[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Dark Souls 3 PC
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /v/ - Video Games

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 154
File: ds3_1920.jpg (343 KB, 548x678) Image search: [Google]
ds3_1920.jpg
343 KB, 548x678
I-I-I got bad news PC-bros...
>>
suck gameworks.
>>
fake
>>
Seems more or less what one would expect. Around PS4 hardware getting 30 fps with drops. Isn't too bad for a company that can't optimize their way out of a paper bag. And I'm guessing max quality is higher than what the PS4 is running at.
>>
>tfw sli 970
>>
what the fuck
surely my 980 will do better than that
>>
Is the bad news that I can run it at framerate cap?
That's great news, actually.
>>
File: 1456453396428.png (124 KB, 378x378) Image search: [Google]
1456453396428.png
124 KB, 378x378
>bought a $200 GPU less than a year ago
>can't even max out the newest Dark Souls of all things
>>
>consoles are holding back gaming
>wahh why cant my mid range card from 2014 max out a new release
>>
>>333324205
>28 fps on 760

killing myself
>>
>>333324995
>Around PS4 hardware getting 30 fps
>i7 5960 + 32GB ram
around
>>
>>333325156
200$ GPU, that's your problem
>>
>>333324205
>390 isnt on the list

i aint even mad
>>
File: ds3_1920.jpg (169 KB, 548x678) Image search: [Google]
ds3_1920.jpg
169 KB, 548x678
>>333324205
>>
>>333324205
>falling for this falseflagging
>>
>>333325261

R9 280 OC'd shouldn't be having issues with a graphically shit game as DS3
>>
>>333325228
it's not going to be a cpu intensive game, that doesn't even matter
>>
>>333324205
Shitty Japanese ports
>>
>>333325228
GPU wise. Not sure how much the CPU or ram are affecting the framerate.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NH-VBoACE0
how can you explain this shit then
>>
>>333324205
>graphics aren't improving but the fps keeps decreasing

Greatest gaming generation.
>>
File: newcomp.png (39 KB, 741x468) Image search: [Google]
newcomp.png
39 KB, 741x468
>>333324205
So am I good or what?
>>
>>333325192
>my mid range card from 2014 can still break 30fps
not even mad and not even going to play this trash
>>
File: butwhy.jpg (47 KB, 695x516) Image search: [Google]
butwhy.jpg
47 KB, 695x516
>>333324205

>the only single card setups that will max out DaS3, a fucking console ported game, are flagship cards that cost more than an entire console
>flagship Nvidia cards don't even hit 60 FPS average

What the everlasting fuck am I reading

I don't have a spongebob rare enough for this
>>
frame rate is probally capped at 60. probally something to do with physics.
>>
>>333324995
>7970s hitting the target framerate for the Console version

Yeah, it'll be fine.
Slightly worse looking game at 60fps on older hardware > 30fps cap with dips being literally your only option on console
>>
>>333325337
Still shit
>>
>>333325228
>RAM
>Relevant
lol.
Have to say that i'll be rather salty if I can't even get 60fps maxed out though.
>>
File: 1459737200793.jpg (20 KB, 255x256) Image search: [Google]
1459737200793.jpg
20 KB, 255x256
>>333324205
Medium looks exactly the same as max so whatever, dropping the settings to get 60 is an absolute must because souls games play like ass at 30fps
>>
File: 1419003538412.jpg (20 KB, 392x243) Image search: [Google]
1419003538412.jpg
20 KB, 392x243
>>333325476

see >>333325447
>>
File: 1459819285983.png (2 MB, 1000x967) Image search: [Google]
1459819285983.png
2 MB, 1000x967
>>333325337
>30 fps with 750 ti
PC STILL WINS
>>
tfw 7870

Game doesnt even look good, da fuck is going on
>>
>>333325476
aren't consoles only able to get up to 20-29 fps as usual?
>>
>>333325752
more like 15-25.
>>
>>333325403
the ps4 gpu is around the 750ti in terms of power, everything else is worse than that setup.

but it runs at 30 fps, not 20

the image is fake as fuck bro
>>
>>333325712
The image is fake man.
>>
>>333324205
What is it with people posting tons of fake bullshit about DS3 performance lately?
>>
>>333324205
Irrelevant, day one patch is coming when the game is released next week.
>>
>>333325868
>>333325928
being this delusional
>>
>>333325640
Considering no 750ti owner has a top end processor like that, it's probably worse.
>>
File: 1459767729038.jpg (183 KB, 650x919) Image search: [Google]
1459767729038.jpg
183 KB, 650x919
>>333325640
>tfw 750ti
>>
>>333325956
It isn't fake, but it also doesn't have the day one patch that improves performance.
>>
>>333324205

