>it's another modern warfare setting
Better be fucking world war two or 2143.
It's not going to be ww2, I don't know why you niggers keep on thinking that.
>>336103620
>Future of Battlefield
2043 please.
It depends. The rumors going around are WW1 or a BC3. I'd much rather have a BC3 than WW1. That war was so lackluster in weapon variety that it wouldn't make sense to dedicate such a huge title to it. I would love to have maybe an offshoot of Vietnam or maybe Korea. Personally I'm a huge BF fanboy except for the disgusting Hardline and the pathetic launch of BF4 (its fixed and amazing now so personally IDC).
Pic nonrelated, just screenshotting knife on CS.
>>336103861
A man can dream you know
>>336105559
CoD has moved to the future so they need to step up to the plate again.
Even betterIt's WW1
>>336106884
BF4 might be decent now, but it took another studio coming to fix DICE's broken shit. DICE either doesn't care about or is borderline incompetent at anything that isn't asset creation.
Unless DICE LA is handling balance, net-code and hit-registration, and map design from the get go then expect another broken ass game full of shit maps.
>>336106884
>That war was so lackluster in weapon variety
nigga everyone had like 8 fucking rifles because they were using shit from the 1800s and had like a dozen variations.
Even better.Renegade 2 in the bf4 engine
Whatever it's going to be they need to drop the browser bullshit. Can't even play BF4 anymore cause my browser is 64 and they only use 32 something. I didn't get it.
if it is WW1 i tip my fedora to them
because i cant see how they'll make it work without scaring off the skrillex noscopers
>another forgettable futuristic FPS game
Why do people buy these
>>336103861
>>336103620
>>336106884
Sorry boys
>>336107380
ADD and shit taste, they buy things that seem 'relevant' becos they have some normie psychology going on
>>336107465
>Nostalgia MapPack
this has to be fake
>It's another WW2 game
>Zero customization
Oh boy fun.
>>336103620
sometimes i wonder if EA politicaly motivated or political cashing in since the release may 'coincidence' with election
>>336107465
No way that's the box art. Fake.
>>336103620
2043 or BC3
If theyre done right DICE will win me back. I still play BC2 because that game is so much better than the bloated modern warfare run and gun shit.
>>336107465
>nostalgia map pack
Put them in the main game you fucking kikes
>>336107465
FUCK YES i hope so
>wanting WW2 shit
It takes a big faggot to think that revisiting the most overdone historical setting in modern culture and shooting a primitive rifle at enemies inside some old abandoned factory is better than lasers, jetpacks, flying warships etc.
>>336103620
>2143
I'd rather that game be left unmolested by modern-gaming's filthy hands. 2142 was fucking perfect.
>>336107701
>Implying futuristic games aren't just modern warfare games reskinned
>>336107701
what? the last time ww2 games were big was when I was a child, it's literally been fucking nothing but futuristic or modern shit for the past 7 years aside from some steam games
>>336107607
It's sad that I just expect anythijg released by a large studio/publisher to be 70% (if I'm lucky) of a full game these days, with the rest as DLC or season pack shit.
>>336107762
thank you
>>336107786
thats because before those 7 years of modern warfare games there was at least a decade of WW2 shit
Reminder that by the time MW1 happened people were openly complaining about the overabundance of WW2 shooters.
>>336107326
Use battlelogium you pleb
Yeah that's what I want! More World War 2! I want Charlie Company dressed in all different colors with pimped out rifles and golden dog tags! How many scopes can you unlock for your tommy gun boy?! Just fuck my m1 up!
>>336107841
aside from the intial sale of the game, dlc or microtransactions are the only way for them to make money they dont have theatre sales then dlc sale then merchandise then product placement like movies do, you wouldn't actually prefer fucking product placement would you?
I liked World at War
>>336107762
>unreal tournament is a modern warfare game reskinned
>tribes is a modern warfare game reskinned
Sorry, you're retarded
On the other hand, every WW2 game is a modern warfare game, just with slightly older weapons
It's going to be the exact same setting as BF3 and 4. The campaign in 4 ended with World War 3 starting. They wouldn't just leave it at that.
>>336107701
futuristic settings are shit in FPS games
why?
Because if you're doing a historical/modern setting, you can just emulate the look and sound of an existing weapon. An AK-47 or a pump action shotty has a grit that is unique.
