oh my
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
Keep in mind the first was the worst PC port of all time.
>>336211123
People buy this game on literal toasters and complain that they can't run it.
Seriously, read the negative reviews. They're all that stupid.
yeah, DS1 is the best by far
>>336211123
You apparently slept through Batman: Arkham Knight.
Or you might just be shitposting.
>>336211123
The problems with the first game were also easily fixed by a single text file. The crashes in DkS III had no such fix
>>336211123
>the first was the worst PC port of all time
The first didn't cause my PC to crash and bluesscreen multiple times and require me to put multiple settings on low just so it would be playable without crashing.
DS1 wasn't even CLOSE to the worst PC port of all time.
DS1, as terrible as it was on release, didn't crash most users to desktop.
>>336211123
>worst
you dont play many ported games
I'm getting weird stuttering with DS3. It's like it's hanging my machine slightly everytime it tries to load level geometry. It's not constant, but seems to trigger at all the wrong times to add a spike of lag right when I need it least.
No other game or even DS1 does that. At this point I'm blaming DS3 and From for it.
>>336211123
>pirated DS3
>have experienced literally 0 crashes
Moralfags getting fucked over once again
>>336211664
feels good to be console master race
These Souls ports are at worst as bad as their console counterparts.
Thats not amazing because From Software is incompetent, but its far from being a contender for worst port.
The performance of DaS3 really is a joke. the framerate hitches every time it autosaves in online mode, and it doesn't matter what hardware you're running on, it's the game itself causing it.
>caring about ports of a horrible goddamn game series
Can the Dank Souls meme finally die, /v/? Nobody actually cares for this garbage, do they?
Your face when you're in the lucky bunch with zero DaS3 crashes
>>336211123
Im guessing you didn't read any of the negative reviews. Right after launch they were all "The game is great but bonfire crashes keep me from playing!!!" and now they are "The game is great but from is banning innocent players!"
The moral of the story is the game is gud but pre launch patch and multi shenanigans got the neg steam reviewers peeved. If there were reviews when DaS 1 came out total reviews would be around 68-70% considering all the bitching about the port quality in those times.
>>336211712
See >>336211991
DaS3 hangs for around 500ms every time it autosaves while in online mode. There's no fix, you just gotta deal with it.
>Launch a game that was released on PC
>keys are A, B, X, Y and shit
What the actual real life fuck is this?
Do they even give a fuck?
Thank god I pirated this piece of weaboo crap.
People who give a game negative reviews for being buggy on launch and don't change it when it's fixed are the worst scum.
>>336211294
Not OP, but that was a transcendent example of fuckery. If unplayable broken games count, there'd be an endless tie.
DaS was completely playable, just shittily.
>>336211214
Fucking this
These mongoloids should have their reviewing capabilities suspended if they're going to be this fucking stupid. I'm tired of seeing people trash a a game's reputation because their ancient computer cannot run it on high at 60fps
DS1 wasnt exactly a hit when it first launched. It took people a while to get around to it and by that time a lot of it was fixed or easily fixed.
DaS1 was fixed right away though. And it didn't stop at resolution, DSfix got an array of neat features over time.
>>336212486
>thinking steam reviews actually mean anything
>>336212571
If an aggregate score is negative and it's one of the first things you see when opening a store page, it's gonna push away potential customers.
>>336212103
>tfw it has crashed only twice
>in 90+ hours
>both times only when I started the game up
>got it running less than 5 secs after the incident
>>336212486
I'm running above the min requirements and I can't stay above 30fps on all low/off
>>336212935
post speccy
>>336212845
>tfw no crashes and only a few online glitches
Best glitch was the fog wall still being up while the host was fighting a boss. It wouldnt let me through.
>>336212935
Well, might as well make a negative review about it!!!
>worst PC port
Didn't even crash a single time for me. And the performance on your average toaster isn't all that bad.
Try shit like Devil May Cry 3. That is an god awful port.
