>gaming "theory"
>it has no evidence so it's actually a hypothesis
>>337473780
I am unsure, but I believe a hypothesis also needs evidence
>>337474209
No, but it's generally better to have evidence as to show a line of reasoning.
>>337473780
>niggas be like "evolution theory is called "theory" because it got no evidence bruv"
Uh huh.
>>337475681
Has anyone proven evolution through repeated experimentation with observable results?
>>337475865
Yes, actually.
>Entire theory based on a something probably trivial like the MC losing his shoe in a cut scene
>Somehow leads to his actually in a coma based on theories with literally nothing to support on
>>337473780
A hypothesis also needs to be disprovable, which much of 'game theory' is not
>>337476984
DUDE WHAT YOU WERE REALLY A RAPE VICTIM AND THE GAME WAS JUST YOU COPING WITH THE TRAUMA LMAO
>>337475865
With fruitflies, yesalthough I'm pretty sure the evolution was a detrimental change to the organism.
>guy attempts to debunk a stupid idea
>his argument is even dumber than the idea
wew
