Would you prefer a WW2 Battlefield or futuristic?
Futuristic of course.
There haven't been that many since the 90s and early 00s.
Futuristic. in a futuristic setting the gameplay can be more fast paced and rely on slower projectiles.
>>335934852
Would love to see battlefield 2145
just give me 1943 on PC please
>>335934852
would prefer a 1991/2003 BF
fuck your futuristic and prehistoric bullshit
>>335934852
Neither
>>335935298
it would be 2143 noob
Gimme a fuckin korean war battlefield game so i can relive the footsteps of my grandfather as a tank commander.
They will make 2143 but it will be super fast paced like CoD is now but with vehicles to make it 'still BF' including tons of bloom, wubstep, and filters.
>>335935393
Golly gee where are my manners maybe a bc3
>>335935641
Cod is fast paced? Since when
>>335934852
ORANGE AND BLUE
R
A
N
G
E
A
N
D
B
L
U
E
Gay
It doesn't matter. I just want more thumpers.
>it ain't me starts playing
Hey, I'm a NA BF4 player who is looking for a platoon.
Does anybody here play with a dedicated group that could use a player?
>>335934852
i read that as a WWF Battlefield, and for a moment I was euphoric
>t. Battlefield (no number)
bet its a reboot, and will have the same gameplay focus as battlefront
would be cool if they go all out as "battlefield" goes, like different eras and shit
We're never going back to WW2. Kids these days are too obsessed with fifty trillion fucking weapon attachments. World at War pretty much have to stretch every possible choice to put a CoD4-like system into its game.
2142 was my favourite of the whole series but I don't doubt they'll fuck it up.
>>335934852
>WW2
>futuristic
I don't know which theme I hate more. Current day is the best.
>>335936079
how the fuck do you reboot a multiplayer series that has a new game coming out every year.
>>335934852
ww2 is nice i dont like future coz everything looks toyetic, tacticool and has to have a dubstep EDM soundtrack. Why a Napoleon or Civil War era CoD doesnt exist?
>>335934852
I'm not sure its an exact time setting or whatever but whatever time setting bad company 2 was in.
>>335934852
either is fine as I don't buy EA games
>>335935582
bfbc2 Vietnam dlc?
WW2 setting has always bored me to tears. Futuristic allows for inventive items.
the mass market consumer wants a modern warfare setting
they don't like the futuristic fake guns wall jumping shit, and it shows when you look at how sales dropped when COD started doing that and how Titanfall failed to grab people.
2143 sounds cool to battlefield fans but the average FPS bro gamer won't like it
>>335936415
Hasnt cod been doing futuristic for a while? And theres even doom and halo that are futuristic. Where the fuck do you get your idea of average consumer not liking futuristic from
>>335934852
PURE FUCKING CANCER
>>335936135
Maybe they should make a post apocalyptic one? that way they could have tons of homemade attachments, but not be modern again or future crap. And the guns would be different too, since it would be scavenged rather then tacticool.
>>335936698
Battlefield is about combined arms, doesn't really work that well in this series.
>>335935719
since all the arena shooters died off
>>335936535
look at advanced warfare, it's the worst selling cod
blops 3 cut back on that shit and sales went up
titanfall was a failure literally no one plays it, they were expecting it to contend with cod
>>335936752
they can do a mad max style thing, no reason they can't have trucks with guns welded on there, repurposed police apcs, military grade stuff from a base or they could say a faction rebuilt the vehicles from a old WW2 museum. might be better suited for a spin off like hardline though, yeah.
![nazi_soldiers_by_eco_flex[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/cD1XC9N.jpg "nazi_soldiers_by_eco_flex[1].jpg")
>>335934852
WW2
But it won't happen because no red dots and homing missiles.
Some alternate history WW2 would be nice though.
>>335936873
What? Black Ops 3 is the most "futuristic" CoD yet. They didn't cut back on shit, they only pushed it further.
