Battlefield 5 speculation thread.
16 Hours until the reveal, get hype.
Countdown and teaser
http://www.battlefield.com/event
What would you like to see, realistically or unrealistically?
>>336646612
Id like to see balls to the wall crazy shit
But that ain't gonna happen
WWII, no battlelog and a stable launch
all very unrealistic, but one can hope
BC1 level of destruction.
Too bad it won't happen since consoles are shit and normies like pretty garphics instead of actual cool gameplay.
Realistically? 2143
Optimistically? Bad Company 3
so...alternative WW1?
>>336646997
>WWII
Possible, albeit unlikely.
>no battlelog and a stable launch
Not a hope in hell.
>>336646612
>huge maps
>multiple conquest points (atleast 7)
>128 or even 256 player maps
>airstrips where you actually take off your planes instead of spawn in them mid flight like we used to
>more destruction levolution isnt a big deal fo rme
>no battlelog bs
>>336647092
you know bc1 was console only right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbcMzWWRChQ
Here's a YouTube embed of the teaser.
>>336647367
Levolution was their way of making the games less dynamically destructible by including scripted destruction instead.
WW2 but alternate history.
What-if tech advanced much faster than it did, aka the Wolfenstein design. Mechs, Zeppelins are space bound crafts, exo suits.
>>336647572
>games
Meant maps
>>336647313
>>336646612
>possible but unlikely
the hell is OP pic?
That's Wake Island.
>WWI game
>"It's A Long Way To Tipperary" starts playing
>>336647831
Nigger Wake Island's been in every Battlefield game apart from Vietnam, 4 and the Bad Company games, it was even in 2142. It be no means confirms a WW2 setting.
>>336647935
I really, really want to toss a can of chlorine gas into a Mark V.
>>336647831
it means nothing.
1943 in the pacific region. It would be a dream if they made that
>tfw there won't be an ingame server browser
Fuck you Dice
>tfw they will DLC the shit out of it
>>336647831
And? What's your point?
They're going to throw a curve ball at us and make it Battlefield 1952.
Better not be some historical shit. That's not and never has been creative or interesting. It's just boring.
Will it suck at launch, /v/?
http://www.strawpoll.me/10140331
http://www.strawpoll.me/10140331
http://www.strawpoll.me/10140331
>>336648513
I wouldn't mind a historical game but if they make it just to pander to all those retards crying for one it'll end up being shit. They need to make it because they want to, not because autists on the internet want them to.
>>336647543
Anyone watching this would know that's a fucking Titan from BF2142.
This is 2143. No fucking joke. Also the collar of the guy's armor looks like the color the EU forces wore in 2142.
>>336646997
what's wrong with battlelog?
>>336647092
BC1 was console exclusive, anon.
>>336649202
It's unintuitive, having to close and relaunch the game client every time you switch server.
>>336649374
Are you serious? It takes no time at all to start/shut down the client.
>>336648593
I voted for "it'll always be shit" but now i'm not so sure, DICE LA did a pretty decent job fixing DICE Stockholm's aborted fetus.
>>336649616
The time it takes is irrelevant, it's still unintuitive and backwards as fuck.
>>336649647
Was that BF4? I dropped it like 1 or 2 months after launch. Never played Hardline.
>>336649616
he doesn't have a goddamn ssd, probably
>>336649751
Yeah BF4, it's actually playable now. The game's still ass at it's core but it's far better than it was at launch.
http://www.strawpoll.me/10137640/r
Future tech still behind WW2 and Alt-history, modern day least wanted
>>336649856
Hope BF5 doesn't go through the same. BF3 had its issues, but I had fun. I hated BF4, despite being hyped for it. I still can't quite put my finger on what my issue was with it, I just couldn't stand it.
>>336649856
>bf4
>actually playable
>>336649739
Battlelog is the most robust server browser/stat tracker in a PC game. Nothing even comes close. There are a lot of problems with the battlefield games, but I fail to see how battlelog is one of them.
