Previously:
>>337288674
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1bfgARmuGQ
http://store.steampowered.com/app/289070/
https://twitter.com/CivGame
http://www.pcgamer.com/civilization-6-everything-you-need-to-know/
http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/05/11/three-ways-sid-meiers-civilization-6-radically-reinvents-itself-city-building-science-and-diplomacy
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/civilization-6-revealed-brings-major-changes/1100-6439691/
>that art direction
I can't.
this would be great for my iPad!
>>337301280
any word on the AI not being shit?
hope the music's good
What civ waifu are you hoping for the most?
I hope they add our The Maid of Orléans.
>>337301280
those trees look like absolute shit
So, which female leaders will be shoved into the game this time? Better get your list of empress-consorts.
>>337301280
It looks like plastic
>be me 2 weeks ago
>get that hunger to play sum civ
>DL and install 4 because 5 is shit
>shits fun
>today
>see trailer for 6 at work
>so happy I bought the expansions for 4 on steam
I didn't actually read what was in them all, anyone know what the major things BYS and WL brings in 4? I noticed some spy shit and thats it so far
All I want is for Wonders in coastal cities to not appear in the fucking water.
Oh, and give India a real ruler instead of meme-Gandhi.
Why is the map so colorful and smooth? Why would they do that? This is a step back from Cov V.
looks bad
>>337301625
It should at least be better in BE since they actually bothered creating a new engine this time instead of trying to tack on new mechanics and hope for the best.
>>337301869
They might not seeing how they actually take up tile space
>>337301869
Ashoka.
>>337301869
Nuclear Gandhi is the most important meme in the history of civilization though.
If they added the Mughals with Akbar though that would be pretty cool.
>>337301280
nice looking game. It will run on my samsung galaxy ace, right?
>I start interning with Firaxis on Monday
Well, that's some fucking awesome timing
>>337301869
I always liked those. I tried to create my own headcanon for why my civ would build wonders in the sea.
>>337300960
I've always though that one of Japan's abilities should have been "Can always found a pantheon" and "always benefits from pantheon regardless of dominant religion"
>>337301869
You have to place wonders on tiles, so that definitely won't happen.
>>337302118
And your Samsung Gear. ;)
Endless games > Civ games
What the fuck happened?
>>337301785
Harriet Tubman for US
>>337302063
I don't think Indians would like a Muslim leader.
>>337301280
has anyone else noticed these cliffs
perhaps you can't embark those so easily?
Age of Mythology looks better than that.
>>337301280
Lets casualize civ more!
>>337301785
If Merkel leads Germany in the game as well, I'll suicide.
>>337302443
>Asia has no Everest-Himalayan type mountains
Retardation happened, clearly.
>>337302624
different tree colour/ style, eg certain trees only grow on certain continents
So who else is going to just stick with Civ 5 for the next few years?
Civ 6 is gonna be utter shit when it comes out. It'll take a couple years for it to become playable.
>>337302703
Jesus, that looks terrible. Are those palm trees jungle?
Get rid of city-states, they were always shit and you had to pay shit ton of gold only to see them lose interest in you 3 turns later, the bonuses they gave you were never worth to ally them.
![Headerbanner_Januar-702x336[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/vpEEt2C.jpg "Headerbanner_Januar-702x336[1].jpg")
>>337302785
if Merkel was the leader her game would end within 10 turns after being overrun by barbarians
>>337302607
they should have thought of that before they let themselves get conquered by muslims
>>337302703
>perhaps you can't embark those so easily?
oh shit that's interesting. I just assumed it was the Gibraltar natural wonder
there's literally nothing wrong with the graphics
>>337302961
>I never played Civ 5 the post
>>337301528
I expect them to use modern hardware capabilities to have ai make better decisions
>>337303070
>we want the Clash of Clans audience
As long as the game still has as much or more content, the changes to the interface and aesthetic are perfectly fine
>>337301280
Who here disappointed as shit!?
Cartoony graphics and pretty much just civ 5 2.0. Nothing really groundbreaking or unique.
This game is looking shit so far.
>>337302961
What the fuck, man.
>>337303196
I was at first thinking Dreamworks made a Civ game but you're more correct I think.
So will the game have religion and espionage or will we still have to wait for DLCs to have that shit?
