![img[2].png](https://i.imgur.com/MAkPCuc.png "img[2].png")
I wish people like you would just kill themselves from my board with your shit threads.
Sword every time. Daggers are for fgts.
>>338264985
but with a sword or with a dagger?
Impossible to say without seeing how much damage each one does at base.
![img[3].png](https://i.imgur.com/jBGtAwv.png "img[3].png")
>>338265263
Let's say this much.
>>338265386
>lmao lemme theorycraft without knowing everything
Literally fucking braindead. What are the attack speeds?
>>338265590
turn-based, you and your enemy take turns attacking, patiently waiting for your turn like a retard.
>>338265386
If we assumed that they both had the same DPS value D, then they would have both dealt the same amount of damage. For the sword, (D + D + D + (2D since on average, each 4th hit deals 200%) = 5D). For the dagger, (D + D + D + 2D = 5D).
However, since the sword now does (100/75 = 4/3) times the base damage of the daggers, it now does 33% more overall damage that the daggers do.
This doesn't even take into account if the battle system is real-time or turn-based, or if buffs can be applied, or anything intricate.
Without any more knowledge, I choose the sword because it does more damage per second.
>>338265771
in that case.... IM A NIGER LMAO /POL/ XDDD GUYS
>>338264985
Chance vs static buff.
I'll go with the static buff because you can't create a playstyle around chance.
>>338265590
irrelevant, assuming overall dps (before proc) is balanced. l2math
>>338265771
Why the fuck would you ever pick the daggers then? Even if the sword doesn't proc it still does more damage than the daggers in this case
>>338266173
>I choose the sword because it does more damage per second.
scum of the earth, literally setting back top end MMO raid progression every single day and not even realizing it
>>338266537
>assuming overall dps is balanced
Are you fucking retarded? Do you have brain problems?
I guess we can assume that 25% is the same as every fourth attack then, child.
People like you really need to fucking die.
Sword still has better reach and scales better with attacking skills due to higher base damage so sword it is
>>338266563
well, fuck, I'm a retard then.
In the OP, the weapons were balanced. Sword was subject to RNG, daggers were consistent. Over a long enough trial they would have been even.
>>338265386 Unbalances them to the point where the sword will always be better, even when it has spouts of bad RNG.
>>338266682
bro can i have some of those cherries you just picked
>>338264985
Blue was best until it was nerfed in >>338265386
>>338266753
Depends on how damage mitigation work.
If it's a threshold, then the sword is best.
>>338264985
What if I main hand the Sword and Off-hand the Dagger? Do I get the damage increase and the additional attack?
>>338264985
does striking twice with the dagger get me twice as close to the next fourth attack?
>>338267584
They're both physical weapons that do the same amount of physical damage. They have the same amount of mitigation applied to them.
>>338268161
One does 200% damage, one does 100% damage twice.
Assuming a base damage of 100, if I have armor mitigation of 100 then the first one does 100 damage, the other does 0 twice.
>>338268505
I didn't think of the dagger striking twice for a normal attack. I've never seen an armor system that worked like that though, they're all % based.
>it's a /v/ argues about math episode
.25 X 200 + .75 X 100 = average 125% damage
Attack 4 times
500% damage
100 X 4 + 100 = 500%
It's the same? Assuming damage on both weapons is the same.
>>338268654
You must be very inexperienced with RPGs then.
That's the system of AD&D, among others.