>GEFORCE GTX 750 ti 2 GB - 17 FPS

poorfag piratekeks on suicide watch
>>
>>333326016
Well I got a i5 4440 3.1ghz, so I am the exception to your rule I guess.
>>
>>333325337
are any of those 60 fps cards in the 200-300 dollar range?
>>
>>333326012
>>333326054
But it actually is fake. OP posted the 1440p benchmark.
>>
File: witcher3 2016-04-05 10-48-02-12.jpg (944 KB, 1920x1200) Image search: [Google]
witcher3 2016-04-05 10-48-02-12.jpg
944 KB, 1920x1200
>>333325712
7870 bro
our card is great
>>
File: jncfj.png (612 KB, 494x564) Image search: [Google]
jncfj.png
612 KB, 494x564
>>333325463
Send help
>>
>>333324205
Where's the R9 390?
>>
>>333326137
You can probably get a 780Ti used for $200
>>
>>333326012
>>333326054
There's a video in the effin thread showing where a guy is running it with a fucking 950.
If the OP is correct a 950 performs just aswell as my 970 strix.
>>
File: dark souls gtx 750 ti.png (37 KB, 1028x564) Image search: [Google]
dark souls gtx 750 ti.png
37 KB, 1028x564
This is the real one for GTX 750 ti users
>>
File: 55555.jpg (101 KB, 555x555) Image search: [Google]
55555.jpg
101 KB, 555x555
>Mfw 780 ti still going strong
>>
>>333326246
>used

does this matter?
>>
>>333326054
>>333326253
There's also this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzVttaQVWEg
>>
File: 23.png (28 KB, 236x236) Image search: [Google]
23.png
28 KB, 236x236
>mfw I still have a 6850
/v/ you guys told me that I wouldn't be fucked
At least I can still run SOTFS 60fps I guess
>>
>>333326162
>But it actually is fake. OP posted the 1440p benchmark.
No, it isn't fake. Many websites have performance reviews up.

But as I said, they are irrelevant seen as they don't have the day 1 patch.
>>
>>333325337
>780 still chugging along at 60fps
Glad I didn't fall for the AMD meme
>>
File: Y.jpg (47 KB, 720x480) Image search: [Google]
Y.jpg
47 KB, 720x480
>>333324205
>690 outperforming 980
Never trust the jap
>>
File: 1374043462897.png (78 KB, 1021x746) Image search: [Google]
1374043462897.png
78 KB, 1021x746
>>333326306
>Had 780 Ti since 2013
>Still going strong
>>
>>333325337
This is also on a beast of a PC regarless of GFX cards.

I have a 750ti and I'll probably get 30FPS with low settings.
>>
>>333326285
>that cpu

pointless benchmark
>>
>>333326310
I don't know, does it? You are the one buying it not me.
>>
>>333326421
http://gamegpu.com/rpg/%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B5/dark-souls-iii-test-gpu
>>
no really, how does a Radeon R9 390 stack up?
>>
where's the pic with the potato pc outperforming PS4? lol
>>
>>333325868
It doesn't run at 30 on PS4.
>>
>>333326409
Performance is ok until you get out of Lothric. Performance tanks in the swamp area.
>>
>>333326416
>6850
I envy you.
5670
>>
>>333325337
OP status: bootyblasted

Half the frames, twice the asshurt.
>>
>>333326421
Guess the guy in the video I linked has a special 970 that outperforms all other cards then :^)
>>
>>333326770
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkKCn2B5gEM
>>
>>333326016
>thinking a souls game of all things would benefit from either an octo-core or hyper-threading
you will see the same performance from an i5
>>
>>333324205
Do they mention what area this test is done at?