In a futuristic setting, say you get a laser gun or whatever - its always lackluster and feels unpowerful because they develop has to invent all these hypothetical weapons which drives down the quality.
>>336107960
Unreal Tournament isn't...
Quake is.
>>336107465
>EXCLUSIVE CONTENT
why
>>336108060
because EA
>>336107465
Holy shit i fucking hope so. Time to start saving up for a new Graphics card to blast that shit in 4k.
>>336107956
>there will never be Battlefield: WaW
>>336108034
shut up
>>336107465
Fake as fuck.
>>336108197
I mean, you can keep saying that, but it doesn't make it true.
>>336107607
>>336107667
>>336108060
>>336108084
Already confirmed fake a couple days ago, it's just a shoop.
>implying a World War 2 Battlefield wouldn't bomb hard with all the kids throwing a shitfit why they can't put red-dots and silencers on their MP40's and Bar's
I can't wait to beat pathetic german soldiers in a video game again.
>>336107465
>weapon used by allies
>desert fox
>>336108413
Maybe in five years when Sweden becomes an Islamic caliphate and the cucks at DICE makes a Battlefield with noble Islamic warriors vs. German Intolerants.
>>336103620
Fuck off.
I'm praying for more refined modern warfare.
I'm hoping it's just the same leap from BF3 to BF4 to BF5.
Fuck WW2.
>>336108413
>>336108647
What's wrong with killing nazis?
I hope it goes WW2 so all the autists will kill themselves when they don't get another modern setting.
The next Battlefield's going to be another dumpster fire, especially after CoD4 remaster was confirmed.
>>336107907
>battlelogium
Well damn. Thank you man will try this out.
>>336108829
We suck at making new shit, so we're going to literally sell you the same shit again.
How much can they fucking 'remaster' it? It's not like the shit looks that bad anyway. Is George Lucas going to add some CGI creatures in it?
>>336108862
I'm glad to see Shia happy. He delivered a really powerful message with JUST DO IT.
>>336108818
Yeah, you can enjoy BF failing like you wouldn't believe too.
They aren't going to do WW2, it's economic suicide.
It's going to be modern warfare, both times they strayed from the path it didn't work out at all. Hardline went bad, Battlefront wasn't well recieved, they're going back to modern warfare.
>>336108957
Not a fan of his movies but am a fan of these projects he's been doing.
>my face it will be yet another USA vs. Russians vs. China
Just replace Russians with the MEC you fucking cucks.
>>336108413
hmm
I wonder who's behind this post?
Looks like I'm never playing an EA game again, considering I had SMS protection, then got a new phone, and now there is no way for me to get to my account.
EA 0 Help
>>336108034
> its always lackluster and feels unpowerful because they develop has to invent all these hypothetical weapons which drives down the quality.
Good god, how fucking stupid could you be to think that laser, railguns and particle weapons don't exit and are hypothetical.
>>336109108
No fuck that. I want to shoot Russians and Chinks.
Get the fuck out.
>>336108932
Well, the actual new COD is called Infinite Warfare, but everyone knows Infinity Ward is shit now, so everyone's more excited for the actual good COD game even if it's a remaster.
Meanwhile DICE Sweden has the twin rotting albatrosses of launch BF4 and SWBattlefront. Hardline also did nothing but dilute the Battlefield brand, especially with normies who don't pay attention who's the developer.
>>336109143
>new phone
New number, I meant.
>>336109175
Stop lying nigga, you are missing this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0aXAm0jqd0
>>336109018
>Hardline went bad
It was garbage pandering to millennials Nobody was going to buy it after BF4 tanked so hard.
>Battlefront wasn't well recieved
No shit, it was a shitty rush job for Disney so it could generate hype for the new SW movie. You (and I) will be sad to know it actually sold very well.
With a WW2 setting they actually have a chance to return to basics and figure out what went wrong with BF3 and 4.
>>336108957
At least he got the stench of the Transformer movies off of him to be his own person instead of a one-hit wonder. Megan Fox isn't as fortunate.
>>336107465
Epic
>>336109270
Agreed. I was sad to see that Megan had a role in the new TMNT movie, which actually looks good for once.