>>337303268
>it's an "anons haven't seen gameplay and are already making extremely cynical assumptions" game
Mostly worried.
>not dropping 1-unit-per-tile or adding attrition, just being lazy and letting people have 2 units
>art style looks like a flash game
>$80 for base game
Admittedly many more things could be revealed, I'm just saying with what they've shown so far (very little) it looks mostly bad. Time for more Civ IV mods I guess. Can't get excited for the current stuff.
>>337303310
the stuff from the dlcs is supposed to be in.
>>337302773
Pretty much this.
>>337302443
>Africa arctic
>>337303363
do teens only use the official steam forums or something? their writing is such garbage
>>337303310
everything from civ 5 and dlcs is in with improvements/adjustments
>>337303150
Not him, but I hate how every game turns into a contest to see who can rub all the city states' dicks the most
>>337303381
What is there to "see" for gameplay? Everyone knows how Civilization is played and how it works.
Don't know what to tell you, read the interviews where they talk what's new with the game, I guess.
>>337303363
So if I don't like the cartoon aesthetic I am just as dumb as that dude?
>>337303484
>adjustments != improvements
Literally looks the console Civilsation Revolution game, released back in two thousand-fucking-eight.
>>337303409
>>337303484
You're kidding right?
They're actually doing that?
I remember every game since Civ III had the religion and espionage added in via DLC, are they ending that tradition?
Some leaders got spoiled:
Abd al-Rahman I - Spain
Suleiman I - Greece
Haile Selassie - Sweden
>>337303507
no you're just being a whiney cynical cunt for the sake of being a whiney cynical cunt
Will we ever get another baby yeti?
>>337303576
Sadly, you're 100% right.
>>337303507
no, I'm not sure I like it either but his post was shit
I think my biggest problem with it is that the trees look like absolute shit
it's hard for me to pinpoint what it is exactly I dislike about it though
So how many years do we have to wait for all the expansions that fix the game?
>>337303363
>Civ
>Realistic
It's a boardgame that uses the concept of history to suit its gameplay.
What's the point of Civ now that there are better 4x games like the Endless series and GS are better than ever?
>>337303576
wow, you are actually right. Well, it looks like an updated version of it, but still.
>>337303381
You don't need to play to point out the graphics style is garbage.
>>337303725
You keep trying too hard.
>>337303397
base game is 60
>>337301280
>can see underwater
This is good.
>those mountains
>that inconsistency between buildings and trees
That's bad.
>>337303835
For my region it's $80. Over 100 for the deluxe edition. Based on what I see so far I'd never get it on release anyway, just get the gold edition when it launches and pirate it until then.
Can't support bad changes at full price.
>>337303801
I don't mind it.
That's also not a reason to completely disregard an entire game.
>>337303576
Yup, my first thought too.
>>337303948
It's a sign that the rest is going to be bad.
Holy shit people.
If you're going to sperg out about the art style, just play the fucking game in tactical view mode.
Think of how shit the new tile management would look in 5's engine
>>337303363
>someone over 18 wrote this.
>>337303948
There is no reason to COMPLETELY disregard (or support) the game based on what's known.
The stuff I've seen is mostly bad though but it's not everything.
>>337303948
If I'm going to be looking at something for several hours, it better look relatively good.
And "good" is relative. SMAC still looks good. I was playing Civ IV a bit ago, still looks good.
This looks like mobileware shit.
>>337304098
What?
Civ IV looks great to me. The art design on this looks like a mobile game though.
>inb4 this appears on iOS/Android
>>337304160
>SMAC looking good
Yeah you're totally full of shit
It sounds good honestly. Cities now have districts, research is more specialized, you can have support units on the same tile instead of strictly 1upt, and there more environmental considerations.
If only they'll give us some better AI.
Looks like they want it to run on tablets.
Mobile market is the new console fags. Pc games have to take 8 steps back to run on your phone.
>>337303363
this post has 364 replies to it
>>337304259
>not appreciating 1999's aestetics
Bitch please. Pharaoh and SMAC still look good.