There are insanely dramatic differences
One specific area goes anywhere from 20-40fps on a 980ti, but the vast majority run at 60fps on a 960
>>
>>333326607
Can't read moonrunes
>>
>>333326613
390 performs pretty well (slighty above the 290) but with dayone patch it starts to crash too many times
>>
File: Feels_917bdb_1603409.jpg (41 KB, 475x360) Image search: [Google]
Feels_917bdb_1603409.jpg
41 KB, 475x360
>>333325337
>tfw bought my PC with a GTX 690 3 years ago, still maxing most things on the market.
>>
>>333326893
The graphics are there and they are in english though.
Nice try, OP.
>>
>>333325261
Nope, fuck you that's solid high mid range
>>
>>333326824
Still a 50 fps average. Unlike OPs pic.
If it's only this area I could live with it until drivers are out.
>>
>expecting good performance out of a fromsoftware game

it's amazing they manage to make games that run at all
>>
File: image.png (1 MB, 848x826) Image search: [Google]
image.png
1 MB, 848x826
>390

I think I'm good.

May upgrade to pascal later this year anyway
>>
>>333326137
I know I got my 970 on sale for $290 about a year ago
>>
File: 1448425427225.jpg (119 KB, 796x805) Image search: [Google]
1448425427225.jpg
119 KB, 796x805
>>333324205
>>333325337

THESE ARE NOT FAKE!!!!!
>>
I just found this video, rejoice 750ti bros

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIOnaDvWHDg

seems to be fine even for low tier card, like my 660 (it should be around the 750ti, maybe a little bit faster)
It's ok

>>333326661
It does
>>
Im getting it on console anyway

Fuck your 50 GB installs, From
>>
>>333325337
Why even play it at very high quality?

There's probably very little difference in this dumb fucking game between medium and very high. But I'm sure it's much more taxing on your hardware. I'm willing to bet most cards will be able to do 60fps at medium quality, while still looking much better than console versions(And running at 60fps!).
>>
File: 1459668230702.png (489 KB, 700x990) Image search: [Google]
1459668230702.png
489 KB, 700x990
>>333327023
Don't try to reason with these guys, they also say that the 390 and 970 are mid range and anything below them is garbage
>>
How the fuck is it this unoptimized? There goes playing it on 1440p
Why the fuck are Japanese devs so completely incompetent?
>>
>>333326253
Where is the video senpai

I don't believe you
>>
>>333327292
Did you even read the thread, or did you just see the op and immediately started shitposting
>>
File: 1442329882922.jpg (24 KB, 494x494) Image search: [Google]
1442329882922.jpg
24 KB, 494x494
>mfw gtx 960
>>
>>333327329

this >>333325447
>>
>>333326875
Those are the 1440p benchmarks. The real 1080p ones are >>333325337
>>
>>333326981
>tfw still maxing games on the market with HD 5870 from 2010
>>
>>333327551
>He fell for the Nvidia Meme
>>
>>333327419
Japanese devs being incompetent is still a valid claim though. They might be able to make fun games but they can't do their job properly. Even if these are the 1440p benchmarks they are still completely unnaceptable.
>>
>>333325338
>>333325337

So a sonycuck was so mad he had to lie? Kind of shows how desperate those cucks are getting
>>
>>333327638
They got me good
>>
>>333327551
You must've done absolutely no research you fucking retarded consumer

The 960 is a horrible deal and a shit card
>>
>>333327719
Just get a 70 or 80 card next time anon.
>>
>>333327689
There is a video just posted right fucking here of a 950 playing the game >50fps majority of the time maxed out.
>>
>>333327689
How many games can do 1440p on VHQ?
Even Witcher 3 couldn't do that shit.
>>
>>333327689
1440P is still a meme.

japanese devs develop for 1080P. is it that hard to understand that? consoles are locked at 1080P, and they won't be entering true 1440P for at least 2 console cycles if ever.
>>
File: 1448160349511.png (298 KB, 2271x2380) Image search: [Google]
1448160349511.png
298 KB, 2271x2380
>>333325337
>mfw 770

starting to slip, its all dowhill from here
>>
>>333327863
Are you an actual retard? If they optimized their game properly like any paid "professional" should, 1440p would run fine. Just look at GTAV. It looks great and it also runs great at higher resolutions because they actually fucking optimized it.
>>
>>333324205
>tfw gtx670

fuck bros I don't want to buy a new gpu but this thing isn't cutting it anymore
when's the next series of cards coming out?
>>
>>333327782
Tell me, what should I have bought approximately 10 months ago for about 190 freedom dollars
>>
File: 1402200990071.jpg (12 KB, 184x184) Image search: [Google]
1402200990071.jpg
12 KB, 184x184
>tfw gtx 745
>>
>>333328047
Off the top of my head maybe a used 290 from something like gpu shack? Or saved and got something that isn't a literal steaming turd for a little more.
>>
File: Dark Souls 5 Ready.png (11 KB, 360x207) Image search: [Google]
Dark Souls 5 Ready.png
11 KB, 360x207
>>333324205
I run on an Intel HD 1.5 GB Graphics Card on a 64-bit i3.