>>335934852
wanna see some WW with modern graphic in action
>Underage kiddies who weren't around during the WW2 flood in the 00's memeing these games back into the market
The sad thing is that FZD already confirmed that most AAA companies are working in several cinematic WW2 themed games.
>>335934852
WW2 wouldn't be fun, since the levolution shit is a staple to the series there wouldn't be much they could do
the farthest they should go back is Vietnam
>Medieval Battlefield
Everything would implode.
>>335937313
I was there and I want this flood back
>battlefield
nobody cares about this
its like halo, people play the multiplayer for like a month then go back to CoD
>>335936079
>Multiplayer series that is still going strong
>reboot
>Fabtasy Battlefield
>magic weapons
>huge fireball launchers
>wyverns, gryphons, horses, siege weapons
Imagine
>>335937365
so it'd be that For Honor game pretty much?
>>335934852
I hope they change the name on the reveal
>>335937501
Battlefield is pretty fucking popular on pc
>>335934852
just give me titan mode with big maps and old knife mechanics, do not fucking care about anything else
>>335937512
Hardline was a failure.
didnt they already make a futuristic battlefield?
>>335936612
I like the Republic Commando thing they tried to do in BF4, but it failed because there was just a dedicated shoot button for NPC's instead of individual commands and also the characters sucked ass
Hopefully DICE LA is making this one because they are the only competent team
>>335936415
>Completely ignores HALO which is set 200 years in the future and is one of the most successful FPS's of all time
>>335936752
You could still have tanks and stuff in a Post Apocalyptic game. I remember Josh Sawyer pitched an idea for a Battlefield-like Fallout spinoff called Fallout: Resource Wars
>It would be a game set in the Fallout world's Europe during the Euro-Middle Eastern war that took place there around the 2050s. Focused on team-based multiplayer, the gameplay would be a blend of Motocross Madness pacing, Battlefield: 1942 foot and vehicle combat, and slightly longer-than-CS duration rounds. A salvaging element would be included giving the player the choice of either repairing damaged vehicles/weapons for use in the next round, or scrapping them for parts.
>The plot would involve a crew of soldiers from the Royal Armoured Corps who become stranded in a war-torn anarchistic northern Italy and have to fight their way to the English Channel in quickly degrading vehicles, scavenging replacements, fuel, and weapons as they go.
>>335937660
because it was a spin-off
go ahead and check just how many people are still playing bf4
>>335937660
Hardline was a spin-off
>>335937726
The series has changed a lot since then and the new improvements would be really neat in a futuristic setting
>>335934852
I'd prefer whichever doesn't have a broken as fuck netcode.
>>335937745
>DICE LA
>Competent
Unless the entire team changed when they renamed from Danger Close Gamesyes I'm still fucking mad about what they did to Medal of Honor, I find that very hard to believe.
Vietnam or FULL future. Not semi-future like Call of Duty
Honestly, I would be fine with Battlefield Star Wars if it was actually Battlefield but with Star Wars shit instead of some shitty inbetween like Battlefront
>>335937865
DICE LA is responsible for all BF4 post-launch updates and fixes. They made a borderline unplayable piece of shit into one of the best battlefield games to date
Battlefield: Tiberum wars.
Battlefield: Mass effect
Battlefield: Cowboys and Indians
Battlefield: Steampunk
Battlefield: good company
Battlefield 3: the second one
Battlefield: cold war
>>335937313
I honestly don't mind that.
The issue will be that they're probably going to fuck them up.
gib 2143
>>335936698
This idea.. I like it.
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Mass Effect
Remind that this was almost a thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSy33Cc_96I
>>335938070
you... i like you xD
>>335937525
have one faction be that, the other still military dudes. for scale.
>>335936260
That's the wrong war
>>335937759
Halo sold more on the Universe and Casual multiplayer more than anything
Now 343i has absolutely fucked both of those and MS has to include bundles just to say they sold more than 1mil
>>335936698
They already did it with BF3 Aftermath DLC and they totally blew it aesthetic-wise.
>>335934852
I'd like one that isn't a buggy pile of crap
>>335937313
it has been more than a decade
>>335938095
that could be cool, it's not that like that series has a rep to tarnish.
