>"Listen, we've got enough clout right now for one major bill, not both. So whaddya want me to push forward?
>Do you want to be the President who cured cancer or the President who solved world hunger?"
3. Give anons their waifu.
World hunger serves a purpose to limit the population and prevent other resources from getting eaten up too quickly
Cancer serves no purpose
Fuck cancer
>>336988979
Good choice
Cancer is a first world problem
Hunger is a third world problem
So Fuck Cancer
>>336989103
You could just say the exact same thing about cancer
If you solve world hunger though it makes literally no difference. People in those countries still won't be educated, still won't contribute to the earth as a whole.
Fuck cancer.
Cancer probably. It depends on what the solution is for solving world hunger.
>>336988783
Neither. Humanity doesn't deserve either. I would have the scientists who cured cancer rounded up and executed quietly. Can't have the knowledge slipping out.
Ending world hunger would simply cause the population in Africa and India to explode even more. Eventually, we will run out of space as our leaders import more third world immigrants and life would be hell.
>>336988979
>>336989103
>>336989141
These desu
Cure cancer.. i save more people from civilized countries instead of saving people from shitty african countries.
>>336989103
this guys gets it
Last time I answered a thread like this, I got banned.
>>336988783
Cure cancer. It's something to do with overpopulation.
If you solve world hunger, humans would just exponentially multiply until space and other resources becomes the problem, instead of food.
Now if you cure cancer, only a few benefits from it, so it wouldn't really disturb the balance that much.
>>336988979
My man
>>336989224
>feed hungry people cancer
>both problems solved
>>336989206
but there's gonna be more of them coming to europe
Curing cancer will just breed something else to fuck us up in a few decades. and solving world hunger won't last very long.
The powers that be will just develop super cancer, and make poor people starve again to keep the balance.
I'm going with >>336988979
>>336988783
We had this thread infinite times and arguments are still same.
World Hunger: We have resources for that, just nobody gives a fuck and giving niggers food for free would result in population explosion and collapse of civilization.
Cancer: We become timeless, cancer kills literally everyone who don't get to die first from other causes, like getting shot by a well-fed niglet.
Gotta go with cancer.
Only the weak go hungry.
If you starve, you weren't strong enough.
But cancer can kill the strong anyway.
Fuck Cancer.
>>336988783
World hunger has a solution and it's simple fàm just give people food
Cure cancer
>>336989397
>>336989381
>Curing cancer will just breed something else to fuck us up in a few decades
What
>>336988783
>Let Them Eat Cake
Sometimes this game actually gets a good joke in.
Cure cancer. Malnutrition is much easier to treat than cancer.
>implying cancer would ever be allowed to be cured
>>336989473
Nature will find a way.
>>336989298
Threadbans for feeding an off topic thread should be standard procedure, as both parties are equally guilty of perpetuating shitposting.
Reply to off topic? See you in 3 days. that's how it should be.
>>336989397
People who get cancer have weak genes
>>336989383
>World Hunger: We have resources for that
Only short term. Long term, the world would be pretty fucked in terms of resource and whatever side effects spawns from mass producing food like that.
>>336988783
I'd fix world hunger, because that's a path into solving cancer anyway. (Greater number of people by sheer numbers become scientists and researchers)
Unless by "cure cancer" they mean "lets butcher anyone who has cancer and feed them to the hungry," in which case, I'm game.
>>336989103
>>336989141
>>336989206
>>336989256
>>336989309
These guys get it.
>>336988783
If you end world hunger the population would just rise and you're right back to starving people now using even more resources
Cancer doesn't have a big impact on population and even people who take care of themselves get it
Fuck Cancer
>>336989652
You can get cancer from outside sources too, Dipshitticus.
>>336989638
You should be banned for posting in this thread too by that logic famalam
>>336989745
I spend too much time here anyways, I'd gladly take the 3 day vacation from you faggotrons if it meant every offtopic thread results in everyone contributing getting the same treatment.
