The Old Gods
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games
So which Legendary revealed so far looks to be the best? Deciding which one to craft day one.
I am really a fan of that 4/5 shaman card
>>335390882
I'm always leery of random effects.
>>335391038
That's the one. Why give it Yeti stats and a good effect? It's so OP
>>335391118
Blizzard has been doing that for a while. Lots of newer cards are straight upgrades of older ones.
>Shaman leggo isn't Therazane
SUDDENLY NOT HOLDING
>>335391210
Oh well I am a mid range shaman guy so this card is day one craft.
>>335391118
>>335391038
I cannot wait to evolve my evil heckler into a booty bay bodyguard
>>335391118
It's random, so not strictly better
>>335391337
you probably don't have much to fear if you upgrade a 0-1 cost unit, or a 8-9 one.
I think this has much more value than the Master. Abuse the shit out of some battlecries.
>>335391337
>>335391327
Yeah but it can also be a heal to. Most of the time you are going to be getting a better minion then you already have.
>>335392000
shit damn
>>335392081
Right, like use it on a minion that you mostly use for it's battlecry. Once it's job is done just upgrade it.
>>335390320
don't craft any legendary on day one. wait at least a week
everyone thought pic related will be goat before the release of GvG
>>335391118
Because it requires a board to work, and Shamans aren't known for having the cleanest of early curves due to Overload
>>335392206
Yeah with this guy on curve after attacking with it will be insane. Or you can just use it on a totem to get a better minion. Master is going to be OP and people will be making threads complaining about it mark my words.
>>335390320
emprah bros
>>335390320
Yogg Saron is the only acceptable answer.
>>335392515
Have they even shown him yet?
>>335392568
All cards have been shown.
http://www.hearthpwn.com/guides/1205-whispers-of-the-old-gods
i have 2900 gold ready i hope i get some good cards
>>335390320
he didn't preorder
>>335392243
No one thought that was good.
Though the only legendary anyone should craft day 1 is Yogg-saron
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_pC6olbQUI&feature=youtu.be&t=100
>>335392779
enjoy your boogiemonsters senpai
>>335391118
Because it's a class card with random effects. The effect isn't always beneficial just because you HAVE to transform a minion and if the one you need to transform is already good you can kind of get shafted.
>>335392937
Damn son, this is getting made no doubt.
Also is it just me or is there a metric fuckload of legendaries?
>>335392000
>1-mana disposable Brann Bronzebeard
>>335392000
This could actually make Miracle rogue somewhat viable again. Having basically free Azure Drakes is pretty good.
>>335392000
This card is going to redefine Rogue, but outside of Cthun shells and Raptor memes I don't know what other kinds of decks they can play anymore. Perhaps bring back Questing/Edwin Miracle?
>>335391118
if you play it on a totem while winning on the board you might get Doomsayer and lose :^)
>>335393271
5 or 6 neutrals and one for each class, doesn't seem that out of the ordinary
>>335393505
Just counted, there are 12 neutral legendaries.
>>335393571
alright, that sounds like a lot, but legendaries with huge effects are the big gimmick of this expansion so w/e, just means more value for your packs
>>335393565
That's shit.
>>335393291
Actually, since triggering it means you have Brann on your table, doesn't it mean
>TWO 1-mana disposable Brann Bornzebeards
>>335393565
Wow, it's so good that I'm forced to run 4 other cards just to make it playable.
>>335393719
Nice argument
>>335393719
>7 mana for double Druid of the Claw is shit
>tfw no flamewaker for yogg deck but want to open packs instead of spending 2100 gold on it
fucking adventures, just
>>335393719
>>335393792
I found the idiots
>>335393758
>Infinite Brann Loop
>>335393823
>Druid of the Claw that can only work in one deck
Yes its shit.
>>335393792
Why would you not run a C'thun deck? It's easily the best legendary of the entire set and you get it for free
>>335393719
>7 mana 8/12 is shit
>>335393823
>>335393817
It's just Carne, but cost more and requires having having a C'thun deck.