>>337304105
women are emotional children
it's either a woman who thinks she's deep in nerd culture or a hormonal mtf
>>337304191
In 5 the game couldn't even draw the wall of china right most of the time. The new look should let you quickly identify stuff like wonders and city buildings way better than the last game
>>337303363
>realism
>Civilization series
>>337303484
>improvements/adjustments
CIV IV is shit compared to it's predecessor. So far, the fourth game, with it's expansions, is by far the best game they've made in th series. The mechanics hasn't yet been simplified to make the game more accessible, and the AI can actually handle combat reasonably well.
When are they going to add a Canadian civ? We may be irrelevant but I want to play as Sir John A. MacDonald and build a great Canadian empire dammit.
>>337304358
I know... I just wish that Civilization wouldn't have fallen prey to this.
Guess some dedicated indie studio could save 4X.
>>337304358
>60 dollars on PC
>only 15 dollars on handheld with time gated turns
whoo boy
>>337302607
Ackbar invented his own religion, you twat.
>>337301280
>Mfw Paradox did a better "Civ in space" than Firaxis.
I hope they do their dream game: A GS game that spans the dawn of men to modern days.
It's going to BTFO CIV so hard...
>>337304624
>CIV IV is shit
>So far, the fourth game, with it's expansions, is by far the best game
Not sure how to respond.
>>337301696
As long as Isabella looks as C U T E in 6 as she does in 5, it's all good mane
>those graphics
do they plan on making this a mobile app?
Do the tile graphics change when you have a citizen working them like they did in Civ IV? That was one of my favorite parts.
And the civ leaders changing their clothes based on what era they were in.
>>337304626
Play IV (or V if you're retarded) with mods.
>>337304730
IV is garbage without warlords and bts to be fair
>>337302961
>the bonuses they gave you were never worth to ally them.
>>337301280
Does it still have the same pro-environmentalist "Love mother nature or suffer massive civ penalties" bullshit consistent with the series?
Can you play as Hitler yet? Whether it's Muhnarrative!Hitler the genocidal maniac who attacks innocent groups of people for not being aryan or Historical!Hitler the guy who wants a German Germany for the German people and who sends people with ties to hostile foreign groups (such as communist revolutionaries, or international bankers) to prison camps during wartime?
I do like the limestone pyramids tho.
>>337304786
It looks like it.
>>337304858
So you're saying Civ IV is the worst and best before and after its expansions? I don't think that makes sense.
hopefully online isn't a fuckfest of desyncs and crashes again
>>337304626
Canada is barely a nation, let alone a civilization
t.Canadian
>shitty animatic trailer
>graphics look mobile game-tier
This game looks cheap as fuck.
>>337304730
>>337304624
>CIV IV is shit compared to it's predecessor
That's supposed to be Civ V, the fifth game.
>>337305157
Alright, then I agree completely.
>>337304935
I wasn't him but I'm kind of agreeing, Civ IV was the worst vanilla and it's by far the best with all of its expansions
I'm pretty sure he meant V was the worst then 4 with expansions is the best
>>337304908
epic. simply epic.
>>337301280
Didn't the Dev from 5 shit all over it? Is he working on this one too?
>>337305146
This is some normie site
>PC_Gamer
Ah, yep. Knew it before I looked.
>>337301280
Imma laugh if Nelson "War criminal that runs the country into the ground" Mandela is considered a leader.
>>337305308
http://kotaku.com/5985186/lets-rank-the-civilization-games-best-to-worst
>>337305393
>kotaku
I'll never know what they said.
>>337305348
I'll laugh harder if someone considers South Africa a civilization at all.
>>337304728
> Paradox did a better "Civ in space"
Stellaris is civ in space?
>>337304705
These are getting better and more elaborate.
>>337303184
It'd be nice if you could choose the AI's intelligence and also it's mechanical advantages.
So instead of requiring the AI to get +50% nutrients, minerals and energy in order to unlock its Not Retard mode, it'd be nice if you could set the AI to Not Retard at +0% bonuses.
Will best slut be in game?
