
>>
>>338273514
But all of those examples are a correct way to spend money.
>>
>>338273539
>not having the option to leave as an entire party

Kek
>>
File: screenshot1.png (34 KB, 661x525) Image search: [Google]
screenshot1.png
34 KB, 661x525
Fuck. I'm getting more curious about this game. Is the game any gud? Can I run it with my laptop?
>>
>i5 6500
>GTX 970
>130 fps on ultra
>>
File: f30c331612[1].jpg (92 KB, 605x491) Image search: [Google]
f30c331612[1].jpg
92 KB, 605x491
>>338273539
>>338272581
>>338272995
>Playing an FPS
>From a PC-centric company
>On consoles
>>
>980ti
>i5 6600k

Never bothered checking, only bother if it noticeably drops <60 and that rarely happens.
>>
>>338272447
>6600
>560

WHY????????????????????
>>
>>338273843
>Going anywhere near 60fps on a 980ti

What are you smoking? My 980ti never has the game below 120fps even when shit hits the fan.
>>
>i7 6700k
>980ti
>taking full advantage of 144hz monitor
feels good
>>
>i7 4790k
>270
>80-90 fps on high 1080
>>
>>338273804
>implying the game wasn't MADE for consoles
>>
>>338274087
Except it's not and it's obvious. That's like saying TF2 was made for the 360 because it got a TF2 port at launch.
>>
>>338272447
>i7-5930k
>R9 290X
>60fps+ maxed at 1440p
>>
>>338274087
>implying you can even play the game without aim assist

Watch as they make widow instantly charge up so the spergs can quickscope with their controllers
>>
>>338273984
I mean't in general rather than specifically Overwatch. I get the occasional dip with some more demanding games.
>>
>>338273730
I have a 960m and it runs flawlessly on medium to high tweaked 1080p. I have friends who are playing on 860m, you should be fine.
>>
File: kek.jpg (54 KB, 800x804) Image search: [Google]
kek.jpg
54 KB, 800x804
>mfw footage of console overwatch comes out
>watching the slow movements and the auto aim
>>
>>338273875
i had a 955 phenom before for 8 years
>>
i7 4710hq
gtx 860m
stable 70 fps on low-medium 1080p
>>
AMD Athlon II 640 (A 6yr. cpu)
GTX 750 ti

140 fps to mid 70's
>>
How is this game even going to be playable on console? How are you supposed to do super fast 180's with tracer etc? If you make the sensitivity high enough then they won't be able to aim. confused
>>
>>338272447
i7 5930k
2x GTX 980 Ti
120fps (ULMB) @ 1440p max settings including res scaling 200%.

Feels good to be master race.
>>
>>338274693
the difference in performance between 960m and 860m is literally 0-3%. 920 is a lot weaker than both of them, the cpu is absolute garbage as well. It will be playable on 30fps just fine though, blizz even made a setting to limit the framerate to that specific value

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKz1T_GZyJU

how it runs on 920m, ~40 fps, which means you want to limit to 30 to avoid input delay from oneframethreadlag when gpu is overburdened.
>>
PS4
1080p
60fps
>>
>>
>>338272447
670 4GB plays on max.
>>
>>338273238

Who the fuck upgrades every year except people who benchmark and shit to brag? I'm still using a 670 4GB I bought years ago and maxing out everything.

Quit being autistic. Also you can have both, quit being poor and autistic.
>>
>Playing Overwatch
>ON PC

enjoy your cesspool of a comunity OP
>>
Why did you overspend on that i5 instead of upgrading your dogshit GPU?
>>
>>338272447
>i7-5930K
>3-way SLI Titan X
>200fps on ultra
>>
>>338275903
You mean the community that threatens and reports modders for not porting to our platform?
>>
>>338275658
I am not sure if you are retarded or baiting since soldiers 67s ult is an aimbot.
>>
>>338275780
>670
>maxing out everything

damn, dat 480p quality
>>
>>338275940
>>338274917
>>
>>338275976
nice meme friendo

:^)
>>
>>338275976
That shit is hysterical. Console warriors not understanding the concept of extended libraries
>>
File: compy.jpg (51 KB, 960x640) Image search: [Google]
compy.jpg
51 KB, 960x640
>>338276001

Yeah dude 4 screens at 80p each 480p

YEAH DUDE SUCH A SHIT CARD

DAMN DAT SHIT QUALITY

Except not you faggot nigger
>>
>>338275658
>those crosshair movements at the end
You can just tell there's going to be 5 soldiers per map on console
>>
>>338272447
GTX850M
i7 4710

Ran pretty good with everything on low and 75% scaling.

