Were adventure games merely the walking simulators of their time?
only young dipshits would even suggest that, OP
>>334664969
Close, but I think you're not giving adventure games enough credit.
For starters, most adventure game were 3rd person. So you have a fully animated, interactive character. More than you can say for a walking simulator (first person, no character).
Second the variety of different places you could go to. Most walking simulators are limited to one or two isolated places right?
adventure game have puzzles and require brainwork to complete, so no.
Adventure games has puzzles and interactions so no
>>334665909
walking simulators have those too
No. Walking simulators can only be developed by SJWs or Sony.
>>334667428
>walking simulators
>puzzles
Suuuuuuure.
imagine a modern version of Police Quest
>>334667934
I'd rather not.
>>334667934
>You can only progress if you go directly against proper police procedure and the only viable playthrough is corrupt
>every puzzle involves harassing minorities
>instead of busting the Death Angel and breaking up the drug ring you just shoot Travyon and dance on his corpse with your fellow white cishitlord officers
>>334668223
Most obvious reverse troll ever.
>games will never ship with 20 page blank journals for you to write down notes and doodles in to help you solve the game.
>>334668962
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1INKH_iBak8
TWO
MONTHS