>>337303363
i think the artstyle is meant to help new players distinguish the geographical features from each other. bright colours and simple shapes are also easier to make while still conveying the same message
there is literally nothing wrong with this kind of artstyle if it means we'll have more interaction with the terrain. if anything it helps keep things somewhat legible when the whole map is covered with cities and armies
modders will also have a very easy time imitating that artstyle so new content will spring up faster. stop freaking out before we even get to see how the gameplay works
>>337305476
well south africa does tend to make it's own everything really
weapons, cars, clothes, etc
they're not a great civilization but you could put them in as a weird estranged uncle of a civilization
>>337301280
>Instead, Firaxis has created the concept of 12 different types of color-coded Districts (five or six of which will be available from the beginning) that exist on their own tiles on the map, outside the city center and will house specific building types. “A science district, which we’ve called a campus, once constructed will allow you to put a library and a university and a research lab out on that tile. And now your city is sort of specialized toward being a really good science city,” says Beach.
Uh, isn't this straight from Endless Legend?
>tablet graphics
PEOPLE FELL FOR THE PASCAL MEME FOR THIS
>>337305728
There is an estrategic view for all that m8. They'll remove eye candy because fuck you.
>>337305801
I think it's been done before Endless did it
>>337305146
Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri was top tier.
Though I do wish that Support for units was more global rather than per-city.
Anyone have that civ roulette?
I feel like killing some time tonight.
Good thing this looks like shit or else I'd be regretting my Stellaris purchase right about now
>>337305728
This. Everything being monotone and blending together is going to make distinguishing terrain and improvements a clusterfuck.
If what they're saying about the terrain being more interactive and impactful on the gameplay is true, this kind of aesthetic is kind of necessary.
Still think they could add more trees to the forests and jungles though so this doesn't look so SPORE.
>>337305974
I'm wanting to get Stellaris. Would you recommend?
>>337305949
Sometimes I wish they would just remake SMAC.
Then I look at Beyond Earth and desperately hope that they don't.
>>337305974
>purchasing stellaris
senpai…
>>337305801
Not really, Endless Legend didn't have specialized boroughs, just boroughs.
There were wonder boroughs for each aspect of the FIDSI though that did that kind of stuff but only one could exist in the world of each type.
I think the newest expansion might have changed it a bit but I don't have it.
>>337305957
Can I help you make a good decision?
Just download http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=288570 and enjoy.
>>337305728
>bright colours and simple shapes because bloo-bloo goo-goo-gaa-gaa
Literal fucking babies, fuck this gay earth.
>>337305476
m8 we got Mali, Thailand, the Celts, the Zulus, and Holland.
At this point I'd be surprised if Australia doesn't get added in, with their unique unit the Shitposter to replace diplomats/missionaries
>>337305974
This won't be out for another 5 months.
Pretty sure you're run out of Stellaris mileage before then unless they do some extensive content/gameplay updates.
>>337306018
>this view already exist
>not even the devs care about it
I always play with strategic view on, it's pretty comfy and easy on the gpu
>>337306018
>>337305728
I think they're trying to copy blizzard's philosophy with hearthstone's graphics where it's easier to see what's going on for both new players and people watching on a stream.
>>337306057
It's worth a pirate at least. Watching your empire get big is pretty fun.
>>337305728
>>337306018
I completely agree. So many times in Civ V I've had enemy units sneak up on me simply because my eyes would just completely pass over them being buried in some muddle
>>337301280
>hexes
>1UPT
>Clash of Clans art
Lads, I've bought every Civ since 2.
And I'm done. This is too much. It's dead.
>>337306292
I can't stand it to be honest. I don't like looking directly down at the map like that.
You might as well just play gsg if you're going to remove all the immersion.
>>337306265
There will probably be $500 worth of DLC between then and now
>>337306413
nothing wrong with hexes
also you can merge support units together with main soldier units and stuff
>>337306098
Xcom remake "Procedural maps? more than 6 units? Flattening the map? Lol you think you do but you don't"
IM HORNY SHORT FOR THE HORNED REAPER IM CHUMS WITH THE DUNGEON KEEPER
Doom! Now with "Press X to awesome" mini-cutscenes and a slower walking speed, because god damn fuck gameplay
Fallout 3
>>337304861Salut, connard
>>337306417
>immersion
spotted the roleplaying faggot
>>337306456
Civ 6 is being made by Paradox Interactive? <g>
>>337306413
I like hexes and 1UPT better than stacks of doom honestly. Those are the changes I actually like from IV to V
>>337306309
>watching someone stream civ
Why
>>337306717
It's Current Year.
Why play video games when you have twitch.tv and youtube where you can watch video games?
