why there are no more tank simulator games, /v/?
>>338022363
World of Tanks existed anon
>>338022456
>WoT
>simulator
>not to mention online only
yeah nah
Singleplayer please. Online is shit.
Even if you forget about simulator part, look what PS1 had to offer
https://youtu.be/no2GNY4GHDE
>>338022456
>World of Tanks
>Simulator
U WoT M8?
I remember playing Panzer Front on the PS1 and Dreamcast. For a console game, it was really immersive. I could never play the PS2 one, but I was told it was watered down in comparison.
post good tanks games
>>338023564
My giga nigga! Puela a best!
>>338022363
I'd like to see a true tank sim where you play as the whole crew.
>>338022456
nice bait
>>338022363
Because tanks are boring. Mechs are better in every way. Why would you want to drive a tank when you could pilot a mech?
>>338023971
T72 Balkans on fire
>>338024003
>Venus wars tanks
>boring
nigga what
>>338024043
Actually looks pretty cool
>>338024003
show me a new mech game then.
not online one
>>338023761
>literally impossible to find good art of characters, even pixiv has like 4 game tagged pictures
anyway, why the fuckTANK! TANK! TANK!exists instead of more games like PNT! anyway
shit is not fair
https://youtu.be/NXeKmkvNES4
Because Steel Battalion for the xbone was a gigantic flop.
Give it a few years before publishers feel confident again
>>338024863
>Because Steel Battalion for the xbone was a gigantic flop.
>make a bad videogame which completely relies on kinect when first game was hardcore simulator niche mech game with super awesome controller
gee, I wonder why.
>>338024941
We know why it was a flop, point is it was a colossal failure that will have a short term impact on the genre because it will be seen as risky to publishers.
>>338025058
even idiots can figure out that problem wasn't the theme but a control scheme.
that's why kinect is dead.
>>338022363
Because the only one you will ever need is Steel Beasts Pro. Doesn't matter that it costs like $90 or something close to that, I have personally spent close to 1000 hours on it.
>>338024003
mech games are even deader senpai
>>338023564
None will ever surpass this one.
>>338024103
Needs more dakka
>he actually watched Venus Wars
>>338025505
it's kinda meh tho
>>338025309
>tfw using SB as an educational tool in the military and later purchase it for personal use
>>338024003
Because mech are and will always be autistic (often weeaboo) sci-fi. Mobile Infantry Armor is the upper limit where battlesuits end and mechs begin. It's ridiculous in a modern setting anyway and tanks project the very image of modern, heavy hitting warfare.
I remember long matches of Red Orchestra driving in a tank with my two buddies as gunner and commander. Without good communication the tank was mediocre at best. With it we destroyed the battlefield and had plenty of those awesome immersive moments. Can't do that in a mech.
>>338026035
>tanks project the very image of modern, heavy hitting warfare
Nope. Were you thinking of jets?
>>338025759
>t. Benet The Sage
Venus Wars is kino
>>338026035
>it's tank vs mech episode
why not both
>>338026405
why not neither
we all know the battlefield of the future won't have AFVs at all
>>338026457
cause both of those are cool
battlefield of future sucks balls
>>338026035
You're right about that. Reality shits all over mechs. When it comes to war you want efficient, functional things that kill your enemy while keeping you safe. Mechs are about being cool. They aren't as practical or as reliable as tanks. A mech is a much bigger target. A mech can fall over. It may be able to climb over a wall but a tank can just drive through the fucking wall.
>>338022456
I'd kill for a futuristic science-fiction version of Warthunder and World of Tanks. Mechs, tanks, hover tanks I'm not picky.
>>338026880
closest thing is planetside
>>338026974
it has shit tank design tho