God, let it be 2142 2
Bring back Titan mode please.
Battlefield: Falklands or Battlefield: WW1 would be interesting.
Basically just huge empty maps with lots of rocks and mountain and shit to hide in and spot enemies/snipe/call in artillery etc.
Or trench warfare, with all matches lasting like 30 seconds when one team captures the machine gun placements and proceeds to mow down everyone as soon as they go over the top.
>>335934852
ww2 with offline bot battles.
>3 installments later
>still can't fight dinosaurs in an Apache Helicopter
fucking when
>>335938264
I never played that dlc but that was immediately after detonation right? maybe if the whole game based around the end of the world it would turn out better. I imagine it let you use all the tools from the base game and that kinda misses the point. like a disease or weather based apocalypse would fit better
Anything that isn't USA vs Russia/China/Germany. These pairings have been run in to the ground.
WW2 games are overdone and overrated
Futuristic games (with lasers and shit) is gay as fuck.
Modern = Near future > World wars > futuristic
>>335938741
>battlefield: Falklands
>the entire game is just Royal Marines chasing down drafted Argentine teenagers and shooting them in the back as they retreated
Wouldn't be very interesting desu, Argentina Vs. Britain was never a fair war
>>335939037
Who else, North Korea or aliens?
>>335934852
>The future of battlefield
>Future
it's gonna be WWI
>>335939147
If they go future they can combine nations into something cool or just make up pmcs or rebel factions. Africa could be used more.
>>335938195
> Battlefield: GATE
Sounds fucking awesome
>>335939236
didn't WW1 have fuck all for vehicles? just those slow "tanks" and little propeller planes.
>>335939114
CS babby detected
I'd prefer it if DICE and EA were to die instead.
What does everyone think the new factions will be? USA and.....
>>335939147
The sky is the fucking limit if they pull some alt history shit. USA vs England in modern times.
Alternatively, South America and Africa never seem to get any real love in these modern military shooters, really any conflict involving people in either could be a good twist.
>>335939441
We need horses.
2143. Fuck ww2 we had enough of them for fucks sake what are you 11 years old that yout can't remember how for YEARS the only shooters were ww2? Medal of Honours? BF 1942? CoD 1235?
And if not 2143 I want to see some future shit. Like fighting on a space station and low g jumping stuff. Shoot a window and motherfuckers fly away or the only sound you hear is from the vibrations your gun does on your suit
>>335939719
>South America and Africa never seem to get any real love in these modern military shooters
Because games set in modern setting tend to strive for authenticity and pitching usa against either would be a fucking joke.
>>335934852
Modern.
>>335939127
They shoulda thought about that before they invaded
It's clearly going to be a future setting. Look at the DLCs; they tell a story. The DLC of 3 led to 4. The DLC of 4 lead to 2142. This could be set sometime before that; BF 2132 anyone?
Settings I would personally really fucking enjoy:
> Post-Apocalyptic
> Ultra far future robot war
> XCOM style alien invasion
> Cold war gone hot
> Hardline: 1972
> Hardline: 1932
>>335937764
This, pretty interesting idea.
>>335939821
the usa doesn't do very well when it isn't alllowed to go all in
>>335934852
I would prefer an actual Battlefield 3 and not that shitty game that they delivered
>>335939821
No one said the US needed to be involved at all.
>>335940043
so play battlefield 4?
The only thing I want for a Battlefield game is for the sniper class to be ditched and replaced with a normal scouting class with carbines.
Sniping is fucking pointless in BF3 and BF4
>>335940160
Also shit
>>335935719
if you want to be technical, advanced warfare
>>335940160
he said an actual battlefield 3 , not another bad company shit sequel
>>335940129
Yeah, nigger warfare would be very interesting
>>335940250
>>335940262
have you even played bf4 after 2014?
