Mists of Pandaria is the best WoW expansion. Discuss.
i think so too. at least they didn't recycle warcrab three characters and innovated for once
I think you have to play TBC and Wrath first to make such claim.
/v/ told me it was warlodes of daynor
>>333483332
i couldnt afford to sacrifice 40 hours per week for a computer game so its a no from me, i played both, but Burning Crusade demanded unreal ammounts of dedication, which normal people dont have
>>333482729
I wish I could have played it, I stopped after lich king
>>333483332
I did and I still enjoyed MoP a lot more. I don't really care either way about the pandas anymore which I think is the main reason most people disliked it.
I have the best memories from Vanilla which is likely nostalgia but i'd say MoP is definitely the best xpac.
>>333482729
It's the second best, worse than tbc, slightly better than wotlk.
expansions only:
Tbc>MoP=Wotlk>>>>>>>>>Cata>>WoD>Legion(projected)
It was pretty great apart from 14 months of Siege of Orgrimmar. Even 5.1 was fun despite not introducing a new raid tier, the story was good.
>>333482729
every expansion was shit proof me wrong nu males.
cata>wotlk>mop>wod>vanilla>tbc
prove me wrong
>>333483532
>>333483581
i can roll with this
>>333483510
pandas anymore which I think is the main reason most people disliked it.
yes, iam also guilty of this, but as soon as i got to endgame i dropped it.
>>333483653
why is wod not the last one?
>>333483714
>why is wod not the last one?
because it's the best looking WoW expansion
>>333484352
thats it?