>>336107465
>>336109324
get rekt son
>>336109216
The only things that went wrong with 3 and 4 was having a tacked on single player that no one gives a shit about, wasting time and resources on a completely unnecessary piece of garbage.
And the netcode and connectivity issues, fixed by DICE LA. All they need to do is take the shit they learned in BF4, and apply it to BF5, and focus completely on the multiplayer, or multiplayer + training only, and reap in cash.
>>336109581
BF3 single player was fine though. Multiplayer only is cancer.
>>336109675
>BF3 single player was fine though
>>336109581
>tacked on singleplayer that doesn't affect the game one way or another is bad
>but all of the unlocks and DLC content and shitty horrible map designs are good
they need to put the brakes on the DLC train, release fewer, bigger packs, remove microtransactions and unlocks, and stop pushing out new battlefield titles quite so often.
>>336103620
I
WANT
2043
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MgNMJum7gM
>>336109827
This.
I wouldn't mind a WW2 shooter. It would be nice to go back and see what modern AAA could do with it
Although going 2143 would also be good. As long as it's not "near-future", I think we're burnt out on that
The only hope the next Battlefield game has of being good is if
1) It's in the future with no real weapons involved
2) Demize99 is not involved at all and also preferably killed
>>336109108
why not just add mec? more factions the better
>>336109108
why do you care at all god damn no matter what fucking country they throw in it's just generic humans vs generic humans. you just like hearing yourself bitch and whine don't ya?
>it won't be a WWII game because modern "FPS players" are autists who can't handle being handed a Lee-Enfield and told that they are going to LIKE it
The worst part is that 70% of all the different guns that people prize so highly in BF3/4 are all the fucking same anyway.
Even if it's WWI or WWII or whatever that you faggots beg for you'll still not give DICE a dime. You fucks are memesters to the highest caliber.
>>336110356
Nuh uh, Gun #215 has 0.2 sec faster reload and 0.01 degrees of SIPS.
>Moh comeback world war fps
>>336109216
>shitty rush job
Not it fucking wasn't rushed. They were just deadset on making it shit worse than casual shit. This is all on DICE.
>>336110356
Bloated weapon lists have been a problem plaguing modern games.
>>336110585
Medal of Honor isn't coming back, not after the hard dicking that was Warfighter.
>>336110601
>They were just deadset on making it shit worse than casual shit.
It was to be able to played by 8 year olds, yes. And it actually was rushed to meet the deadline. I think we can both agree that it's fucking garbage.
>wanting another world war 2 shooter
Look who wasn't alive during the early 2000s.
>>336110679
Because it's so exciting in CS when people only play M4 and AK47. More isn't bad.
>>336110679
COD pared it down to about 3-4 per category.
New Battlefield has fucking 20 guns per category.
Then you have gameplay designers who think HURR EVERY GUN DOES 25-18 DAMAGE and you basically backed yourself into a corner when it comes to balancing.
>>336110765
People WERE alive during that time you dumb fuck. That's exactly why people want a ww2 game, because early 2000's were the golden age for vidya.
>>336110791
It is bad because you still have 3-4 guns that are actually worth using and a fuckton of worthless trash. You could have 3-4 gun statlines and then give each statline 4-5 skins but then autists will complain about that.
>>336110713
>I think we can both agree that it's fucking garbage.
Of course. But they could've made Battlefield: Star Wars easily. They should've. I'd be playing it RIGHT NOW if they did.
>>336110791
CSGO has other weapons too, it's just the rest are shit.
Same with Battlefield. Only weapons worth using in BF3 were M16A3/AEK/M416, and BF4 it was ACE23/Bulldog until DICE LA finally took charge of handling DICE Stockholm's mess.
>>336110981
But then it wouldn't have fulfilled Disneys wishes. Also it's easier for DICE/EA to release a shiny turd than actually working on a proper game.
Also I love how EA has been sitting on the exclusive rights for vidya for so long, but has done absolutely shit about it. Best business deal ever. Truly worth the TURD award they won twice.
>>336108413
>>336110679
>>336110791
I don't think you get what he means. They're all hitscan weapons (and mostly rapid fire).
Compare that to something like quake, where you have 1 each of the following:
>rapid fire, low dmg hitscan, last resort weapon
>super slow fire, high dmg hitscan, requires dexterity and reaction times
>short range beam, requires good dexterity
>short range, wide angle shotung, requiring speed, dexterity and close range
>slow moving AoE rocket, requires prediction of enemy movement
>grenade launcher, requires geometry
Compare that to a massive bin of hitscan rifles with slight variations in stats, where the skills required are essentially the same.