>>336989840
>if everyone is super no one will be
>>336989840
Also if you really hate it here just leave, the door is right there in the corner of your screen bye bye
>Have a strong intro like this
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9IPNZf11uc
>Game goes to shit once the intro sequence is over
Why
>>336989665
But hunger is only really a problem in the less civilized areas of society. Which likely would not suddenly say, "Well we have food, lets stop killing each other and forcing our own people into slave labor or child soldiery or any other fucked up shit." They would keep doing that so they could have more power and wealth. Curing cancer would not come from giving those asshats food. Even if you are talking homeless people in civilized countries. They don't have to worry about feeding themselves, are they going to suddenly stop drinking and pull their lives together, go off and find a cure for cancer? Fuck no they aren't. Most of them will go buy more booze and drugs with the extra cash they have. Curing cancer is the best decision here.
>>336989938
Not even the same concept but whatever
>>336990068
You can check out any time you like, but you can NEVER leave
>>336989938
Kinda how I felt when I visited a liberal arts campus once.
>Curing Cancer just means old people live longer and drain more resources
>Curing World Hunger means a path towards ending capitalism
Fuck Hunger
>>336990078
It would have had potential if they had actually bothered to make more than 2 story missions
People also don't seem to realise that when you fix world hunger, we will eventually be able to achieve things we're currently holding off.
We can setup a far more aggressive space program, develop orbital platforms and stations, eventually start building a dyson sphere, colonization of our system and moving on to the next planetary system.
It is the start of humanity's leap to the start, but you faggots are too busy voting to cure cancer for the few.
Damn you idiots and your short-sightedness
>Which likely would not suddenly say, "Well we have food, lets stop killing each other and forcing our own people into slave labor or child soldiery or any other fucked up shit"
Funny, but that's exactly what would happen.
>>336988783
Hunger.
>>336990232
Fuck off
>>336990213
Fuck off commie, capitalism has given us the highest standards of living in the world
Solving world hunger is not going to be very effective if there's conflicts in some place of the world who will just take the food for themselves and tell the starving population blame it on X.
Cancer is a long-term threat since the longer you live the more chance you have to develop cancer.
I would say fuck cancer but really >>336988979 is the better choice.
>>336989730
Shitty lifestyle, and shitty decisions, which are arguably even worse than being weak or having shit genes, because you're actively involved in the process.
Cancer, because my mom's ovary didn't starve to death.
>>336988783
Neither, both will result in unsustainable overpopulation, I say accentuate world hunger AND spread more cancer.
>>336989218
Eating those who have died from cancer.
>>336990315
Anyone who votes to cure cancer has a very short view on humanity and fails to see the bigger picture, and/or is too fucking sheltered to realise the reality of the world, as it truly is.
The adults aren't the one who need help, its the children, children whom some of have already become significant forces of good in history. Getting more of these children to stay alive and healthy gives them the chance to develop into people who matter.
And by removing the food supply question to the whole planet and giving us a massive leg up in resource management, we are given the freedom to research, develop and build more, even divert resources we used to channel into global food supply into energy instead.
tl;dr: picking "fuck cancer" is for amerifats
>>336989652
>>336990453
>I don't know what cancer is
>there's absolutely no random element in my life so there's absolutely no way something can go wrong in my life
>>336988783
world hunger affects subhumans the most
cancer affects people living in the first world the most
cure cancer obviously
>>336988783
>This image causes some of the best debate on /v/
Fucking great.
And fuck cancer.
>>336990835
Asshurt cancer patient detected.
cure cancer, solving world hunger would just result in massive overpopulation and niggatry
>be poor person
>have shitloads of kids without planning
>half of them die from starvation
>world hunger is solved
>all my poor dumbass kids can now have shitloads of kids
>africa population rises to 5 billion
there is NO world hunger problem. If third worlders and poor people would have a reasonable amount of kids nobody would be starving. if anything, rich countries should stop helping africa and they should have a population relative to their worth
>>336988783
I'd rather cure cancer. Solving world hunger would fuck up the economy a lot
Hunger can be fixed, cancer probably can't.
>>336991084
forgot my picture
>people will defend "muh world hunger!"
>>336990828
children get cancer too tho
also they're not the only ones starving
>>336990078
I must admit.
That intro is epic.
>>336988783
>Implying that world hunger isn't trivially solved by Americlaps just eating less
>>336989357
Found the poo.
If curing world hunger meant shitholes wouldn't be shitholes anymore and would start contributing to humanity's progress then I would go with that because it would lead to curing cancer eventually.
>>336990828
There isn't a problem with hunger in developed nations. The problem is with third world countries having too many people and no infrastructure.
