If you pretend StarFox wasn't a Nintendo game and made by an indie developer, would you still actually buy it?
>>333695864
>indie games
>competent 3D
lel
fuck off grafixs shitposter
>>333695864
>made by an indie developer, would you still actually buy it?
>voxels but labelled 8 bit
>early access corneria only
>tons of memes
>spiritual successor shilling
No thanks.
>>333695864
>would you think it was an indie game?
Nigga have you seen indie games? This shit is in three dimensions, that automatically puts itsself above 90% of indie fare
Its 3D
The 3D elements have textures
So no, I wouldn't.
>>333695864
/v/ would shit on it for having anthro characters and being on rails
If this was indie it would look like the original starfox except with less color
Reminder that Star Wolf's Wolfen ship has a walker form, and it's Bladewolf.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieZ5PQrKisc
>>333695983
>That
>Competent 3d
No ,because no indie game would have the money or time to design a game like this with the controls it has.
all the damage control autists
>>333696676
>lel I was just pretending to be retarded
>>333696240
I'm sorry, this is a shitposting thread sponsored by NeoGAF^TM.
Please don't post ITT again.
No, but to be fair I wouldn't buy it if it was a Nintendo game either unless I played it already as a kid and already knew it would be fun. If I saw it now for the first time I wouldn't think I would enjoy the game, but I know I do already.
A better question is if most Nintendo games would still without the famous ip characters. Would people really buy a game like Pokken if it weren't for pokemon being in it?
>>333696382
>looks good
>60 fps both on tv and on gamepad, which are literally two different actions at once
this is some of the most competent programing in a while
>>333697542
>looks good
In what fucking world. It look worse than a game released for a console from a decade ago.
>>333697617
Found the underage.
>>333696382
looks better than any indie game i've ever played
>>333697269
Fuck no, its the thing nintendo cant seem to escape from.
Nintendo makes new IPs all the time but they generally sell like shit and people turn arpund and ask nintendo where are the New IPs as if they dont make any. Last new IP they had that was actually successful was Xenoblade and even that was piggybacking on previous Xeno games. Before that it was Pikmin and thats still a rather niche title.
>>333695864
I would consider it knowing that indie games usually have this standard for graphics
>>333695864
> Muh greyfax
>>333698932
>Splatoon
>Not successful
Maybe they thought nobody would buy a god damn Star Fox game for the graphics.
>>333695983
SFZ looks like shit though. It looks like a phone game.
>>333699593
Fair enpugh, I wasnt thinking of it
>>333695864
Indie developers can't make a game of that caliber.
>>333698932
Because nearly all of their new "IP"s since the GameCube have been one off casual games or low budget zany Japanese titles. There's a reason people were more excited about Splatoon than garbage like Brain Age or FlingSmash.
If it was an indie game it would probably have a more reasonable price tag.
>>333698932
Yeah this is what Nintendo needs to ask themselves "would this still sell if it didn't have Mario in it?"
>>333699915
Nintendo gave it a damn good showing at e3 so that had alot to do with it.
>>333695864
It's way above the scope of an indie product unless you would consider a bunch of 20 year veterans building a game to still be considered indie.
>>333696039
I suggest you look up what indie means in this context.
>if it's not AAA it's indie!
spot the 12 year olf fifadrone.
>>333695864
Yes, absolutely. I think many indie games look better too.
Considering the lack of content in the game, its pretty much an unfinished/rushed indie game.
>>333702313
Name one indie game that looks better.
>>333695864
If it's not made by Rare then no.
>>333697269
Four of my favourite Nintendo IPs didn't have any famous characters at all.
Some of them are famous now though.
>>333699915
>Nearly all
You don't know what you're talking about.
>>333698932
>Codename STEAM sequel never
>they sent out Chibi Robo to die
End me.
Real talk, is there any indie game on PC plays like StarFox and is actually good? I would buy it without second thought.
>>333706713
There's a game like Star Fox on steam but it's multiplayer only and rips off all of the characters.
I bought Fast Racing Neo, so yeah, as long as it looks good and fun to play.