>>336649953
>WWII winning
It's like people don't remember 10 years ago, they think they want it now but they'll get bored of it after a week.
>>336648384
>tfw consoles will have ingame server browser
Why?
>>336650073
>It's like people don't remember 10 years ago,
Gee, only 10 years ago? Pray tell, what's the acceptable time you should wait before playing two games with the same setting?
what if you get to play through all the wars
>>336650306
They wouldn't make it that obvious would they?
Anyways, my guess is alt-history like The New Order.
>>336650292
Yeah, because there won't be another WWII FPS for a long time, eh?There's already one coming shitlord, don't ask for dessert when you haven't finished your dinner.
I want to see better map design.
Less shit like Operation Metro and Flood Zone
More like Caspian Border and Siege of ShanghaiAlso more maps like the ones in China Rising. The Chinese aesthetic was sick as fuck and those maps were severely underplayed
It's going to be world war 1.
They already leaked this info a few weeks ago.
It's the only thing that has not been done yet because there were game design and technology problems.
It will be the first battlefield with hundreds of players.
The object in the teaser is not a Titan. It's a Zeppelin.
So happy dice is doing this.
>>336650475
Its probably going to be ww2, vietnam, modern warfare and future warfare packed all into 1 game.How awful would this be?
This will make or break if I build a new computer.
it's it's not a 2142 remake it's insta-quit for me
>>336650523
What a coincidence, here's the game just for you coming out soon!
>>336650587
Something like Timesplitters could be cool.
>>336646612
as long as its not some gay ass futuristic game then i'll be excite
>>336650672
Fuck yes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SF1yMNJ38k
>>336650569
Im sick of faggots wanting ww1. Nothing about that war was interesting, the entire thing was a giant stalemate waiting to die of disease in a cold wet trench. The by-planes are fucking boring, the weapons were generally boring or stationary also in their infancy for the time. The only weapons of interest might be the artillery but no Battlefield has ever gotten that right. Also rule out chemical weapons actually being a thing.
Stop asking for wwI its fucking stupid
>>336647205
same, I just want a new game mode and no more auto knife bullshit
>>336650638
>i-i b-bet you like c-c-cowdoody!
I just want to be in command of a panzer, in the frostbite engine. Is this so much to ask for?
Don't ask me how I know, but tomorrows announcement is this:Battlefield: Good Company
Prequel to the Bad Company series. Turns out they were actually the answer to what happens when the good guys lose. Set in World War 1. Starts off with usual war, but ends up fighting dinosaurs.
>>336650819
>here's a game in the same setting coming out, so shut up
>b-but this one doesn't count
not very bright eh
>>336650569
>They already leaked this info a few weeks ago.
>rumour=leak now
>>336650920
>Starts off with usual war, but ends up fighting dinosaurs.
I'd buy it.
>>336650753
Retard understanding of ww1. Defensive lines have always been a part of warfare.
Ww1 would be fun as absolute fuck with hundreds of players rushing a trench
Verdun sucked because of the player count. You jack that up a notch ww1 is bananas
>>336650753
>he only knows about the western front
Please anon, stop talking about shit you don't know.
>>336650920
>Starts off with usual war, but ends up fighting dinosaurs.
Fuck it, what could possibly go wrong
>>336650854
I just want to ram things with a Titan, in the frostbite engine. Is that so much to ask for?
>>336650943
We're in the middle of a futuristic stagnation, of course multiple futuristic games are coming out, you mongoloid.
>>336651016
>>336650981So would I. I apologize for making it up.Also I'm going to ruin your day by telling you something else.The New Ghostbusters movie could have used the It's Always Sunny cast.
>>336650920One of the theories floating around is that it is a prequel to the Bad Company series and expands on the second game's intro mission
Literally anything that isn't another BF3 clone. I want new gameplay, not BF3-but-chinese
>>336646612
WW1 with a twist.
Time travel. Screencap this.
>>336651264
Upvoted! Aaaaah have some gold, sir! :o
>EA
>DICE
>still uses the same aesthetics
I fucking forget it's 2016 and people who were 10 in 2007 can now legally post here
>>336651068
Yes, because it's not WW2.