>>335391118
Because "lel it's random which means 99% of the time it helps you but 1/100 times it will fuck you over so it's balanced :^)" is how Blizz balances Hearthstone cards with random effects
>>335394021
>4/5 is taunt 4/6
what did he mean by this?
>>335394021
How can you even compare this to Cairne at all? They aren't even close to being the same thing
I can fap to this.
>>335393758
Well yeah, but I was thinking that since Brann typically gets shot down so quickly after he's played, a 1-mana version of the card opens the way for many more combos.
C'thun druid is gonna be pretty fun to play
Why did they shit on Paladin so much?
>>335394381
>arakkoa that buffs C'thun
this triggers the fuck out of me
>>335392937
Card games by nature are quite luck based, but hearthstone is just dumb. Blizzard's idea of fun with hearthstone was to take a luck based game and throw RNG upon RNG upon RNG on it and see who wins.
Yogg-Saron culminates this as the ultimate joke in a joke game. It's almost magical.
>>335394482
That's an insane heal card if you have an empty board though.
>>335394597
>>335394567
>He doesn't remember that quest in Shadowmoon Valley
>>335393758
>brann
>shadowcaster 2x
>thaurissan
>twin emprahs
>yogg
>c-thun
>rest of the deck control with some cthun minions
>>335394626
But in general healing is worth half of what damage is. So he's worse than the old Rag in 90% of situations.
>>335394361
I meant that since Brann triggers battlecries twice, and that cloning thing is a battlecry, you should get two copies of him, right?
>>335394686
that wasn't C'thun, it was an other Old God that used C'thun's model because Blizzard was too lazy to make a new Old God for a single quest
>>335394482
>We need an Elemental Lord who's willing to stand up and fight against the Old Gods
>Lets use Ragnaros
>>335391118
its a class card so it gets extra budget
>>335394381
wow that is fucking strong
who needs legendaries?
behold the beatstick, king of the commons
>>335394768
it can attack normally m8
>>335394814
Oh wow, I completely misread your post. You're right, it should result in two 1-mana Branns.
>>335395163
indeed. but having 6 Branns means your battlecries will still only go off twice
>>335395061
>Coin this turn 3
>Play the 2-Mana 3/2 that unlocks your crystals next turn.
>>335395221
>tfw Combo doesnt work with Brann
>tfw no 26+ Edwin stats or 4 damage SI:7s
>tfw everyone will start calling shaman cancer now that it can actually have multiple competitive archetypes
>>335395367
>Playing SI:7 when you could play that Panda C'thun worshipper
>>335395516
Dude that card is insane. Easily one of the best cards I've seen in the set
>>335393719
Moron spotted.
It's easily the highest value minion in the set.
>>335395460
More like because face shaman will be everywhere
>>335395367
>still no "your combos trigger twice" legendary
>still no "your minions' end of turn effects trigger twice legendary
>>335395686
>Still no "Your Taunt minions now also Taunt Spells, Battlecries and Hero Powers" legendary
>>335395061
>Turn 3 7/7
You cunt.
What does /v/ think of this card? It seems like it would do well vs aggro/token decks.
>>335394597
This is why I instantly go AFK if I'm about to lose.
No joke, I only play games I win
>>335395846
>no way to deal with it before turn 5 now
>>335395367
>no drawing 14 cards with 1 coldlight oracle
>no +30 frostwolf
>no instant +20 damage to the face nightblade
>no combo with tharuassian for +zillion damage cthun
>no wasting the entire turn by playing a joust card
>>335395061
Why does Shaman get so many amazing cards? Overload isn't even that bad of a drawback.
>>335395862
if zoo lock turns out to be as insane as it looks like it might then it'll be great for C'thun and other stalling decks
![635968546735362773[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/u9HUUJt.png "635968546735362773[1].png")
>>335395516
main difference is is that SI Agent is a 3/3. SI is strictly better unless you're doing a C'thun deck. in which you'd use both
personally, i feel this card is the newest staple
>>335395862
would need 2 minions to be equivalent to tazdingo. control looks to be the new meta, so this is one to keep in the back of your mind
>>335395956
>What is Hex
>>335396021
Overload is only a drawback for idiots who don't understand how to properly curve.