I'm totally fine.
>>
>>333327689
1440p is about 50% more pixels than 1080p. 7970 fps drops about 50%. That's reasonable.
>>
>>333328018
>when's the next series of cards coming out?
June
>>
>>333328136
I just wanna play some fucking games man. Every time you say your card on /v/, it's

>Meme card
>Should have waited for X
>Should have got Y

Apparently a 950 can run the game at nearly 60 fps maxed out. I'm okay lowering a few settings for 60.
>>
>>333328306
What game can a 950 run maxed? Oblivion?
>>
i5 2500k
270x 2GB
8GB RAM

h-how fucked am i /v/?
>>
>>333327968
I might wait another year or so.
>>
Framerate locked...... Why do they even try anymore?
>>
File: 1450163664194.jpg (22 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]
1450163664194.jpg
22 KB, 480x480
>tfw 750M


Truth be told, i think ill be able to run it decently enough. Even if at minimum settings, as long as it's playable, i'm fine. At least that's what i tell myself.
>>
>Tfw 780 ti
>with FX-6300
I goofed
>>
>>333328136

why are you genuinely enraged by someone elses choice of gpu, are you THAT autistic?
>>
>>333328360
Right here family.

>>333325447

Would you not agree this is good performance for a 950? 1080p, max settings, and doesn't go below 30. and hovers around the 45-55 mark.

I think you just want to be angry and argue.
>>
>>333327995
they did optimize thier game

for 1080P. for them that's the highest resolution that they expect majority of players to play their games at. your also playing at a resolution that requires 50% more pixals at once than what the designed their game around. I doubt they ever even intended it to be played at 1440P. that's why it isn't as well optimized. to them it's like trying to optimize for 8K gamming,

you must be the retard, because you don't seem to understand that.
>>
File: 1425881796525.jpg (25 KB, 480x358) Image search: [Google]
1425881796525.jpg
25 KB, 480x358
>>333324205
>mfw I have a 980 Ti

time to upgrade your piece of shit computer, kiddo
>>
>>333328210
I guess I can wait that long
>>
File: speccy.jpg (49 KB, 475x375) Image search: [Google]
speccy.jpg
49 KB, 475x375
who /notworried/ here
>>
>>333328360
You are a fucking drone, if you want to max every game you play just buy 2 980ti and be done with it, but not everyone can afford or simply wants to buy a card to play a single fucking game at 60fps all maxed out.

Playing the game at 60fps or even 50 on low-ish settings is enough sometimes, buying a card at the price of 400$ to play one game you are interested in (all maxed) is stupid
>>
>>333324205
>dat optimization
Wow they literally just got it to run at 30fps then called it a day?

Bahahhahaha

>Japanese Developers
They couldnt even get their precious Final Fantasy not to run and look like shit compared to western devs
>>
How can a game that looks that shit require such powerful hardware?

I swear that muddy shit texture I see in all the screenshots is like something out of Morrowind--a game which looks like the brown moldy inside of a gas station toilet bowl
>>
>>333328373
youre gud m8, probably just cant play on max if u want 60 fps
>>
>>333327157
upping this since I think many people on here have this card and might be interested in the performance they may get
>>
File: 1437360408174.jpg (88 KB, 558x600) Image search: [Google]
1437360408174.jpg
88 KB, 558x600
>>333325337
>mfw my r9 280x still holds right in the middle
>>
>>333325337
>mfw 770 4gb oc
Lewl look at the little guy gooooo
>>
>>333324205
Source?
>>
File: speccy-g3258.jpg (48 KB, 460x419) Image search: [Google]
speccy-g3258.jpg
48 KB, 460x419
>>333328826
feels good
>>
>tfw no 60fps on my 660 ti

curse this gay earth
>>
File: worried.png (20 KB, 659x444) Image search: [Google]
worried.png
20 KB, 659x444
>>333328826
Who /worried/ here?
>>
>>333328672
>commercial gpus
you cant talk shit when you are just a sheepminded pleb
>>
>tfw 660 gtx and an i5

Should I bother upgrading? Is their even much of a difference between medium and high?
>>
>>333328884
He could've gotten a refurb 290 that would still work well for the same or less you stupid nigger


I understand budget constraints I wasn't suggesting to go out and buy a 980ti you stupid cunt
>>
File: 1405197964669.jpg (42 KB, 285x285) Image search: [Google]
1405197964669.jpg
42 KB, 285x285
>>333327283
Are you retarded?