Give me Aircraft Carriers and panzers over titans and mechs any day.
What do we think? Does his collar look like something from WW2?
>>336651413
You've now been awarded 4chan GOLD for your contribution to the RANDOM board. Only random, epic works of fiction will be awarded this prestigious rank.
>>336651264
>That Ghostbusters fact
You're right. That genuinely upsets me
>>336646612
Why the fuck are you shilling this here
/v/ doesn't even like westacuck trash, what the fuck
>>336650061
why couldn't they integrate the robust server browser and stat tracker into the client itself?
>>336651553
Seems more like you're grasping at straws, looks like a run of the mill collar to me.
>>336650523
>shitlord
Kys
>>336651553
Vietnam flak jacket
>>336651630
Fuck off, weeb. Go back to your lolis.
>>336651630
Given that the thread is 80 posts in and you're the first to say that, i'd say you're wrong.
>>336651574
>We got four ugly women
>We didn't even get Dee
>>336647276
i vote in Alternative WW
this gonna happen
>>336651668
Can you blame me? It's been so long since I've played a decent WW2 game. Company of Heroes and World of Tanks just aren't doing it for me anymore.
>>336651802
>>336651808
whatever you say
As long as you have a shit eating grin the game is fine, right?
Shill somewhere else
>>336651846
>World of Tanks
How is that decent?
What if they throw us a curve ball and its Post-Apocalyptic!
>>336651553
>tfw it's ww1 and both panzer and Titan fags are blow the fuck out.
Dice will eventually return to World War Two. But they have to do battlefield ww1 first.
It's a god damn Zeppelin flying above him
I hope they do the same thing as they did with Hardline where they announced the game and immediately had an open beta so people could already play it. It's such a great marketing strategy to get people hyped, although of course it only works if you're confident that people will like your game.
>>336651796
>Alternate timeline where we won vietnam but were still fighting for now-Axis Europa.
Vietnam or any WW desu would be game of the year.
More CoD arcade less Battlefied.
Every time, don't expect the trend to suddenly change.
> 2142 was pretty much ignored on the Battlefield time line by Dice.
> People want a 2143.
I want one too, but the sad truth is, if it were to come out, it would have no heart into it.
I miss titan mode.
>>336652002
If anything i'd wager that their next WWII title will be a spinoff like Hardline. Seems like it'd be too much of a gamble for their main series, EA don't really ike taking chances, they like playing it safe.
>get hype
>EA
kill yourself
>>336652094
I'd like to play 1942 or Vietnam again. my pc at the time couldn't run 2142 so i never got to play it while it was alive
>>336652094
> 2142 was pretty much ignored on the Battlefield time line by Dice.
But how about BF4 End?
>what could that slowly moving shadow be
>>336652154
No if dice made a new battlefield game with the full effort of their team set in ww2 it would be fucking sick
>>336652267
oh sweet
>>336652267
A giant Dildo?!?!?
What's this shadow everyone is speculating about?
>>336652094
BF4's Final Stand DLC is literally a set up for 2142, the PAC is founded during it.
>>336652423
Its your moms amazon delivery
I've given up on battlefield games famm
>>336652372
It being good and it being a safe investment for EA are two very different things anon.
>>336646997
did someone say...'hope'?
>lol they don't even invented air defense yet lol
>>336652002
I dont want WW1, thats boing as fuck.
>trench warfare
Its literally the only time in war when camping became a legitimate strategy.
Also,
>boring weapons
>no customization options
>vehicle options are limited
>repetitive map design
It's going to be Vietnam guys
>>336651630
dumb hamster poster
>Its BF3 but in a different skin!
How can I get excited for something I already know everything about
>>336652546
Same, it's still fun to speculate on what it will be though, even if i'll likely never play it past the beta.
>>336649202
if you like facebook you ike battlebook
>>336652581
I'll just shoot at it with my rifle.