>>335396021
Yeah idk why they gave shaman so much love this expansion
>>335395957
having multiple Branns only makes battlecries go off twice. read his card
>>335396054
>a card for Shaman
>who the fuck plays Shaman
>>335396112
>>335396021
shamans were the lol class for a very long time. only recently, ie the last couple months have they been remotely viable.
and now its time for the shaman meta
>>335396021
>>335396112
Forgot pic
>>335395957
Brann's effect doesn't multiply with multiple copies of him on the board
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKqoZkp9bMU
>>335396050
>strictly better
One is a combo, the other is a battlecry.
>>335396112
And even more ways to get around overload.
>>335396176
I have over 2500 wins with Shaman
Glad hes getting buffed
Been shit tier since day 1
Worst hero power, plus overload is a garbage mechanic. Glad they making it slightly less terrible this expac though
>>335396050
that card seem great but i really dislike the art, it doesn't match the name at all
>pandaren stormcaller
>ever even hearing of cthun
>serving an old god at all
>>335396472
Still better class cards than Warlock, who by the way didn't even get any new demons
>>335395956
Shadow Word Death would like a word.
>>335396832
Why not?
>>335396832
The whole expansion is about corruption, it's a what if
>>335393758
HOLD THE PHONE
>Play Bran Bronzebeard + Shadowcaster + Conceal.
>Next turn play a 2nd Shadowcaster on yoru shadowcaster.
>you now have infinite 1/1's, infinite minion copying, and infinite doubletriggers.
>>335397515
Nice, a three turn combo that doesn't even result in winning the game
>>335397225
Well Pandaren were closed off the rest of the world since the Sundering. So the only old god they'd hear of would be the one that was in their territory, Y'shaarj. But, their sworn enemies were the Mantid, who were the followers of Y'shaarj. So a pandaren would never do something like that, and especially not for Yogg/Cthun/Nzoth
And if you argue it's after the Mists fell, then it's also after C'thun fell (for now) (after the War of the SS)
>>335397481
i know, it's just a card game, etc etc but it still triggers my autism
For Rag they had to use him for that effect but for this they could have used like any other art and been fine
>>335397768
>>335397768
You're forgetting that this is an actual card game played in the Warcraft universe. The whole "story" for it is just "lmao wouldn't it be cool if ___?"
>>335398463
>i know, it's just a card game, etc etc but it still triggers my autism
I know
>>335395885
That's retarded though since the whole point of all this randomness is so that even games that are clearly lost can be turned around completely.
>>335398653
Not everyone enjoys the idea of winning by random.
>>335396847
What?
NO new demons?
that is retarded.
This expac is ALL about demons and shit,
why no warlock love?
>>335400030
It's about the Old Gods, they aren't demons
It's still retarded though
>>335399842
>i play hearthstone to win
>but not by random chance
you honestly believe that your skill made you draw the perfect curve?
>>335400030
There's some good shit.
>>335394854
All 4 of the Elemental Lords went to war against the old gods tho
>>335400127
I believe my deck building skills and knowing what to mulligan was a significant factor in that.
>>335400143
Yeah, that could actually work out pretty ok.
Warlock was my main for a long time though, and I need MORE demons.
>>335400030
It's about the demons' enemies, not demons
>>335400245
so your ability to manipulate the RNG enhanced your ability to win? thats almost like a skill or something.
you won't be winning any poker tournaments if all you draw are 7 highs
>>335400245
Just fuck right off with your illogical shit.
>>335400374
but I NEED more demons.
>>335400672
No anon, you ARE the demons!
Hearthstone would be a lot more interesting with a sideboard.
Unfortunately the game is shit.