>>335940262
Hey, this is a niche
>>335939954
>Hardline type campaign with an actually good setting/cast/writing
>It's just some singleplayer DLC instead of a spinoff
>It's just campy
>>335940043
>>335940236
thank you for the quality post
thankfully we have you to remind us of the games quality
>>335940320
meant for >>335940236
WW2 Africa campaign
>Battlefield
>DICE
>EA
no thanks and you sperglords would do well to ignore it entirely before you shitpost it into a meme and have it sell 20 million copies from people who only ironically like it because memes
Futuristic.
>>335940424
its call of duty shit
>>335940424
Yes
Have you ever played an FPS released before CoD 4?
>>335934852
WW2 on the Eastern Front
I want a Reichstag & surrounding area map aswell with dynamic destruction of various parts of the building
>>335940585
a simple 'no' will do
>>335940273
The customization options would be insane.
if they make a new 2142 ill buy into this shit franchise again
>>335940396
Thanks for the support
If you want I am available for 24/7 support
I am always ready to decide if the game you are playing is shit or not(They probably all are)
did they write 'see the future of battlefield' to throw us of? i hope its world war 2 desu there hasnt been a world war game in 10 years.
>>335940632
have you ever played a battlefield before bad company?
>>335939719
>South America
cod ghosts did it
>>335940630
This is my dream, but i doubt it would happen
>>335940747
Oh sorry I thought we were talking about good games.
>>335940747
Arent these games just a simple deathmatch though, it doesnt really matter who you are playing as or against
>>335940741
you have either never played bf4 or are deliberately shitposting if you think bf4 is a bad battlefield game or in any way similar to cod or bad company
>>335939821
instead of USA just have a "peacekeeper" faction, that way they can be scaled back reasonably.
>>335940963
>battlefield
>scaled back
But that's not what the series is known for, just look at the shitstorm that was Hardline.
>>335940902
Game itself just fine.Maps complete garbage though.
>>335940902
>paying 100$ for one game
>paying for a game that has random cases you can open
>paying for a game that has an option to pay for unlocks
>>335940683
only setting where the stupid silly camos for guns would make sense.
Reminder that of the "new" Battlefield games, BC2 is still the best.
>>335941192
The bad company titles are fucking console cancer kill yourself my man
>>335940902
and you never played battlefield 1942 or bf2 so stfu
>>335941259
Back to mordorhq with you
>>335935921
Atleast use the actual song name you fuck
>>335940683
>>335941303
Where were you when WW2 is pretty much confirmed?
https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/726142382417141760
>>335941303
it's a meme you fucking dip
>>335934852
2143 or nothing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk4wEAO07hM
>>335941493
EA wouldnt be stupid enough to publish a world war game, no one fucking wants that
>>335941493
They wouldn't be invited 1944 Devs to the premiere if it was WWII. DICE is made of decent people, they aren't dicks.
>>335935298
2146
>>335941493
>WW2
>AGAIN
Jesus.
Do you not remember WW2 saturation?
It'd have been better if they just went full creative and made like an alternate history.
Maybe a shooter in a world where the Western Roman Empire never fell.
Or if the Americas colonized Europe instead of the other way around.
Just fucking something new, Jesus.
>>335934852
futuristic
its going to be open world shooter, like the division
>>335941640
a lot of the Battlefield community is rallying for a WWII game. Jackfrags held a massive poll and WWII won by a massive amount.
http://www.strawpoll.me/6459945/r
>>335941640
EVERYONE WANTS THAT YOU FUCKING DIP
RED ORCHESTRA 2 IS GETTING FUCKING BORING
>>335941878
A bunch of literallywhos don't have any say on multimillion dollar business decisions
>>335941493
>>335941906
RO2 being as dead as it is is a pretty good indicator of how much demand there is for a ww2 game outside of some loud autists
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Mass Effect
Not gonna lie, it would be pretty damn fun to play a pvp multiplayer based off of the galaxy at war in ME3, with a single player story tying in to the events in that game.
>>335942046
>Battlefield
>single player
Who gives a shit?
It's only there for autists who can't handle real people.