>>336652667
>battlefield reveal begins
>it ain't me starts playing
>>336652554
Dude people will buy millions of copies of video games titled "battlefield"
Ea doesn't make money by maintaining online communities. They make it by getting 14 year olds dragging their mom to gamestop to buy that new snooty shooty explosion game
WW2 is a really difficult war to balance, and we know EA/Dice have never been good in that area. How would it work? Outnumber the German vehicles? King Tiger would pwn
>>336652605
>I need unlockable gear and nigger paint to put on muh guns to have fun.
Lol pleb
>>336652725
I remember being excited for bf3, then all the dlc split the player base and bf4s release, fuck EA
>>336652842
Realistically, it would be copy/paste the stats across tanks. Cosmetic would be the only difference,
>>336646612
who /bfg/ here? We coming back boys?!?!
>>336652816
EA want people to continue playing the game after release, buying DLC and battlepacks so they can get that OP sight on their favorite gun without having to grind. They're in it for the long run, not just the initial paycheque.
>>336652372
>Spawn, die, spawn, die
>Here, pick ammo
So sick, breh
>>336652816
>Ea doesn't make money by maintaining online communities.
Then why did they pay DICE LA to fix BF4 if they didnt care if people stopped playing?
>>336652842
not true. There were comparable tanks on all sides (except for Japanese who never got into armored warfare)
For example, the T34, Sherman, and Panzer IV were all very comparable machines. And it's not as if the vehicles need to be historically accurate. There is nothing stopping them from making all tanks in the game have similar stats for the sake of balance.
WHERE IS MY 2142-2!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>336653038
Sounds like WWII to me.
>>336653038
>he thinks that's not what happens in current games and actually thinks new guns is where the fun comes from.
>>336652964
This. One of the things that turned me off of BF3 was the stupid amount of guns and customization.
>>336652605
>the only thing that happened in WWI was trench warfare
Loving this meme. It wasn't like there was a period of time on the western front where trench warfare hadn't started yet and there wasn't an entire other front that didn't use trench warfare nearly as much as the west.
>>336653405
>stupid amount of guns and customization.
What the fuck?
Why is variety of choice bad?
>>336653585
Having to unlock them.
>>336653405
I get not liking the customization, but guns? How is more content a bad thing?
>>336652964
BF2 did it right. THere was little in the way of customization, but you could unlock different weapons as you played.
BF3 and BF4 were fucking stupid in how the unlock system worked.
>spend dozens of hours upgrading one weapon
>Get new weapon that is better in every way
>all of your attachments and addons are not carries over.
It was infuriating.
>>336653250
2143*
>>336652489
why would my mom order 2 airplanes?
>>336650073
>implying anyone with actual taste got bored of that
the problem wasn't WW2; the problem was that too many games followed the same gameplay model. nobody wanted an aesthetic change only
>>336646612
Rush mode, foliage, and no retarded shit for recon class, such as your scope glaring giving your position away and automatic target spotting like in BC2.
>>336653585
Because unlocking guns doesn't make the game better. It's simply a minigame that encourages shit teamwork
>>336653660
How the hell do you even let one gun upgraded before you unlock everything else.
By the time I got to AK-12 completion in BF4 all my other guns have been unlocked for a while beforehand
>>336653624
Pretty much.
>>336651264
>The New Ghostbusters movie could have used the It's Always Sunny cast
wait, what? that was on the table?
>yfw operation metro 1944
As much as you faggots like wishful thinking and say that it's going back in time away from modern shit, it's not gonna happen. Literally the last DLC for BF4 was setting up a future setting, calling forward to 2142.
I'm only trying to soften the pain and disappointment when it turns out to be exactly what I said.
>people honestly don't think it's going to be 2142
The last battlefield 4 DLC had a map in Russia with a giant prototype titan in it.
the writing has been on the wall for years now
>>336653927
Yeah but saying that it's set up as such is setting me up for disappointment if that's not the case.
