SONY DEFENSE FORCE
I thought PC users were the ones making petitions?
Did Neoga/v/ lie to me again?
>One single review that doesn't praise the game as highly as other people merely because they weren't bought
>FUCKING DISGRACE SUCH INSULT SUCH SLANDER
Because god forbid of one fucking Naughty Dog game ever getting a negative review.
I liked their games back then, but Jesus, has Naughty Dog gotten overrated as fuck.
To think they've gotten this famous following trends of each generation. Guess I should have seen that one coming.
Uncharted fanbase is fucking bafflingly awful. It was the same when 3 came out, they have a meltdown over any score below 95 and act like it being a great game is somehow objective truth.
>>337511885
>>337512026
The person who reviewed the game is objectively wrong and only gave it a low score to get clicks on his article.
>>337512147
Hey, Dimitrios!
>>337511885
how do you think they always got so many sales?
crash bandicoot: during the time (PLATFORMING/COLLECTAN)
JAK and Daxter (same as crash)
JAK 2 (GTA ELEMENTS and platforming)
JAK3 (Same as Jak2 just with a lil extra tweaking)
Uncharted SERIES (Beautiful graphics action action lil platforming MOVIE)
8.8
>>337512147
Please demonstrate how it's objectively wrong.
>>337512245
Not signing a petition just a fact that uncharted is not a 4/10
The reviewer is some SJW faggot still mad a white girl is voicing a black women
>>337511885
Didn't they also freak out at another site giving 8/10?
People need to learn that an 8 is still a great score, and that nothing is perfect. But I guess drones will be drones.
>>337512293
If you think Uncharted 4 is a 4/10 Aka a broken glitchy mess then go back playing Undertale cause your taste is shit.
He said he hated the Uncharted games and it should have stopped after the first. He also called Dark Souls 1 and 2 the worst games ever made and gave Twilight Princess HD a perfect score.
He's a retard/troll
>>337512432
You didn't even answer him you shitposter, try again
>>337512432
Oh, so you're just a butthurt Uncharted fan.
It's not the end of the world that your precious game got ONE bad review. The MC score is not the end-all of a game's quality.
>>337512432
if a 4/10 is broken, what the hell is a 1-3/10?
>>337512501
>He also called Dark Souls 1 and 2 the worst games ever made and gave Twilight Princess HD a perfect score.
Every part of that sentence gave me cancer.
Jesus christ...
>>337512650
did answer him sorry if your to incompetent to see how it's objectively not a 4/10
>>337512676
Nope only played uncharted one bud don't care about the review it's just objectively wrong
>>337512689
1-3 depends how broken/unplayable the game is.
>the amount of shilling for this game
I just don't get it
Is the game really that good, or are these really die hard fans of the series?
I played 2, thought it was fun but ultimately forgot about it
Is this just another thing people can bandwagon onto
>>337512692
>He also called Dark Souls 1 and 2 the worst games ever made
Well he was right about one of them
>>337512923
Obvious troll is obvious
>>337512930
well it's not like PS4 players have anything to talk about except this, bloodborne, and vita ports
>>337511150
Is anyone seriously going to not buy Uncharted 4 just because of that one low score buried in a sea of unmitigated praise for the game?
Seriously, this should be a non-issue.
>>337513076
>H-he doesn't agree with me must be a troll
Time to go back sucking you moms tit.
>>337512930
No, they're just children (the target audience)
>>337513136
It's not a non-issue to Sony fans, though.
>Understanding their mentality
Don't bother, I tried.
>>337512501
He is not only pretentious and a hypocrite but is also full of shit. He is just retarded. He even has the jew numale look on top.
>>337512930
Uncharted 4 has the biggest Sony marketing push so far, apparently. That, and drones hyping it up.
The funny thing about Playstation drones is that they don't hype up the fun gameplay of a game, but it's popularity instead. They don't truly care about having a great product, all that matters is that as many people buy it as possible.
>>337513397
>playstation drones
What if my favourite games just happen to be on Playstation hardware though>
>>337513136
A 10 second google search would reveal that the guy is a retard as well. But these people are drones and are just are retarded.