>>336991287
With questions like these, there's no way to have both. If you choose one, the other will never happen
>>336990226
>do all of this shit that was just fun bonus stuff in the last game to unlock the next mission
>mission complete! now go do all that shit again
>etc
I don't know how anyone thought this was okay, seriously kills all momentum and desire to complete the game.
>>336991287
They aren't shitholes because they have no food, they have no food because they are shitholes
>>336991240
But then there would be even more hungry people.
>>336991287
How the hell would a massive population boom in shitholes result in them becoming less of a shithole?
What if the cure for cancer resides in a formula that allows the growth of and replacement of cells, which leads to the creation of easily replenishable artificial meat, which leads to solving world hunger?
How about a more important choice
>>336991413
If shit holes didn't have to fight every day for scraps to eat, they'd have more time and money to actually go to school and do something useful.
>>336991084
>>336991157
Kids aren't even the problem. It's just that those regions have shitty agriculture infrastructure.
>>336991413
more people to scoop up the street poop and get rid of it
>>336991307
It's "everyone gets to eat" not "we lack food we'll grow more" its fixing whatever is currently broken in the food supply system so well that NOBODY goes hungry.
And that means more hands for things to happen, humanity progresses faster, if for no other reason than sheer necessity of building out into space.
Or we all kill each other due to whatever other reason, in which case, also good.
>>336991460
Reminder that season 3 of Nyteblade was the tightest shit and season 4 nerds are the reason the franchise went downhill.
>>336991537
they would find some other reason to fight
>>336989473
Previously benign cancer will evolve into a new form of supercancer immune to whatever cure the bill makes yo
>>336991608
that's not how cancer works
>>336991537
No, they'd fight for land, money, oil or power
>>336991460
Go to hang out with Oleg
>>336991287
a surplus of food will do nothing to better the gene pool of third world countries which is shit across the board
>>336991460
>there are fags who didn't say Totally
>>336991537
No, if they had enough to eat, the children who survived to adulthood who would have otherwise died will breed at the exact same rate as their parents and the food supply will be quickly be made insufficient again
Only this time with greater numbers of starving children
>>336991608
Cancer is a disorder, not a fucking organism
>>336991537
>>336991542
without world hunger those countries would just become even more overpopulated. I've been to the Philippines there is no fucking room for all those people. The real problem is countries with cultures that make them want to have shitloads of kids. overpopulation is the problem not hunger.
>>336991413
They have high populations because they need more kids to work and bring in food for the family.
>>336991565
africa's imput on the world is extremely minimal
>>336991537
Shitholes are shitholes because of a lot of reason. Corruption, idealogies, all sorts of shit. You can't just 'fix' a problem and expect them to sort it out.
We gave those motherfuckers houses, food, and medicine, and they rape babies thinking it will get rid of their HIV.
There might be a solution to turning those shitholes into non-shitholes, but the shithole-ites are incapable of bringing it about themselves. The problem is more complicated than 'lack of food.'
>>336991789
>Pump out more kids who need food to feed the kids who need food to work for food to feed the kids who need food to
>>336989635
>>336991608
That isn't what cancer is. That would happen if it was a living organism leaving an empty niche, but cancer is just your cells fucking up uncontrollably. There would be no open spot if it was gone, and nothing to take it.
>>336988783
Fuck the cancer
>>336991287
fuck off lahey
>>336991387
How about we eat the Americlaps then?Implying that I want that level of fat density in my food
The real question here is "can afro-ethnics actually maintain civilisation when left to their own devices?"
>Cure cancer
>Redistribute cancer funding to programs that treat domestic hunger/poverty
>Call it a day and go get some of that sopping, young secretary pussy
THREAD SUMMARY:
Cancer better short term option
Hunger better long term option
Most people don't have the foresight or understanding to think long term so they say cancer, nothing else to see here, move along!
>>336989206
Solving world hunger is about educating people.
There's a misconception that it would be about us producing enough food for them, but we already do that. (The food we throw away each year could feed the starving)
The key is actually having the infrastructure to get food to hungry people, which requires stability and peace, things which are ultimately achieved through education.