>>335942001
RO2 was never well known
It was made by a low-budget company that's pretty much only known for Red Orchestra and Killing Floor
>>335942137
It was pretty heavily hyped on release though
>>335941958
>battlefield community
>literally whos
>when DICE LA has done nothing but listen to them for 2 years while fixing BF4
>>335942097
>my meme opinion is why they shouldn't have it
>not playing both
>>335941878
BF, COD, they all say they want to go back to something like a WWII shooter but I guarantee when they get it, they will complain of a ''lack of content, weapons, etc'' and talk about how its the same old generic FPS game with updated graphics. Also people whining about wanting boots on the ground do it because they get their asses handed to them with the arena shooter movements and jumping and they aren't used to it on consoles so they whine.
You know those rumors about the next battlefield being set in WW1?They're true
>>335939719
Was just thinking of UK vs USA. Maybe not Battlefield but some alternate history type game where the British Empire never collapses. Just to even the odds a bit.
>yfw they call it just "Battlefield"
I'll play WWII only under the condition that they keep in flamethrowers that work similar to the Vietnam ones. I know its fucked up but its a game and I need more flamethrowers. Otherwise im hoping for 2143.
The only thing that interested me in a new WWII BF game is NO FUCKING LOCK ON'S
BEEPBEEPBEEPBEEPBEEPBEEP
>>335942237
if you genuinely enjoy the sp of battlefield and call of duty there is something wrong with you
>>335940221
>love sniping at all ranges in BC2
>it fucking sucks in 4
At least the other weapons are pretty fun
World War II not even close. "Future" shit has become incredibly boring and CoD is already doing that this year.
>>335942283
>WW1
>for a BF game
Yeah nah.
It was a shit war for Battlefield.
Would make an amazing singleplayer focused game, but not for BF.
Trench warefare is just shit gameplay.
Its going to be on the eastern front
>>335935110
>slower projectiles
>more fast paced
what did he mean by this?
Futuristic for sure. WW2 is played out.
>>335934852
BF2143 please.With extra bugs not yet known to mankind, obviously
>>335942380
COD has been doing it for 2 years now.
>>335941149
I bought BF4 for about 15€ a few months ago
>>335942046
They wanted to make a Battlefield clone of masseffect at one point
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSy33Cc_96I
>>335942203
By a the fan base perhaps
Normies like battlefield fans probably never even cared
There is little progression in RO2
There are no camos, fancy gun paints, and there's very few vehicles other than 1-2 tanks for each faction and an APC
The game was also extremely bugged upon release
>>335942431
Trust me friend it is true and it is happening. Screencap this post.
>>335942375
Excellent meme, m'good sir! You are a gentleman and a scholar!
>>335941764
>something was overplayed a fucking decade ago and hasn't been touched at all since
>therefor it can never be done again ever
WW2 wasn't any worse than the gritty modern shooter so real that followed it.
>See youtube vid about BF5 announcement
>I WANT RUSH
>I WANT BF3 MAPS
>SMALLER MAPS
>I WANT MAPS MADE FOR RUSH
Kill me
>>335942380
>"Future" shit has become incredibly boring
12 year old detected
Clearly the blue and grey image is zoomed into and it's probably the cover.
>>335942534
Did you watch a Levelcrap video
>>335942534
Rush is a good mode tho
>>335942516
>he enjoys modern military singleplayer
Seek help son
>>335942380
the only good type of shooter is a fantasy/sci fi shooter
I just want BC2 style destruction again.
Shit was based as hell
>>335942678
Another excellent post! I'll bless you (non-religiously) with some 4chan gold! Keep making excellent memes!
>>335935921
> incorrect name for song
But fuckkkkkkkkk that would be good.
>>335942530
>hasn't been touched at all since
>what is red orchestra
dead game because nobody fucking cares about ww2
>>335942654
yeah apparently
>>335942672
BF3's tunnel straight line maps were an abomination. Its ok if it doesn't touch the more important modes but overall its pretty shit.
