>>335909627
doesn't matter what they intended to mean, it wouldn't hold up in a EU court and if you're living in ameristan you've got way more problems to think about other than developers fucking you over.

>>335909627
he meant

>>335909627
he meant the same thing as Ion Storm when they wrote the exact same thing on the manual of your Deus Ex copy.

>>335910079
This desu. UELAs never hold up in court since you are forced to agree with them after you've already bought the game. They have no legal merit at all.

>>335909627
He meant that if you try to roleplay as a nazi in a fucking WW2 game they have the right to revoke your "license"

>>335910747
So you defend paying full sticker price for what amounts to a rental of the game's properties rather than ownership of a product?

>>335910891
You own the license to use the product. You don't own the product, it's two completely different things in legal terms.

>>335911007
But the question was whether you believe this is morally acceptable to you as a consumer. Would you rather hold license to a product, or hold the product itself?

>>335911186
No, it isn't acceptable.

But since an EULA does not hold in european court or in my country's, if that's the case, and I'm not American, I really don't care about EULAs.

They could make me sign a paper that said they're entitled to fuck me in the ass while charging me 10€ every day, that paper would never hold up to anything.

>>335909627
>eula
he meant it doesnt matter

>>335909627
It has always been like this for every game and software in history. Just because you own a cartridge or disc a game is on doesn't mean it belogs to you.