Would you watch a Red Letter Media style review show about video games if I made itand it was good/funny
>>333535754
Review the cutscenes of mgs4
Would love to see a plinkett review on WoW post Vanilla
>>333535754
reddit letter media is a bunch of hack frauds, but I would watch a version covering MGS4s cutscenes
>>333536432
I liked there stuff on starwars overall because I thought it was funny, but I'd say 75% of it is just pointless nitpicking.
>>333535754
Basically what you're asking is, "Would you watch something about video games that is good/funny"
Yes I would.
the 1886 vid put every sonygger on suicide watch.
>>333537443
>75% of it is just pointless nitpicking
Fair point, but how is any different from your average 4chan post? I mean, look at this post.
I would watch if Red Letter Media started doing shows about video games
Their Resident Evil movie review was great. Imagine if they did the same with Resident Evil 0-6
>>333535754
>and it was good/funny
It's just going to be some uncharismatic sperg mumbling out unfunny lines he wrote in front of a green screen in his basement, regaling us with uninsightful and irrelevant opinions.
I could be wrong though.
I don't know you but regardless the answer is no.
RLM knockoffs are honestly more embarrassing than AVGN or NC knockoffs.
>>333537443
The reviews themselves address that and say that at the end of the day they're bad movies because the characters are inhuman and you can't get invested, the plot inconsistencies are just icing.
>>333539904
What if I'm a thin tranny who's really good at vidya
>>333540562
Then stick to streaming, Cosmo
The keyword is good, OP.
Everyone is attracted to good content, provided that it's genuinely good.
But if you make something you're proud of and you gain the approval of others, 4chan will naturally declare it e-celeb shit, criticize you and make fun of you for false information that spreads to be widely believed and considered fact.I AM NOT A FUCKING KEKOLD
>>333539608
The average 4chan post is garbage, so again it makes them look even worse.
>>333535754
Won't work because you literally aren't Mike and Jay.
Red Letter Media works because it's unique. Jay and Mike know how stupid Half in the bag is and are totally aware of it. The plot is almost always just completely disregarded and they always segue in the stupidest way possible.
I don't think you could pull it off. Especially solo.
>>333540504
You don't get to have your cake and eat it too. When a large part of your criticism is pointless and arguably misleading, it lowers the quality of said criticism.
>>333541478
The analysis of the prequel trilogies are almost as long as the prequels themselves. It's basically breaking down the movie shot by shot. It's super in depth, so yeah, a lot of it may come down as criticism, but at the same time, I feel like a lot of it is valid, and only a few things are nitpicks.
Nah, talking about vidya isn't as funny or entertaining as talking about movies.
Watching people talk about movies is a lot more interesting because it can be a lot more polarizing. Video game discussion is mostly mechanics and gameplay jargon that gets old really fast (see: MatthewMatosis, SBH, GamingBrit, HBH etc, opinions are very homogenous)
>>333542729
Fuck Movies.
>>333535754
RLM has a vidya review show, but it's dogshit
Do you mean Plinkett (cause SBH already tried it and it sucked shit) style or Half in the Bag style aka two unfunny turds being unfunny for 40 minutes?