>>336653960
>>336653927
>yfw all the CoDfags migrating to Battlefield to avoid a future setting have to put up with a future setting
BF3 was my favorite FPS game. Then BF4 came along and just shat on my hopes and dreams.
I want BF5 to just be as good as BF3. That's it. Is that so much to ask for?
>>336653960
Why would a game set in the modern day have a machine from 130 years in the future?
It's ww1 it's already been leaked. Future war is the current ww2 game of 2 generations ago
>>336653848
>wanting Metro spawnfuck again
Pure unadulterated cancer.
>>336654096
>BF3 was my favorite FPS game
play more FPS
>>336652605
>>boring weapons
>>no customization options
>>vehicle options are limited
>>repetitive map design
if this is what WW1 sounds like to you, and the absence of customization and limitation of vehicles sound like a bad thing to you, you must be completely fucking stupid
WW1 had machine guns, submachine guns, riflemen, and snipers
it had beach charges, battles where thousands died in hours, trench runs, dogfights, tank warfare
I mean fuck, the war was essentially a stalemate with high points of intensity, but why do you think that a game about it would be boring?
thats like saying modern warfare games would boring because modern war is boring
you stupid fuck.
>>336654074
Did that really happen? Seems like a stretch.
>>336654096
BF3 was good? News to me.
>>336653848
Operation Metro is the worst map I have ever played in any game ever.
>>336654120
>It's ww1 it's already been leaked.
lol
no
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbcMzWWRChQ
it's clearly a titan
and i dont think you understand what im saying battlefield 4 had a PROTOTYPE titan in it that you could fight on
>>336654096
>BF3 was my favorite FPS game.
You have an awful taste in FPS games.
>>336654143
You haven't seen spawnfuck until you've played on Operation Locker with 32 other people spamming impact gernades and LMGs, watching as people can't even leave their own corridor, with 40 minutes still on the clock
>>336654240
You have an awful taste in FPS games.
>Pick support
>Deploy an LMG or DMR with a bypod at a hidden bumfuck corner of the map
>Have an IR scope and silencer
>25+/0 average score every game
I love being a piece of shit
>>336654145
>>336654167
>>336654240
/v/ is always so high and mighty about their impeccable choice in vidya.
FPS is literally already the lowest common denominator when it comes to games. I'm not going to play more than one at a time.
>>336654238
It's a Zeppelin. Nobody in 2142 is wearing khaki jackets you fuckshit.
>>336654312
Because BF3 isn't my favorite? Whatever you say kiddo, shouldn't you be getting ready for school?
>>336654354
Well if you're only going to play one, play something other than BF3.
>>336654407
What if it's a Titan in WW2
PLEASE GOD LET IT BE A TITAN IN WW2
>>336654407
>It's a Zeppelin
lmao_______________no
>>336654472
>It's a Secret Nazi Superweapon
>any game from SJWEA
I think the twist to the "WW1 with a twist" is that the Ottoman Empire is on the side of the allies.
mod tools and map editor
Nazi distant future, Hitler time traveled
zeppelin fags btfo
>>336654472
>>336654542
>>336654472
>>336654542
its WW2 Alternate timeline
LIKE THIS
Friendly reminder that Battlefield 1943 was the best Battlefield game.
>>336654561
Where did this "WW1 with a twist" rumour start? I keep seeing people say it but where did it come from?
>>336654561
"ww1 with a twist" is that it's actually the civil war.
have fun with your 20 second reloads
>>336654407
>>336654472
>>336654542
what if it's a hybrid WW2/future game and its about a WW2 soldier who time travels into the future to find some way to end the war and comes across a titan
>>336654407
>guy is looking up to the sky
>object is moving at a fairly slow, yet steady pace
>next screen shows the sky on fire, which was the downfall of zeppelins
If this ends up as titans, then they did a shit job with that teaser. Zeppelins are much more likely with that video.
>>336654695
Some literally who on twitter.
>>336654542
this that i am talking about: Nazi Super Weapons
>>336652267
How the fuck did they land these things?
Why did we stop using them?