>>337306717
I have no idea
probably vying to get more sales
>>337303583
How on earth is it a bad thing
>>337306637
stellaris is made by paradox
>>337304705
This could easily be a real ad.
>>337301280
Their trailer had to censored this painting. kek
https://youtu.be/c1bfgARmuGQ?t=47s
>>337306873
No it's a good thing.
It's just completely unbelievable.
>>337306907
american prudishness at work
>>337306873
I think he's trying to say that Civ6 having everything that Civ5+DLC had is too good to be true.
It's what SHOULD happen, but not what will happen.
>>337306907
man north english accents are not suitable for this kind of thing
>>337307220
Yeah what else are they going to be able to offer in the DLCs other than the same shit they've offered in every game before?
This means they'll have to actually come up with new ideas for once in their entire career.
>>337307427
I think DLC that are focused on specific time periods are fine.
Industrial and Modern age are always difficult to make interesting in vanilla and usually they do a good job of adding what needs to be added.
However, Religion needs to be Day 1. It won't be, with the excuse being they "didn't have time," but fuck that.
Also oceans need to be way more interesting, not some "you can't improve these tiles at all" empty space.
>>337307427
Ocean/underwater cities I hope. I never understood why this couldn't be a thing in mainstream Civ even when you reach the era of Death Robots and XCOM drop squads.
>>337307662
Religions, Espionage and Trade have all been confirmed as Day 1 features.
>>337304908
all those jewish farmers and working class people surely had the same ties to communism and the new world order as the rich ones right?
remember to sign the petition
https://www.change.org/p/firaxis-games-ask-firaxis-to-change-civ-6-s-cartoony-graphics?recruiter=539937170&utm_source=share_for_starters&utm_medium=copyLink
what have you got to lose?
>>337307902
are you serious?
>>337307964
literally no downside
>>337307818
Where is the proof
>>337307669
>mining ocean trenches
>exploiting costal reefs, atolls, and seamounts for food and gold
>whaling and ivory system where you have to manage not over exploiting them
>in endgame fighting over the last bits of oil under the arctic ice
>ocean cities, tidal power plants, and kelp farms just like SMAC
It'd be beautiful.
>>337307902
only my dignity
>>337307818
Source?
>>337307990
fucking lol
>>337307902
What if I like the graphics
>>337308152
Download Clash Clans free now on the App Store or Google Play store!
I wouldn't mind random events coming back.
>>337308301
It depends how they do it. It should at least make some sense based on circumstances, so you don't grow unbelievably sick of them.
>>337308301
Didn't Civ III have volcanoes and shit?
I mostly played only V and not much of the other ones.
>>337308363
Just something to throw off monotony.
Political
>Low happiness and personal opinion leads to revolutionists (barbarians) spawning near cities.
Environmental
>Volcanoes cause population to decrease by later grant fertile soils
>Tsunamis decimate coastal towns but you can spin international aid
Or just purely random events with +/- thing.
>>337306669
I agree but the problem with 1UPT is that the AI has no idea what the fuck to do with em. At least stacks of doom gave the AI a fighting chance. Conquest victories in 5, even on the highest level, were a joke.
>>337308009
Hell, a game where resources could actually deplete instead of being infinite would change so much
Guys how much for the full version on launch (all factions, scenarios, etc)?
$80? $90
>>337301280
Graphics haven't grown on me. I really preferred the more realistic backdrop of V. The promo art also seems pretty at odds with the weirdly saturated mobile tier visuals.
>>337308664
It might be a problem with people who enjoy the 'one more turn' thing.
A compromise could be resources having a chance of disappearing from overuse.
>>337305728
>stop freaking out before we even get to see how the gameplay works
I'll I've said is that I'm predicting a shitty game.
Nobody can say with certainty for a long time yet. Also the art style blows chunks but it's entirely subjective, there's no accounting for (your shit) taste.
>>337301696
Not Civ 6, but it was a real kick in the balls when BE came out and I saw the leaders
They were so bland and forgettable, it was really disappointing, especially since SMAC, even if some of the ideas were absolutely retarded, had such lovable leaders
I think the secret agenda and the personality thing will make the campaign much more fun, but if the leaders themselves aren't interesting, I just don't think it'll work
Pick related, Aki is my autismo waifu
>>337307818
Now prove it! That's the tougher part.