The notion of food scarcity as population control is actually a myth, we generate food in surplus. Overpopulation is also a bit of a fallacy, with many developed nations actually facing a population crisis in terms of age and birthrates (Russia, Japan). Once nations develop, educate and plateau they generally have the means to feed their population manyfold. The real issues in the developed world usually revolve around credit, debt or housing.
>>336992071
>be africa
>euros come and build infrastructure
>they leave
>africans can't into maintenance
>china comes in
>rebuilds shit
>they will eventually leave
>africans will fuck it up again
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0C4_88ub_M
>>336992071
http://rense.com/general47/stunningsuccessofwhite.htm
>100 white farmers, starting from scratch, in Zambia, produced 70% of Zambia's maize crop in one year. They outperformed, 150,000 black peasants
>>336992164
More educated people = better world
>>336992137
Hunger is by far worse long term, the entire issue with fixing world hunger is it completely fucks us over long term.
>>336989397
>Not giving yourself weaker strains of cancer so that you can withstand stronger ones
Heh, weakling.
>>336992137
>Cancer better short term option
>Hunger better long term option
other way around, curing cancer will be necessary at some point if we don't want lifespan gains to stagnate
>>336992209
>comments disabled
topkek, I can imagine that it would be filled wth angry SJWs
GIVE EDUCATION
MAKE SMART PEOPLE SMARTER AND DUMB SMART
THERE FIXED
>>336992071
>>336992250
captcha ate my pic, sage, etc.
If I had the cure to cancer, I would destroy it out of guilt for all the people who died of cancer in the past.
What gives our generation the right to be free of cancer over previous generations?
>>336992273
I don't know
A lot of 'educated' people want first-world nations to destroy themselves through unlimited immigration
>>336992134
This guy's onto something
All the money and jobs we have into curing cancer are no longer useful if cancer is cured.
Instead of letting it all go to waste we can redirect it to feeding the poor.
2 birds with one stone,
>>336992419
THAT'S NOT GOOD EDUCATION
>>336992209
>China
>Never colonized
>Plutocracy
>Population of dirt farmers
>Lecturing anybody on anything
>>336992405
>If I had the cure to cancer, I would destroy it out of guilt for all the people who died of cancer in the past.
>What gives our generation the right to be free of cancer over previous generations?
Thats the most retarded thing I have ever heard. Do you think the same should have happened for every disease cure we have now?
>>336988783
Hunger, hands down. Not only do you save millions of lives, you also skyrocket the potential sustainable population.
Curing cancer on the other hand just means rich people live about 10 years longer.
>>336992405
you sound like a cuc.k who apologies for slavery because you are white
>>336992537
doesn't change the fact that they are correct
>>336992579
entropy is real
>>336992579
>you also skyrocket the potential sustainable population
food isn't the only thing you need for sustainability
all you'd get is a bunch of fat homeless people contributing nothing to society
>>336992642
He's joking and trying to sound like one, but he fails because the modern lefty holds that previous generations were awful because of their supposedly outdated views
>>336992579
ok so now you got billions of africans with cancer and aids
good job
You know, for all its faults, I did like this game. The actual gameplay was pretty satisfying.
>>336992405
>People thinking like this are allowed to vote
>>336992440
>All the money and jobs we have into curing cancer are no longer useful if cancer is cured.
This is why cancer isnt cured yet
chemo is WAAAYYY too profitable
>>336988783
What game is this
>>336992071
Likely no.
Mostly because they can't into not being short sighted. I'm not saying everyone needs to try to be America/Russia/China/etc, but they kind of need to get their shit together and worry about how things will be three or four generations down the line instead of I WILL BE WORLD KING OF THE AFRICAS only to be shot by child soldiers.
I hate to say this because it sounds /pol/ as fuck, but the quickest way to bring Africa to the first world is to take it away from the Africans. Let someone else run the show and enforce the rules long enough for the stupid fucks to be washed out. They may never be a world power, but they can be brought up from doped up child soldiers to, at the very least, DESIGNATED SHITTING STREETS level of civilization.
>>336993005
Patron Lines
>>336992579
>Curing cancer on the other hand just means rich people live about 10 years longer.
>tfw being poor makes me immune to Cancer
>>336993040
I'm aware this makes it sound like Africa is a country and not like the continent that it is, but a lot of the problems are shared with many of the countries within it.
Most of the 'civilized' areas are basically just tourist hot spots, and I still wouldn't go.