>recommended 970
>have 770
>still 60fps
Probably because im still on 1080 though.
>>336211294
>>336212342
AK got patched into playable state, hope you know that.
>>336212103
>>336212845
>>336213375
>100 hours in and not a single issue
I don't think you can appreciate 3 until you go back to play 1 and 2. Especially 2.
>Mfw I have a GTX 660
>Still ran it 55-60 FPS on Medium/High
Although, is it just me, or does Max look the worst out of all the settings? I got like 50 FPS there, but graphically, it looked kinda meh.
>>336211123
Keep in mind From Software said "We don't know what we're doing."
They were honest about it from the start.
>>336211749
this
i quit tho because its harder than ds1 and i didn't want to gitgud again
>>336211123
>Keep in mind the first was the worst PC port of all time.
And has been out for four more years.
780 Ti Classified @ Stock (don't taze me)
2500k @ stock (don't taze me)
1440p, max settings
Vsync on, 60hz display.
I monitor my framerate via the LCD on my keyboard which MSI Afterburner sends info to.
I'm always above 51 FPS, I average around 55, can often hit 60, but usually not at 60.
>the worst PC port
It was exactly like the console version minus the slowdowns in Blighttown. If that's the worst thing ever on PC, I'd hate to see what consoles have to offer.
>>336212103
>>336211123
Both are objectively bad games.
>>336215108
You are objectively both wrong and autistic
>>336212103
Crashed once for me but I think it was something I did.
>>336212486
>PC master race
>>336211123
>Keep in mind the first was the worst PC port of all time.
Underage?
>>336211214
And other people have decent to high-end rigs and it runs poorly for seemingly no reason.
For example, I'm playing with two GTX 970s and a 4790K, but my game averages around 48 fps, regardless of settings. Of course, I'm not leaving reviews on steam, but my point is some people have legitimate issues with how the game runs.
>>336211214
My PC is far from toaster and until a recent update I could hardly keep 40fps. FromSoft always does shit ports at first.
>>336215691
>fell for the SLI meme
>>336215691
Really? I've got one 970 and an FX6300 and I get about 55 average in most areas. Lothric Castle is the worst though. Usually get an average of 45ish there and smouldering lake.
>>336212935
Me too mate, I got a GTX 570 which could get 60FPS in Das and DaS II so I was hoping to get at least 45 or so.
>>336216398
For Dark Souls 3, it doesn't matter if I am running in SLI mode or not, because there is no performance increase from doing so, for me. A friend with a 970 is now only getting 40+ after the latest patch, and another friend with a 960 play at a constant 60, except for a few transitions.
It is silly, but at least its playable.
>>336211214
There is no reason that my 280x should be struggling to maintain 60 FPS on low.
At least PTDE has mods that fix the problems, DaS3 has nothing.
>>336211123
Port was terrible, but the fix fixed everything. It was so satisfying, being able to finally play this.
>>336213859
After being pulled from the Steam Store for a long fucking time.
>>336215691
how?
i have a 4690k and one 970 and the only time i dip is when theres a lot of online shenanigans happening at once.
beat the game several times now, been to all areas.
>>336211123
>worst PC port of all time
Tales of Symphonia recently took that turd crown
>>336219957
>all time
m8, console ports from the early-mid '00s were far worse than any half-assed Japshit we get now.
>>336211214
From is a shitty dev when it comes to PC. 3 horrific ports in a row - why even try to defend them?
Darksouls 3 is the anti souls
>focus on online
>no risks or new concepts
>pandering
>anti twink measures to make host feel safe
a true souls fan will never play this game
>>336211214
I feel like they should have to meet minspec at least if they wanna post a review.
Man why do devs even bother with PC ports. These mustards are too cheap to shell out for a console, let alone a high-end PC, so they try to run games at high settings with prebuilt intel graphics cards and complain that the game is terrible.
>>336211123
First was bad, but at least it was playable. Third is literally unplayble because it crashes constantly and from absolutely fails to address the issues it has.