>>337308034
>>337307991
http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/05/11/three-ways-sid-meiers-civilization-6-radically-reinvents-itself-city-building-science-and-diplomacy
>Despite being rebuilt from the ground up, Beach promises that unlike most of its predecessors, Civilization 6 won’t be stripped down to its bare essentials in its initial release form. We can expect a set of features that’s comparable to what’s currently in Civilization V in its post-expansion state, including trade, religion, archeology, espionage, Great Works, Culture Victory, and more.
>>337304908
No you can't play as Hitler. Any art depicting him is a serious crime in Merkel Land. Needless to say this game has to move units everywhere (no pun intended).
>>337309126
>“We have almost all of that in there,”
>almost
What a difference a word can make.
>>337309081
>>337309126
>>337309207
>>337309184
Checkmate.
>>337309126
>We can expect a set of features that’s comparable
>Comparable
Streamlined shit.
>>337309340
Yeah exactly. Phrasing is important, looks like some people are falling for it though. That's all they hope for.
>>337302063
>>337302607
They should split India into multiple civs, like the Mauryans and the Mughals.
>>337304218
Some people are saying this is more akin to Civ IV but I really don't see it. Feels like how Red Alert 3 played up the cartoonishness of Red Alert 2. Looks more like Civ Rev than any other Civ game game, which is disappointing.
That cover art is some of the most breath taking art i have ever seen then the gameplay looks like some nintendo 3ds shit.
>>337309369
>looks like some people are falling for it though
It has happened before and it's going to happen again.
I hope I'm wrong.
>>337309369
>>337309270
>>337309184
http://www.polygon.com/features/2016/5/11/11653620/civilization-6-release-date-preview
>Religion, trade and tourism are going to be back in Civilization 6, for example.
>"OMG WHERE'S THE PROOF???"
>shows proof
>"THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!!!"
Then don't pre-order it like a retard. Wait and see if the gameplay actually implements these features in way that satisfies you.
Do you babies need to be spoonfed everything?
>>337309579
Steam refunds are a thing. Too bad early launch hype and people not wanting to go against groupthink are way, way more powerful than 2 hour refunds.
>>337304705
I need more of these memes.
>>337302063
I'd rather see Chandragupta Maurya as India's leader, he was truly a Great Man. A conqueror who laid the foundations of a real empire, not just someone like Alexander or Genghis Khan who built an incredible empire that immediately crumbled upon their death.
>>337309464
Why the fuck is everybody judging the gameplay entirely based on the art style?
>>337301280
People are interpreting far too much from 3 screenshots. Mind you they were dumb to release just a pointless cinematic trailer and 3 screenshots.
>>337309624
>do you need to be spoon-fed what a product people ask money from you to provide will have?
Yes.
I get your hyped, but you also come across as retarded.
>>337301280
>We want the P2W mobile audience.
So tell me anons, how does Civ 4 compare to Civ 3 cause I might give it a shot if its similar.
>>337309747
The gameplay can't be talked about outside of the brief mentions of stuff, most of which sounds bad but isn't all inclusive.
Nothing about this sounds good.
I need good things to be announced to demonstrate hype or excitement. That's just how I am.
>Get home from a long day at work
>Downing zzzquil to get to bed early
>Open Steam
>See Civ6
>Hype instantly shoots through the roof
>Check the pictures
>That art direction
I think that was the quickest I've ever had my hype killed.
Looks like complete garbage.
>>337309747
They're not you fucking dope. There is nothing to talk about but the graphics so people are talking about the graphics.
>>337305728
I honestly hate Civ Vs graphics. Hard to see anything at all. Just looking at it gives me a headache.
>>337309976
Civ 5's graphics got old on me pretty quick as well.
I don't know how to feel about the art directions
but all i hope for is just multiple leaders for each Civ
>>337309773
You're coming off as full mongoloid.
Posting sources isn't "hype", it's showing the available information.
If you don't like it, don't attack the person doing the Googling that you were too lazy to do.
>>337309960
There have been at least two major gamechanging features announced that aren't getting half as much discussion as "muh clash of clans art"
>>337310089
>it's showing the available information.