I miss my desktop
>>
File: speccy.jpg (349 KB, 752x1776) Image search: [Google]
speccy.jpg
349 KB, 752x1776
You can guess.
>>
>>338275903
>autoaim
>>
i7 920/2gb 7870

120fps no drops on all low @ 1920*1080

wish i could turn off bloom
>>
i5 2500k
Hd 6950

50fps on high
100+ on low

gets much worse if i try to record but it doesnt look bad in the recordings themselves.
>>
>>338276435
>32 gigs of RAM
>Sound card
ahah
HAHA
AHAHAHAHHA
>>
>>338276435
>32 gigs of DDR4 ram on a gayming rig
>Windows 8
>Soundcard in CURRENT YEAR
>>
File: 1455659136607.gif (673 KB, 176x176) Image search: [Google]
1455659136607.gif
673 KB, 176x176
>>338276641
>Being this new
>>
File: 1459051346820.gif (559 KB, 400x276) Image search: [Google]
1459051346820.gif
559 KB, 400x276
>>338276816
>>338276641
Not one, bu two newfags, lurk more.
>>
>>338276945
>>
>>338276435
>4K
>3 290(X)s
>OW has no legit CF support
So I assume it drops under 60 and it's not even maxed, right?
>>
>>338276912
>>338276827
The pic is less than 2 years old, isn't a meme and I don't frequent /g/. Not sure how this exposes me as new
>>
File: 1463705174730.jpg (45 KB, 728x546) Image search: [Google]
1463705174730.jpg
45 KB, 728x546
>>338276262
>big ass empty chat box and stretched out friend's list
haha
>>
File: speccy.png (36 KB, 803x465) Image search: [Google]
speccy.png
36 KB, 803x465
I get over 60fps a 1080p and ultra settings with reflections turned down one notch.
>>
>>338272447
This is probably going to sound retarded
But during the beta, my game ran at 90fps (my monitor is 60hz)
But it didnt feel as smooth as other FPS games I played

I dont understand why
>>
File: A-H01.jpg (2 MB, 4912x2760) Image search: [Google]
A-H01.jpg
2 MB, 4912x2760
>>338276641
>>338276816
>32GB
Ramdisk, video/audio/photography editing and 3D modeling. It's also nice since I don't have to worry about tabs, ever.

>Soundcard
That is a DAC.
>>
>>338272447
>i5 4670K
>GTX 970
>8GB DDR3
>Samsung 850 Pro

No idea since I didn't know about the beta. Got it on preorder but I'm sure it will run well at 1080p
>>
>>338274180
>All those chokepoints on the map
It's made for consoles, that's why they dont have any sidepaths like TF2 does
>>
>>338277514

>N-N-NANIIII!!???
>>
Go away blizzard shills

Jesus Christ
>>
NVIDIA 970

vsyncd because I hate screen tearing and I don't have a 144hz monitor so 60fps on ultra, although it could do much more.
>>
>>338277514

Is that an issue to use screenspace? Am I not allowed to view a large conversation at once instead of having to scroll back like some idiot with 1 tiny screen? Is this how poor people think? You probably think 4k monitors are pointless also I bet. Fucking pleb
>>
i7 4700MQ

Dual GTX 860M

40fps on Epic, slows down to 25 or so when it gets busy.

I get a steady 60 fps on the setting below Epic, though.
>>
>>338273646
>spending money at mcdonalds
>correct
>>
>>338272447

> a toaster with a geforce 780

runs like a dream
>>
File: speccy3.png (43 KB, 771x582) Image search: [Google]
speccy3.png
43 KB, 771x582
>>338276435
It's okay anon, they're just jelly. I opted for 1440p and ULMB vs 4k though.
>>
File: TR6TE8b.jpg (73 KB, 655x681) Image search: [Google]
TR6TE8b.jpg
73 KB, 655x681
I am on a gtx 560 ti 448, can i run this at 60 fps?
>>
>>338278183
Those are some frosty temps, thinking of gutting my alienware and putting it in a tower so I can get some decent airflow, Dell is shit at circuitry anyway, when I bought this pos craptop off a friend if you pressed down on the handrest the backlight would cut out.... dammit Dell....
>>
1tb SSD
Nvidia 980ti
32gb ram
i7

OverWatch doesn't even get my computer warm
>>
any toaster can play overwatch, i dont get this thread
>>
Got an i5-6600k instead of an i7-6700k because people told me to save that extra hundred to get
my 980ti which I did.

