What is your opinion of this game? It's already been over a year since release.
Ok, I'll start
>game
>sony is so creatively bankrupt that they have to shoehorn automatic weapons into an otherwise cool victorian setting
Victorian settings are trash, especially when they feel the need to mix high technology into it.
Are they still going through with the sequel?
>game
>>336136145
The company was literally bought by GameStop.
>>336134724
>neat concept
>good visuals
>gameplay so non-existant it could have just as easily been a movie
>>336134724
I bought this on a PSN sale and enjoyed it for the cheapo price.
I would have been pissed if I spend $60 on it.
The graphics are really fucking good.
>>336134724
Amazing quality.
But a movie.
>>336134724
It looks pretty nice but the gameplay is the same lame third person cover shooting that we've seen over and over again with some qte cutscenes. It's also like 5 hours long. Would not recommend unless you can get it under $10 and have nothing else to play.
>>336134724
good graphics
decent setting
shit gameplay
shit bosses
shit aspect ratio
>>336134724
I thought it was pretty good. I just hated the unexpected ending.
>>336135889
>Sony
Why do people keep blaming Sony for this game? Sony didn't develop the game.
>>336136812
>gameplay
Gameplay mechanics were fine but the balance and pacing was so horrible that it didn't matter.
The flow of battle was too simple.