Those are mid range. Barely. A 980 Ti would be the entry point for "high end", maybe. High end involves multiple 980 Ti GPUs in SLI or Titans.
>>
>>333329141
>/worried/
had you any hope to begin with
>>
Just wait till Nvidia releases their next cards and fucks over the current new cards in future driver updates
>>
>>333324205
Nice bullshit image bro.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NH-VBoACE0
~40 maxed on a 950
>>
File: Specs.png (17 KB, 474x375) Image search: [Google]
Specs.png
17 KB, 474x375
>>333329141
Me
>>
>>333324205
>ever trusting paid benchmarks
my HD6870 is supposed to have 10 fps in everything, yet I play everything in a nice 50-60 fps
this'll be no different
>>
>>333329215
>Have to spend $300 just to get a mid range gpu

lmao pc gaming
>>
>>333329253
So were in the clear for the next year at the least.
>>
File: 1438982991127.jpg (27 KB, 447x444) Image search: [Google]
1438982991127.jpg
27 KB, 447x444
>>333329154
>commercial gpus
>>
File: 1458847475308.jpg (60 KB, 474x503) Image search: [Google]
1458847475308.jpg
60 KB, 474x503
>tfw 980 ti
>>
>tfw 560ti

I'll be able to run it at minimum settings r-right?
>>
File: 1351476642111.jpg (475 KB, 1500x1200) Image search: [Google]
1351476642111.jpg
475 KB, 1500x1200
>>333324205
>>333325337
What graphics settings are these being tested with?

I need to know if my 660ti can handle DaS3.
>>
File: 1459877050140.png (886 KB, 1067x1027) Image search: [Google]
1459877050140.png
886 KB, 1067x1027
>>333329215
Here's your (you), fucking tryhard ebinbaiter
>>
>>333329352
Blame the devs who can't optimize for shit and just rush games out the door.

Or blame consoles for being pieces of shit that can't run anything above 30 FPS.

Sorry boy, if you want high performance you have to pay for it.
>>
>>333329412
what are you getting at
>>
>>333329483
VHQ aka Max
>>
File: 1405380722556.png (130 KB, 413x400) Image search: [Google]
1405380722556.png
130 KB, 413x400
>>333329495
>facts are bait because they upset me

wew lad
>>
>>333329450
>mfw
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (92 KB, 726x524) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.jpg
92 KB, 726x524
>>333329450
I bought mine beginning of February, so far so good.
>>
File: 1349048806892.jpg (18 KB, 250x250) Image search: [Google]
1349048806892.jpg
18 KB, 250x250
>>333329286
>mfw everyone is ignoring this and continues getting baited by shitposters like OP
>>
File: 1402184009494.gif (2 MB, 245x175) Image search: [Google]
1402184009494.gif
2 MB, 245x175
>all these <18 year olds posting in this thread right now who can't ride daddy's dick enough to earn a decent computer and/or are too fat, ugly, and stupid to get a job

Your suffering is delicious.
>>
File: 4790k.jpg (1020 KB, 2988x5312) Image search: [Google]
4790k.jpg
1020 KB, 2988x5312
>>333329882
Same but 980 Ti SLI. Bought CPU/motherboard about a year ago, though.
>>
>>333327551
that card is good for the price
i had that card and maxed all games at 1080p 60fps (except tomb rider game) (yes also the shitty arkham knight port too, game which 970 and 980 fags were all having a problem with)
now i have 960 sli and max all games at 4k and it's still cheaper than a single 970 in this country

anons who care are either underage or unemployed young adults
>>
>>333328884
>buying a card at the price of 400$ to play one game you are interested in (all maxed) is stupid

This sounds like a personal problem

Personally I've done it twice and it worked out for me because I never buy a card for one game and I always hang on to those cards for at least 3 years unless they fuck up.
>>
File: 2016-02-23 10.22.26.jpg (393 KB, 1885x1060) Image search: [Google]
2016-02-23 10.22.26.jpg
393 KB, 1885x1060
Neat
>>
>>333330343
>Mircocenter