>>337512930
Remember the people who kept going on about how amazing Halo 3/Reach was, and throwing a fit over every review under a 9?
Yeah it's the same people, they're a bunch of bandwagon faggots who have to defend every little thing they take interest in like their lives depend on it.
>mfw this is all over 1 (ONE) metacritic point
Naughty dog shills proving to be the most rational fanbase yet again
>>337511150
>HURR THIS IS DISRESPECTFUL TO GAMERS
why do faggots constantly label themselves?
>its a straight up insult to all gamers
In a way, he's actually right.
Ok, so Sonyggers are mad as fuck, and I like that, but the reviewer in question is either a troll or a complete retard. I remembered his name from somewhere so I dug up one of his previous masterpieces.
>It’s the worst and least ethical form of play, taking the naturally constrained single encounters of Chess or Go into the heart of an infinity spiral rotating out from the center of a box of microprocessors built out of a grand network of exploitive labor practices around the world, creating a transfixing hallucination sublimely disassociated from the networks of labor required to produce it. The friendships formed in message boards and YouTube comment threads offset by the number of lives pinned in place by the economic conditions necessary for the creation of such hallucinatory machinery, offering the great thrill of achievement for having done nothing but press a few half-inch buttons, hypnotized by the unseen patterns passing through the screen, scrutable only to those others who’d undergone the same rite of initiation and spoke the secret lexicon.
That's from his Dark Souls 2 review.
>>337513468
If you kick and scream and shit your pants to defend them, then yes you're a drone. Or if your favorites all happen to be the ones with the biggest marketing pushes.
>>337513136
Fans are retarded, do you not remember 8.8?
>>337513902
Oh no you're his entire goal is to get reactions from fanboys with low quality bait, but that doesn't take away from how funny it is that people actually get upset about this shit.
>>337513902
How can anyone write so much and say so little
>>337513917
>Or if your favorites all happen to be the ones with the biggest marketing pushes.
I agree with your first statement but this one kind of is a dumb argument.
Granted I'm not a fan of their most marketed games but I can respect others who do, like The Last of Us or something.
>>337514086
he reeks of postmodernism
>>337514061
I think he only plays vidya reluctantly because vidya reviews with shockingly low scores are the only way he can get his arrogant tripe read by a large number of people.
OH NO PC FRIENDS THE SONYGGERS ARE TRYING TO TAKE AN EXCLUSIVE AWAY FROM US, ONLY WE CAN USE CHANGE.ORG
>>337513902
They are mad over a pretentious retard drooling, that makes it even funnier.
>>337511150
>Sonygger didn't even noticed that it's was a satire post designed as a click bait post to increase their cpm value.
>Eurogamer did same and Sonyggers still got baited
Wow Sonyggers really are pathetic bunch.
>>337513178
A 4 is a fair score, it's a pretty game but the gameplay itself is barebones and nearly a decade old. It's really unimpressive.
Uncharted 4 is overrated garbage, but seriously how do people like this get hired to write reviews?
It's obvious that he doesn't like games. He shit on Dark Souls for being too long, and then there's pseudo-intellectual shit like this >>337513902 where he decides to not even talk about the game.
>>337513902
Made a pastebin of this review so none of you faggots give him clicks:
http://pastebin.com/gefcDt0U
>Uncharted 4 gets rave reviews
>"It doesn't matter, they're all shills the game is shit
>Star Fox Zero, an actually good game, gets mediocre reviews for arbitrary reasons
>"AHAHA LOOK AT THE REVIEWS KNEW IT'D BE SHIT"
?????
>>337514697
star fox doesnt have good graphics or a "good" story which is all reviewers care about
When the game would be as good as they saying, they wouldn't need to shill it the whole week on /v/ they would actually play the fucker instead of making screenshots of the protagonists glowing ears to make a fucking point.... - to themselves.
From my observation on /v/ alone the game has to be utter shit, because people only defend a game that fiercely because they somehow want to convince themselves that the game thanked their hype by giving them utter disappointment.
/v/ does that all the time - shilling shit because their feelings got hurt.