![1212667481[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/pFMYLgx.jpg "1212667481[1].jpg")
>>333697987
????
>>333699763
Because it's rendering 2 separate screens at 60fps.
If Platinum was helping the indie studio make it of course I would.
>>333699915
>Because nearly all of their new "IP"s since the GameCube have been one off casual games or low budget zany Japanese titles.
Eh. A lot of new IPs they make or fund aren't those.
>>333696921
Found the redditor, trying to use markup on 4chan lollery
>>333707625
What the fuck is markup? Are you a redditor as well, because I have no idea what you are talking about.
>>333707624
Yet you post a picture of a low budget zany Japanese title.
I'm pretty sure that if dark souls wan't made by From, its poor game design wouldn't fly for sure.
>>333708091
Same as your favorite game faggot!!
>>333707249
You do realize that is mostly just a satellite image texture with some modeled buildings.
Not saying AC looks bad, it looks great at distance (which you are 95% of the time)
>>333703624
Talos Principle
>>333706942
link
>>333708391
Don't know the name. Look it up yourself.
>>333695864
I never understand why Star fox is so regarded. The first one for SNES aged very badly, and even back then it wasn't so good compared to other arcade shooter, for example Galaxy force 2 was 5 years older than star fox and it was better. Star fox 64 was really good, but, again, the sequels weren't so good. If you want to try a reaal good arcade shooter for Nintendo consoles, you should try Sin and Punishment. But if you grew up with SEGA games, star fox is only an average shooter.
>>333708023
>low budget
You have no idea what you're talking about.
>>333708668
Nintendo titles in general are low budget compared to just about anything in the industry, even indie titles at this point
>>333696504
This game is looking so much better just over-all, but man, those fonts and meters look pretty dumb and just way too thick. I think Shiggy needs some glasses.
>>333708807
>even indie titles at this point
You have no idea what you're talking about.
>>333709043
Do you expect shitposting to make sense?
>>333709374
I expect shitposters to keep up with the banter but most of the time they break down and cave in on themselves.
>>333709043
"Indie" titles have millions of dollars behind them at the very least these days due to Sony throwing exclusivity deals at everyone in their mom that can write a compelling story and attach it to a gameplay concept. Meanwhile Nintendo is developing HD titles with Gamecube era budgets
>>333709547
Amd those budgets are still million dollar budgets + marketing budgets. Indie devs don't get nearly the same amount of money just to make their games timed exclusives, you're crazy if you think that they do.
>>333695864
Pic related is releasing in the very same month as Star Fox Zero, and both were first announced E3 2014
Nintendo has NO EXCUSE for being so shitty
>>333698932
You forget about Splatoon, bud? That game was extremely successful. With that said, I agree they obviously hold onto their old IPs wayy too much. Not to say they should all die out, it's just that they need to introduce new ones and stop chugging out shitty NSMB games all the time.
Also, I am actually glad they had Pokken star Pokemon. Pokemon is an established series with characters with very cool designs (not including chandelure or pika libre) and I think it obviously helped the game sell. I'm not a very big fan, actually I'd go as far to say as I don't enjoy the traditional pokemon games, but I think this is a very good game to have Pokemon in, whether or not they are entirely necessary.
>>333709925
Their excuse is that they had to redo the title and probably got lazy, and because they insisted on having the gamepad and TV being used, both at 60fps. Also, it had to be released on theWii U.
They aren't very good excuses but that's why
>>333710009
>That game was extremely successful
Relative to a console with shit sales perhaps
If you ask a random person on the street if they know what splatoon is they'll have no idea
>MUH GRAFIX
Fuck you, you're the reason game remasters are now commonplace.
>>333710240
4 million sold in a year is successful no matter what platform it's sold on.
>>333710240
Very true, but as a new IP on such a shitty selling console, that's some impressive numbers. It's hope that Ninty will learn that sticking to their old IPs may not be the best move
>>333709925
weaker hardware
lower budget
>>333710240
The game sold more than Bloodborne already on a console that has 30+ million sales, that's not an argument.