I'd kill half my family and sacrifice a goat to live near one. I have to get my stuff from Amazon at buttrape prices.
>>
>>333330412
>that card is good for the price
Meh, not really.
It gets beaten in pretty much every game by equivalently-priced AMD GPUs.
Plus, 128-bit in 2015 is just fucking cancer.
>>
File: probably need a 970 ti.jpg (77 KB, 848x510) Image search: [Google]
probably need a 970 ti.jpg
77 KB, 848x510
should I bother upgrading?
>>
File: 1457170341860.jpg (119 KB, 800x600) Image search: [Google]
1457170341860.jpg
119 KB, 800x600
>>333330876
name one "equivalently-priced" AMD GPU, and i'll let you know the price of it in my country if its available at all.
keep in mind:
9604gb: 510 dollars
970: 1364 dollars
titan: 3615 dollars
>>
>>333329141
>videocard has more ram than your actual system
Cute vintage P4 anon
>>
>>333324205
AMD shills on life support
>>
>>333330672
>1000w
for what purpose
>>
>>333331074
Sorry m8, I didn't realize you lived in a third world shithole.
Carry on.
>>
>>333331074
380 should be the closest in price
>>
>>333330720
I drive almost an hour to get to the closest Microcenter. It's always worth it.
>>
>>333330672
>>333331149
Bought the RM1000I, it's p. good. But I also have a H100i so I have to use Corsair Link anyway.

Way overkill, though. Even my 850W bronze was enough for a 980 Ti SLI.
>>
File: 1459415747066.png (204 KB, 900x900) Image search: [Google]
1459415747066.png
204 KB, 900x900
>>333331149
lol i had a 1kw psu once it was a silverstone and blew up after 4 years

what a turd
>>333331016
660 getting a bit slow the rest of the build is fine.

get a 120-240gb ssd and whack windows 10 on it
>>
>>333331319
Also it was only $110 so whatever.
>>
>>333325463
>GT 740
>4GB VRAM

nigga what the fuck? why?
>>
File: fug.jpg (47 KB, 600x797) Image search: [Google]
fug.jpg
47 KB, 600x797
>>333331074
>970: 1364 dollars
>>
>>333330412
i'm sure someone will fall for this b8, well done
>>
>>333327968

Except those are maxed settings

Just lower a few settings or one to high and you'd get 60 easily
>>
>>333324205
>my fucking GPU is at the botton of the barrel
jesus fuck i thought mine could still hold up.
What is this. game doesn´t even look that good.
>>
File: 1459717277016.jpg (41 KB, 248x250) Image search: [Google]
1459717277016.jpg
41 KB, 248x250
>tfw HD7790
Fucking chinks can't even optimize their shit.
>>
>>333325001
>still running sli in 2016 for gaming purposes
It's like you wan't to get your money wasted.
Except if you got both for a pretty cheap price it's KINDA pointless in comparison to a 980 or 980 Ti i think
>>
File: 1458466563448.png (147 KB, 317x350) Image search: [Google]
1458466563448.png
147 KB, 317x350
>>333331016
do you want to?

>>333331202
its hard anon, importing things myself is illegal too
and being a minority(white) makes it harder
right now im saving to go up to the americas and get fucked in the ass by my boyfriend everyday

>>333331258
its available for 462 dollars, if its a better card, then i guess i got told.

>>333331479
>niggertina
at least you wont hate this country anymore because we'll pay all the debt this month

>>333331569
>everyone in 4chan lives in my country
>>
File: 1402328130949.jpg (24 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]
1402328130949.jpg
24 KB, 640x480
>>333331387
>get a 120-240gb ssd and whack windows 10 on it
>win10
>willing installing a botnet
>>
File: 1450732042617.jpg (59 KB, 736x960) Image search: [Google]
1450732042617.jpg
59 KB, 736x960
>>333331569
>>333331713
whoops sorry sir i wanted to quote >>333331593
>>
>gtx 760
>want to play at 1440p 60fps
will i manage bros?
>>
>>333325640
tfw I have a 750TI
>>
What about my gtx 580 :c
>>
File: 1452713264439.png (564 KB, 500x738) Image search: [Google]
1452713264439.png
564 KB, 500x738
>>333325337
>TFW GTX 970
And you guys made fun of me with your 3.5 meme
>>
>>333331851

