Today's the day
..and it's shit
>>335910629
>Kick some asteroid
That pun is pretty much the only good thing concerning the movie. Well, expect the game itself.
>critics think it's shit because video game kids movie
>users rate it 7.5 on average
I'm going to go with 'it's okay'
If you really expected anything more than a mediocre kids film from the start there wasn't much hope for you
>Replacing Kevin Michael Richardson with a phoning it in Paul Giammatti for non-existent star power
They had this coming.
And apparently it's quite terrible.
>>335911376
I like how user scores mean something only when they are about your favourite book/movie/videogame but when they are about a book/movie/videogame you hate they don't count.
>the movie tie-in game is better than the actual movie
>tfw the movie tie-in game is better then the movie
>>335911661
well in this case it sbecause its a film based off a game, so of course the game based of the film would be better than the film.
also its not really a tie-in game. it was just a remake and it was delayed to match the release of the film
>tfw the movie tie in is better than the movie
This might be the first time since the Super Mario Bros movie that the movie was made to promote the game.
>>335911661
>>335911714
>>335911761
>game made by the company who has a record of making good games in the series makes a good game in the series
>noname animation studio making a movie riddled with corporate decisions that the original writer jumped ship from years ago ends up not being good
wow
>>335911376
Users also rated BvS around the same.
Users are also retarded.
>>335911936
but it wasn't
>>335911939
>company who has a record of making good games in the series
>last several have been dogshit terrible and killed the series
um wow lmao wowsers whoa wow
>>335911968
Critics are also retarded.
>>335911939
>game made by the company who has a record of making good games in the series makes a good game in the series
They've only made like two good games in the past 10 years. And the last several Ratchet and Clank games were horrible.
>>335912186
But Users more so.
Movie critics actually take their job seriously (for the most part) compared to video game critics. Movie critics don't rate a movie low because they got triggered by fiction.
>>335912273
Since 2006 they've made
TOD
QFB
CIT
ITN
Sunset Overdrive
Which were all good
>>335911939
Why didn't SONY use their own animation studio?
>>335912371
>TOD
The blandest mainline Ratchet with a bad story.
>QFB
Mediocre DLC chapter that shouldn't have existed at all.
>CIT
Pretty great
>ITN
Imitation of a traditional R&C game made by their B team.
>Sunset Overdrive
Hahahaha
I like how you left the Resistance games out because you know they're bad. Same with those spinoff Ratchet and Clank's and the indieshit Insomniac churns out.
>>335912496
Because branches of Sony act as if they're seperate companies, and SPA would have to want to make this. Instead Blockade approached Sony with a cheaper option, a cheap $30m movie made by cheap Canadian animators that could sold to a distributor.
>>335912725
>I like how you left the Resistance games out because you know they're bad.
I heard they were decent.
>>335912725
Resistance 1 and 3 were great though
Fuse was ruined shit
And they're upcoming indieshit looks shit
>>335910629
That isn't the fucking poster is it? it looks like a direct to dvd cover what where they thinking
>>335913523
That poster is literally in a huge display at my local mall outside of the movie theatre.
>>335913523
There's several different posters.
>>335910629
Do you think the sony execs wanted to redesign clank with eyebrows so he could do the dreamworks face like everyone else in this poster?
>>335910629
Its flat but its not awful. Honestly, if you are big fan of Ratchet & Clank, then this movie is for you...kinda.
Does Qwark steal the show?
>>335912725
ITN only had 3 flaws
it's length (but consider that it MSRPed at $30 on launch)
30fps
and the nexus parts
>>335914740
Also Ratchet's horrible design and more melodramatic bullshit
>>335910629
Does Sony pay you more or less now that the movie flopped?
>Ratchet and Clank movie
>not a Dr Nefarious story
One job, god damn.
>>335911376
So you're saying the reviews are right?
>>335915525
He already hijack Drek's role as the bad guy what else?
I actually liked Paul Blart 2
>>335912496
Internal prices, read up about it
>Used to love the Ratchet series to the point where it was my favorite
>Even liked Deadlocked, though not as much as I did the others
>Found Future super boring
>Crack in Time was great and is a contender for the best game in the series
>Everything else in the PS3 cycle was below average to good with some caveats
Man, what happened? At least the new game seems to be good, but it's a bummer that most people's first exposure to the series will be the movie.
>>335917297
Games like Ratchet just are out of style at the moment.
>>335917297
>even liked Deadlocked
are you implying deadlocked was bad?
But it's just Ratchet and Clank sans gameplay and with some changes because why not
You cannot watch this movie in a vacuum, you need context going in.
It's "ok" even as a fan of ratchet and clank but this is definitely the most extreme version of "a video game movie" where it's actually the video game.
I hope this movie is a success. If not, I'll never get to see Courtney Gears on the big screen!
I saw it last night and it sucked ass
I loved the PS2 Rachet games so I'm curious about this, as a fan will I enjoy this? See I'm glad they're staying true to the games but some games should just remain that.
>>335912725
>Not liking Sunset Overdrive
>>335910629
Isn't the movie just the game's cutscenes edited without the gameplay?
I just got the game yesterday and noticed that the cutscene I was watching was a 1:1 copy of a trailer I saw for the movie.
Someone explain this to me.
>>335912321
Are you kidding?
Disney owns like half of the movie review and aggregation outlets.
Half of the rotten reviews on BvS were ridiculous shit like "THIS MOVIE WAS WORSE THAN CATWOMAN AND ELEKTRA COMBINED! LONG LIVE MARVEL!"
