Are you excited for Civ VI anon?
>>337505991
No
4 was the last good civ
t. Guy who abhors one unit per tile
It always feels like I'm fighting in a traffic jam
Wait is this real ?
>>337506378
yes
>>337505991
it would actually be awesome to have a civ game on mobile
If it has to work on phones at least the game isn't going to hang for 60 seconds every turn.
>>337505991
Most disappointing news of 2016 so far.
I would literally check Civfanatics everyday until I saw some news about Civ Vi.
When I saw the screen shots my heart sank. I remember thinking no way these were actual in game screen shots, it looks like something from 2004.
This is so obviously to try and get the mobile gamer market.
Fuck this 2k and this world and anyone who sucks up to this game.
>>337505991
I honestly wouldn't mind a mobile Civ
Especially of you can play it over time
No fucking cash shop shit though. It has to be a full blown experience.
>>337505991
Why would they do this?
Couldn't they come up with something unique and original instead of Civ V 2.0.
>>337508697
>SPEED UP YOUR GREAT WONDER! COMPLETE IT IN ONLY FIVE TURNS FOR ONLY $2.99!
>>337506378
not the OP image, the game is 60$ and i doubt on mobile
>>337508697
Kill yourself. You are everything wrong with the gaming industry.
>>337508697
>mobile game
>no cash shop
pick one
I just finished the tutorial for Civ V. What do I do now?
>all these faggots saying they would love a mobile civ game
Jesus fucking christ just when I think /v/ cannot possibly get any worse at all after so many years, it keeps fucking happening.
>>337505991
There is a civ game on mobile and it's not this it's civ revolution 2 and its 10 shekles.
Yeah all of the changes they're making seem really interesting
>unit stacking is back, but not to the ridiculously broken extent that it was in 4
>you know build your cities across multiple tiles
>you get science boosts based on your actual location
the graphics don't bother me that much either but they could be better
>>337507576
Sure. Until you get to mid/late-game and turns start taking forever to complete.
It does look goofy as fuck but honestly if the mechanics are good I don't mind too much.
>>337508884
>>337509083
There is nothing wrong with wanting a portable version of Civ you arrogant cucks. If I were asking for a mobile port with all the bullshit that a typical mobile phone game gets then I would be wrong and gladly shoot myself. But at no point was I implying that is the version that I want. I said I want the full Civilization experience, not a cash shop.
You morons can't even be open to the idea. You'd probably suck each other off if I said Civ for the 3DS.
Fucking morons.
>>337508915
The version I want. If it doesn't exist then I won't play it. EZ
>>337509409
>The version I want. If it doesn't exist then I won't play it. EZ
>Hello yes I have no idea how the mobile industry works
>>337509494
Get it through your dumb fucking skull. I know such a version will never fucking exist.
When the fuck was simply wishing for something become offensive? I'm not fucking posting on /mp/ - Monkey Paw
>>337509717
Because why the fuck would you be hopeful for something that has a basically impossible chance of existing?
In any case we already had a Civ on portable devices, and, big shock coming, it was fucking terrible.
>>337508697
It's called Civilization Revolution 1+2Faggot
>>337510252
Because I can you dumb shit. I wish I could fuck your mother and not get infested with STDs but you and I know that will never happen
>>337510336
Civ Rev sucked
>>337505991
let's be honest.
turn based strategy is a mobile drama.
real time strategy is the only strategic genre which deserves any respect.
>>337508697
If you have an android you can get a PS1 emu and get civ 2
>>337505991
oh shit lads
>>337510971
I will try them out thank you anon.
Wish multi-player was a possibility
>>337511189
It's got the same graphics as the PC version, the whole isometric thing.
It's all there.
Just made for controllers.
>>337505991
The art style alone killed it for me. I'm not interested in playing a game that fucking ugly.
>>337511180
I had this feeling for awhile now. It's fucking depressing. This reminds me of Simcity all over again. I don't understand why they don't just give us what we want. If this truly is for tablets, which it looks like, I hope it completely bombs.
>>337511671
>I don't understand why they don't just give us what we want.
Because people will buy it even if they don't give them what they want, meanwhile they can try to expand into the lucrative mobile market. Try and fail that is, because what mobile players are going to play a game like this. Sid Meier has been trying and failing to tap this market for a few years now, it's time to put the old man down.
>>337509409
Your "dream game" will never exist. F2p is the highest grossing platform for mobile games. And they don't care about you because if they made it p2w they'd just make it f2p with an online store if it was failing . Was that EZ to understand?
>>337512002
I don't want to live in this world anymore.
I can only hope this fucking flops hard.
>>337511671
>Simcity all over again
So based paradox will come out of the woodwork and deliver upon us the most based stratgey game of all time a year later?
im ok with this
>>337511180
Civ V is probably easy as fuck on a touch screen. Fuck Warcraft 3's campaign is easy on a touch screen
>>337512137
It was the top seller the day it was announced, it's already too late.
>>337508627
>Civ V was my first civ game. Civ is so epic and realistic and serious!!!
ur a faget
>>337508781
DELETE THIS BEFORE THEY FUCKING SEE IT
I'm not buying this shit. This is coming from someone who has bought everything in the civ franchise since CivII. I'm not paying these fuckers to make anymore shit.
>>337506376
And I bet it just burns you up inside, doesn't it?
>>337512094
>Your "dream game" will never exist.
Well gee golly, I wonder why it's a dream game!
>>337507576
No it wouldn't. It would probably make it so that once you use a settler to found a city it will take 8 hours for the city to complete, but can be sped up with Civ Gems™.
>>337507710
hahaha
no
It will hang even more.
Don't worry fampais, I fixed it