You'll likely have to settle for mixing low/medium and high settings
>>
File: 123.png (1 MB, 791x2059) Image search: [Google]
123.png
1 MB, 791x2059
>>333331851
you can do that with any card you want
as long as it supports SLI and you have enough of them
>>
>>333326285
Fucking this >>333326508
I bet the game is even CPU bound with such a low end processor in usage even tho it's a lower mid-range GPU
>>
>>333327968
same here bro

you really don't need to max out all the settings though, most of it looks literally the same if you've checked out any comparison vids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6xTnRRTunc
>>
File: 1443249364941.gif (933 KB, 500x379) Image search: [Google]
1443249364941.gif
933 KB, 500x379
>>333331593
>>333331846
whoops sorry sir i wanted to quote >>333331480
>>
File: memecard.png (30 KB, 363x484) Image search: [Google]
memecard.png
30 KB, 363x484
>>333331918
Feels good mane.
>>
>>333331851
absolutely not, just be happy if you'll be able to run it at 1080x60
>>
DSFix or is that guy no longer doing them?
>>
File: 1458519994452.jpg (20 KB, 480x451) Image search: [Google]
1458519994452.jpg
20 KB, 480x451
Whole lotta shitposting itt. Check this out:

https://youtu.be/0cjE0COuQPs

A 950 and an i5 that only clocks in at 2.9GHz having 40fps as the lowest with 3 settings on high and the rest on max. Drop some stuff down to high/medium and you'll easily hit 60fps and the difference will be negligible.
>>
>>333331290
same, there is a frys alot closer but its full of beans and nogs
>>
>>333332320

does the ps4 run maxed?
>>
>>333330036
at least I have all the time in the world to enjoy my games in under 60fps instead of slaving away making money for the kike overlords every day :^)
>>
>>333331713
Is their much difference between medium and high?
>>
File: Capture.png (69 KB, 286x176) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
69 KB, 286x176
>>333329882
what the fuck, you have all the same parts as me.
>>
>>333325192
>consoles are holding back gaming
Such a horrid true, Xbone and Gaystation 4 dont see more than 24fps...
>>
>>333332050
>not overclocked
>PCI-E 1.1
kek
>>
>>333332320

Sounds good. Might still get a 950 since low end Pascal is a ways off.
>>
>>333332441
it's literally low on just about everything
there's a serious lack of proper water effects
>>
File: rKYSLrP.png (80 KB, 390x307) Image search: [Google]
rKYSLrP.png
80 KB, 390x307
>>333332441
nobody will know until someone does an uncompressed graphics comparison to even confirm it runs at maxed
graphics options are not in console menus
>>
>>333332585

AHAHAHAHAHA

HAAAAAAAAAAA

Polaris is here in two months retard keep cucking yourself though do it
>>
>>333332582
It is OC'd though.
I'm to much of a scrublord to do it without GPUTweak though.
>>
File: shaq.gif (853 KB, 355x325) Image search: [Google]
shaq.gif
853 KB, 355x325
>>333324205
>tfw 980 sli
>>
>>333325640
Xboners and gaystationers be like "human cannot see more than 19-24fps"
>>
>>333332013
Well, that's good to know. Some of those settings I can't even tell what looks different
>>
>>333332320
You're forgetting this is all From Software coding, stop judging it by regular standards.
>>
>>333332441
Probably closer to medium or low.

>>333332679
You're retarded. But please, continue to delude yourself into thinking everyone can/wants to have a 1070/1080. People aren't solely interested in the very high end of the spectrum, mid range cards are popular for a reason.
>>
>>333332679

x50 Pascals are definitely not coming out this year.
>>
>>333326661
>did you try turning it off and on again?
>>
>>333333030
I dont know about you but DS2 was extremely well optimized, not everything they make is blighttown tier.
>>
>>333325868
So... this is the power of the Next Gen
>>
File: Cool-Shades.jpg (56 KB, 438x330) Image search: [Google]
Cool-Shades.jpg
56 KB, 438x330
>>333327968

We're almost there bro.