>>336992840
It was basically Infamous if Infamous was played for laughs. So yeah.
>cure hunger
>all the poor people just shit out more children starting the entire thing all over again
>cure cancer
>some rich people live I guess
Cancer It is
>>336993005
Preist's queue
>>336992137
Cancer is the ultimate killer. It's a time limit on your life that you can only avert by dying of something else first. Curing cancer would be man's first step towards immortality. Hunger is so short term.
>>336993005
Cleric's Avenue
>>336992939
Doctors were experimenting with using high doses of Vitamin C to kill cancer cells.
Tests were promising but the National Cancer Institute shut them down because they'd lose a lot of money and prestige if chemo wasn't a thing.
>>336988783
From a practical perspective, Cancer is the better choice. World hunger is nice from a moral perspective, but the world really doesn't benefit from a sudden and massive population boom that would ensue. It would result in a massive shortage of resources, war and tons of other problems. Cancer would just raise the average lifespan of most first world countries by a couple years and cut some tragedy out of people's lives.
Hunger would be fine if we lived in the future where people could just be carted off to space colonies or some sci fi shit, but that aint the case.
>>336993196
In the same way that suicide makes you immune to dying in a traffic accident, yeah. It's specifically the rich people because they're the ones with the cash to cover medical bills for things that can kill them before cancer.
>>336992671
Are they though? What's the use in going abroad to point out what doesn't work on a continent when you've got the same issues back home? China has some of the most abysmal poverty in the world despite being a 'BRIC' nation. The truth is that Africa is a god send for China because it costs their companies so little to operate out there and there's so little regulation.
/v/ also uses that video to deride all of Africa, while ignoring areas like Lagos and Accra which are developed and maintain infrastructure. The guy in that video was in the sticks (where business is cheapest), what was he expecting?
It's like me going to an abandoned factory in the arse end of Eastern Europe and saying 'boy, the state of European manufacturing is so shitty right now'.
But guys if we cure cancer that means no agdq/sgdq.
>solved hunger = many niggers with cancer and aids, and earth is destroyed
>cure cancer = less niggers, maintain & control, and earth is happy
Duh...
>>336988783
>male Boss
Fuck outta here with this shit
>>336993461
His point was more that there was infastructure, and it was left to rot, not because of any specific economic factors, like the example factory, but because they just couldn't be bothered to actually take care of their shit.
>>336993289
>cancer
>anywhere near being a "rich person's" condition
Fuck off.
>>336993620
Fuck off feminist faggot.
>>336993569
AGDQ doesn't exclusively give to cancer research, I remember one year they gave to MSF. There will always be humanitarian causes and other illness researches to give to even if cancer is cured.
>>336991240
Americans throw away enough food every year to feed everyone on the planet many times over.
The issue isn't food production. Its infastructure and logistics. Most places where people starve, its because there is no cost effective way to get them food.
If it was profitable to sell food to some dirt farm in Bumfuck Africa, they would have plenty of food.
>>336993449
This is another myth like vaccines causing autism. The studies that produced those results were found to be flawed, and larger studies afterwards revealed no effects. Only crazy alternative medicine hippy quacks niece that crap. And conspiracy theorists like you.
>>336988783
Cure cancer.
World hunger is easily achievable if some conditions are met.
>>336988783
>World hunger
>Caused by people breeding too much and because of poor infrastructure and distribution and corrupt governments, could easily be solved if effort was put to it, but isn't because the actual benefit of doing so is outweighed by the cost drastically
Versus
>Cancer
>caused by the fragility of DNA and is a problem inherent to some degree in all DNA based life, a major barrier to life extension and has no real true "cure" in the foreseeable future even with global effort, curing this would vastly increase all of human potential,
Is this even really a question?
How about neither but advancing technology and science so that both problems can be solved?
>>336993449
High doses of vitamin C doesn't do anything. It gives you the Vitamin C your body needs and after that its just pure waste.
>>336993459
>It's specifically the rich people because they're the ones with the cash to cover medical bills for things that can kill them before cancer.
are you retarded
>>336993861
Curing cancer would allow for the resources currently spent on trying to find a cure to be diverted elsewhere, like hardier strains of grains or better preservation and storage technology.
And/or space because I'm down to get some alien strange before I die.