>>337511150
>puts a space before every comma
y
>>337514697
>Star Fox Zero, an actually good game
>an actually good game
Lmao
>>337511785
Sonyponies have been doing the petition thing for years. Every time a PS "exclusive" (or at least exclusive in the eyes of the fanboys) gets ported they start a petition to stop it. Same with bad reviews for flagship titles, or petitions to revive failed franchises. Of course, not one of those petitions ever changed anything, but that doesn't stop them from trying.
Just because PC petitions are a meme doesn't mean PlayStation fans don't do them just as much.
>streamer played through uncharted 4
>said he loved it
>also said the gunplay was shit
>he literally liked it only because of cutscenes and story
I guess the playstation still only has movies :^)
>>337514697
>all reviews get glowing praise
>one outlier makes hipster special snowflake hate review to try to get recognized
>literally a fucking nobody
>never has given reviews of games before
>suddenly gets warranted to be recognized by metacritic
>>337514697
oh yeah look at the writer of the review
>>337515082
Meme it up but I've played it, you haven't, and I love the game.
Shitters who complain about controls and length do NOT understand the game and they're just that: shitters.
>Neil Cuckmann takes over again
>suddenly a stronk black woman that don't need no man beats you up an entire game and gets off scott free at the end
You can't make this shit up.
>>337515386
>it plays like shit and its as long as my dick but it's still good in my eyes you guys are just trolls
This is some poor ass attempt to defend a game
>>337515601
>Hi I can parrot regurgitated, misinformed opinions I got from the internet
>Yes, I am indeed a vidya expert qualified to deem this game shit
>>337515475
>"I thought we'd matured beyond that"
>has taunting as a feature with hip hop dance moves in the MP
Christ, what a complete faggot.
>>337512692
He also rated Telltale games higher.
He is a massive faggot and the people defending him just to shit on Sony fans are equally pathetic.
He is a faggot and tried to generation traffic to his website.
Why are most gamers such whiny babies? Is it autism?
Sony brings petitions to a whole new level
>>337515386
>Shitters who complain about controls and length do NOT understand the game and they're just that: shitters.
[People I don't like] who complain about [Legit complains] do NOT understand the game and they're just [People I don't like]
I don't even care about Starfox but you are full of shit.
>>337515747
>implying /v/ doesn't think this game is garbage as well
>implying that even the SF fans think this game is mediocre
There's no shame in admitting that you wasted 60 bucks on SF0 bud
>>337513094
>>337513284
>>337513397
>>337513609
>The game can't be good, anyone just hyping it up is a Playstation drone hardware fanboy.
>I've never played the game though so I actually don't know but I'll tell you RIGHT NOW that it's absolute garbage
You guys, are the very cancer you seem obsessed with trying to point out. I honestly hope you realize that. Uncharted 4 was fucking amazing and fun to play.
>I believe in Freedom of Speech/the Press
>except when it is something I disagree with
Comedy fucking gold. This is the same logic the people who were triggered by "Trump 2016" in chalk used.
>>337515940
I've played the game. If you set the controls to "active when ZL is pressed" you can become ace at that game in no time, but the Polygon-tier casuals who are ripping into the game didn't even bother to learn the controls as a base let alone tinker with them, they just decided they hate it and bumrushed a single path so they could give a score and THEN they squawked about the length like dumbasses, when they skipped 90% of the game's content.
As for you, you are incapable of forming a single thought or opinion on your own and should probably kek yourself.
>>337512405
They should instead just enjoy the game, and not give a shit if one site gave a bad review for it. The only reason anyone would give this much of a shit, is if they truly didn't enjoy the game enough, and any negative opinion is only reaffirming that idea.
Jesus fucking christ.
It's one review. Are you really that insecure?
>>337516261
Bro, even the people who learned the controls know the game is terrible it has less content and replay value than 64
>>337516067
my understanding was that the actual core game was bretty gud
just everything surrounding it is a bit of a trainwreck
>>337511785
You are mistaking them from nostfags
>>337516417
Not true according to The Completionist.
Go figure, one of the only reviewers who praises the game up and down is also one of the only ones to bother 100%ing it so he could see all the content. This "less content than 64" shit is a blatant lie.