Will the next BF be at least better than 4? It was a complete mess.
>>336111180
1944 means no fuckin commander right?
>>336111180
If it's going WW2 it'll be pretty sweet what they can do with nowadays tech. Also it ensures that they can't make the same mistakes as in 4.
>>336111113
I am still holding out for Visceral's Star Wars game. Fuck, it should be teased at this E3... it's been long enough.
>>336110791
While not exactly what I meant, >>336110850 got the general point. There doesn't need to be any more than what is absolutely necessary. There doesn't need to be any more than 2-6 weapons per class, with anything over 2 or 3 pushing it on the more-specialized weapons lime DMRs and shotguns.
>>336111126
All of Battlefield's weapons fire a projectile.
>>336111180
There will be some improvements, but a ton of fuckups because the history of Battlefield is "1 step forward, 2 steps back".
>>336107740
Except for unlock system.
But this is the modern times of endless treadmills so I can already kill myself.
>>336111578
Goddamn I love that song. Best radio ever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmVJMbB1nFg
>>336107530
Why? They've done it 3 times already.
>>336108034
Yes
1000 guns that are just reskins is MUCH better, amrite?
>>336111779
Because they don't call them "nostalgia map-packs" retard.
>>336103620
>Better be fucking world war two or 2143.
I hope nope, for futuristic shit you got bunch of new cod games and for WWII there are some out that are better than bfs.
>>336111246
>>336111261
>>336111578
I mean technology-wise. The prone mechanics and hit detection were fucking awful. When you are prone or crouching behind cover you can't shoot for shit because all your bullets are stuck in your cover.
A WW2 reveal would just be icing on top of an already awesome year for vidya. Maybe DICE can actually do something right for once.
>>336112058
How is G.B supposed to see?
>>336112010
>for futuristic shit you got bunch of new cod games
No I fucking don't you idiot. Cod and BF are hardly similar. I'm not ever going to buy Call of Duty.
Notice how they are even revealing this now
Instead of E3
>>336112153
Why did you think the boxer rebellion happened?
>>336112010
You might as well say "hurrr you've got Battlefront for futuristic shit why would you want 2143" because that's how silly you sound.
>>336112058
>In order of height
>Britain just wearing a bigger hat so he gets to be the tallest
>loyal subjects trying to get away with the exact same shit
>>336112058
Third soldier is australian not Russian.
>>336112854
Cheeky cunts
the only WWII game that comes close to being worthy to be played, is red orchestra 2, and still it's full of shit. if really a wwii set battlefield will come out, it will just be even more shitty than battlefrond and hardline. the only acceptable future for the battlefield trend would be a BF2143 with destructible maps and more customization than there was in 2142. also this is now a BF2142 thread.
>>336112153
By tilting his head back and sneering down his nose at the natives like a proper imperialist.
>>336115345
hm, i haven't checked the revive guys for a couple of months, have they fixed the login issues?
>ww2
>THE FUTURE OF BATTLEFIELD
>SMALLER MAPS
>MORE LIKE CALL OF DUTY
>MORE GRINDING AND UNLOCKING WEAPONS AND ACCESSORIES
>MORE PAYING FOR MAP PACKS
>LESS SQUARE FEET
>AIRPLANES SPAWN MID AIR WHO NEEDS AIRFIELDS
Game has been shit since BF2
>diceshit with no mods and forced colour grading
No.
>buy game
>buy game again to get all maps
>grind to unlock all the things
no thanks EA, not again.
>flashing lights and blooming effects even on lowest settings and all effects turned off
No thanks.
>>336115457
>no thank you2
Do you have more images like this? I only have one.
>>336115980
i got a couple
>>336116139
that was embarassing
>>336116194
Doing the lord's work my man
>>336112058
even in a line with a turban wearing pajeet.italy somehow still looks like the most retarded person there
>>336115440
there is a patch and some shit, to get the online service back up. they succeded as far as i remember, the problem is that still almost no one plays it, and the server are almost always empty, with around 20 players in the best moments
>>336103620
>The FUTURE of Battlefield