geforce 1000 series was already leaked, will be announced next month and released probably in fall. We'll make it.
>>
File: Clippy.jpg (96 KB, 812x598) Image search: [Google]
Clippy.jpg
96 KB, 812x598
win
>>
>>333333247
It was also extremely poor visually and made by an almost completely different team. There are already reports of some area dropping to 45 on 980ti.
>>
>>333332816
>>333332582
What does the @x16 pci-e 1.1 mean that my card is in a 1.1 socket?
If that is the case i've seriously cucked myself.
>>
>>333333784
PCIe 3.0 = 32GB/s, PCIe 2.0 = 16GB/s, PCIe 1.1 = 8GB/s
>>
>>333327172
It's the same size on consoles
>>
File: justkillme.png (33 KB, 656x471) Image search: [Google]
justkillme.png
33 KB, 656x471
>>333329141
who /doubleshiftsfortherestofthemonth/ here
>>
>>333333853
Appearently overclocking your CPU and GPU can cause the program to display it as PCI-E 1.1 for some reason. Pretty sure I don't have any 1.1 ports on my mobo.
>>
>>333334027
It's the slot running at 1.1 speeds, not a 1.1 slot.
>>
File: canirunit.png (13 KB, 448x341) Image search: [Google]
canirunit.png
13 KB, 448x341
am i going to be ok
>>
>tfw gtx 480 and don't even know what the performance will even be
>>
>>333326137
get an AMD R9 290 or 390

they're the same price range as a 970
>>
>>333329087
very nice set up. no troll. OCing that processor, obviously saving for the GPU on your build. i would've came if you had 1080p/10 senpai.
>>
>>333334086
Okay, either way it might be the program doing a faulty read.
Gon check it out right now.
>>
>>333333784

x4 won't bottleneck a 7990 so you're fine.
>>
File: clippy.png (124 KB, 362x335) Image search: [Google]
clippy.png
124 KB, 362x335
>>333334001
can you even run HL2?
>>
>>333324205
Ha ha ha. You losers can't stop sucking from's dick and then they shit on you when they're done.
>>
>>333334159
>the ol' amd meme

don't listen to this devilish charlatan
>>
>>333329882
why does your 980 ti only have 2 gigs of vram?
>>
>>333334259
yes but my pc collapses in a puddle of vomit if i try to alt-tab out of source games
>>
>>333324205
>tfw have R9 390
>Benchmarks don't give a crap about it so they don't include it
Should I be afraid?
>>
>>333334310
speccy
>>
File: 1270926577146.jpg (8 KB, 251x249) Image search: [Google]
1270926577146.jpg
8 KB, 251x249
will GTX 650 ti BOOST run it?

Bought it years ago and havn't found anything it won't do yet. I'm not a graphics whore.
>>
>>333332897

>"Blinking is what happens when it stutters - that's what it's for"
>>
File: Dark Souls 3 Graphics Cost.png (26 KB, 632x378) Image search: [Google]
Dark Souls 3 Graphics Cost.png
26 KB, 632x378
>Motion blur
>5/5
>>
>>333324205

>1920x1080

Got any benchmarks for proper resolutions and not 2006 shit?
>>
File: Untitled.jpg (104 KB, 401x589) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.jpg
104 KB, 401x589
>>333334310
Speccy can only read 2gigs of it.
The card has the standard 6gigs.
>>
>>333334086
Okay, I tried the GPU-Z render test.
Whenever the render test is running it switches to 3.0.
And when the card is idle it goes back to 1.1.
That's what it seems like atleast.
>>333334243
970.
>>
File: 1459520182720.png (174 KB, 336x320) Image search: [Google]
1459520182720.png
174 KB, 336x320
>>333334304
but we are not shitting on from anymore now that we've seen the real 1080p benchmark
>>333325337
now its about shitting on anons who made a bad purchasing decision
>>
File: 1458667240926.png (75 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
1458667240926.png
75 KB, 500x500
>>333325640

>tfw 750ti

STILL DON'T HAVE TO UPGRADE JUST YET SENPAI
>>
>>333324205
>770
This is unacceptable.
>>
>>333325001
My fellow African American.
Feels good, doesn't it?
>>
File: ds3_2560.jpg (175 KB, 548x678) Image search: [Google]
ds3_2560.jpg
175 KB, 548x678
>>333334540
>>
File: ds3_3840.jpg (133 KB, 548x524) Image search: [Google]
ds3_3840.jpg
133 KB, 548x524
>>333334540
that is one of the proper resolutions
here's 4k
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 154

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.