I just started playing about a month ago, and I main rogue. I'm going to have about 1200 dust from the refund, and I'm still missing some of the core cards that are hard to obtain quickly like Preparation. Would it be a good idea to go ahead and craft two of them, or should I still wait for the dust to settle on the new cards?
>>335400030
no it's eldritch horrors not demons
>>335401224
what the FUCK is a sideboard?
>>335400672
You lost Voidcaller now so half the demons are trash-tier now anyway.
>>335401385
a pile of cards on the side of the deck that you can add and take out between rounds
in hearthstone its called having two decks
>>335401286
refund? what refund?
>>335396176
Face Shaman has been cancer for a few months.
>>335401508
>implying I'm going to play standard.
go wild or go home.
>>335401694
the cards that got nerfed give you a full dust refund if you disenchant them.
>>335401821
I'll play it for the free packs.
>>335401286
>rogue
Anon...I have bad news. Rogue is going to be unplayable in the next meta.
>>335401876
is there a list of the nerfed cards?
>>335401951
free packs?
why don't I know anything about any of this?
when does it come out?
>>335401385
Extra deck that lets you swap cards between it and your main deck between rounds of a match, so you can tailor your main deck to your opponent better in the next round. Hearthstone doesn't even support rounds, so it really wouldn't do anything.
>>335401694
Refund's probably not the best word, but all of the cards that got nerfed can be exchanged for full dust value for two weeks, starting this Tuesday. There's no reason not to just dust everything, since worst case scenario, you'd just recraft the cards you need.
>>335401985
I wouldn't go that far. Weapons are going to be garbage, but I think there's enough new stuff to make for some new playstyles.
![ridingsilithidtankskinarmoredblack[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9hGJYt4.jpg "ridingsilithidtankskinarmoredblack[1].jpg")
This is what's actually missing from an Old Gods expansion. I don't understand how they could have left it out.
>>335402067
>this fucking below shieldbearer thread
On tuesday you get 3 free packs for Woog
You get a quest win 2 Standard games get 5 packs
Another quest win 7 standard games get 5 more packs.
All woog packs.
>>335402067
http://us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/blog/20097355/keeping-hearthstone-fresh-4-20-2016
This Tuesday. Three free packs and C'Thun right out of the gate, and quests to earn ten packs on top of that.
>>335402289
oh damn.
thanks anon.
>>335401985
>rogue gets shafted every expansion
>"we're going to nerf Blade Flurry to allow more Rogue archetypes and better cards (weapons) to compensate!"
>every WotOG card is fucking hot garbage, minus like 1 or 2 okay cards
>only viable and fun archetype now pretty much shit
>trying to push retarded Deathrattle/Pirate shit every xpac
why doesn't Blizzard just delete the fucking class already? It's obvious they have no clue what Rogue's identity should be and they give 0 fucks about the class
>>335402456
Where do you see that anywhere in the article?
>>335403230
It was said by pizza man Ben Brode himself on stream showing off the new cards.
>>335402240
>mounted silithid
yeah, that's a good point
>>335391118
It a class card and no one plays yeti anymore you subhman
>>335403350
Pizza man?
>>335402648
>we're going to nerf x so y sees more play
>y doesn't see play because it's shit, not because x is good
>no effort made to buff y, x just gets gutted with no recourse but not playing the character anymore
literally the cancer of Blizzard balance, they keep pulling that shit in HotS too
>>335403568
He used to deliver pizza before joining Blizzard iirc
>>335391118
because then you wont have any reason to buy the new cards.
>>335396050
This can kill a 3/2 on turn 3 without the coin, SI agent can't.
>>335394292
>2 more mana
>For +2 health and -1spellpower
Is the balance team retarded. The previous card didnt even make it into all priest decks
>>335397768
Hearthstone is a game within a game. It's a "what if" scenario played in a tavern in Azeroth.
It's been a while since I last played it. Have they done anything to make the game less grindy?
>>335403784
Most of the cards from this expansion have a low power level to account for the creation of the Wild format.
The way they intend to balance Wild is to create shitty cards that won't see any play in it.