>We almost have all this stuff
>GUYS THIS STUFF IS CONFIRMED
Fuck off, you better work for Firaxis, anything else is pathetic.
>>337302961
This. It's so fucking dumb having to ram the worthless shitty citystates cocks down your throat for delegates. They waste space and should be removed.
>>337301280
>>337301494
>looks like a fucking mobile game
>>337310136
>gamechanging features
You mean multiple units?
Too bad it's a half-assed measure.
They should have added attrition and full stacks. Could have made techs/promotions around increasing the limit and reducing attrition as well.
>>337301494
>>337310219
I hate it too but the water looks nice.
>>337304728
stellaris is just as much of a disappointment as beyond earth
>>337309887
I feel it really kills the mood of the whole "epic timespan of human civilization" thing. The promo art looks pretty good, and I imagine the music will be along the same lines as V and IV. These visuals look like they'll be pretty jarring in that respect.
This just looks so terrible I can't help but believe it was some dumb executive decision to make it look more appealing for tablet users.
>>337306018
This is terrible. I'm all for having better terrain and it blending in more, but that doesn't mean you have to make the game look like a cartoon or some cheap mobile shit.
>>337310152
Because "NONE OR ALMOST NONE OF IT WILL BE IN THE GAME, ALL OF IT WILL BE STREAMLINED AND ABSENT" is an appropriate reaction to being told by the guy who led the G&K and BNW expansions that the features from those things will be implemented in some form in an entirely new game.
I get that you're baiting but maybe put more effort in next time.
>>337303576
I played the console version and loved the aesthetic
>no luxury resource specific unit/buildings
Why don't they just do this. I want to become a trade baron.
>>337310458
The appropriate reaction is to rub two brain cells together and realize they will oversell the quantity, being that they want your cash and are not your buds.
>>337304705
This is what looked off to me. Looks just like it'd fit on mobile.
>>337310334
No way, that delivers a much better product. It's not perfect but it's got a good core. BE has no good core. Adding shit wouldn't fix its problems.
I'm not going to buy it until it has 2 expansions, I learned my lesson with beyond earth.
>>337306907
>Game is called Civilization
>Is censored because it could offend uncivilized people
>>337310507
Then it will be fairly easy to see it when the Let's Plays and other player reviews on Steam start showing up.
That's assuming people actually wait for reviewers that play the whole game through, and not just hype it themselves like you clowns did for Stellaris.
>>337310603
That game could have 100 expansions and be shit.
Civ V would be a better example of your point.
>>337304705
You made my heart skip a beat. Thank god that's not real.
>>337310458
>The guy writing in all caps is not the one baiting.
>It's clearly the guy being logical instead of falling to misguided hype.
>>337310507
Then don't buy it. Don't preorder it. Wait to see what other pople say.
>>337310667
>Then it will be fairly easy to see it when the Let's Plays
I regret ever responding to you.
>>337310726
No shit. My only point is that at this stage anybody responding with glee is a little dense.
>>337310336
That's my problem with it. It just doesn't fit the theme of the game, at all. The artstyle would fit other games fine, just not Civ.
you guys they fixed the graphics!
>>337310724
see
>>337310152
I guess all caps are okay when the person you agree with is doing it. Or you're doing it.
>>337310334
What >>337310592 said.
We all know Stellaris is going to get the EUIV/CK2 bi-monthly DLC treatment.
What matters is that the core game is pretty solid and polished.
>>337310789
Watch it on Twitch first though.
That's where you'll find the best Let's Plays.
>>337310820
Well to be fair, I was quoting you when I used the caps.
Greentext/meme arrows mean quoting on 4chan.
>>337310807
something tells me this is bait
>>337310592
its an extremely feature poor and bland game, you can see exactly where features from EU4 and Vicky 2 have been torn out so they can be sold as DLC. There's no way at all to win a war against a more powerful enemy, and wars against weaker empires are so simple its not even satisfying. The ai's will do literally nothing and never fucking declare war on you to break up the monotony. The lategame crises were supposed to be these big things that completely reorder the status quo and force you to work together with your old enemies but its nothing like that at all, oh some literally who empire on the other side of the galaxy had a robot revolt and their rival invaded and put it down. Wasn't that amazing? Sure hope you don't mind continuing to do nothing.
>>337310325
>but the water looks nice
This is false.