>>335941571
No shit sherlock, memes aside i dont think alot of people even know the song
Combine both in one game
I'm getting sick of the futuristic cyber-soldier trend thats been going on. All these shooters with drones and exo-suits and retarded shit. Just give me a good war game. Better yet, they could keep it warfare centric but remove the military aspect, that would be very interesting. Like a civil war in a not-so-advanced country.
all these retards hate ww2 probably never even touched 1942
probably a bunch of bc2 spawns
>>335942759
BC2 destruction wouldn't work in a real battlefield game. The match would become really fucking boring when after 10 minutes there was literally nothing left and you would be shot by a tank or jet over and over again as infantry.
>>335942804
Red Orchestra 2 is over five fucking years old, anon.
That's half a goddamn decade, and it's one game.
>>335942583
Modern was done to death and now future has been done to death in the most safe and sterile way possible. Fuck off.
>>335942926
you are aware that the best shooters of all time are all futuristic scifi right
of course you aren't since you're 15 years old who started gaming during the ww2 boom
>>335942893
>I'm getting sick of the futuristic cyber-soldier trend thats been going on.
I think it's better because it allows the devs to be more creative and not be restricted by what is real and what is not.
They can do whatever they want with the gameplay, which should be a priority.
Like the new COD games could actually be good of TTK was a little higher.
What's the point of all that mobility if you're dead in one bullet from a spraygun?
>>335942465
That's true actually but the rumors are that the next will be even FARTHER (3 more years) in to future.
>>335934852
Pseudo-futuristic WW2 setting like the new Wolfenstein
>>335942454
>WW2
>played out more than futuristic
I fail to think of any recent WW2 FPS beyond world at war, and I can name fucking tons of recent futuristic FPS
recent futuristic
Black Ops 2+3, advanced warfare, Titanfall 1+2, UT4, Destiny, halo 5, battlefront
recent ww2???
>>335943132
Thy even know people are getting tired, that's why they are making the COD4 remaster.
>>335943139
black ops 2 wasn't futuristic
Don't care because it'll be the same shit since 3 in maybe a new setting.
>>335943256
People are getting tired of COD, not the futuristic setting.
>>335934852
Fuck futuristic, it's the #1 reason I stopped playing COD with their dumb laser guns and jet pack bullshit. BF4 is probably the last good authentic looking modern warfare FPS for a while to come.
>>335943256
they're making it because they want everyone to forget the fact that they made ghost
>>335943314
poor bait
>>335943475
10-20 years into the future isnt fucking futuristic
>>335943107
im 31 so you can shut the fuck up kid. just because you want future doesnt mean it cant be ww2. you never even played 1942 so stfu kid
>>335943391
modern warfare is fucking boring tho so who cares
futuristic or ww2 are both better
>>335943314
what did he mean by this??
>>335936191
10 minute reloads, that's why
And horrible accuracy
Every hit would be instakill
Fucking blunderbuss
>>335934852
battlefront 2145
>>335943391
insurgency is good too
>>335943314
are you retarded?
>>335936148
this
>>335943550
>kid
>kid
>stfu kid
tfw you realize you're arguing with a literal child
>WW2 with current graphics and advanced effects
>Night maps
>actual commander position
>Well done gun animations done by a higher budget team compared to back then
>64v64 servers
>Planes
>Bombs
>Good looking tanks
I'm cumming
>>335935393
the northern strike expansion already took place in 2143
and they're well past battlefield 3
I want bad company 3.
I'll take 24 player servers if it plays as well ad bc2 did. I put about 350 hours into that game on my 360 god damn it was fun.
>>335943565
>modern warfare is fucking boring
t. casual pussy fuck who starts yelling if he doesn't get a laser guuded smart pistol or a jetpack so he can run away from every engagement
>>335937214
Wolfenstein: the new order
IF THIS ISNT FUCKING 2143 IM GONNA TEAR MY FUCKING FACE OFF.
YOU PLAYED WITH MY GODDAMN HEART WITH THAT LAST EXPANSION OF BF4 SHOWING OFF THE HOVER TANK AND OTHER SHIT.
