How keen would you guys be for a new WW2 Battlefield? Personally I'd be pretty keen.
>>336082884
If you give EA and DICE money you are cancer
would be great, especially if it wasnt some cliche "good and evil" type shit. if it had a mature story line and mature design, it would be pretty sick.
>>336083002
alright I'll get you a copy too
>>336083002
Aren't you a noble consumer guardian?
>>336082884
>WWII shooters get done to death and get boring
>Modern war shooters take over and get done to death and now are boring
>tfw storming Normandy again
>>336082884
They should go fully back to WWII and by pc only.
Only if I could play the Nazi side.
>>336083382
This
>>336083364
>PC only
why
>>336083535
To fuck with the console players.
>>336083364
The consoles handle 64 players now. Making it PC exclusive won't make the game more hardcore. You mad you can't play your dolphin diving PoS anymore?
>>336083798
a stupid and petty reason
>>336083382
>>336082884
>playing an El Alamein map with 64+ populated servers
>them Afrikacorps vs Desert Rat infantry skirmishes
>them Call of Duty 1 & 2 esque Tank battles
>Spitfires and Messerschmidts overhead duking it out
shit could be glorious
I think it'd be cool. For variety's sake they should hit maps in all the different theaters.
You're a fag if you wouldn't be hyped for Rush or conquest assault on Normandy or Okinawa.
Battlefield 4 ended up amazing and is still being supported.
So I'm much more open to the next Battlefield. I would love WW2 but I would really love Vietnam
>>336084035
I'm mad they didn't jump on the success that was Bad Company 2's Vietnam DLC, everyone loved it but Dice didn't do shit with it.
>>336083917
>You're a fag if you wouldn't be hyped for Rush or conquest assault on Normandy
Nope. Just because it made a hella fricken epic! scene in SPR doesn't mean it works well in videogames. Normandy is shit. Iwo Jima is shit.
>>336084126
The Vietnam DLC for that game was easily my favorite part of any Battlefield game ever. Flying around in the heli with CCR playing was too fucking fun.
>>336084132
If they did it like Kharg Island it'd be cool as shit
jesus christ this awful fake leak still posting
>>336084132
>Iwo Jima is shit.
Iwo Jima is fun as fuck in Rising Storm. Just kidding. These sorts of maps require a level of coordination that faggots aren't willing to give. Though I fault the game itself for having piss poor squad mechanics.
WHERES MY WORLD WAR ONE GAME
>>336085830
>sit in a trench in your own shit and vomit and starve for days
>get out and die within 10 seconds from machinegun fire
>alternatively die from poison gas
>air forces campaign
>your plane disintegrates upon taking off
>civillian survival campaign
>do nothing
>die from the spanish flu
>>336086198
World War One is way more interesting than world war 2. Just you yanks didn't do anything in the first one so nobody cares about it but everyone there will eat up some stupid shit world war 2 game.
>>336085830
The only WW1 game I'd like to play would be in the Eastern Theater against the Ottomans. I'd love a Lawrence of Arabia styled one, riding horses with Arabs, ambushing trains and storming the Ottoman forts in Arabic cities.
>>336086520
Only if you can play as a Turk so you can shoot shitposters
Holy shit could you imagine a Galipoli style Red Orchestra? The butthurt from NZ/Ausfags would be immense
> "Desert Fox" cammo
> On an american gun
Wasn't that a Rommel thing?
>>336087206
allies were jelly of rommel's style
this is fake
BF5 is releasing this fall and on one will call a map pack "nostalgic map pack"
>>336087091
I don't think we'd get but Thurs. We actively celebrate how much we got our shit pushed in at Gallipoli.
>>336087269
I don't mean the cammo but the name itself.
KOREA
O
R
E
A
>>336085830
verdun isnt bad, its alittle call of duty esq now with some of the early sub machine gun classes but its good imo
>>336082884
It'd be the first battle field I've bought since Vietnam.
Despite the heavy saturation of WWII games a few years back, I'm still a sucker for them.
Will pre-order if you can play in northern Africa, and Russia too.
>>336088359
>a few years back
It was over a decade ago
>>336082884
Nice try.
>>336082884
I'd want maps from Stalingradyou get one guess for what other game makes me want that.
So what are the chances that we get another battlefield with rush mode, aka the best mode to ever grace FPS, and sniper rifles that don't fucking tell the enemy where you are before you fucking shoot? Also some foliage would be nice too.
>>336088627
ay well we can still hope
>>336088627
>>336085830
Verdun
I want a WWI where you play in squads as sappers. Where they'd mine from their trenches to under the enemy ones. Then you plant explosives and blow the whole trench off the map.
>>336088484
Oh shit
stupid time moving and shit
>>336088759
>rush mode
Guaranteed, but it'll never be as good as it was in bad company 2 since 64 player maps is the standard now.
>>336088759
Conquest on properly sized maps (1942/2) > Rush.
It is fun, though, for sure.
>>336089084
>Guaranteed
But for some reason they took it out of Hardline.
>>336089119
But when using snipers, without foliage, you are too easy to spot, and conquest tends to mean people are surrounding you.
Yeah, except it will only have match making crap.
Maps will be small as fuck
And we won't even have battleships
>>336089923
Battleships will be a call in killstreak like the AT-ATs.