>>336993289
Actually as GDP and conditions improve people tend to have less children.
>>336993923
He's American, nearly the same thing.
>>336993992
I don't think research departments are that flexible
>OK you medical experts, what do you know about crops?
>'Um, nothing?'
>Well then get reading.
>>336988783
How is that even a choice? Even worthy people get cancer. Only worthless people go hungry.
>>336989224
>>336994020
Not really. China has its current population purely as a result of efficient farming methods let them eat to their heart's content even while being poor as fuck.
Same with India.
Poor people breed like crazy. Usually hunger is what keeps their populations stable, but remove that and they balloon like mad.
I say fuck em and put all the money on developing space travel and mechs
>>336994223
Fuck that. We need sex bots.
>Cure cancer
More first world people.
>Cure hunger
Many, many, many more third world people to come and shit up the first world.
Tough choice.
>>336993645
I'm not saying he was wrong, the film shows what he saw. Every country has abandoned infrastructure, that's the fallacy I'm pointing out. The point made in the video isn't as profound as anons make out because business 101 is buy low and sell high. Why ridicule somebody for a the condition of their town when the only reason you're there is because it's cheap for you to set up? The people living there were fed and there wasn't a war, so who really cares if the infrastructure had fallen into disrepair? Zhang was only upset about it because it made HIS job more difficult.
Also the idea that you can 'leave' infrastructure systems to a community and everything will be hunky dory is silly. We don't know what access the local government had to the fuels, metals or specialist labour required to maintain what was already built.
>>336993738
I agree, but isn't that only if the goal is for Africa to source food remotely, which seems like the least cost effective option for them?
It's not profitable for other countries to sell to them, and there isn't the level of development to sustain a population of that size within the country itself.
>>336994605
Well sure. But thats the issue isn't it? Humanity produces considerably more food than it needs, but it doesn't have a method to actually get it to everyone.
And not everyone can produce their own food in sufficient amounts either.
But its not because people are callous or because some countries eat too much. Its just simple economics and lack of necessary agricultural infrastructure in lots of places.
>>336993837
This guy gets it
>>336994120
Eh, if you are a molecular biologist/geneticist focusing on cancer cells, it's not all that much of a leap to switch to another form of genetic research like transgenic crops. At least far less of a leap from training new PhDs.
World hunger.
Cancer will eventually be solved, but food will always be an issue.
>>336988783
This is easy.
Curing cancer just means more people live. Some of those people are good and some are bad.
World hunger can already be cured, we produce more food than everyone needs to live a healthy life but it id distributed by where the money is. If you are able to actually solve world hunger it means you have either pushed humanity past material greed or you have created an ideal economic system where all essential needs are met for every person on the planet allowing them to reach their full potential.
Easiest choice I've ever seen.
>>336994084
hey muslimfodder, don't you have a mosque to be bringing your white women to? better get on that
>>336992405
>If I had the cure for smallpox, I would destroy it out of guilt for all the people who died of smallpox in the past
>what gives out generation the right to be free of cancer over previous generations?
Your post gave me cancer anon, the least you could do is give me the cure.
>>336993005
Blessed Boulevard.
>>336988783
Cured cancer would garner a more favorable public opinion. Nobody (normal people) really care about starving african babies that would die of boredom in the desert anywayHunger is already solved in the civilized world
>>336992636
I dont know what getting at, posting a pic of Carl Sagan
>>336994767
>Humanity produces considerably more food than it needs,
Assuming perfect efficiency and conservative intake requirements yes, but the truth of the matter is the real world is not perfectly efficient, and of course humans are creatures of excess too. That combined with other issues such as the looming threat of peak phosphorous, a population expected to grow another 6 billion, and issues of adequate nutrition other than just bulk Calories means that the issue isn't so simple as just having proper transportation infrastructure to solve world hunger for good.
>>336995169
It's so solved that a considerable number of people in developed countries now die from overeating rather than hunger.
>>336995023
I seriously hope you are only pretending to be retarded.
>>336989473
Oy gevalt, he's asking to many questions! SHUT IT DOWN
>>336989473
I Am Legend.
>>336988783
Not reading this whole thread, but birth rates sit below the replacement rate in most of the developed world, so the malthusian catastrophe we all learned about in ap european history is not inevitable in the modern world
>>336994265
>sex bots in space
I cured cancer, world hunger is a fault of shitty people living shitty lives, whilst even the best and greatest can't beat cancer.