>>335403582
Not quite the case with Rogue
>We're nerfing x so we can make Y
>We're not making making Y anytime soon, so you'll have to get by until we do
>>335400030
>This expac is ALL about demons and shit,
The Burning Legion was started to combat the Old Gods and their masters, the Void Lords.
>>335404109
What the fuck are you talking about you nerd?
>>335404036
Source?
Rag Light Lord & the new shaman legendary are the best legendaries from the set class wise
best neutral besides C'thun because he's free would most likely be Twin Emperor.
>>335404292
Xaril's also pretty good.
>>335402240
The mount which gives you the most reverence but also shows how you have zero real life.
>>335404292
We'll have to see if C'Thun decks are good before we decide if Emperor is good.
>>335394482
>Lightlord
HOLY SHIT MY SIDES
>>335404036
>Ninja Sex
>At a party
I like it.
>>335394851
ding ding ding
>>335405289
Yeah it's pretty stupid.
>>335394482
This card could be really good in late game. If you decide not to attack it the opponent could get 8 live. Also it is really good in trading with everything that has >8 attack.
I never played alliance in WoW, but why are there so many darkshire cards, were they corrupted by the old gods or some shit?
>>335403784
What priest deck was that card not in? It's so fucking good pretty much any high tier priest deck had it.
>>335405742
Wow Legion spoilerIn legion it will turn out that there are many old gods followers in Darkshire.
>>335394768
Its ragnaros that heals but takes damage if it damages a minion.
>>335405742
Darkshire is just a spooky place
>>335406114
Darkshire is the key to all of this.
>>335404036
source pls
How much time is left on the tavern brawl? EU if it's relevant.
For what purpose?
>>335408007
Milling.
Flavor.
Fun.
>>335408007
Mill decks
>>335408007
mill drop?
its the same kind of card that Zombie Chow is, but not as good obviously
>>335408007
better than vanilla stats in exchange for a negative effect, with the extra upside of being good in mill decks. Mukla 2.0 with Pagle as a base
>>335396262
I am building a deck around this card.
>>335408007
It's just Chow, but instead of 5 HP, they get a useful effect and it costs 1 more for 1 more HP.
Also useful for Mill filler, mostly just fodder since it doesn't jack fucking shit early.
>>335409196
thing is its a legendary. it should cost 1
>>335409196
>Blizzard logic
>1/2 chance of getting an extra card every turn is worth less than 5 HP
>As such, instead of getting 1/1 over a 1 drop like Chow, Nat gets 0/1 over a 2 drop
>>335396472
Overload would be a cool mechanic if it was coming like
>lightning bolt(2 mana): deal 3 damage
>overload(1): deal 1 damage
Like the druids choose one spells, you can choose to increase the mana cost of a spell to increase it's effect, and the spells, are already balanced like mage/lock spells (2 mana 3 damage for LB, 4 mana 5 damage for lava burst). Frost wolves can be 2 mana 2/3 taunt, overload summon a 2nd taunt.
Would be a cool mechanic, early game cards that work late game as well.
>>335405312
>party
He's just meeting her parents
>>335409590
>That
Yaknow, Choose One is one of the few mechanics locked to 1 class, would be interesting to see a Shaman rework like that.
>Doomhammer is now a 2/8, Overload 2, your weapon gains Windfury
>Try to buff a particular play style
>nerf existing OP combo that are used by everyone playing that class because all other options are worthless
>give 1-2 usable class cards relating to that playstyle
>0-1 useful neutrals
I will never understand blizzard's boner with pirate decks.
Just Disenchanted nerfed cards, currently sitting at 8.7k dust. Where we at boys? You ready for WotG?
>>335408007
Each set has a certain number of shit legendaries. Nat isn't even that bad compared to boogiemonster or corrupted mukla.
>>335409967
tribal decks are fun. they just need more love, like murlocs. gimme a pirate knight ala murloc knight and a pirate token generator
>>335409967
Tribals are split among 2 Classes each.