>>337511885
If any review ever goes against the hivemind, people always throw a shitfit. This is exactly like that guy who gave Biocock Infinite a 4/10. Drones swarmed to the comments section and demanded the reviewer be fired for not conforming to their opinions.
>>337511150
FUCKING STOP YOU GUYS
P-POWER TO THE P-PLA-PLAYERS!
>>337511150
DELETE THIS
>>337516109
You almost had me until i read the last sentence.
>>337516685
lol, I remember Haze.
>>337511150
>sonyggers petition to change metascores
>>337516136
unless the score is warranted and substantiated through regulated process, it should not be counted in the tally that defines the merits of all video games
other sites use a score system with very set limitations of why something is or isn't recieiving .5 more points than another
some little hipster pleb writing a commentary piece for the washington post should not be held in the same high regard as websites completely devoted to rating and scoring games accurately through a proven metric
>>337511150
>sonyggers
>>337511150
>40/100
>You have gained the casus belli: diplomatic insult.
Jesus, what do you do when someone scores you a 10/100?
>>337513780
He's sending those to his brother. There is nothing wrong with this
>>337516570
>shit on others for not forming their own opinions and listening to the media
>however listens to others to back up his defense
You can't make this shit up
>>337516663
>>337511885
Kinda reminds me of a reversal/twist of the new superman movie.
It wasn't marvel or deadpool, so people flamed it.
>>337516953
But what about reviews that have 3 points taken off due to triggering level of breasts. Is that a proven metric to critiquing games?
>>337517145
Do you honestly think Uncharted 4 deserves a 10/100? Just asking out of curiosity.
Because 500 or more people and counting thinked it deserved a 0 and this as well its bringing down its metascore
To be fair it's a really shitty review, you can't review a game with a clearly hate for it
>>337517163
I listed him for his credentials, retard.
>Not only played the game, but played it ALL the way through, 100%
Compare this to someone like Yahtzee, who sped through a playthrough so he could perpetuate the "3 HOURS" meme or that joke from Polygon who played 2 missions and quit. These are the people /v/ trust as their metric? I certainly hope not.
Also, I chose Completionist because I'm on the way to obtaining every medal myself and his commentary on the game is probably the one that comes closest to mine, even though he went full raving fanboy over it.
It's not every day I get to post this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko1sklmOR9E
An old skit but a good one.
>>337517380
>You can't say that you dislike something.
wat?
>>337516953
>other sites use a score system with very set limitations of why something is or isn't recieiving .5 more points than another
Thanks for the laugh. I'm sure someone will fall for that bait.
>>337514697
>zero
>good
The graphics and the price tag are just insults to top it off. Assault has yet to be topped.
>>337514225
>mfw how badly this post bombed
>>337515475
God damn it
Why is /pol/ always right?
>>337511150
What fucking game?
>>337517573
Of course you can but that's impartial and not professionally
>>337517582
>Assault has yet to be topped.
>>337517576
>saying they should hold reviewers accountable and have a standard for reviews is bait
so, you've given up attempting to troll and now just pretending to be retarded? we all knew you were a retard from the beginning, we're just sitting here proving you wrong, again and again.
Do fags realize that this kind of shit is why no one takes their children's hobby seriously?
>You're not allowed to rate a game you didn't enjoy badly!
fuck
Uncharted is a cookie cutter action movie franchise and a alright vidya series.
t. uncharted fan.
Well 4/10 means it's below average, which it very much isn't. Even the most biased of gamers can see that. Dude must've been on drugs or something.
Browsed the article, don't quite see a score on it either.
Metacritic a shit. Who cares
>>337517919
He rated Twilight Princess HD high, he reviewed and hated dark souls and scored them badly and also plays Telltale games, actual non-games and gives them top scores.
It's occasionally possible that the reviewer just has really bad meme-tier taste and opinions that defy simple reasoning and objective criticism. I'm not say he isn't allowed to into free speech but go read the review, he hated the game and wanted to before even playing it.
>B-BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE A SCORE!
The only reason to ever read/watch a review is to read/hear what the reviewer has to say about the content of the game. Who fucking cares about a number?