>>336996183
>developed world
Yeah, the developed world, the one that doesn't have hunger problems and 5+ kids per women.
>>336994172
>He's long dead so you can't argue with him like you can with the serpent or Elohim
You win this round humanist.
>>336989473
A lot of people think of cancer as a virus but in reality it is just the physical state of DNA/RNA in cells.
Cancer doesn't control an ecological niche so eliminating it will not make room for its top competitor.
>>336988783
cure cancer
niggers can starve to death for all I care
>>336988783
>cure cancer
>divert resources from curing cancer to solving world hunger
>>336989381
>Curing cancer will just breed something else to fuck us up in a few decades.
there aren't an infinite amount of diseases. the less diseases that are around, the closer to get to curingdeath itself
Cure cancer, so we can let the third worlders starve.
>tfw we could probably nearly "cure cancer" in a half century or so, but we won't because people are scared of taking the necessary steps for self directed evolution
>all these people talking about black people starving
unless you produce your own food, it would only take a couple months for you to starve to death, maybe more since so many people are overweight, they would actually have an advantage. and it would only take days for there to be massive riots if food production/transportation was interrupted even in mostly white countries.
>>336998097
it's muh stem cells
Cure cancer.
If they don't starve Africans will flood the world with their fatherless offspring
>>336988979
NEVER EVER EVER would I give everyone their waifu because right now out there is some subhuman piece of shit that thinks they deserve my waifu more than I do.
I once heard that sharks can never get cancer. Can anyone confirm?
>>336995041
/Thread
>>337000439
It's not true. Sharks can get cancer, it's just rare
>>337000439
There are a few species which very very rarely get cancer. One reason I have read about for why some species to get it so rarely is because while humans only have a few genes that make sure that DNA replication is error free or terminate cancer cells, some other animal species have sometimes up to double digits of copies of "error checking" genes inter spaced throughout their genome making the error rate or possibility that a cell will manage to become cancerous very low.
Still while there are some species that rarely get cancer, due to the way DNA works I do not believe there are any complex DNA based organisms which are immune to cancer so long as they live long enough for errors to start building up.
I am a layman though so take that with a grain of salt.
>>336993461
>China has some of the most abysmal poverty in the world
[Citation needed]
This is one of those things that muritards just keep desperately parroting just like with the "chinese economy will collapse this year!!!" meme, because God forbid if there's a nation out there that outdoes them without invading middle-east.
Seriously, every time a muritard posts about anything China, it always reeks of bitter jealousness and petty anger of not being special anymore. Grow up, nobody fucking cares about you or how much you hate China, stop trying to push that autistic opinion on the civilized world outside your continental quarantine zone.
Cure hunger just to make the first-world cucks mad
I'm going to kill myself next year anyway, don't care about cancer much.
>>336989652
>i have absolutely no idea how tumors form nor how they become aggressive
>>336995041
You're just making shit up to add to the question. None of what you wrote is implied or anything, it's a simple question and you just made up extra shit to it.
The solution to world hunger is for dindus to discover farming.
>this thread
>>337005337
Mate I think it's cool what china has been doing these last few years, but you can't just pretend that there's no looming issues that are going to severely retard their growth if not dealt with extremely well.
>the pope have enough money to remove world hunger 3 times
>HOW DO WE FIX IT?
well kill him? fucking greedy people
>solve world hunger
>africa produces half a billion nogs per year, some of whom come to europe
>african water table goes dry
>rest of nogs come to europe
>europe collapses
>whole world turns into a burning hellhole where men swing cacti in the street and eat enemy warlords' hearts
>>337005932
>not focusing your ire at the saudi royal family instead
>>337005949
>Whole world
>Europe
Sorry mate, but when the EU is burning and being pillaged by the barbarian hoards I'll be over here playin me lyre and enjoying the view over the ocean. Feels good to have giant tracts of sea between us and you cunt.
>>337006085
The new saudi prince seems like a pretty cool guy, what's your problem with em?,
>>337006282
There are over a thousand Saudi princes, so which one do you mean?
>what's your problem with em
They're a mini-caliphate straight out of a dark ages. ISIS as an internationally recognized nation-state.
