Why?
sequels are often made to popular/well liked games, anon.
i can teach you more, but only if you want to learn.
better than das3
>>337803647
Because 2 comes after one?
What a stupid question. No one except an idiot starts a series on anything but one.
It's like starting with the fourth movie!
>>337803759
I understand why Dark Souls III
I do not understand why Dark Souls II
because
DS3 better first playthrough
DS2 better replayability
>>337803647
YEE HAW
>>337804575
This desu
I really appreciate Dark Souls 2 now after trying my second playthrough of Dark Souls 3.
Ds2 handled pvp and NG+ so much better.
>>337804575
I completely 100% agree.
Dark Souls 2 gets memed on a lot, but what it got right was making so many different things viable and making replayability value so high.
Dark Souls 3 had a fantastic first playthrough and design, but it honestly feels like a chore to play through multiple times.
>>337803990
What the fuck are you talking abiut? If you're gonna shitpost abiut DaS2 at least mention the level design or something so people can shitpost back
DS2:
>New world and lore to explore
>New mechanics like powerstance
>New weapons to try out
>Hardly any content rehashed from 1
>/v/ hates it because its not Dark Souls 1
DS3
>Rehash of 1
>/v/ loves it
Lame
I used to try to make myself think the "Dark Souls II is shit" meme was just a meme and I had fun for a while. The more I played the more I realized I was bored as shit and I was playing for the sake of finishing it. I stopped after I got the King's Ring and I don't think I'm ever gonna go back to finish it despite how close I am.
Despite not having poise Dark Souls III is miles more fun to play. NG+ isn't great but repeat playthroughs on NG are still way more fun than when I was playing II.