So this is the power of PS4
>>338161328
>game looks like ass
>runs like ass
>is an overall bad game
Compare it to the new Doom. Smooth 60 fps at all times even on consoles, decent PC easily gets 90+ maxed on 1080p or 1440p.
>>338161749
>decent PC easily gets 90+ maxed on 1080p or 1440p
That's a boldfaced lie.
![1920[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/WYiEZYA.png "1920[1].png")
>>338161995
>lie
>>338161995
>>338162091
Exactly. Only cards there getting 90 maxed with lowly 1080p are fucking $320+. For a meager corridor shooter with decent graphics it runs like ass.
>>338162356
You can't really blame id for your misguided expectation of some lowly 270x running the game at Ultra and 60+ stable. Magic doesn't happen IRL.
>>338162356
>a meager corridor shooter
>Doom
Anon...
>>338162532
That's funny because it does run at 60fps on consoles which are even shittier.
>>338162886
And consoles are running at Ultra since when?
>>338162620
I'm obviously not shit talking your favorite brand. I'm calling it what it is. It's a fucking corridor shooter. Corridor shooters should be the smoothest running games on the market, no? Is it acceptable that it runs worse than Battlefield/Battlefront? Don't say "but current year!" when it's a corridor shooter with standard graphics.
>>338163105
>runs worse than Battlefront
top kek
>>338163105
It's a corridor shooter because it has corridors? Am I getting this right?
>>338163075
Check actual gameplay footage. Low only runs like 20% worse.
>>338161328
silky smooth, perfectly fine 0fps. stop being entitled... ugh..
>>338163075
Consoles also roll with dynamic resolution
>>338161328
Since the human eye can't see more than 0 fps I don't see the problem here.
>>338162091
Any benchmarks since the AMD hotfix that improved performance by 35%?