>>337006442
This one http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/26/world/middleeast/saudi-prince-shares-planto-cut-oil-dependency-and-energize-the-economy.html
>>336992164
No fuck cancer it's the only thing that everyone on this fucking shitty board can agree on
>>336990213
>he actually think ending world hunger would be the end of capitalism
>>336988979
no thanks
>>336992405
You sound like some melodramatic autistic underage
World hunger is something that can easily be alleviated, the problem is how direct or indirect it's done, whereas cancer is a dice roll of whether you get to live or die.
Cure cancer because hunger can be fixed later.
>>336991157
>France
Cancer.
Don't care about nigger children starving.
3. Raise the retirement age by eight years and put more money into medicare
>>337010394
>white poverty doesn't exist
keep dreaming trumpo
>>337010591
>Raise the retirement age by eight years
that makes it harder for young people to get a job, making unemployment worse
>>337010940
Only baby boomers matter
>>337010802
>Thinks in the grand scheme of world hunger, white people are even close to relevant
Who taught you this retarded shit?
Cancer shows genetic instability that must be removed from the genus
>>337010802
white people in poverty might as well be niggers
World hunger is solvable, unlike cancer. So i guess I would cure cancer, if given the possibilty
Cure cancer
Because that way I can get better
>>336988783
Solve world hunger by killing all the hungry people.
>starvation
>not the most effective way of dealing with overpopulation
>not knowing that at this rate, the earth is just going to fill up with people
>malignant cell growth
>sucks
>you die eventually
>noticeable primarily in the first world
>dad is still dead
>still have a brain tumor
let the nigger babies rot
>>336989625
No amount of money would stop people releasing a cure for cancer. Especially considering they'd get rich and famous any away.
>>337011219
>marty
oh shit this brings me back
is that attentionwhore still alive?
None, all of that can be fixed later, there are more pressing issues at hand.
First, we must build a dyson sphere from the sun to the earth with graphene superconductors to store vast amounts of power.
After the superconductors charge, we must build a massive thruster capable of moving a planet.
Third and finally, using the power from the superconductors, we must use the thruster to steer the earth into the sun.
>>337011059
damn.
we're all gonna make it, bro.
>>336988783
Fuck cancer
>>336989309
Not really. If people have food they can become more industrialized and people can leave rural areas to the urban ones, once they reach that and enter a middle class they'll become more educated, secular and will have less kids as the west has done.
>>336988783
I want to be the president who played a better video game
>>336988783
I chose the fuck cancer bill, and will choose it every single time. I'm a fucking dependable president.
>>336988783
World hunger is a matter of logistics and incentivizing proper economies. We have barely figured out the basics of cancer. If you solve the former solving the latter is still going to be just as unattainable.
Cancer is the obvious answer. All the money you save in healthcare can be spent on food if you're so desperate to end world hunger as well.
>>337011529
>everyone can be middle class
>>336988783
cure cancer.
cure hunger would change how we live
Fuck cancer ;_;
I have two relatives with cancerso that one.
>>337011754
It's possible through science and technology. If you can increase food production in third world countries without the need of extra manpower, more people can pursue other jobs and get educated.
>>336991460
Totally party with Josh and Oleg.
>>336988783
Cancer
World hunger is mostly an infrastructure issue, cancer is something where figuring out how to stop it, let alone distributing a cure, is extremely difficult, possibly even incurable given how it works
>>337011951
I don't think you get it. Society intentionally stratifies itself. There will always be a lower class and upper class as the latter seeks to exploit the former in perpetuity.
>more people can pursue other jobs and get educated
Except that's not what the world wants of them. There are no other jobs. Just the same jobs already filled by other people. There is only so much need for education in the world. Why do you think so many college grads struggle the find work, even below their education levels?
>>336988783
Cure cancer of people who's having hunger problems, so I can prolonge their torment.
>>337005912
>1999
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2000
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2001
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2002
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2003
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2004
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2005
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2006
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2007
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2008
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
>2009
>"the chinese economic bubble will burst this year!"
and so on and so forth
you cucks are so fucking salty holy shit, I'm pretty sure the majority of chinese don't even know how much asshurt you are at them
>>337011810
Start lifting brah, being bald isn't the end of the world.
>>337012869
Hasn't it already?