>>336654708
This is literally best-case scenario for me. A game with future maps/vehicles/weapons mixed with WW2 maps/vehicles/weapons would be so amazing.
>>336654708
Because it's not.
It's just ww1 because a major game studio has never explored this and it's about time.
If it works expect more untouched history games.
British empire vs Zulu when?
>it's a WW2 alternate timeline
>you have to defeat nazi germany and win it for the good goyim country
why cant there just be one game where you can stomp shit and win with germany
>>336654863
>How the fuck did they land these things?
With the little planes, silly.
>Why did we stop using them?
I'll give you one guess.
>>336654705
Fuck this would be great. Having to actually aim your gun and think before you shoot would be nice.
>>336654716
>next screen shows the sky on fire
You mean that same stock image they've been using since the reveal trailer of BF4?
>>336654708
I hope with everything in me that it won't be future warfare bullshit. I may hate my gf, but I love my historical firearms, and I want something nice for once
>>336654902
Too edgy. Maybe give it 100 more years and it'll happen
>>336654863
They hooked up to towers and were pulled down by ropes.
They also caught on fire if you looked at them wrong
>>336654693
>me and friend play coral sea
>pick sniper
>fly to enemy career
>drop on top of tower
>snip off of spawn
>or plant c4 on enemy planes and blow them up in mid air
pretty fun for a console game
>>336654902
>>why cant there just be one game where you can stomp shit and win with germany
What, do you actually give a shit about the singleplayer?
>>336655030
>he doesn't play the singleplayer
look at this guy
>tfw it's not vietnam so I won't be buying it
>>336654939
Not all of them had to be controlled by planes right? Shit if that was the case I would cut myself from the thing and fly the fuck away kek.
And im guessing they werent that durable so fire and air leakage?
>WWII Settings
>NAZI Robots
1942/1943 PEOPLE WINS
2143 PEOPLE WINS
EVERYBODY WINS
>>336654863
>Why did we stop using them?
They had a tendency to burst into flames, not the most practical mode of transportation.
>>336654693
well it definitely had the best song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOB4q01VCVg
>>336654985
We've had a single futuristic battlefield game. One. Isn't it a bit much to be so disappointed if they decides to do that once more?
>>336655072
Singleplayer games are fun, but I couldn't give less of a fuck about Battlefield singleplayer. Save for Bad Company 1/2, I suppose.
>>336654716
Listen to the sound it makes and you hear it's a titan.
>>336654147
>you must be completely fucking stupid
quality post faggot. It was literally the war equivalent of a camp fest. I want a war of movement, which is something only fully mechanized warfare can bring. That means it needs to be WW2 era or later.
>>336655116
>battlefield vietnam
>it ain't me starts playing
>>336654670
>>336655215
Battlefield 4 is technically futuristic if you count near-future, 3 was also near-future at the time of release.
>>336652445
Anyone? Is there a video (hence someone just mentioning a sound) or what?
>>336652445
>>336655369
read the thread
>>336654982
>same stock image they've been using since the reveal trailer of BF4?
Do you have a link to this? I just did a search and watched the supposed reveal trailer of BF4, and I never came across this image. You aren't making shit up to try and disprove what I said are you?
>>336655136
yeah t b h
I would be down with 2143 or WW2
2142 was dope
It's going to be Battlefield 214X because it has to compete with CoD Infinite Warfare.
>>336655403
>reading a shill thread
>>336650523
>2017 release date
>>336655363
Eh, that's reaching. His point was that he wants actual weapons instead of made-up ones, so I'm saying that he's gotten what he's wanted for a long ass time.
>>336650587
I would jizz everywhere. Garands alongside railguns, make it happen.
>still no battlefield: franco prussian war
>still no battlefield: emu war
>still no battlefield: hundred years war
>still no battlefield: fall of rome
>>336655449
Why the fuck cant they do their own god damn thing. Set their own trend instead of piggy backing on CoD all the time.
>Alternate timeline when WW1 never ended and has stretched to 2142 so were able to play both old and eras of wars.
It is lit.