>Pirates are Rogue and Warrior
>Murloc are Paladin and Shaman
>Beast are Druid and Hunter
>Dragon are Paladin and Priest
Off the top of my head.
Some Effects are mixed in there too, like Deathrattle as Rogue and Hunter.
>>335409967
Eric Dodds, the lead designer and game director, has stated that he loves pirates
>>335410296
The warrior pirate deck looks p good now
>>335410262
>he disenchanted them already
you don't get the refund price dust until the xpac released on tue/wed
>>335410441
No, they just added all the cards, as well as implemented the nerfs, at least for EU.
>>335410262
You're a retard, but yeah. Sitting at ~7K Dust and 250 Gold, hoping 13 packs free will net me a few decent cards.
>>335410441
patch just came out on NA, literally seconds before I posted to mock him
Should I put this in a deck or disenchant?
>>335410538
read: >>335410526
>>335410612
Never disenchant non-duplicate Legendaries before the meta sets in, unless you desperately want to craft something.
Anyone know if the cards from Naxx will give full dust refunds with the new patch? I heard rumors of that but I haven't seen any links confirming that.
>>335410526
>>335410607
i'll be dipped. i was robbed of my shitpost by mere seconds
fucking blizzard
>>335410612
That card is too much fun. And also what the other guy said.
>>335410379
Mage is also Dragon,
and Warlock is Demon.
and Mech is Rogue and Shaman.
>>335410787
Pretty sure that they won't. Blizzard would be insane to refund full dust for them.
>>335410296
>tribal decks are fun. they just need more love
That's the point I am trying to make, I like the idea of tribals but if you are really going to push them start giving them some actual "good" cards that puts them on a somewhat equal footing with the tier 1 decks.
I would play beast druid if the cards I get from TGT aren't so fucking horrible.
>>335410612
>Greenskin
Chances are Pirates won't pick up, but no, don't dust him.
Dust all/almost all if you're sentimental, Naxx and GvG cards.
>>335410612
Don't dust anything bar absolute worthless-tier legos like mememaster.
>looking through collection
>somehow dusted Reno without thinking
i have 12k dust.
what legendaries should i make? i like random cards and control priest. i already have dust set aside for yogg.
Confessor Paletress piques my interest for example
>>335410869
Mage has exactly 1 Dragon, nothing dedicated to Dragon Synergy.
And Demon is the outstanding Tribal, locked to Warlock.
I forgot about Mech, yeah. Although that is Mage too. They kinda dumped a ton of Mechs with GvG.
>>335411093
>crafting anything a day before the expansion
Really faggot?
>>335411093
Confessor is a huge gamble and not great, only usable in Reno Priest.
>remove belcher
>remove healbots
>put in unreliable neutral heals and late game taunts in their place
this is so going to be a face shaman year.
>>335410878
Yeah I figured. Now i'm curious: Is it worth dusting Rivendare/Maexxna/Zombie Twins for a more solid /standard legendary? I stopped playing sometime after GvG came out so my library is very small.
>>335411251
The big 3 of Standard are Wallet Warrior v. 7, Freeze Mage, and Aggro Shaman. Everything else once the Meta cements will be T2.
>Cabbage Captcha
What the fuck?
>>335411093
Make N'zoth if you want to play wild. That dude will be nutso with Belchers and sylvanas, tirion, cairne, etc.
Honestly, just sit on your dust for a month, wait to see what the meta shakes out to be and build whatever deck you want to play.
>>335411093
>Confessor Paletress piques my interest for example
>NONE MAY CHALLENGE THE LIVING MEME
Paletress is a good card only when you are ahead and will do very little in helping you recover from a dysfunctional game, so no unless you exclusively play memedecks.
>he isn't crafting LIGHTLORD
>>335411384
Yes, unless you intend to play wild - which will basically be wallet measuring contest, you can safely dust shit.
>>335411403
>Freeze Mage
why do people keep saying this? freeze mage is far weaker because mad scientist is gone and from what I had seen there are very little new cards that contribute to their playstyle.