Did I get cucked? The i7 can't be that much better
>>
>>338274917


phenom 955
radeon 6950
can play on low around 30-40 fps.
Hogs a shitton of cpu resources, only like 70% of the gpu.
Although I just overclocked the cpu after like 5 years of owning it, so maybe I can squeeze some extra performance out of it.
>>
>>338277792
but there are sidepaths... only one or two maps revolve around a single chokepoint once at some point throughout the match, and even then - don't be a fagget and pick reinhardt
>>
>>338280047
i think your cpu starts bottlenecking. Maybe a new motherboard + cpu will help to bump it up to 60 fps
>>
>>338275658
>let me just GET IN LINE OF SIGHT when his ult is heard from a mile away.
>>
oh look i stumbled into another meme threads

*slowly walks out*
>>
>>338272447
i5 6600k
gtx 660
16gb ram
1080p
60-58 fps.

Saving for that 1070 was well worth it.
>>
File: 1431099451391.jpg (7 KB, 300x196) Image search: [Google]
1431099451391.jpg
7 KB, 300x196
>FX 9590
>R9 380X
>16GB

You guys think I will be fine? I didn't play the beta so I'm not sure.
>>
i7 4880k
980 TI GTX 6gb
16gb RAM

Runs on the highest setting with ease and I haven't checked the FPS since November, but that was before I upgraded from a 780 GTX 4gb and 8gb of RAM.

I need to upgrade my i7 desperately.
>>
>>338280952
Ran at a stable 60 FPS back in november*
>>
File: ddf.png (130 KB, 500x368) Image search: [Google]
ddf.png
130 KB, 500x368
i played during the beta on my core2quad 2.6 ghz 560ti and 6gb of ram on medium low settings with characters set to high and I got a nice buttery smooth 50fpsish sometimes it'd drop down to a cinematic 30 fps though. Can't wait to grab my new pc again so I can play it with good graphics for the first time
>>
>>338280707
Don't buy it. it's garbage.
>>
File: toolate.jpg (259 KB, 1200x750) Image search: [Google]
toolate.jpg
259 KB, 1200x750
>>338281621
>>
>>338281774
Good for you. I thought it was terrible. Shallow and boring.
>>
>Have a 970 coming in the mail today
>4GB of RAM
>Athlon II x4 640

I know I'm bottlenecking the shit out of it.
>>
>AMD Phenom II X4 940, 3.0GHz
>8 GB system RAM
>AMD Radeon HD 7700, ???RAM

Haven't tried running it. Not going to try.
>>
>>338280707
You'll be fine. The game runs on a toaster.
>>
>>338282547
but does it run on a toaster at 60 fps?

if it is 30 fps only I might as get it for console
>>
4670k + GTX 780.

Can run it fine on Ultra preset at a constant 60 FPS (can't remember what framerate I got with variable desu), but my temperatures do get a little high so I just play it on the High preset instead.
>>
>>338282717
except even consoles run it on 60 fps. enjoy your overpriced custom pc
>>
>>338282717
I think most modern PCs could run it at 90.

It really isn't a demanding game.
>>
File: laptop.png (19 KB, 467x434) Image search: [Google]
laptop.png
19 KB, 467x434
Can I run it on my shitty laptop?
>>
Can I run this on a GT 730?
>>
>>338284048
it got an i7 intel cpu, you will be fine
>>
4690k overclocked to 4.5ghz + gtx 970
runs at 100fps with everything on max but I turned some settings down to get ~150
>>
>>338284048
no
>>
>>338272447
Xbone
>1080p 60fps and looks identical to max PC settings

Feels good, man.
>>
>i3 4330
>960
>over 150 fps
>>
>>338277792
>sidepaths
Like 2fort which has literally one alternate fucking TUNNEL.
>>
>>338285795
I've gotta a pretty shitty PC and I don't think I will get a new one any soon, guess I'll buy for xbone then.
>>
>i7 6700k
>980ti gold edition
>16 GB ddr4
>I have no clue because I upgraded between the beta shutting down and the incoming release

T H R E E D A Y S
Thread replies: 110
Thread images: 21

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.