>>335943765
Might come as a surprise but futuristic shooters existed before titanfall
>>335943681
ok i guess your way more mature then me sure
im still right though. your first bf was bc2 or above. meaning your not a veteran
>>335942446
that the soldiers run faster than the projectiles
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Tiberium Wars.
Would be awesome. Imagine how the maps would look. Start at a spawn and from the distance, you can see glowing fields in the distance with gunfire and explosions occurring in the background.
>>335943851
>video game
>veteran
holy shit this is embarrassing
>>335943550
Check it out everybody, cool guy on the internet. I bet hes a lot of fun at parties.
>>335936612
I hope you posted that image to show how both of those NeoGaf posters are fucking retards and neo-Battlefield babies, never having played BF2/1942.
>>335943919
ok im a cringey nerd but at least bc2 wasnt my first battlefield and get mad when people ask for ww2 game
>>335941060
I meant just for the settings sake, the gameplay would be traditional.
>>335943861
okay, and how does having slow as molasses projectiles make the game faster paced?
>>335944003
>at least bc2 wasnt my first battlefield
i'm beginning to think it was since only someone on full projection mode would use that as a serious argument
![bb9dc21865[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qiORUtv.jpg "bb9dc21865[1].jpg")
>>335944003
So what?
Piss off nerd, those are old and long gone, nobody cares about your old, abandoned games, plus, they're not pandering to you, lol, they're pandering to whatever makes more money, and obviously you're not part of that group.
>>335937991
>Battlefield: Tiberum wars.
I would bust a fucking nut.
KANE LIVES
>>335934852
gimme battle feel 2015/16 and let me fight for russia or ukraine
>>335934852
I would prefer Bad Company 3, but it's not like that's gonna happen any time soon.
They're probably gonna do WWI like the rumors were already suggesting.
>>335934852
Battlefield 2242 please
>>335944056
Have you ever played quake? Rockets are pretty slow but somehow the game manages to be fast
>>335944107
its a fine argument. its a better one then saying bf cant be ww2 because there was already a lot of ww2 games
>>335934852
Somewhere between 1980 - 2004 would be the sweet spot for me. It's modern but not modern enough to enable stupid shit like exoskeletons & rifles with 4 different scopes. WW2 over Futuristic.
>>335944306
Yeah, exoskeletons and futuristic rifles are shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit
>lmao flying soldiers lol XD
FUCK OFF
>>335942446
he wants an arena shooter
>>335944260
quake still isn't as fast paced as the average call of duty where the TTK is about a second
making the projectiles slower makes the game slower, not faster
>>335944246
i am with you bro, although i dont know if they are really going back to ww2. something tells me they arent.
the only way i would enjoy a ww2 game now is if it had the sound design that bc2 and bf4 bring
>>335944432
That depends on your definition of fast paced
COD is more twitchy than actually fast
One of the main problems I have with futurstic shit, aside from le jumpy soldier men are the guns
I don't want to use AK-147X I want to use a fucking AK-47. Every game out there does this, take modern guns, slap some stupid crap on them and rename them. Give me the guns I actually want to use.
>>335943458
I'm surprised they are going to outright ignore Ghosts after that sequel-bait ending.
>>335944462
I meant WW1, not 2. I think CoD and BF have completely abandoned WW2 and aren't looking back, which I don't agree with since I think they can do a great job making those games today. If it goes futuristic...eh, I don't know how to feel about it. I guess if it looked interesting, but not something I would invest my time in.
Ww2 shooter
Similar multiplayer to WAW or cod2
And there should be 32v32 games, with huge maps. 16 people in infantry, 8 Air Force, 8 armored division. Like a real battle. Think of war thunder, but add infantry to the mix.
And there should be a ruse total war like weapon unlock system,
Like low levels start with mg34s, Kar98s, panzer IIs, me109, ect, then higher levels get the mg42s, stgs, panthers, me 262, ect.
And of course I'm suggesting a fucking Wehrmacht campaign. You never get to play as axis because of muh feelings.
>>335944119
>nerd
>lol
Greetings, Reddit.