>>335411384
twins are used in reno lock, rivendare is necessary if you want to play dreadsteed. Maex is free dust. Card will never be important/meta defining. But, if you're only going to ever give a shit about standard, dust away.
>>335411583
That's cause they don't need anything else.
>>335411506
I'm considering it.
>>335404218
Official lore.
>>335411506
>Lightlord can attack
Huh, never noticed that until now.
>>335411873
Jesus. Imagine how shit it would be if it couldn't. A genuine Magma Rager-tier Legendary.
>>335411708
They are going to waste an entire/half a turn worth of mana to play an iceblock if they are lucky enough to get one out of 30 cards in their deck.
>>335411980
I believe the word you are looking for is "boogeymonster-tier legendary".
>>335411612
Odds are I'll be playing standard/arena since as >>335411525 mentioned, Wild will be a dick-measuring competition and I'm still a scrub-lord with the cards I have right now. Looking at Reno-Lock and Dreadsteed as well, I probably won't be able to get those anyway.
I was thinking of dusting those 4 for something like Ragnaros or some other more versatile legendary. I was also debating dusting the weird ooze thing to get some bread & butter cards.
>>335412059
>Boogeymonster-tier
You mean Am'gam Rager tier.
>>335409773
Lightning storm (4 mana) deal 2 to all enemies, Overload (3) deal 2 to all enemies. Consecrate early that turns into flamestrike late.
Ancestral Knowledge (2): Draw a card, Overload (1) Draw a Card, arcane intellect equivalent.
Totem Golem: 2 mana 2/3, overload(1) gain +1/+1
Stormforged Axe (2): 2/3 Overload (1) Gain +1 attack on your weapon
Dust devil(1): 3/1 Overload (1): gains windfury, and +1 Health, whirling mech essentially
Fireguard Destroyer (4): 3/6 gain +1-2 attack, overload (1) gain +1-2 attack, 5 mana 5/6 or 7/6
Replace Forked lightning entirely with:
Chain Lightning (3): deal 2 damage to a minion, and 1 damage to the minions next to it, Overload (1) Deal 1 damage to a minion and 1 damage to the minions next to it (cone of cold without freeze, just more damage)
>>335404036
gonna need the sauce on this one senpai
>>335412059
boogey monster could at least see play in arena
magma rager doesn't even deserve to be a card
>>335410779
Unless it's milhouse or cho.
>>335412140
hey, at least it's not a lego so you won't feel as bad getting it because you are going to dust it anyways.
>new cards out
>Psych-o-tron's flavour text isn't a Megadeth reference despite holding a guitar in the art and being named after one of their songs
Blizzard's reference game is slipping, never thought I'd see the day
>>335412338
At least if it were a Legendary, I'd get 400 instead of 5.
oy blizz m8 u cheeky cunt
>the whole standard/wild split
JUST BALANCE YOUR FUCKING GAME YOU FUCK WITS.
I AM POWER INCARNATE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLw5MX7bZqI
>>335411836
You would have to get some sorry legendaries to pick boogey. 8 mana for a boulderfist ogre, straight loses to stuff like Divine force tank, kraken, etc. The fact it hast to attack minions in order to buff kills the card. Remove that shit, slap a taunt effect on it, then it becomes op.
>>335412246
>>335407056
>>335404252
>[Gorgeous Takarada] Cannon Sensei Tobashisugi
sourcing because I love back and partially hidden sex in public and I would hate to miss out on this one.
>>335412461
Fucking Blizzard bringing the bants.
>>335412472
Standard/Wild isn't about balance, it's the MtG strategy of rotating out old cards to get neckbeards to buy the new ones.
>50 pack preorder + 13 free packs
>63 packs
That's almost 2 forsure legendaries, right?
>>335412472
Better nerf arcane golem than Dr Boom and mysterious challenger
>Zul'Drak cardback
Troll expansion when?
>>335412663
way more than 2.
Blizzard confirmed, memes.
It was about time.
>>335412663
Enjoy Boogeymonster and Nat.