>>337517783
Reviews are always objective, thats why the old game mags, at least the better ones, always had one main reviewer but also a bunch of other people from the editorial staff also giving a score and a short review.
If you were the flightsim guy, and the their flightsim guy rated an fps you had a second opinion you could relate too.
But hey nobody does that anymore.
>>337518270
>whoa......... a game reviewer can have differing opinions from most of his peers!!!!!!!!!! LETS GET HIM LE FIRED!!!!!
Look at movie critics. It's very rare that a movie gets all green-reviews on Metacritic. I wish video game scores weren't so fucking inflated. Every game that's moderately playable gets at least a 70. A movie that scores a 70 has the potential to be a classic.
p.s. Uncharted 4 is a solid 5.5/10. Little player agency and the flashy set pieces hide the fact that it's a glorified running/walking simulator
>>337518651
>p.s. Uncharted 4 is a solid 5.5/10. Little player agency and the flashy set pieces hide the fact that it's a glorified running/walking simulator
In other words you haven't played the game yet and somehow insist on being able to rate it and throw memes out about it like you have a clue.
You are a pathetic human being, even lower than the reviewer because he at least played it.
>>337518817
You really need to grow up.
Don't you guys ever get tired of pointless arguments? Genuine question. I don't have it in my to argue with every person who disagrees with me, but you guys make it your religious duty every time a new thread shows up.
>>337512930
>1:1 Assassins creed push a direction on the stick and press 1 button "Climbing" sections.
>Walking down Hallways, pressing (X) on objects.
>Generic 3rd person shooting in small enemy arena's.
Personally, I don't understand the appeal, I think the people who enjoy the Uncharted games just like passive cinematic experience, where they obtain the endorphin release for completing a video game without having to put in any effort.
>>337518651
>5.5/10
Boy, you're being generous. I just threw it into 1/10 for falling into some of the worst traps a video game could commit: gameplay that's on rails, excessive story, rehashing the previous game with reckless abandon, and the final boss which is a terribly programmed quick time event.
Not to mention that it's ANOTHER brown shooter starring a gruff emotionless protagonist shooting and killing things left and right. Do we not have enough of that?
>>337518817
I have played the game
It's a 5.5/10
Which is above average, why so butthurt sonycuck?
>>337518884
>I, the mature one here, will tell a person I disagree with that he is immature. I'll show him I'm right and he is wrong!
I wish I would receive a dollar every time someone used this kind of argument.
>>337519187
>being butthurt about a worthless score given to his favorite toy
uhh, he was being immature
>>337519187
>I will accuse someone who dislikes something I like of not having experienced the media in question because I can't possibly understand how someone would have opinions that differ from mine.
He's right, you should grow up.
People forget that 5/10 score is average.
They think 7/10 is average, 8-9/10 is good and 10/10 is perfect. Anything 6 and below is shit.
They really need to learn how scales work.
>>337519830
I'm for abandoning numerical scores completely and just rate a game in "how much money would i pay for it without feeling ripped off"
Because "wait till it's 20 bucks" says more than any 6/10
>>337520267
For a lot of people who read those reviews, the price isn't the deciding factor. It's more a question of "Is this game worth my time?"
>>337512432
>You don't like what i like then your taste is shit
>>337517174
It was also bad
>>337518983
t. Cuckold
>>337520778
In a market where the publishers established that a "AAA" game experience is 60 dollars, nothing shows more if it's worth your time than commenting on its price.
Saying something is worth, in your opinion/review, 20 dollars let's you imediatly know you the value.
6/10, 70%, 4 stars have now relation to real life, they are just abstract numbers - but everybody knows the value of money.
Well-adjusted adults:
>buy and play game
>enjoy it on its merits
>discuss it politely with other people
Insane retards:
>buy and play game
>enjoy it because people on other platforms don't get to play it
>get angry at low review scores
>compare metacritic scores to other games
>follow sales figures
>>337521481
Insane retards:
>enjoy that people on other platforms don't get to play it
>get angry at low review scores
>compare metacritic scores to other games
>follow sales figures
>post on /v/
fixed that for you mate