>>336655369
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbcMzWWRChQ
>>336655245
There is no sound. There is only background music. The video is showing off the graphics engine, not a completed product.
>>336655403
I did. But somehow I never noticed that teaser video link on the site.
>>336655558
Thanks.
>>336655215
I don't care that there was only one future battlefield, it's just that every single fucking game coming out these days is future warfare
>>336655537
It's just the way things are. There has been 2142 easter eggs in BF3/4 - pretty sure they have been developing it since BF4 because DICE LA has been fixing DICE SE's mess for BF4.
Mark my words, /v/. It will be a futuristic Battlefield, like 2142 so it can compete against Infinite Warfare.
>>336655553
im going to believe that you are a dice employee and subscribe to this theory
>>336655519
>Everything has to made into first person perspective
>>336655560
I don't think the deep rumbling sound is part of the background music
>>336655684
I can only hope Grace.
>>336655616
So stop being a CoD crackfiend and play Insurgency. Or Red Orchestra. Or Verdun. Or wait for one of the billion WW2 games coming out.
>>336655695
total war games suck bro
>>336655537
Because video game companies are a business and businesses compete with each other for market share.
>>336655616
You don't have to play all of them.
>>336649202
>>336649616
>>336650061
>>336655537
They are doing their own thing, like >>336655674 said. If it's 2143 they've been teasing it since BF3.
>>336655616
2143 has a lot more to offer than nanomachines and exoskeletons.
>>336655757
my names not grace
>>336655674
honestly, I agree with you. The trailer they released immediately made me think of a mech standing up, and you're right about the 2142 easter eggs in the BF4 DLC.
I would just rather a WW2 game so much.
>tfw no operation Citadel in Frostbite 3
>>336655756
That deep rumbling plays through the entire video including the very end. It is all part of the background music, and the rumbling even changes with the music. Listen to the end, and you can tell at that point that the rumbling is changing pace to match the obvious music.
I don't see how it could be WW1 how else are they going to sell another $40 weapons/attachments unlock pack
>>336656110
They're not going to have every since WWI-era gun in the base game. Or if they did, they could just start putting in experimental guns.
>>336655791
>implying a WW2 setting appeals to a completely different market from a futuristic setting
Mechanically, it's still a FPS and will have similar gameplay
>>336655782
And you think settings like the Franco Prussian War is going to be better in first person?
>>336655674
They don't need to compete against a game that even normalfags are sick of. They are doing what infinity ward did in the 2000s when they dropped ww2 because it became stale.
Dice is taking the high road and doing something completely different
>>336650565
All of those maps are pure garbage. The only good maps in BF4 are Zavod and Propaganda.
>>336650565
>caspian
>good map
it had badly placed flags on conquest. always felt like death match no matter the game mode
the only good 64 vehicle map is operation firestorm. lineary placed flags, sorta balanced (except for US having it slightly easier cuz they were going downhill) and good vehicle spawns
>>336656243
>propaganda
>good map
>>336646612
2143 or FUCK OFF EA
>>336656229
desu that sounds pretty cool
>>336656224
Do you really think 12-16 year olds (the majority of the shooter audience) give 2 fucks about WW2? Do they fuck, all they care about is things that go pewpew and look cool.
>>336656213
Not him but this. No ones going to be happy using 3 types of rifles, a 1911, revolver, and heavy machine guns that require 2 people to operate there has to be some steampunk/wolfenstein tier weaponry going on.
>>336656328
>BC3 or FUCK OFF EA
FTFY
>>336656505
>wanting another bad company
pls god no
>>336656505
Anon this is BC3 though...
>>336656505
BC fans should be gassed
>>336653848
Operation Metro is one of the worst maps in the history of online gaming.
>Getting hyped for any EA game.
You fucking idiots, do you ever learn?
>>336656567
>implying bc2 isnt the best battlefield
>>336656428
Only reason you videogame babies in general a fuck about WW2 was because of hot Spielberg movies and Vietnam hurt fee fees.
WWII or BC3 please, PLEASE
